New Forests

, Volume 48, Issue 4, pp 563–572 | Cite as

Grazing exclosure increases fruit and seed production but reduces seed viability in Myrtus communis

  • J. M. Mancilla-Leytón
  • J. Cambrollé
  • E. Valdés-Correcher
Short Communication

Abstract

Plants have compensating mechanisms to alleviate the loss of vegetative and reproductive tissues by herbivores. In this study, we evaluated how reproductive traits (size and production of fruit and seed, as well as germination and viability of seeds) of Myrtus communis (myrtle) were affected by goat grazing exclosure of forest understory in the Doñana Natural Park. One hundred and fifty myrtles were selected in three sites with similar environmental characteristics, although with a different length of grazing exclusion: (1) exclosure for 2 years (GE2); (2) exclosure for 3 years (GE3); and (3) long ago grazed plots (GE15): non-accessible to goat for at least 15 years. Fruit production, fruit and seed morphology and seed viability and germination were evaluated. Length of exclosure to goats increased fruit production, mass and volume of the fruits and seed, and endocarp mass. However, seed viability was higher in more recently grazed plots (70–90%) than in GE15 plots (51%). The final balance of viable/germinable seeds produced by an average sized myrtle in each treatment showed that the recently grazed myrtles (GE2) produced nearly five times less seeds (1200) than the myrtles grazed 15 years ago (5500). However, myrtles recovered the ability to produce viable seeds quickly, almost tripling, each year of non-grazing the number of viable/germinable seeds. The results of this study indicated that goat grazing could affect regeneration of myrtle because it reduced reproduction output and the number of viable propagules. Future studies should evaluate other related ecological aspects, such as fruit consumption by potential frugivores and seed dispersal (distance and place of seed deposition).

Keywords

Doñana Fruit Goats Viability Germination 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank the management of the Doñana National Park and Dehesa de Gatos S.L. for their helpful support. This study was funded by the Consejería de Medio Ambiente (Junta de Andalucía) (OG-052/07). We also thank Dra. Rocío Fernández-Ales and Sandra Astorga for their useful comments on the earlier version of this manuscript. The authors wish to thank the Associate Editor and anonymous referees for their useful suggestions, which led the revision. Mr. I. Knutson revised the English version of the manuscript. J.M. Mancilla-Leytón acknowledge the receipt of a Postdoctoral Research Contract (V Plan Propio de Investigación de la Universidad de Sevilla, Ref. II.5.B/2015).

Supplementary material

11056_2017_9583_MOESM1_ESM.docx (803 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 802 kb)

References

  1. Amiri N, Emadian SF, Fallah A, Adeli K, Amirnejad H (2015) Estimation of conservation value of myrtle (Myrtus communis) using a contingent valuation method: a case study in a Dooreh forest area, Lorestan Province, Iran. For Ecosyst. doi: 10.1186/s40663-015-0051-6 Google Scholar
  2. Augustine DJ, McNaughton SJ, Frank DA (2003) Feedbacks between soil nutrients and large herbivores in a managed savanna ecosystem. Ecol Appl 135:1325–1337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barnea A, Yom-Tov Y, Friedman J (1991) Does ingestion by birds affect seed germination? Func Ecol 5:394–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bradbeer W (1998) Seed dormancy and germination. Chapman Hall, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Brenchley JL, Probert RJ (1998) Seed germination responses to some environmental factors in the seagrass Zostera capricorni from eastern Australia. Aquat Bot 623:177–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ferraro DO, Oesterheld M (2002) Effect of defoliation on grass growth. A quantitative review. Oikos 981:125–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gao Y, Wang D, Ba L, Bai Y, Liu B (2008) Interactions between herbivory and resource availability on grazing tolerance of Leymus chinensis. Environ Exp Bot 631:113–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. González-Varo JP (2010) Fragmentation, habitat composition and the dispersal/predation balance in interactions between the Mediterranean myrtle and avian frugivores. Ecography 33:185–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. González-Varo JP, Nora S, Aparicio A (2012) Bottlenecks for plant recruitment in woodland remnants: an ornithochorous shrub in a Mediterranean ‘relictual’ landscape. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst 14:111–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gramacho M, Santander T, Farji-Brener AG (2001) Efectos de la herbivoría sobre la cantidad de óvulos en Loasa speciosa Loasaceae. Revista de biología tropical 492:513–516Google Scholar
  11. Granados Corona M, Martín Vicente A, Novo FG (1988) Long-term vegetation changes on the stabilized dunes of Doñana National Park SW Spain. Vegetatio 751:73–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Green LR, Newell LA (1982) Using goats to control brush regrowth on fuelbreaks. Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station General technical report PSW-59Google Scholar
  13. Guitián P (1998) Latitudinal variation in the fruiting phenology of a bird-dispersed plant shape Crataegus monogyna in Western Europe. Plant Ecol 1372:139–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hendrix SD (1988) Herbivory and its impact on plant reproduction. In: Lovett Doust J, Lovett Doust L (eds) Plant reproductive ecology: patterns and strategies. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 246–266Google Scholar
  15. Herrera CM (1984) Selective pressures on fruit seediness: differential predation of fly larvae on the fruits of Berberis hispanica. Oikos 42:166–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Herrera CM (2000) Measuring the effects of pollinators and herbivores: evidence for non-additivity in a perennial herb. Ecology 81:2170–2176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hladun KR, Adler LS (2009) Influence of leaf herbivory, root herbivory, and pollination on plant performance in Cucurbita moschata. Ecol Entomol 341:144–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Huhta AP, Hellström K, Rautio P, Tuomi J (2003) Grazing tolerance of Gentianella amarella and other monocarpic herbs: why is tolerance highest at low damage levels? Plant Ecol 1661:49–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Janzen DH (1976) Effect of defoliation on fruit-bearing branches of the Kentucky coffee tree, Gymnoclaudus dioicus (Leguminosae). Am Midl Nat 95:474–478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Juenger T, Lennartsson T (2000) Tolerance in plant ecology and evolution: toward a more unified theory of plant-herbivore interaction. Evol Ecol 144:283–287Google Scholar
  21. Karimi MA (2012) Investigating the most important degradation factors of myrtle (Myrtus communis L.) in Lorestan province (a case study in Chegnei forest area). Tehran Research Centre of Scientific-Applied University, IranGoogle Scholar
  22. Keeley JE (1986) Resilence of Mediterranean shrub communities to fires. In: Dell B, Jopkins AJ, Lamont BB (eds) Resilience in Mediterranean-type ecosystems. Dr. W. Junk, Dordrecht, pp 95–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kudo G, Nishikawa Y, Kasagi T, Kosuge S (2004) Does seed production of spring ephemerals decrease when spring comes early? Ecol Res 19:255–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Leiva MJ, Mancilla-Leyton JM, Martín-Vicente Á (2013) Methods to improve the recruitment of holm-oak seedlings in grazed Mediterranean savanna-like ecosystems (dehesas). Ann For Sci 70:11–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Levey DJ (1987) Seed size and fruit-handling techniques of avian frugivores. Am Nat 129:471–485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. MacKay DB (1972) The measurement of viability. In: Roberts EH (ed) Viability of seeds. Chapman & Hall, London, pp 172–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mancilla-Leytón JM, Fernández-Alés R, Martín Vicente A (2011) Plant–ungulate interaction: goat gut passage effect on survival and germination of Mediterranean shrub seeds. J Veg Sci 226:1031–1037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mancilla-Leytón JM, Pino Mejías R, Martín Vicente A (2013a) Do goats preserve the forest? Evaluating the effects of grazing goats on combustible Mediterranean scrub. Appl Veg Sci 161:63–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mancilla-Leytón JM, González-Redondo P, MartínVicente A (2013b) Effects of rabbit gut passage on seed retrieval and germination of three shrub species. Basic Appl Ecol 147:585–592CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mancilla-Leytón JM, Martín Vicente A, Parejo-Farnés C, Fernández-Ales R, Leiva MJ (2014) A vegetation management experiment: goats grazing shrublands in Doñana Natural Park. Russ J Ecol 45:384–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mancilla-Leytón JM, Leiva MJ, Martín Vicente Á (2016) Soil compaction and water availability affect growth and survival of Quercus ilex subsp. ballota seedlings under different light environments. New For 47:621–633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. McNaughton SJ (1983) Compensatory plant growth as a response to herbivory. Oikos 40:329–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mitchell E (1991) Brush control with goats. The Kerr Center for Sustainable Agriculture, Inc., Pinkerton, CAGoogle Scholar
  34. Miyazaki Y, Hiura T, Kato E, Funada R (2002) Allocation of resources to reproduction in Styrax obassia in a masting year. Ann Bot 896:767–772CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Obeso JR (1993) Does defoliation affect reproductive output in herbaceous perenials and woody plants in different ways? Funct Ecol 7:150–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Obeso JR (1998) Effects of defoliation and girdling on fruit production in Ilex aquifolium. Funct Ecol 123:486–491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Obeso JR, Grubb PJ (1993) Fruit maturation in the shrub Ligustrum vulgare Oleaceae: lack of defoliation effects. Oikos 68:309–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ojeda F (2001) El fuego como factor clave en la evolución de las plantas mediterráneas. In: Zamora R, Puignaire FI (eds) Ecosistemas mediterráneos. Análisis funcional. CSICAEET, Granada, pp 319–349Google Scholar
  39. Perevolotsky A, Seligman NAG (1998) Role of grazing in Mediterranean rangeland ecosystems. Bioscience 48:1007–1017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Romano G, Lahmer FZ, Palasciano MA, Lamaddalena N, Gentile F (2016) Soil erosion control with different plant configurations in a Mediterranean environment. In: 2016 ASABE (American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers) annual international meeting. Paper no 162460165. St. Joseph, MI. doi: 10.13031/aim.20162460165
  41. Rosenthal JP, Kotanen PM (1994) Terrestrial plant tolerance to herbivory. Trends Ecol Evol 94:145–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Stephenson AG (1980) Fruit set, herbivory, fruit reduction, and the fruiting strategy of Catalpa speciosa Bignoniaceae. Ecology 61:57–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Strauss SY, Agrawal AA (1999) The ecology and evolution of plant tolerance to herbivory. Trends Ecol Evol 145:179–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Strauss SY, Irwin RE (2004) Ecological and evolutionary consequences of multispecies plant-animal interactions. Ann Rev Ecol Evol Syst 35:435–466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Strauss SY, Murch P (2004) Towards an understanding of the mechanisms of tolerance: compensating for herbivore damage by enhancing a mutualism. Ecol Entomol 292:234–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Traveset A, Riera N, Mas RE (2001) Ecology of fruit-colour polymorphism in Myrtus communis and differential effects of birds and mammals on seed germination and seedling growth. J Ecol 89:749–760CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Valdivia CE, Simonetti JA (2007) Decreased frugivory and seed germination rate do not reduce seedling recruitment rates of Aristotelia chilensis in a fragmented forest. Biodivers Conserv 16:1593–1602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Vallejo R, Serrasolses I, Alloza JA, Baeza J, Bladé C, Chirino E, Vilagrosa A (2009) Long-term restoration strategies and techniques. Fire effects on soils and restoration strategies. Science Publishers Inc., Enfield, pp 373–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. van Der Meijden E, Wijn M, Verkaar HJ (1988) Defence and regrowth, alternative plant strategies in the struggle against herbivores. Oikos 51:355–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. van Der Wal R, Egas M, Van Der Veen A, Bakker J (2000) Effects of resource competition and herbivory on plant performance along a natural productivity gradient. J Ecol 882:317–330Google Scholar
  51. Waguchi Y (2004) Accuracy and precision of crown profile, volume, and surface area measurements of 29-year-old Japanese cypress trees using a Spiegel relascope. J For Res 9:173–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Zhang H, Zhang Z (2008) Endocarp thickness affects seed removal speed by small rodents in a warm-temperate broad-leafed deciduous forest, China. Acta Oecol 34:285–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Zunzunegui M, Ain-Lhout F, Jáuregui J, Barradas MD, Boutaleb S, Álvarez-Cansino L, Esquivias MP (2010) Fruit production under different environmental and management conditions of argan, Argania spinosa L. J Arid Envir 74:1138–1145CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. M. Mancilla-Leytón
    • 1
  • J. Cambrollé
    • 2
  • E. Valdés-Correcher
    • 3
  1. 1.Departamento de Ciencias Agroforestales, ETSIAUniversidad de SevillaSevilleSpain
  2. 2.Departamento Biología Vegetal y EcologíaUniversidad de SevillaSevilleSpain
  3. 3.Biogeco, INRAUniversity of BordeauxCestasFrance

Personalised recommendations