Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Plantation development and colonization of woody species in response to post-mining spoil preparation methods

  • Published:
New Forests Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rising mineral and fossil fuel demand have accelerated the global prevalence of surface mining, resulting in adverse impacts to many forest ecosystems. Post-mining reclamation techniques, specifically spoil preparation methods, can influence reforestation success and the trajectory of future stand dynamics. Compaction is a common post-mining spoil stabilization technique but consequently creates high-density rooting media unconducive to forest succession. In the eastern USA, mine operators have traditionally attempted mine reforestation in compacted soils, achieving little success. In 1996–1997, a series of reforestation plots were created on a reclaimed surface mine in eastern Kentucky, USA, to evaluate the impacts of post-mining spoil preparation on plantation development of six native tree species. We conducted follow-up inventories 19 years after planting to elucidate the effect of three spoil preparation methods on tree growth, stand structure, and natural regeneration during the initial period of the stem exclusion stage of stand development. Low compaction reclamation techniques prior to tree planting generally resulted in higher survival and larger trees of all species nearly two decades after establishment when compared with compacted spoil. Natural recruitment and relative percentage of native colonizing species were also inversely correlated with level of grading treatment. Height and biomass growth of plantations in low-compaction treatments approximated those of naturally regenerating stands in unmined forests during similar periods. Study findings indicate that choice of spoil preparation technique during initial stages of reclamation guides forest dynamics up to two decades after planting and that loose-dump and strike-off treatments each promote favorable long-term growth trajectories.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams MB ed. (2017) The forestry reclamation approach: guide to successful reforestation of mined lands. U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service. https://www.fs.fed.us/nrs/pubs/gtr/gtr_nrs169.pdf. Accessed 20 May 2019

  • Angel PN, Graves DH, Barton C, Warner RC, Conrad PW, Sweigard RJ, Agouridis C (2006) Surface mine reforestation research: evaluation of tree response to low compaction reclamation techniques. In: Proceedings of 7th international conference on acid rock drainage. American Society of Mining and Reclamation. http://www.imwa.info/docs/imwa_2006/0045-Angel-KY%20.pdf. Accessed 11 Jan 2019

  • Angel PN (2009) Reclamation with trees: the ‘dark ages’ and the ‘Renaissance’. Int J Min Reclam Environ 23:1–3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angel PN, Burger JA, Zipper CE, Eggerud S (2012) Reforesting unused surface mined lands by replanting with native trees. In: U.S. Department of agriculture forest service proceedings RMRS-P-68, pp 10–15

  • Ashby WC (1997) Soil ripping and herbicides enhance tree and shrub restoration on stripmines. Restor Ecol 5:169–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baskerville GL (1972) Use of logarithmic regression in the estimation of plant biomass. Can J For Resour 2:49–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bending NAD, Moffat AJ (1999) Tree performance on minespoils in the South Wales coalfield. J Appl Ecol 36:784–797

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brinks JS, Lhotka JM, Barton CD, Warner RC, Agouridis CT (2011) Effects of fertilization and irrigation on American sycamore and black locust on a reclaimed surface mine in Appalachia. For Ecol Manag 261:640–648

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burger J, Graves D, Angel P, Davis V, Zipper C (2005) The Forestry Reclamation Approach. The Appalachian Regional Reforestation Initiative. U.S. Office of Surface Mining. Forest Reclamation Advisory 2. https://arri.osmre.gov/FRA/Advisories/FRA_No.2.7-18-07.Revised.pdf. Accessed 20 May 2019

  • Carmean WH, Hahn JT, Jacobs RD (1989) Site index curves for forest tree species in the eastern United States. U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service GTR–NC–128. https://www.fs.fed.us/nrs/pubs/gtr/gtr_nc128.pdf. Accessed 10 Jan 2019

  • Core Team R (2019) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • Cotton C, Barton C, Lhotka J, Angel PN, Graves D (2012) Evaluating reforestation success on a surface mine in Eastern Kentucky. In: U.S. Department of agriculture forest service proceedings RMRS-P-68, pp 16–23

  • Dallaire K, Skousen J (2019) Early tree growth in reclaimed mine soils in Appalachia USA. Forests 10:549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emerson P, Skousen J, Ziemkiewicz P (2009) Survival and growth of hardwoods in brown versus gray sandstone on a surface mine in West Virginia. J Environ Qual 38:1821–1829

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fields-Johnson CW, Burger JA, Evans DM, Zipper CE (2014) Ripping improves tree survival and growth on unused reclaimed mined lands. Environ Manag 53:1059–1065

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher RF, Binkley D (2000) Ecology and Management of Forest Soils, 3rd edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox J, Weisberg S (2011) An R Companion to Applied Regression, 2nd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin J, Buckley D (2019) Influence of microtopography and soil treatments on tree establishment on a reclaimed quarry. Forests 10:597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franklin JA, Zipper CE, Burger JA, Skousen JG, Jacobs DF (2012) Influence of herbaceous ground cover on forest restoration of eastern US coal surface mines. New For 43:905–924

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilland KE, McCarthy BC (2014) Microtopography influences early successional plant communities on experimental coal surface mine land reclamation. Restor Ecol 22:232–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holl KD (2002) Long-term vegetation recovery on reclaimed coal surface mines in the eastern USA. J Appl Ecol 39:960–970

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacinthe P, Lal R (2007) Carbon storage and minespoil properties in relation to topsoil application techniques. Soil Sci Soc Am J 71:1788–1795

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kline KL, Coleman MD (2010) Woody energy crops in the southeastern United States: two centuries of practitioner experience. Biomass Bioenerg 34:1655–1666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lenth R (2019) Emmeans: Estimated Marginal Means, aka Least-Squares Means. R package version 1.3.4. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=emmeans. Accessed 15 May 2019

  • Macdonald SE, Landhäusser SM, Skousen J, Franklin J, Frouz J, Hall S, Jacobs DF, Quideau S (2015) Forest restoration following surface mining disturbance: challenges and solutions. New For 46:703–732

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver CD, Larson BC (1996) Forest Stand Dynamics. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • OSMRE (2012) Annual report 2012. U.S. Department of Interior, Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement (OSMRE), Washington, DC

  • Peichl M, Arain MA (2007) Allometry and partitioning of above- and belowground tree biomass in an age-sequence of white pine forests. For Ecol Manag 253:68–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pericak AA, Thomas CJ, Kroodsman DA, Wasson MF, Ross MRV, Clinton NE, Campagna DJ, Franklin Y, Bernhardt ES, Amos JF (2018) Mapping the yearly extent of surface coal mining in Central Appalachia using Landsat and Google Earth Engine. PLoS ONE 13:e0197758

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pichtel JR, Dick WA, Sutton P (1994) Comparison of amendments and management practices for long-term reclamation of abandoned mine lands. J Environ Qual 23:766–772

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Plamping K, Haigh M, Reed H, Woodruffe P, Fitzpatrick S, Farrugia F, D’Aucourt M, Flege A, Sawyer S, Panhuis W, Wilding G, Cullis M, Powell S (2017) Effects of initial planting method on the performance of mixed plantings of alder and oak on compacted opencast coal-spoils, Wales: 10-year results. Int J Min Reclam Environ 31:286–300

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ringe JM, Graves DH, Stringer JW (1989) Economics of sawmill residues in the establishment of black locust biomass plantations on surface mines. Int J Surf Min Reclam Environ 3:201–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigue JA, Burger JA, Oderwald RG (2002) Forest productivity and commercial value of pre-law reclaimed mined land in the eastern United States. North J Appl For 19:106–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers NF (1949) The growth and development of black walnut (Juglans nigra L.) on coal strip-mined land in Southeast Kansas. Trans Kansas Acad Sci 52:99–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rokich DP, Meney KA, Dixon KW, Sivasithamparam K (2001) The impact of soil disturbance on root development in woodland communities in Western Australia. Aust J Bot 49:169–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sena K, Barton C, Hall S, Angel P, Agouridis C, Warner R (2015) Influence of spoil type on afforestation success and natural vegetation recolonization on a surface coal mine in Appalachia, United States. Restor Ecol 23:131–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sena K, Agouridis C, Miller J, Barton C (2018) Spoil type influences oil genesis and forest development on an Appalachian surface coal mine ten years after placement. Forests 9:780

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simmons JA, Currie WS, Eshleman KN, Kuers K, Monteleone S, Negley TL, Pohlad BR, Thomas CL (2008) Forest to reclaimed mine land use change leads to altered ecosystem structure and function. Ecol Appl 18:104–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skousen J, Ziemkiewicz P, Venable C (2006) Tree recruitment and growth on 20 year-old, unreclaimed surface mined lands in West Virginia. Int J Min Reclam Environ 20:142–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skousen J, Gorman J, Pena-Yewtukhiw E, King J, Stewart J, Emerson P, DeLong C (2009) Hardwood tree survival in heavy ground cover on reclaimed land in West Virginia: mowing and ripping effects. J Environ Qual 38:1400–1409

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas WR (1999) Reclamation of surface mined lands in eastern Kentucky using high value tree species. Thesis, University of Kentucky

  • Thompson PJ, Jansen IJ, Hooks CL (1987) Penetrometer resistance and bulk density as parameters for predicting root system performance in mine soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 51:1288–1293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torbert JL, Burger JA, Probert T (1991) A reforestation case study on a reclaimed Appalachian mine soil in West Virginia. In: Proceedings of 8th American Social Surface Mineral Reclam, pp 663–668

  • Torbert JL, Burger JA, Probert T (1995) Evaluation of techniques to improve white pine establishment on an Appalachian minesoil. J Environ Qual 24:869–873

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Webster CR, Jenkins MA, Jose S (2006) Woody invaders and the challenges they pose to forest ecosystems in the eastern United States. J For 104:366–379

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson-Kokes L, Emerson P, DeLong C, Thomas C, Skousen J (2013) Hardwood tree growth after eight years on brown and gray mine soils in West Virginia. J Environ Qual 42:1353–1362

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zipper CE, Burger JA, Skousen JG, Angel PN, Barton CD, Davis V, Franklin JA (2011) Restoring forests and associated ecosystem services on Appalachian coal surface mines. Environ Manag 47:751–765

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the collective owners and operators of the Starfire mine complex for assisting with cell construction and facilitating site access since the study’s commencement. We are also grateful to Billy Thomas for his efforts in establishing the study and to the numerous predecessors who have worked on the Starfire experimental site. We thank Joe Frederick, Chase Clark, Alicia Wood, Dan Eaton, Cory Schuler, Taylor Childress, Courtney Gover, and Tiffany Heim for field assistance. Funding for the project was provided by the USDI Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement’s Applied Science Program (Grant #S15AC20026). This work was partially supported by the National Institute of Food and Agriculture, U.S. Department of Agriculture, McIntire-Stennis Research Program (Accession Number 1005547).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John M. Lhotka.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dement, W.T., Hackworth, Z.J., Lhotka, J.M. et al. Plantation development and colonization of woody species in response to post-mining spoil preparation methods. New Forests 51, 965–984 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-019-09769-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-019-09769-y

Keywords

Navigation