Skip to main content
Log in

Distance and proximity

  • Published:
Neohelicon Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In order for the value structure of a given culture to be established, a number of its constituents have to be pushed beyond its boundary by shaping an abhorring figure of its Other. The exteriorization of such a figure is a necessary operation of any identity formation. According to Foucault, this entails a steady re-introduction of the delimited exterior into each interior instance of established identity. Not one of the identified instances remains ultimately spared of the rift caused by the necessity of founding elimination, although each of them tries to relegate it into oblivion. Foucault′s ethics resists such oblivion insisting upon the non-relation to alterity as the condition of possibility of relation to other human beings. The paper follows the further development of this ethics in the work of Maurice Blanchot, Jean-Luc Nancy and Giorgio Agamben. All of them highlight the constitutive priority of distance over proximity advocating therefore an eternal deferral of all established identities. In the conclusion an attempt is made to trace the genealogy of this ethical stance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agamben, G. (1993). The coming community (M. Hardt, Trans.). Minneapolis, MN/London: Minnesota University.

  • Blanchot, M. (1986). Michel Foucault tel que je l’imagine. Paris: Fata morgana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanchot, M. (1987). Michel Foucault as I imagine him (J. Mehlman, Trans.). In: Foucault/Blanchot. New York: Zone.

  • Blanchot, M. (1992). The space of literature (A. Smock, Trans.). Lincoln, NE/London: University of Nebraska.

  • Blanchot, M. (1993). The infinite conversation (S. Hanson, Trans.). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota.

  • Blanchot, M. (1995). Work of fire (C. Mandel, Trans.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University.

  • Blanchot, M. (1997). Friendship (E. Rottenberg, Trans.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University.

  • Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1994). What is philosophy? (G. Burchell & H. Tomlinson, Trans.). London/New York: Verso.

  • Derrida, J. (1985). Préjugés–devant la loi, in La faculté de juger. Paris: PUF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, J. (1992). The force of law. In D. Cornell, M. Rosenfeld, & D. G. Carlson (Eds.), Deconstruction and the possibility of justice (pp. 3–67). New York/London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, J. (2000). Demeure: Fiction and testimony (E. Rottenberg, Trans.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University.

  • Derrida, J., & Labarrière, P-J. (1986). Altérités. Paris: Galilee.

  • Foucault, M. (1970). The order of things: An archeology of the human sciences (A. S. Smith, Trans.). New York: Random House.

  • Foucault, M. (1972). The archeology of knowledge and the discourse on language (A. S. Smith, Trans.). New York: Pantheon Books.

  • Foucault, M. (1986). Of other spaces (J. Miskowiec, Trans.). Diacritics, 16(1), 22–27.

  • Foucault, M. (1996 [1978]). Gespräch mit Duccio Trombadori. In Der Mensch ist ein Erfahrungstier. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

  • James, I. (2006). The fragmentary demand: An introduction to the philosophy of Jean-Luc Nancy. Stanford, CA: Stanford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (1952). Critique of judgement (trans: Meredith, J. C.). Oxford: Clarendon Press.

  • Kant, I. (1979). The conflict of faculties/Der Streit der Fakultaeten (trans. and intro: Gregor, M. J.). New York: Abaris.

  • Kojève, A. (1952). “Les romans de la sagesse”, Critique, Vol LX.

  • Lyotard, J.-F. (1998). Terror on the run. In J.-J. Goux & P. R. Wood (Eds.), Terror and consensus: Vicissitudes of French thought (pp. 25–36). Stanford, CA: Stanford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazumdar, P. (1998). Über Foucault. In P. Mazumdar (Ed.), Foucault (pp. 15–78). München: Deutscher Taschenbuch Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nancy, J.-L. (1988). The experience of freedom. Stanford, CA: Stanford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nancy, J.-L. (1991). The inoperative community (P. Connor, Trans. and ed.). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vladimir Biti.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Biti, V. Distance and proximity. Neohelicon 37, 469–475 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11059-010-0066-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11059-010-0066-5

Keywords

Navigation