Neohelicon

, Volume 40, Issue 2, pp 521–542 | Cite as

The monster outside and within: medieval literary reflections on ethical epistemology. From Beowulf to Marie de France, the Nibelungenlied, and Thüring von Ringoltingen’s Melusine

Article

Abstract

While previous research has often reflected on the phenomenon of monsters in medieval literature, identifying them as existential threats, reflections of imagination, or as symbols of the monstrous and evil in an apotropaic sence, here I suggest to refine our investigations of monsters in light of their epistemological function. Examining literary examples from the early to the late Middle Ages (Beowulf to Melusine), we can recognize how much monsters indeed serve consistently for the development of the individual protagonists, for coping with otherness at large, which commonly rests within the heroes and heroines as part of their characters. External challenges thus prove to be reflections of internal problems and issues, and the struggle against the monsters constitutes a struggle against or with the self.

Keywords

Monster lore/teratology Epistemology Beowulf Marie de France Nibelungenlied Thüring von Ringoltingen Melusine Character formation Self Other 

References

  1. Acosta, V. (1995). Animales e imaginario: La zooligía maravillosa medieval. Caracas: Universidad Central de Venezuela.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, E. R. (2010). Understanding Beowulf as an Indo-European epic: A study in comparative mythology, with a foreword by Mary P. Richards. Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen Press.Google Scholar
  3. Anlezark, D. (2006). Water and fire: The myth of the flood in Anglo-Saxon England. Manchester medieval literature. Manchester, UK: Manchester University PressGoogle Scholar
  4. Asthma, S. T. (2009). On monsters: An unnatural history of our worst fears. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Baring-Gould, S. (1865/2006). The book of werewolves. Mineola, NY: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
  6. Bernhardt-House, P. A. (2010). Werewolves, magical hounds, and dog-headed men in Celtic literature: A typological study of shape-shifting. Lewiston: Edwin Mellen Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bildhauer, B. & Mills, R. (Eds). (2003). The monstrous Middle Ages. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  8. Bloch, R. H. (2003). The anonymous Marie de France. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bovey, A. (2002). Monsters and grotesques in medieval manuscripts. Toronto and Buffalo: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  10. Bruckner, M. T. (1991). Of men and beasts in Bisclavret. Romance Review, 81(3), 251–269.Google Scholar
  11. Classen, A. (1995). The German Volksbuch: A critical history of a late-medieval genre. Studies in German Language and Literature, 15. Lewiston: The Edwin Mellen Press.Google Scholar
  12. Classen, A. (1999). Gargoyles—Wasserspeier. In U. Müller & W. Wunderlich (Eds.), Dämonen, Monster, Fabelwesen (pp. 127–133). Mittelalter-Mythen, 2. St. Gall: UVK.Google Scholar
  13. Classen, A. (2003). The downfall of a hero: Siegfried’s self-destruction and the end of heroism in the Nibelungenlied. German Studies Review, XXVI(2), 295–314.Google Scholar
  14. Classen, A. (2004). Love and fear of the foreign: Thüring von Ringoltingen’s Melusine (1456). A xenological analysis. In M. Wade & G. Ehrstine (Eds.), Foreign encounters: Case studies in German literature. Daphnis 33(1–2), 97–122.Google Scholar
  15. Classen, A. (2011). Sexual violence and rape in the middle ages: A critical discourse in premodern German and European literature. Fundamentals of medieval and early modern culture, 7. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
  16. Classen, A. (2012). The epistemological function of monsters in the middle ages: From The Voyage of Saint Brendan to Herzog Ernst, Marie de France, Marco Polo and John Mandeville. What would we be without monsters in past and present! Lo Sguardo: Rivista di Filologia, 9(2), 13–34. http://www.losguardo.net.Google Scholar
  17. Cohen, J. J. (1999). On giants: Sex, monsters and the Middle Ages. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  18. Cohen, J. J. (2006). Hybridity, identity, and monstrosity in medieval Britain: On difficult middles. The new Middle Ages. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  19. Cohen, J. J. (2012). The promise of monsters. In A. S. Mittman & P. J. Dendle (Eds.), The Ashgate research companion to monsters and the monstrous (pp. 449–464). Surrey, England: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  20. Das Nibelungenlied: Mittelhochdeutsch/Neuhochdeutsch (2010). Nach der Handschrift B herausgegeben von Ursula Schulze. Ins Neuhochdeutsche übersetzt und kommentiert von Siegfried Grosse. Stuttgart: Reclam.Google Scholar
  21. Daston, L., & Park, K. (1998). Wonders and the order of nature: 1150–1750. New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
  22. de Vries, J. (1959/1963). Heroic song and heroic legend, trans. B. J. Timmer. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Die Lais der Marie de France (Warnke, K. Ed.). (1925). 3rd ed. Halle a. d. S.: Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar
  24. Drittenbass, C. & Schnyder, A. (Eds.). (2010). Eulenspiegel trifft Melusine: Der frühneuhochdeutsche Prosaroman im Licht neuer Forschungen und Methoden. Akten der Lausanner Tagung vom 2. bis 4. Oktober 2008. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
  25. Frey, J. (2008). Spielräume des Erzählens: zur Rolle der Figuren in den Erzählkonzeptionen von Yvain, Îwein, Ywain und Ívens saga. Literaturen und Künste der Vormoderne, 4. Stuttgart: Hirzel.Google Scholar
  26. Friedman, J. B. (1981). The monstrous races in medieval art and thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Fulk, R. D. (Ed.). (1991). Interpretations of Beowulf: A critical anthology. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Gephart, I. (2005). Der Zorn der Nibelungen: Rivalität und Rache im “Nibelungenlied”. Cologne: Böhlau Verlag.Google Scholar
  29. Gilmore, D. D. (2003). Monsters: Evil beings, mythical beasts, and all manner of imaginary terrors. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  30. Griffin, M. (2010). The beastly and the courtly in medieval tales of transformation: Bisclavret, Melion and Mélusine. In A. Damlé & A. L’Hostis (Eds.), The beautiful and the monstrous: Essays in French literature, thought and culture (pp. 139–150). Modern French identities, 87. Oxford: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  31. Hahn, S. (2012). Crime, punishment and the hybrid in medieval French romance: Robert the Devil and Geoffrey Big Tooth. In A. Classen & C. Scarborough (Eds.), Crime and punishment in the middle ages and early modern age: Mental-historical investigations of basic human problems and social responses (pp. 87–108). Fundamentals of medieval and early modern culture, 11. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
  32. Haymes, E. R. (1986). Preface. In E. R. Haymes & S. Cain Van D’Elden (Eds.), The dark figure in medieval German and Germanic literature (pp. iii–vi). Göppinger Arbeiten zur Germanistik, 448. Göppingen: Kümmerle.Google Scholar
  33. Heinzle, J., Klein, K. & Obhof U. (Eds.). (2003). Die Nibelungen: Sage—Epos—Mythos. Wiesbaden: Reichert.Google Scholar
  34. Hill, J. M. (1995). The cultural world in Beowulf. Anthropological Horizons. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  35. James, M. R. (1951). Pictor in Carmine. Archeologia, 94, 141–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Johnston Staver, R. (2005). A companion to Beowulf. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
  37. Joy, E. A. & Ramsey, M. K. with the assistance of Gilchrist, B. D. (Eds.) (2006). The postmodern Beowulf: A critical casebook. Morgantown: West Virginia University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Kappler, C. (1980). Monstres, démons et merveilles à la fin du Moyen Âge. Paris: Payot.Google Scholar
  39. Lecouteux, C. (1993). Les monstres dans la pensée médiévale européenne: essai de présentation. Cultures et civilisations médiévales, 10. Paris: Presses de l’Université de Paris-Sorbonne.Google Scholar
  40. Lee, A. A. (1998). Gold-hall and earth-dragon: Beowulf as Metaphor. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  41. Lindahl, C., McNamara, J., & Lindow, J. (Ed.). (2000). Medieval folklore: An encyclopedia of myths, legends, tales, beliefs, and customs. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO.Google Scholar
  42. Lionarons, J. T. (1998). The otherworld and its inhabitants in the Nibelungenlied. In W. McConnell (Ed.), A companion to the Nibelungenlied (pp. 153–171). Studies in German Literature, Linguistics, and Culture. Columbia, SC: Camden House.Google Scholar
  43. Lloyd-Jones, H. (1980). Mythical Beasts. London: Gerald Duckworth & Co.Google Scholar
  44. McConnell, W. (Ed.). (1998). A companion to the Nibelungenlied. Columbia, SC: Camden House.Google Scholar
  45. Mittman, A. S., & Kim, S. M. (2008). The exposed body and the gendered blemmye: Reading the Wonders of the East. In A. Classen (Ed.), Sexuality in the Middle Ages and early modern times: New approaches to a fundamental cultural-historical and literary-anthropological theme (pp. 171–215). Fundamentals of Medieval and Early Modern Culture, 3. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  46. Müller, J.-D. (Ed.). (1990). Romane des 15. und 16. Jahrhunderts: Nach den Erstdrucken mit sämtlichen Holzschnitten. In Bibliothek der Frühen Neuzeit, 1. Frankfurt a. M.: Deutscher Klassiker Verlag.Google Scholar
  47. Müller, J.-D. (1998). Spielregeln für den Untergang: Die Welt des Nibelungenlieds. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Müller, J.-D. (2001/2009). Das Nibelungenlied. Klassiker Lektüren, 5. 3rd., newly rev. and expanded ed. Berlin: Erich Schmidt.Google Scholar
  49. Nelson, C. G. (1992). Virginity (de)valued: Kriemhild, Brünhild, and all that. In W. Wunderlich & U. Müller, with the assistance of D. Scholz (Eds.),“Waz sider da geschach”: American-German Studies on the Nibelungenlied: Text and Reception (pp. 111–130). Göppinger Arbeiten zur Germanistik, 564. Göppingen: Kümmerle.Google Scholar
  50. Orchard, A. (2003). A critical companion to Beowulf. Cambridge: D. S. Brewer.Google Scholar
  51. Osborn, M. (1999). Die Monster in Beowulf. In U. Müller & W. Wunderlich (Eds.), Dämonen, Monster, Fabelwesen (pp. 161–69). Mittelalter Mythen, 2. St. Gallen: UVK Fachverlag für Wissenschaft und Studium.Google Scholar
  52. Oswald, D. M. (2010). Monsters, gender and sexuality in medieval English literature. Gender in the Middle Ages. Cambridge: D. S. Brewer.Google Scholar
  53. Picart, C. J. S., & Browning, J. E. (2012). Speaking of monsters: A teratological anthology. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Pochat, G. (1997). Das Fremde im Mittelalter: Darstellung in Kunst und Literatur. Würzburg: Echter.Google Scholar
  55. Renz, T. (2006). Brünhilds Kraft: Zur Logik des einen Geschlechts im “Nibelungenlied”. Zeitschrift für Germanistik, 16(1), 8–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Riches, S. J. E. (2003). Encountering the monstrous: Saints and dragons in medieval thought. In B. Bildhauer & R. Mills (Eds.), The monstrous Middle Ages (pp. 196–218). Toronto and Buffalo: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  57. Rudolph, C. (1990). The “Things of Greater Importance”: Bernard of Clairvaux’s Apologia and the medieval attitude toward art. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  58. Russom, G. (2010). Historicity and anachronism in Beowulf. In D. Konstan & K. A. Raaflaub (Eds.), Epic and history (pp. 243–261). The ancient world: Comparative histories. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  59. Savage, A. (2010). The grave, the sword, and the lament: Mourning for the future in Beowulf. In J. Tolmie & M. J. Toswell (Eds.), Laments for the lost in medieval literature (pp. 67–80). Medieval Texts and Cultures of Northern Europe (MTCNE), 19. Turnhout, Belgium: Brepols.Google Scholar
  60. Simons, P. (2012). The significance of rural space in Guillaume de Palerne. In A. Classen, with the collaboration of C. R. Clason (Eds.), Rural space in the Middle Ages and early modern age: The spatial turn in premodern studies (pp. 407–431). Fundamentals of medieval and early modern culture, 9. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
  61. Steger, P. (1996). Brünhild. In U. Müller & W. Wunderlich (Eds.), Herrscher, Helden, Heilige (pp. 341–366). Mittelalter-Mythen, 1. St. Gall: Universitäts-Verlag Konstanz.Google Scholar
  62. The Lays of Marie de France (2010), trans., with intro. and commentary by E. J. Gallagher. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.Google Scholar
  63. The Nibelungenlied (1965/1969), trans. A. T. Hatto. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  64. The travels of Sir John Mandeville (1983/2005), trans. with an intro. by C. W. R. D. Moseley. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  65. The wonders of the East (2010), in The Beowulf manuscript: Complete texts and the fight at Finnsburg, ed. and trans. R. D. Fulk. Dumbarton Oaks Medieval Library (pp. 15–31). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  66. Tolkien, J. R. R. (1981). Beowulf: The monsters and the critics. In Tolkien, J. R. R., The monsters and the critics, and other essays (Tolkien, C., Ed.) (pp. 5–48). London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  67. Verner, L. (2005). The epistemology of the monstrous in the Middle Ages. Medieval history. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  68. Walker Bynum C. (1999). Miracles and marvels the limits of alterity. In F. J. Felten & N. Jaspert (Eds.), Vita Religiosa im Mittelalter: Festschrift für Kaspar Elm zum 70. Geburtstag (pp. 799–817). Berliner historische Studien, 31; Ordensstudien, 13. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.Google Scholar
  69. Weir, A., & Jerman, J. (1986/1999). Images of lust: Sexual carvings on medieval churches. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  70. Whalen, L. E. (Ed.). (2011). A companion to Marie de France. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
  71. Williams, W. (2011). Monsters and their meaning in early modern culture: Mighty magic. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  72. Wunderlich, W. (1999). Dämonen, Monster, Fabelwesen: Eine kleine Einführung in Mythen und Typen phantastischer Geschöpfe. In U. Müller & W. Wunderlich (Eds.), Dämonen, Monster, Fabelwesen (pp. 11–38). Mittelalter Mythen, 2. St. Gallen: UVK Fachverlag für Wissenschaft und Studium.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of German StudiesUniversity of ArizonaTucsonUSA

Personalised recommendations