Advertisement

New Forests

, Volume 46, Issue 5–6, pp 669–682 | Cite as

Evaluating the evolution of forest restoration research in a changing world: a “big literature” review

  • Gabriela C. Nunez-MirEmail author
  • Basil V. IannoneIII
  • Keeli Curtis
  • Songlin Fei
Article

Abstract

In a rapidly changing world, characterized by novel ecological scenarios and fluctuating socioeconomic and ecological demands, ecological restoration practices must constantly adapt to emerging issues and circumstances. Restoration ecology, the scientific discipline that informs ecological restoration, must therefore evolve and expand its focus to address this need. To describe and evaluate the evolution of research pertaining to the ecological restoration of forests within the field of forestry, we performed a review of all 29,766 abstracts published over the last 35 years (1980–2014) in 15 leading forestry journals using automated content analysis, a machine learning-based tool for automated review of large volumes of literature (“big literature”). We found not only a 50-fold increase in the prominence of restoration ecology in forestry literature from 2000 to 2013, but also an evolution in the focus of forest restoration research. This evolution is likely in response to emerging topics and issues affecting forest restoration, such as exotic species, altered disturbance regimes, degraded tropical forests, and ecosystem services. Our results also revealed a pattern of “cyclic development,” in which research in the 1990s was focused on constructing theoretical frameworks, in the 2000s research appeared to be concentrated on restoration practices and programs, while in the 2010s research revisited established theoretical frameworks, possibly indicating a conceptual expansion. Our study highlighted gaps in research on important topics and emerging challenges, such as global climate change, genetic considerations, landscape-level factors, and restoring degraded systems, thus pointing the way for new and necessary research directions.

Keywords

Automated content analysis (ACA) Big literature Biodiversity Cyclic development Degraded Literature review 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the NSF Macrosystems Biology Program Grant No. 1241932. Special thanks to two anonymous reviewers and Dr. Douglass Jacobs, whose comments greatly helped improved this paper.

References

  1. Alexa M, Zuell C (2000) Text analysis software: commonalities, differences and limitations: the results of a review. Qual Quant 34:299–321. doi: 10.1023/A:1004740203542 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bell DT, Hobbs RJ (2007) Jarrah forest ecosystem restoration: a foreword. Restor Ecol 15:S1–S2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Benayas JMR, Newton AC, Diaz A, Bullock JM (2009) Enhancement of biodiversity and ecosystem services by ecological restoration: a meta-analysis. Science 325:1121–1124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bradshaw AD (1987) Restoration: the acid test for ecology. In: Jordan WR, Gilpin ME, Aber JD (eds) Restoration ecology: a synthetic approach to ecological research. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 23–29Google Scholar
  5. Brudvig LA (2011) The restoration of biodiversity: where has research been and where does it need to go? Am J Bot 98:549–558CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bullock JM, Aronson J, Newton AC, Pywell RF, Rey-Benayas JM (2011) Restoration of ecosystem services and biodiversity: conflicts and opportunities. Trends Ecol Evol 26:541–549CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Caravaca F, Barea JM, Palenzuela J, Figueroa D, Alguacil MM, Roldán A (2003) Establishment of shrub species in a degraded semiarid site after inoculation with native or allochthonous arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Appl Soil Ecol 22:103–111. doi: 10.1016/S0929-1393(02)00136-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ciccarese L, Mattsson A, Pettenella D (2012) Ecosystem services from forest restoration: thinking ahead. New For 43:543–560. doi: 10.1007/s11056-012-9350-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dalgleish HJ, Swihart RK (2012) American chestnut past and future: implications of restoration for resource pulses and consumer populations of eastern U.S. forests. Restor Ecol 20:490–497. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-100X.2011.00795.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Davis MA, Slobodkin LB (2004) The science and values of restoration ecology. Restor Ecol 12:1–3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. DellaSala D et al (2003) A citizen’s call for ecological forest restoration: forest restoration principles and criteria. Ecol Restor 21:15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dosskey MG, Bentrup G, Schoeneberger M (2012) A role for agroforestry in forest restoration in the Lower Mississippi alluvial valley. J For 110:48–55. doi: 10.5849/jof.10-061 Google Scholar
  13. Fearnside PM (2005) Deforestation in Brazilian Amazonia: history, rates, and consequences. Conserv Biol 19:680–688. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00697.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Foley JA et al (2007) Amazonia revealed: forest degradation and loss of ecosystem goods and services in the Amazon Basin. Front Ecol Environ 5:25–32. doi: 10.1890/1540-9295(2007)5[25:ARFDAL]2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fulé PZ, Crouse JE, Roccaforte JP, Kalies EL (2012) Do thinning and/or burning treatments in western USA ponderosa or Jeffrey pine-dominated forests help restore natural fire behavior? For Ecol Manage 269:68–81. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2011.12.025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gaertner M, Holmes PM, Richardson DM (2012) Biological invasions, resilience and restoration. In: Van Andel J, Aronson J (eds) Restoration ecology: the new frontier, 2nd edn. Blackwell Publishing Ltd., Oxford, pp 265–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Galatowitsch SM (2012) Ecological restoration. Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland, MAGoogle Scholar
  18. Gomory RE, Schmitt RW (1988) Science and product. Science 240:1131–1204CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Grech MR, Horberry T, Smith A (2002) Human error in maritime operations: analyses of accident reports using the Leximancer tool. Proc Hum Fact Ergon Soc Annu Meet 46:1718–1721CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Harris JA, Hobbs RJ, Higgs E, Aronson J (2006) Ecological restoration and global climate change. Restor Ecol 14:170–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hobbs RJ, Cramer VA (2008) Restoration ecology: interventionist approaches for restoring and maintaining ecosystem function in the face of rapid environmental change. Annu Rev Environ Resour 33:39–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jalili A et al (2010) Climate change, unpredictable cold waves and possible brakes on plant migration. Global Ecol Biogeogr 19:642–648Google Scholar
  23. Kalies EL, Chambers CL, Covington WW (2010) Wildlife responses to thinning and burning treatments in southwestern conifer forests: a meta-analysis. For Ecol Manage 259:333–342. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2009.10.024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Krippendorff K (2012) Content analysis: an introduction to its methodology. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CAGoogle Scholar
  25. Lamb D, Erskine PD, Parrotta JA (2005) Restoration of degraded tropical forest landscapes. Science 310:1628–1632CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Larman C, Basili VR (2003) Iterative and incremental development: a brief history. Computer 36:47–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Long JN (2009) Emulating natural disturbance regimes as a basis for forest management: a North American view. For Ecol Manage 257:1868–1873CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. MacCleery D (2008) Re-inventing the United States forest service: evolution from custodial management, to production forestry, to ecosystem management. In: Durst P, Brown C, Broadhead J, Suzuki R, Leslie R, Inoguchi A (eds) Reinventing forestry agencies: experiences of institutional restructuring in Asia and the Pacific. RAP Publication (FAO), Bangkok, pp 45–77Google Scholar
  29. Maron M et al (2012) Faustian bargains? Restoration realities in the context of biodiversity offset policies. Biol Conserv 155:141–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Menz MHM, Dixon KW, Hobbs RJ (2013) Hurdles and opportunities for landscape-scale restoration. Science 339:526–527CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Millar CI, Stephenson NL, Stephens SL (2007) Climate change and forests of the future: managing in the face of uncertainty. Ecol Appl 17:2145–2151CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Montoya D, Rogers L, Memmott J (2012) Emerging perspectives in the restoration of biodiversity-based ecosystem services. Trends Ecol Evol 27:666–672CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Oliet J, Jacobs D (2012) Restoring forests: advances in techniques and theory. New For 43:535–541. doi: 10.1007/s11056-012-9354-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Padilla FM, Pugnaire FI (2006) The role of nurse plants in the restoration of degraded environments. Front Ecol Environ 4:196–202. doi: 10.1890/1540-9295(2006)004[0196:TRONPI]2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Palmer MA, Ambrose RF, Poff NL (1997) Ecological theory and community restoration ecology. Restor Ecol 5:291–300. doi: 10.1046/j.1526-100X.1997.00543.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Parrotta JA, Knowles OH (1999) Restoration of tropical moist forests on bauxite-mined lands in the Brazilian Amazon. Restor Ecol 7:103–116. doi: 10.1046/j.1526-100X.1999.72001.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pausas J et al (2004) Pines and oaks in the restoration of Mediterranean landscapes of Spain: new perspectives for an old practice—a review. Plant Ecol 171:209–220. doi: 10.1023/B:VEGE.0000029381.63336.20 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Penn-Edwards S (2010) Computer aided phenomenography: the role of Leximancer computer software in phenomenographic investigation. Qual Rep 15:252–267Google Scholar
  39. Prach K, Pyšek P (2001) Using spontaneous succession for restoration of human-disturbed habitats: experience from Central Europe. Ecol Eng 17:55–62. doi: 10.1016/S0925-8574(00)00132-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pyke DA, Brooks ML, D’Antonio C (2010) Fire as a restoration tool: a decision framework for predicting the control or enhancement of plants using fire. Restor Ecol 18:274–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Roberts CW (2000) A conceptual framework for quantitative text analysis. Qual Quant 34:259–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ruiz-Jaen MC, Mitchell Aide T (2005) Restoration success: how is it being measured? Restor Ecol 13:569–577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. SER (2004) The SER International Primer on Ecological RestorationGoogle Scholar
  44. Smith AE (2003) Automatic extraction of semantic networks from text using leximancer. Paper presented at the proceedings of the 2003 conference of the north American chapter of the association for computational linguistics on human language technology: demonstrations, vol 4, Edmonton, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  45. Smith AE, Humphreys MS (2006) Evaluation of unsupervised semantic mapping of natural language with Leximancer concept mapping. Behav Res Methods 38:262–279CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Stanturf JA, Madsen P (2010) Restoration of boreal and temperate forests. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FLGoogle Scholar
  47. Stanturf JA, Palik BJ, Dumroese RK (2014) Contemporary forest restoration: a review emphasizing function. For Ecol Manage 331:292–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Suding KN (2011) Toward an era of restoration in ecology: successes, failures, and opportunities ahead. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 42:465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. van Andel J, Aronson J (2012) Restoration ecology: the new frontier, 2nd edn. Blackwell Publishing Ltd., OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Vitousek PM, Mooney HA, Lubchenco J, Melillo JM (1997) Human domination of Earth’s ecosystems. Science 277:494–499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wenhua L (2004) Degradation and restoration of forest ecosystems in China. For Ecol Manage 201:33–41. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2004.06.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wiersum KF (1995) 200 years of sustainability in forestry: lessons from history. Environ Manage 19:321–329. doi: 10.1007/BF02471975 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wortley L, Hero J-M, Howes M (2013) Evaluating ecological restoration success: a review of the literature. Restor Ecol 21:537–543. doi: 10.1111/rec.12028 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Young TP, Chase JM, Huddleston RT (2001) Community succession and assembly comparing, contrasting and combining paradigms in the context of ecological restoration. Ecol Restor 19:5–18Google Scholar
  55. Young TP, Petersen DA, Clary JJ (2005) The ecology of restoration: historical links, emerging issues and unexplored realms. Ecol Lett 8:662–673. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00764.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gabriela C. Nunez-Mir
    • 1
    Email author
  • Basil V. IannoneIII
    • 1
  • Keeli Curtis
    • 1
  • Songlin Fei
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Forestry and Natural ResourcesPurdue UniversityWest LafayetteUSA

Personalised recommendations