Advertisement

Neohelicon

, Volume 44, Issue 1, pp 15–25 | Cite as

Digital Literatures circulation: testing post-Bourdieu theories

  • Amelia SanzEmail author
Article

Abstract

The launching of Google Books and Google Earth in 2004 could be seen as a symbolic landmark in the configuration of memories and localization in space. Should we be getting ready for a change in literary reading and writing? It is time we asked whether interrelations on a global scale in digital environments have altered the patterns of production and distribution of writing, circulation and consumption of reading, and if so, in what way. We consider that Digital Literatures are a very useful workbench not only to explore the consequences of global digital circulation as a factual process, but also as an imaginary storytelling. Literatures that were born digital can show how rituals of readings, formulas of production and narratives are being modified in the twenty-first century. In this paper, we work on a very large and diverse domain: Digital Literatures circulating in Spanish all over the world, not only those created in Hispanophone countries. Our starting point is our own repertory: Ciberia, but also other digital collections such as LiteLab, IlovePoetry, Hermeneia, ELMCIP and ELO. We will try to answer the following question: Can we use a post-Bourdieu methodology, conceived for nineteenth century French literature, to study circulating Digital Literatures in Spanish as a changing field? We will provide a complete analysis of the emergence of this dynamic field.

Keywords

Digital Literature Circulation Post-Bourdieu Dymanic field 

References

  1. Balpe, J. P. (2013). e.littérature. http://articlesdejpbalpe.blogspot.fr/. Accessed June 2016.
  2. Bootz, Ph. (2003). Transitoire observable: texte fondateur, ELMCIP. https://elmcip.net/node/7307. Accessed June 2016.
  3. Bouchardon, S. (2011). Déprise. http://lossofgrasp.com. Accessed June 2016.
  4. Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. (1992). An invitation to reflexive sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  5. Casanova, P. (1996). La République mondiale des Lettres. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
  6. Casciari, H. (2004). Mas respeto que soy tu madre. http://mujergorda.bitacoras.com/. Accessed June 2016.
  7. Gache, B. (2006). Wordtoys. http://www.findelmundo.com.ar/wordtoys/index.htm. Accessed June 2016.
  8. Gorski, P. S. (Ed.). (2013). Bourdieu and historical analysis. Duke: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Gutiérrez, J. B. (2006). Extreme conditions. In Literatronica. http://www.literatronica.com. Accessed June 2016.
  10. James, W. (2007). Philosophie de l’expérience. Un univers pluraliste. Paris: Seuil, “Huitième leçon”.Google Scholar
  11. Kozak, C. (Ed.). (2012). Tecnopoéticas Argentinas. Archivo blando de Arte y Tecnología. Buenos Aires: Caja Negra.Google Scholar
  12. Llamas, M. (2015). Digitising the world: Globalisation and digital literature. Neohelicon, 42(1), 227–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mestre, J. C. (2004) Ventanas-Windows. http://www.estudiolibelula.com/ventanas-windows. Accessed June 2016.
  14. Rettberg, J. W. (2012). Electronic literature seen from a distance: The beginnings of a field. Dichtung Digital. A Journal of Art and Culture in Digital Media. http://www.dichtung-digital.org/2012/41/walker-rettberg/walker-rettberg.htm. Accessed June 2016.
  15. Rettberg, J. W., & Ramada L. (Eds.) (2015). Kid E-Lit, Elektronisk litteratur for barn og ungdom. https://issuu.com/bergenbibliotek/docs/e_litt_book_issuu_real. Accessed July 2015.
  16. Rodríguez, J. A. (2011). La Narratopedia. Narrativa digital colaborativa en acción. Reflexiones sobre cibercultura, tecnología, creación colectiva y ciberliteratura. Bogotá: Editorial Pontificia Universidad Javeriana.Google Scholar
  17. Sánchez Coteron, L. (Colectivo Yoctobit). (2012). Mata la Reina. http://www.laracoteron.com/mata-la-reina/. Accessed June 2016.
  18. Sanz, A. (2013). Digital humanities or hypercolonial studies? RICT, responsible innovation, ethical issues. http://www.responsible-innovation.org.uk/?s=Sanz. Accessed June 2016.
  19. Sanz, A., Llamas, M., & Regueiro, B. (2013). A global memory for e-literatures? Modifying the patterns of production. Comparative literature as a critical approach, Proceedings of the ICLA Congress (in press).Google Scholar
  20. Torres, R. (2004). Digital poetry and collaborative ‘wreadings’ of literary texts. Telepoesis. http://www.telepoesis.net/papers/dpoetry.pdf. Accessed July 2016.
  21. Valle, P. (2013). Memory. http://synesthesiasinestesia.blogspot.no/2013/04/memory-e-poetry.html. Accessed June 2016.
  22. Yoctobit. (2012). Homeward journeys. https://yoctobit.wordpress.com/category/homeward-journeys/. Accessed June 2016.

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of ArtsComplutense UniversityMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations