Advertisement

Neohelicon

, Volume 44, Issue 2, pp 389–401 | Cite as

The rights of trees: on a Hungarian short story from 1900

  • Péter Hajdu
Article

Abstract

This paper analyses a short story written in 1900 by Kálmán Mikszáth (1847–1910), a major Hungarian author. The plot narrates the genesis and the consequences of a strange last will, which bequeaths a substantial amount of money to two trees. The plot is partly funny, partly uncanny, and evolves rather slowly, in accordance with the long and rather inactive life cycles of trees. It is not so much the plot, however, that is interesting, but rather the ethical discourse of the personae in how to deal with the trees. Due to the exceptional legal situation, various people start regarding the trees as persons and have difficulties in making decisions about them. While it would be an overstatement to say that Mikszáth wrote a prototext of environmental justice, he definitely challenged some ideas of his times and asked important questions about possible ethical approaches to nature. Legal issues are ubiquitous in world literature, but the world of law is usually limited to human affairs. As soon as trees are treated as legal subjects, they seem to become persons. Usually the development is the reverse in legal reasoning: if one is a person, one has rights. Therefore the short story is a sort of thought-experiment: what if we regard the non-human world as having rights? And the result is a paradigm shift we can nowadays make use of, accepting that justice is not or should not be limited to just the human sphere.

Keywords

Environmental rights Short story analysis Kálmán Mikszáth Stories about trees 

References

  1. A Pallas nagy lexikona. (1894–1897). 18 vols. Budapest: Pallas. http://mek.oszk.hu/00000/00060/html. Accessed August 24, 2016.
  2. Aristotle. (1927). Poetics (Trans: Rhys, R. W.). In Aristotle, Poetics; “Longinus,” On the sublime; Demetrius, On style (pp. 5–118). London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  3. Estok, S. (2016). Ecomedia and ecophobia. Neohelicon, 43, 127–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Freud, S. (1900). Traumdeutung. Leipzig/Wien: Franz Deuticke.Google Scholar
  5. Hajdu, P. (2012). Tudás és elbeszélés. A Mikszáth-kispróza rejtelmei. Budapest: Argumentum.Google Scholar
  6. Kráhl, V. (1941). Mikszáth, a jogász. Budapest: Vajna és Bokor.Google Scholar
  7. Mikszáth, K. (1900). A kompossessor fák. Vasárnapi Ujság, 47(51–52), 846–849 and 866–868.Google Scholar
  8. Mikszáth, K. (1901). A kompossessor fák. In K. Mikszáth, Öreg szekér fakó hám (pp. 1–33). Budapest: Légrády.Google Scholar
  9. Mikszáth, K. (2015). A kompossessor fák. In Mikszáth Kálmán összes művei [The complete works of Kálmán Mikszáth] Vol. 43 (Ed. P. Hajdu) (pp. 129–146). Budapest: Argumentum.Google Scholar
  10. Mogg, K. (2009). The day of the claw: A synoptic account of Alfred Hitchcock’s The Birds. Senses of Cinema, 51. http://sensesofcinema.com/2009/towards-an-ecology-of-cinema/Hitchcock-birds-synopticaccount. Accessed August 10, 2016.
  11. O’Connor, F. (1953). The lonely voice: A study in the short story. Cleveland: The World Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  12. Oppermann, S., Özdağ, U., Özkan, N., & Slovic, S. (2011). The future of ecocriticism: New horizons. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
  13. Otto, R. (1917). Das Heilige. Breslau: Trewendt & Granier.Google Scholar
  14. Paterson, D. (2009). Rain. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
  15. Pikulik, L. (1979). Romantik als Ungenügen an der Normalität. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  16. Pratt, M. L. (1981). The short story: The long and the short of it. Poetics, 10, 175–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Roscher, W. H. (1886–1890). Ausführliches Lexikon der griechischen und römischen Mythologie. Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
  18. Todorov, T. (1975). The fantastic (Trans: Howard, R.). Ithaca, NY: Cornell UP.Google Scholar
  19. Wald, P. (2013). Botanophobia: Fear of plants in the atomic age. Japanese Journal of American Studies, 24, 7–27.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Research Center of HumanitiesHungarian Academy of SciencesBudapestHungary
  2. 2.Shanghai Jiao Tong UniversityShanghaiChina

Personalised recommendations