Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Deep planting decreases risk of drought damage and increases growth of Norway spruce container seedlings

  • Published:
New Forests Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Despite several studies demonstrating that deep planting has no negative effects on seedling development, conifer seedlings are still typically planted to depths of 3–5 cm in boreal forests. Planting machines plant seedlings deeper. While machine planting has become more common in boreal forests, there is still a need to demonstrate that conifer seedlings can be planted using this method without reduced field performance of seedlings. To investigate the effects of deep planting on Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) container seedlings, we established two experiments in Central Finland in 2006 and 2009. In the experiment on a site with medium coarse soil, planting depths were 0, 2, 5 and 8 cm. In the experiment established on fine-textured soil, planting depths were 3, 6 and 10 cm. During the first 4 years after planting, deeper planted seedlings grew better and at the end of the fourth season initial differences in shoot length among planting depths had disappeared. Incidence of insect damage was relatively low, and no differences among planting depths were found. During the dry summer, there was a positive relationship between increased planting depth and improved survivability of seedlings. In conclusion, deep planting improved growth of Norway spruce seedlings and was an advantage in dry conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bergsten U, Goulet F, Lundmark T, Ottoson Löfvenius A (2001) Frost heaving in a boreal soil in relation to soil scarification and snow cover. Can J For Res 31:1084–1092

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beyeler J (1996) Effect of planting methods on field performance of black spruce five years after planting. For Res Rep 62:1–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Björklund N, Nordlander G, Bylund H (2003) Host-plant acceptance on mineral soil and humus by the pine weevil Hylobius abietis (L.). Agric For Entomol 5:61–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bréda N, Huc R, Granier A, Dreyer E (2006) Temperate forest trees and stands under severe drought: a review of ecophysiological responses, adaptation processes and long-term consequences. Ann For Sci 63:625–644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buitrago M, Paquette A, Thiffault N, Bélanger N, Messier C (2015) Early performance of planted hybrid larch: effects of mechanical site preparation and planting depth. New For 46:319–337. doi:10.10007/s11056-014-9463-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cajander AK (1949) Forest types and their significance. Acta For Fenn 46:1–71

    Google Scholar 

  • de Chantal M, Rita H, Bergsten U, Ottoson Löfvenius M, Grip H (2006) Effect of soil properties and soil disturbance on frost heaving of mineral soil: a laboratory experiment. Can J For Res 36:2885–2893

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ersson BT, Jundén T, Bergsten U, Servin M (2013) Simulated productivity of one- and two-armed tree planting machines. Silva Fenn 47(2). http://www.silvafennica.fi/article/958

  • Freij J, Örlander G (1987) Högläggning på mineraljord eller humustäcke—en försöksserie med olika trädslag, planttyper och planteringstidpunkter. [Mounding in mineral soil or humus—an experimental series for different tree species, seedling types and planting dates] Institutionen för skogskötsel, SLU, Arbetsrapporter 19 (in Swedish)

  • Gemmel P, Nilsson U, Welander T (1996) Development of oak and beech seedlings planted under varying shelterwood densities and with different site preparation methods in southern Sweden. New For 12:141–161

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossnickle SC (2000) Ecophysiology of northern spruce species: the performance of planted seedlings. NRC Research Press, Ottawa

    Google Scholar 

  • Heiskanen J, Saksa T, Luoranen J (2013) Soil preparation method affects outplanting success of Norway spruce container seedlings on till soils susceptible to frost heave. Silva Fenn 47(1). http://www.silvafennica.fi/article/893

  • Keane M (2006) Container plants and mechanized planting—the way forward? In: MacLennan L, Fennessy J (eds) Plant quality, A key success in forest establishment. In: Proceedings of the COFORD conference, 20–21 September 2005, Mount Wolseley Hotel, Tullow, Co Carlow. COFORD, Dublin, pp 67–71

  • Krasowski MJ, Elder RJF (2000) Opportunities for improvements to reforestation success. British Columbia, Ministry of Forest Research Program, Extension note 43

  • Lähde E, Mutka K (1974) Luontaisesti syntyneiden ja istutettujen kuusentaimien kehitys ja juuriston rakenne Pohjois-Suomessa. [The structure of the root system and development of volunteer and planted Norway spruce transplants in Northern Finland]. Comm Inst For Fenn 83:1–53 (in Finnish with English summary)

    Google Scholar 

  • Laine T, Kärhä K, Hynönen A (2016) A survey of the Finnish mechanized tree-planting industry in 2013 and its success factors. Silva Fenn. doi:10.14214/sf.1323

  • Landis TD, Dumroese RK, Haase DL (2010) The container tree nursery manual, vol 7, Seedling processing, storage, and outplanting. Agric. Handbk. 674. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Washington

  • Långström B (1982) Abundance and seasonal activity of adult Hylobius-weevils in reforestation areas during first years following final felling. Comm Inst For Fenn 106:1–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindelöw Å (1992) Seedling mortality caused by Hylastes cunicularius Er. (Coleoptera, Scolytidae) in Picea abies plantations in Northern Sweden. Scand J For Res 7:387–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luoranen J, Viiri H, Ylioja T (2009) Marshall SusCon CR—valmisteen teho tukkimiehentäitä ja juuriniluria vastaan. [Effectiveness of Marshall SusCon CR against pine weevil and black spruce beetle] Taimiuutiset 3/2009:19–21 (in Finnish)

  • Luoranen J, Rikala R, Smolander H (2011) Machine planting of Norway spruce by Bracke and Ecoplanter: an evaluation of soil preparation, planting method and seedling performance. Silva Fenn 45:341–357. http://www.metla.fi/silvafennica/full/sf45/sf453341.pdf

  • Macadam A, Bedford L (1998) Mounding in the sub-boreal spruce zone of west-central British Columbia: 8-year results. For Chron 74:421–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson U, Örlander G (1995) Effects of regeneration methods on drought damage to newly planted Norway spruce seedlings. Can J For Res 25:790–802

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nordlander G, Örlander G, Langvall O (2003) Feeding by the pine weevil Hylobius abietis in relation to sun exposure and distance to forest edges. Agric For Entom 5:191–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nordlander G, Bylund H, Björklund N (2005) Soil type and microtopography influencing feeding above and below ground by the pine weevil Hylobius abietis. Agric For Entom 7:107–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliet JA, Artero F, Cuadros S, Puértolas J, Luna L, Grau JM (2012) Deep planting with shelters improves performance of different stocktype sizes under arid Mediterranean conditions. New Forest 43:925–939. doi:10.1007/s11056-012-9345-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Örlander G (1986) Effect of planting and scarification on the water relations in planted seedlings of Scots pine. Studia For Suec 173:1–17

  • Örlander G, Gemmel P, Wilhelmsson C (1991) Effects of scarification, planting depth and planting spot on seedling establishment in a low humidity area in southern Sweden. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Silviculture. Report 33 (in Swedish with English summary)

  • Paquette A, Girard A-P, Walsh D (2011) Deep planting has no short- or long-term effect on the survival and growth of white spruce, black spruce, and Jack pine. North J Appl For 28:146–151

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersson M, Örlander G (2003) Effectiveness of combinations of shelterwood, scarification, and feeding barriers to reduce pine weevil damage. Can J For Res 33:64–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petersson M, Örlander G, Nordlander G (2005) Soil feature affecting damage to conifer seedlings by the pine weevil Hylobius abietis. Forestry 78:83–92. doi:10.1093/forestry/cpi008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahlén K, Goulet F (2002) Reduction of frost heaving of Norway spruce and Scots pine seedlings by planting in mounds or in humus. New For 24:175–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwan T (1994) Planting depth and its influence on survival and growth. Literature review with emphasis on Jack pine, black spruce and white spruce. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Northeast Science & Technology, Technical report TR-017

  • Söderström V, Bäcke J, Byfalk R, Jonsson C (1978) Jämforelse mellan plantering i jordrabatter och efter andra markberedningsmetoder. [Comparison between planting in mineral soil heaps and after other soil treatment methods]. Rapporter och uppsatser 11 (in Swedish with English abstract)

  • Sutton RF (1967) Influence of planting depth on early growth of conifers. Commonw For Rev 46:282–295

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutton RF (1995) Advantages of deep planting black spruce. Technical note 50. Canadian Forest Service, Ontario

  • Tarroux E, DesRochers A, Girard J-P (2014) Growth and root development of black and white spruce planted after deep planting. For Ecol Manag 318:294–303. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2014.01.032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorsén Å, Mattson S, Weslien J (2001) Influence of stem diameter on the survival and growth of containerized Norway spruce seedlings attacked by pine weevils (Hylobius abietis). Scand J For Res 16:54–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valkonen S (2005) Metsänuudistaminen [Forest regeneration]. In: Rantala S. Metsäkoulu. Metsäkustannus Oy, pp 55–80 (in Finnish)

  • Venäläinen A, Tuomenvirta H, Drebs A (2005) A basic Finnish climate data set 1961–2000—description and illustrations. Finnish Meteorological Institute. Reports 2005:5

    Google Scholar 

  • Whaley RE, Niznowski G, Buse LJ (1995) The effect of deep planting black spruce: fifth-year field results. In: Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Northwest Science & Technology, Thunder Bay, Ontario. Technical report TR-92

Download references

Acknowledgments

The research was conducted in co-operation with UPM-Kymmene Corporation who carried out soil preparation in both study areas. We thank Arvi Jääskeläinen and Martti Udd for planting the seedlings, Mervi Ahonpää, Auli Lehtinen, Mikko Tikkinen and Pekka Voipio for the seedling measurements and Dr. Heikki Smolander and three anonymous referee for valuable comments to the manuscript. The language was checked by Semantix. The study was solely financed by the Finnish Forest Research Institute through projects 3450 and 3554.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Management and Production of Renewable Resources, Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), Juntintie 154, 77600, Suonenjoki, Finland

    Jaana Luoranen

  2. Management and Production of Renewable Resources, Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), Joensuu, Finland

    Heli Viiri

Authors
  1. Jaana Luoranen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Heli Viiri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jaana Luoranen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Luoranen, J., Viiri, H. Deep planting decreases risk of drought damage and increases growth of Norway spruce container seedlings. New Forests 47, 701–714 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-016-9539-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-016-9539-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation