Skip to main content
Log in

Mechanical site preparation severity mediates one-year-survival response to summer drought in planted tree seedlings

  • Research
  • Published:
New Forests Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In face of future climatic conditions, methods to ensure the success of forest plantation in warm and dry conditions are required. Mechanical site preparation (MSP) prior to planting is widely used around the world to enhance seedling establishment success. Our study aimed at identifying, among a set of MSP methods that are used in practical forestry, which methods ensure plantation success under dry weather conditions.

We evaluated the combined effects of summer drought (estimated using the Standard Precipitation Index) and MSP severity (estimated using vegetation cover in the immediate seedling vicinity one year after MSP) on 1-year seedling survival. We used a network of 20 experimental sites established in France over a 10-year-period, and where seedlings were planted after various MSP.

In all treatments (severe MSP, moderate MSP, no MSP), seedling survival was higher in years with rainy summers than in years with dry summers. In rainy years, both moderate and severe MSP methods slightly improved the seedling survival rate (95%) compared to the unprepared control (88%). In dry years, seedling survival was similar after moderate MSP or with no MSP (50 and 54%, respectively), whereas it was much higher after severe MSP (79%).

In practical forestry, severe MSP appears as an option to enhance early seedling survival, especially when summer precipitations are lower than the seasonal average, whereas moderate MSP does not significantly improve seedling survival compared to an unprepared control, in all summer weather conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  • Boutte B, Husson C, Saintonge FX (2023) Quelle a été l’évolution des taux de succès des plantations de l’année au cours des quinze dernières années ? in: Expertise collective CRREF «Coupes Rases et Renouvellement des peuplements Forestiers en contexte de changement climatique », Rapport scientifique de l’expertise, editors: Landmann G Paris: GIP ECOFOR, RMT AFORCE (mai 2023) 624–635

  • Chaves Cardoso J, Burton PJ, Elkin CM (2020) A disturbance Ecology Perspective on Silvicultural Site Preparation. Forests 11:1278. https://doi.org/10.3390/f11121278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chirino E, Vilagrosa A, Cortina J et al (2009) Ecological restoration in degraded drylands: the need to improve the seedling quality and site conditions in the field. In: Forest management. Grosberg, Editor, pp 85–158

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole E, Lindsay A, Newton M, Bailey JD (2018) Eight-year performance of bareroot Douglas-fir and bareroot and plug western larch seedlings following herbicide applications, northeast Oregon, USA. New Forest 49:791–814. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-018-9653-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team (2023) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/

  • Cribari-Neto F, Zeileis A (2010) Beta regression in R. J Stat Softw 1–24

  • del Campo AD, Segura-Orenga G, Ceacero CJ et al (2020) Reforesting drylands under novel climates with extreme drought filters: the importance of trait-based species selection. For Ecol Manag 467:118156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Del Campo AD, Segura-Orenga G, Bautista I et al (2021) Assessing reforestation failure at the project scale: the margin for technical improvement under harsh conditions. A case study in a Mediterranean Dryland. Sci Total Environ 796:148952. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148952

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • del Campo AD, Segura-Orenga G, Molina AJ et al (2022) On the need to further refine stock quality specifications to improve Reforestation under climatic extremes. Forests 13:168. https://doi.org/10.3390/f13020168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon PM, Pechmann JHK (2005) A statitical test to show negligible trend. Stat Rep 86:1751–1756

    Google Scholar 

  • Dumas N, Dassot M, Pitaud J et al (2021) Four-year-performance of oak and pine seedlings following mechanical site preparation with lightweight excavators. Silva Fenn 55. https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.10409

  • Frelich LE (2002) Forest dynamics and disturbance regimes. Cambridge University Press, p 266

  • Grossnickle S (2018) Seedling establishment on a forest restoration site – an ecophysiological perspective. REFOR 110–139. https://doi.org/10.21750/REFOR.6.09.62

  • Grossnickle SC, Ivetić V (2022) Root system development and field establishment: effect of seedling quality. New Forest 53:1021–1067. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-022-09916-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hjelm K, Nilsson U, Johansson U, Nordin P (2019) Effects of mechanical site preparation and slash removal on long-term productivity of conifer plantations in Sweden. Can J Res 49:1311–1319. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfr-2019-0081

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2023) Summary for policymakers. In: Lee H, Romero J (eds) Climate Change 2023: synthesis report. Contribution of Working groups I, II and III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Core writing Team. IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland, pp 1–34. doi: https://doi.org/10.59327/IPCC/AR6-9789291691647.001

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Iwasaki A, Noda T (2018) A framework for quantifying the relationship between intensity and severity of impact of disturbance across types of events and species. Sci Rep 8:795. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-19048-5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Keenan RJ (2015) Climate change impacts and adaptation in forest management: a review. Ann for Sci 72:145–167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-014-0446-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurth VJ, D’Amato AW, Bradford JB et al (2020) Assessing the ecological impacts of biomass harvesting along a disturbance severity gradient. Ecol Appl 30:e02042. https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.2042

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lindner M, Fitzgerald JB, Zimmermann NE et al (2014) Climate change and European forests: what do we know, what are the uncertainties, and what are the implications for forest management? J Environ Manage 146:69–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.07.030

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Löf M, Dey D, Navarro RM, Jacobs DF (2012) Mechanical site preparation for forest restoration. New Forest 43:825–848

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luoranen J, Riikonen J, Saksa T (2023) Damage caused by an exceptionally warm and dry early summer on newly planted Norway spruce container seedlings in nordic boreal forests. For Ecol Manag 528:120649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2022.120649

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mataruga M, Cvjetković B, De Cuyper B et al (2023) Monitoring and control of forest seedling quality in Europe. For Ecol Manag 546:121308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2023.121308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mattsson S, Bergsten U (2003) Pinus contorta growth in northern Sweden as affected by soil scarification. New Forest 26:217–231. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024425205712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McEwan A, Steenkamp J (2015) Silviculture modernization in the South African forestry industry. In: Atti del Secondo Congresso Internazionale di Selvicoltura = Proceedings of the Second International Congress of Silviculture. Accademia Italiana di Scienze Forestali, pp 822–826

  • McKee TB, Doesken NJ, Kleist J The relationship of drought frequency and duration to time scales. Eighth Conference on Applied Climatology, 17–22 january 1993, Anaheim, California, 6p

  • Nilsson U, Örlander G (1995) Effects of regeneration methods on drought damage to newly planted Norway spruce seedlings. Can J Res 25:790–802. https://doi.org/10.1139/x95-086

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Padilla FM, Pugnaire FI (2007) Rooting depth and soil moisture control Mediterranean Woody seedling survival during drought. Funct Ecol 21:489–495. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2435.2007.01267.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pausas JG, Bladé C, Valdecantos A et al (2004) Pines and oaks in the restoration of Mediterranean landscapes of Spain: new perspectives for an old practice – a review. Plant Ecol 171:209–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson CE, Anderson PD (2009) Large-scale interdisciplinary experiments inform current and future forestry management options in the U.S. Pacific Northwest. For Ecol Manag 258:409–414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2008.12.029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prévost M (1992) Effets du scarifiage sur les propriétés du sol, la croissance des semis et la compétition: revue des connaissances actuelles et perspectives de recherches au Québec. Ann Des Sci Forestières 49:277–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puyal M, Agro C, Collet C et al (2022) Productivité horaire de la préparation mécanisée du site avant plantation: premiers résultats du réseau Pilote. Internal Report INRAE, p 66

  • Querejeta JI, Roldan A, Albaladejo J, Castillo V (2001) Soil water availability improved by site preparation in a Pinus halepensis afforestation under semiarid climate. For Ecol Manag 149:115–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts MR (2007) A conceptual model to characterize disturbance severity in forest harvests. For Ecol Manag 242:58–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2007.01.043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Royo AA, Peterson CJ, Stanovick JS, Carson WP (2016) Evaluating the ecological impacts of salvage logging: can natural and anthropogenic disturbances promote coexistence? Ecology 97:1566–1582. https://doi.org/10.1890/15-1093.1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Soubeyroux JM, Kitova N, Blanchard M et al (2012) Sécheresses des sols en France et changement climatique. Résultats et applications du projet ClimSec. La météorologie 78:21–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • South DB, Starkey TE, Lyons A (2023) Why healthy Pine seedlings die after they leave the nursery. Forests 14:645. https://doi.org/10.3390/f14030645

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanturf JA, Schoenholtz SH, Schweitzer CJ, Shepard JP (2001) Achieving restoration success: myths in bottomland hardwood forests. Restor Ecol 9:189–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suadicani K (2003) Site preparation and planting in a Picea abies shelterwood stand. Scand J for Res 18:247–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tallieu C, Collet C, Renaud JP, Pitaud J (2022) Conception d’indices météorologiques pour prendre en compte le risque de sécheresse estivale dans la garantie de reprise des plantations. Internal report INRAE, p 70

  • von der Gönna MA (1990) Fundamentals of mechanical site preparation. Br Columbia Ministry Forests. 29 p

  • Wei L, Villemey A, Hulin F et al (2015) Plant diversity on skid trails in oak high forests: A matter of disturbance, micro-environmental conditions or forest age? For Ecol Manag 338:20–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2014.11.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zwolinski J, South DB, Barber BL (1994) Drought and survival of loblolly pine seedlings after planting. Eighth Biennal Southern Silvicultural Resarch Conference, Auburn, AL, Nov. 1–3. 419–423

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors heartily thank Léon Wehrlen, Sébastien Harnist, Lindsay Godard and Erwin Thirion (INRAE), Didier François, Gwénaëlle Gibaud, Jérôme Piat, Quentin Girard, Lucie Arnaudet, Erwin Ulrich and Claudine Richter (ONF), Jean-Yves Fraysse, Mathilde Duverger and Xavier Montagny (FCBA), and Christophe Vidal (IDF-CNPF) for their invaluable help when designing, establishing and running the 20 experimental sites.

Funding

This work was supported by the French Ministry in charge of forests (“Soutien au Pôle Renfor” annual grant), France Bois Forêt (grants 16RD496 and 17RD696), the Grand-Est region (“IPLor” grant), and the Fonds National pour l’Aménagement du Territoire (“IPLor” grant).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design, to material preparation and data collection. Analyses were performed by CC. The first draft of the manuscript was written by CC, and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Catherine Collet.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Collet, C., Agro, C., Akroume, E. et al. Mechanical site preparation severity mediates one-year-survival response to summer drought in planted tree seedlings. New Forests (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-024-10050-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-024-10050-0

Keywords

Navigation