New Forests

, Volume 43, Issue 3, pp 319–333 | Cite as

Effects of seed traits on the success of direct seeding for restoring southern Thailand’s lowland evergreen forest ecosystem

Article

Abstract

The success of direct seeding, as a low-cost approach to forest restoration, varies with tree species and seed characteristics. A system to predict which tree species are likely to be suitable for direct seeding would therefore be useful for improving forest restoration projects. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the effects of seed traits on the success of direct seeding to restore tropical forest in southern Thailand. Seeds of 19 indigenous lowland tropical forest tree species were collected, from both the east and west sides of the Thailand peninsular and the following parameters measured: seed size, shape, coat thickness and moisture content. Field trials were established to determine seed germination rates and to calculate a “direct seeding suitability score” for each species, which combined seedling establishment and growth rates. Seed size, shape and moisture content were associated with germination percentage. Species with higher seedling survival tended to have large or intermediate-sized seeds, round or oval seeds and seeds with low or medium moisture content. Only seed coat thickness was significantly correlated with the suitability score (r = 0.65, p < 0.01). Seed coat thickness >0.4 mm coincided with higher rank suitability score. These conditions successfully predicted the success or failure of direct seeding for 15 out of 19 species tested. Eight tree species are recommended as suitable for restoring lowland evergreen forest ecosystems in southern Thailand, by direct seeding.

Keywords

Direct sowing Seed characteristics Forest restoration Reforestation Tropical forest 

References

  1. Aerts R, Maes W, November E, Negussie A, Hermy M, Muys B (2006) Restoring dry Afromontane forest using bird and nurse plant effects: direct sowing of Olea europaea ssp. cuspidata seeds. For Ecol Manag 230:23–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ashton MS, Gunatilleke CVS, Singhakumara BMP, Gunatilleke IAUN (2001) Restoration pathways for rain forest in southwest Sri Lanka: a review of concepts and models. For Ecol Manag 154:409–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Badek B, Duijn Bv, Grzesik M (2006) Effects of water supply methods and seed moisture content on germination of China aster (Callistephus chinensis) and tomato (Lycopersicon esculentun Mill.) seeds. Eur J Agron 24:45–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Balandier P, Frochot H, Sourisseau A (2009) Improvement of direct tree seeding with cover crops in afforestation: microclimate and resource availability induced by vegetation composition. For Ecol Manag 257:1716–1724CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bewley JD, Black M (1985) Physiology of development and germination in: seeds. Plenum Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Bonilla-Moheno M, Holl KD (2010) Direct seeding to restore tropical mature-forest species in areas of slash-and-burn agriculture. Restor Ecol 18:438–445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Campbell BD, Stafford DM, Ash AJ (1999) A rule-based model for the functional analysis of vegetation change in Australasian grasslands. J Veg Sci 10:723–730CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carmago JLC, Ferraz IDK, Imakawa AM (2002) Rehabilitation of degraded areas of central Amazonia using direct sowing of forest tree seeds. Restor Ecol 10:636–644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cervantes V, Carabias J, Vazques-Yanes C (1996) Seed germination of woody legumes from deciduous tropical forest of southern Mexico. For Ecol Manag 82:171–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cole RJ, Holl KD, Keene CL, Zahawi RA (2011) Direct seeding of late-successional trees to restore tropical montane forest. For Ecol Manag 261:1590–1597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Coomes DA, Grubb PJ (2003) Colonization, tolerance, competition and seed-size variation within functional groups. Trends Ecol Evol 18:283–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Crawley MJ (2007) The R book. Wiley, West SussexCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. De Steven D (1991) Experiments on mechanisms of tree establishment in old-field succession: seedling emergence. Ecology 72:1066–1075CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Doust SJ, Erskine PD, Lamb D (2006) Direct seeding to restore rainforest species: microsite effects on the early establishment and growth of rainforest tree seedlings on degraded land in the wet tropics of Australia. For Ecol Manag 234:333–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Doust SJ, Erskine PD, Lamb D (2008) Restoring rainforest species by direct seeding: tree seedlings establishment and growth performance on degraded land in the wet tropics of Australia. For Ecol Manag 256:1178–1188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Edwards DGW (1980) Maturity and quality of tree seeds: a state-of-the-art review. Seed Sci Technol 28:625–657Google Scholar
  17. Ellis RH, Hong TD, Roberts EH (1988) A low-moisture-content limit to logarithmic relations between seed moisture content and longevity. Ann Bot 61:405–408Google Scholar
  18. Engel VL, Parrotta JA (2001) An evaluation of direct seeding for reforestation of degraded lands in central Sao Paulo state, Brazil. For Ecol Manag 152:169–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fenner M, Thompson K (2005) The ecology of seeds. Cambridge University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. FORRU (2006) Planting trees. In: Elliott S, Blakesley D, Maxwell JF, Doust S, Suwannaratana S (eds) How to plant a forest: the principles and practices of restoring tropical forests. Biology Department, Science Faculty, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, pp 103–132Google Scholar
  21. FORRU (2008) Propagating and identifying candidates framework. In: Elliott S, Blakesley D, Chairuangsri S (eds) Research for restoring tropical forest ecosystems: a practical guide. Biology Department, Chiang Mai, p 144Google Scholar
  22. Garcia-Orth X, Martínez-Ramos M (2008) Seed dynamics of early and late successional tree species in tropical abandoned pasture: seed burial as a way of evading predation. Restor Ecol 16:435–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Grime JP et al (1981) A comparative study of germination characteristics in a local flora. J Ecol 69:1017–1059CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Grubb PJ, Metcalfe DJ (1996) Adaptation and inertia in the Australian tropical lowland rainforest flora: contradictory trends in intergeneric and intrageneric comparisons of seed size in relation to light demand. Funct Ecol 10:512–520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hall JS, Ashton MS, Garen EJ, Jose S (2011) The ecology and ecosystem services of native trees: implications for reforestation and land restoration in Mesoamerica. For Ecol Manag 261:1553–1557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hardwick K (1999) Tree colonization of abandoned agricultural clearings in seasonal tropical montane forest in nothern Thailand. Doctor of Philosophy. University of Wales, Bangor, p 168Google Scholar
  27. Harris JA, Hobbs RJ, Higgs E, Aronson J (2006) Ecological restoration and global climate change. Restor Ecol 14:170–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hau CH (1997) Tree seed predation on degraded hillsides in Hong Kong. For Ecol Manag 99:215–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hooper E, Condit R, Legendre P (2002) Responses of 20 native tree species to reforestation strategies for abandoned farmland in Panama. Ecol Appl 12:1626–1641CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. ISTA (2006) International rules for seed testing, rules 2006. International Seed Testing Association, ZurichGoogle Scholar
  31. Kleijn D (2003) Can establishment characteristics explain the poor colonization success of late successional grassland species on ex-arable land? Restor Ecol 11:131–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Knowles OH, Parrotta JA (1995) Amazonian forest restoration: an innovative system for native species selection based on phenological data and field performance indices. Comm For Rev 74:230–243Google Scholar
  33. Lamb D (2011) Ecological restoration. In: Lamb D (ed) Regreening the bare hills: tropical forest restoration in the Asia-Pacific region. Springer, New York, pp 325–355Google Scholar
  34. Lamb D, Gilmour D (2003) Rehabilitation and restoration of degraded forests. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK and WWF, Gland, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  35. Laurance WF et al (2011) Global warming, elevational ranges and the vulnerability of tropical biota. Biol Conserv 144:548–557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Leishman MR, Westoby M (1994) The role of large seed size in shaded conditions: experimental evidence. Funct Ecol 8:205–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Liu Z, Yan Q, Li X, Ma J, Ling X (2007) Seed mass and shape, germination and plant abundance in a desertified grassland in northeastern Inner Mongolia, China. J Arid Environ 69:198–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Manga VK, Sen DN (1995) Influence of seed traits on germination in Prosopis cineraria (L.) MacBride. J Arid Environ 31:371–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Moles AT, Westoby M (2006) Seed size and plant strategy across the whole life cycle. Oikos 113:91–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Moles AT, Hodson DW, Webb CJ (2000) Seed size and shape and persistence in the soil in the New Zealand flora. Okios 89:541–545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Moles AT, Ackerly DD, Webb CO, Tweddle JC, Dickie JB, Westoby M (2005) A brief history of seed size. Science 307:576–580PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Muller-Landau HC (2010) The tolerance-fecundity trade-off and the maintenance of diversity in seed size. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:4242–4247PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Nepstad DC, Uhl C, Pereira CA, Cardosa da Silva JM (1996) A comparative study of tree establishment in abandoned pasture and mature forest of eastern Amazonia. Oikos 76:25–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Parrotta JA, Knowles OH (1999) Restoration of tropical moist forests on bauxite-mined lands in the Brazilian Amazon. Restor Ecol 7:103–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. R Development Core Team (2010) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, AustriaGoogle Scholar
  46. Sautu A, Baskin JM, Baskin CC, Condit R (2006) Studies on the seed biology of 100 native species of trees in a seasonal moist tropical forest, Panama, Central America. For Ecol Manag 234:245–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Saverimuttu T, Westoby M (1996) Seedling longevity under deep shade in relation to seed size. J Ecol 84:681–689CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Schmidt L (2007) Seed testing. In: Czeschlik D (ed) Tropical forest seeds. Springer, Heidelberg, p 409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Shah S, Tewari A, Tewari B, Singh RP (2010) Seed maturity indicators in Myrica esculenta, Buch-Ham. Ex. D.Don.: a multipurpose tree species of subtropical-temperate Himalayan region. New Forests 40:9–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Shankar U (2006) Seed size as a predictor of germination success and early seedling growth in ‘hollong’ (Dipterocarpus macrocarpus Vesque). New Forests 31:305–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sun D, Dickinson GR, Bragg AL (1995) Direct seeding of Alphitonia petriei (Rhamnaceae) for gully revegetation in tropical northern Australia. For Ecol Manag 73:249–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Tewari B, Tewari A, Shah S, Pande N, Singh RP (2011) Physical attributes as indicator of seed maturity and germination enhancement in Himalayan Wild Cherry (Prunus cerasoides D. Don.). New Forests 41:139–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Thompson K, Band SR, Hodgson JG (1993) Seed size and shape predict persistent in soil. Funct Ecol 7:236–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Tunjai P (2005) Appropriate tree species and techniques for direct seeding for forest restoration in Chiang Mai and Lamphun provinces. Master of Science. Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, p 107Google Scholar
  55. Tunjai P (2011) Direct seeding for restoring tropical lowland forest ecosystems in southern Thailand. Doctor of Philosophy. Walailak University, Nakhon Si Thammarat, p 216Google Scholar
  56. Turnbull LA, Rees M, Crawley MJ (1999) Seed mass and the competition/colonization trade-off: a sowing experiment. J Ecol 87:899–912CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Van Ulft LH (2004) The effect of seed mass and gap size on seed fate of tropical rain forest tree species in Guyana. Plant Biol 6:214–221PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Woods K, Elliott S (2004) Direct seeding for forest restoration on abandoned agricultural land in Northern Thailand. J Trop For Sci 16(2):248–259Google Scholar
  59. Yu S, Sternberg M, Kutiel P, Chen H (2007) Seed mass, shape, and persistence in the soil seed bank of Israeli coastal sand dune flora. Evol Ecol Res 9:325–340Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Ecology and Biodiversity Program, School of ScienceWalailak UniversityNakhon Si ThammaratThailand
  2. 2.Forest Restoration Research Unit, Department of Biology, Faculty of ScienceChiang Mai UniversityChiang MaiThailand

Personalised recommendations