New Forests

, Volume 42, Issue 3, pp 347–362 | Cite as

Nitrogen forms affect root structure and water uptake in the hybrid poplar

  • Susy Domenicano
  • Lluís Coll
  • Christian Messier
  • Frank Berninger


The study analyses the effects of two different forms of nitrogen fertilisation (nitrate and ammonium) on root structure and water uptake of two hybrid poplar (Populus maximowiczii x P. balsamifera) clones in a field experiment. Water uptake was studied using sap flow gauges on individual proximal roots and coarse root structure was examined by excavating 18 whole-root systems. Finer roots were scanned and analyzed for architecture. Nitrogen forms did not affect coarse-root system development, but had a significant effect on fine-root development. Nitrate-treated trees presented higher fine:coarse root ratios and higher specific root lengths than control or ammonium treated trees. These allocation differences affected the water uptake capacity of the plants as reflected by the higher sapflow rate in the nitrate treatment. The diameter of proximal roots at the tree base predicted well the total root biomass and length. The diameter of smaller lateral roots also predicted the lateral root mass, length, surface area and the number of tips. The effect of nitrogen fertilisation on the fine root structure translated into an effect on the functioning of the fine roots forming a link between form (architecture) and function (water uptake).


Nitrogen fertilisation Hybrid poplars Root structure Fine roots Proximal roots Water uptake Sapflow 



This project was made possible through several funding sources: a Collaborative Research and Development NSERC grant for a project titled: Soil fertility and productivity of poplar plantations in southern Quebec (awarded to Dr. James Fyles of McGill and co-researchers including Dr. Christian Messier), a Canada Research Chair in Forest Productivity (awarded to Dr. Frank Berninger), an internal UQÀM subsidy (PARFAC awarded to Dr. Frank Berninger) and a FARE bursary awarded to Susy Domenicano (UQÀM). LC was supported by a Ramon y Cajal contract (RYC-2009-04985) from the Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación of Spain. We would like to thank the reviewers for their invaluable comments and suggestions, as well as Stéphane Daigle for his statistical advice.


  1. Albaugh TJ, Allen HL, Kress LW (2006) Root and stem partitioning of Pinus taeda. Trees-Struct Funct 20:176–185Google Scholar
  2. Armengaud P, Breitling R, Amtmann A (2004) The potassium-dependent transcriptome of Arabidopsis reveals a prominent role of jasmonic acid in nutrient signalling. Plant Physiol 136:2556–2576PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bauer GA, Berntson GM (2001) Ammonium and nitrate acquisition by plants in response to elevated CO2 concentration: the roles of root physiology and architecture. Tree Physiol 21:137–144PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Block RMA, Rees KCJ, Knight JD (2006) A review of fine root dynamics in Populus plantations. Agrofor Syst 67:73–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Clemensson-Lindell A, Persson H (1995) Fine-root vitality in a Norway spruce stand subjected to various nutrient supplies. Plant Soil 1:167–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Coleman MD, Friend AL, Kern CC (2004) Carbon allocation and nitrogen acquisition in a developing Populus deltoides plantation. Tree Physiol 24:1347–1357PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Coll L, Potvin C, Messier C, Delagrange S (2008) Root architecture and allocation patterns of eight native tropical species with different successional status used in open-grown mixed plantations in Panama. Trees 22:585–596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Coners H, Leuscher C (2002) In situ water absorption by tree fine roots measured in real time using miniature sap-flow gauges. Funct Ecol 16:696–703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cooke JEK, Martin TA, Davis JM (2005) Short-term physiological and developmental responses to nitrogen availability in hybrid poplar. New Phytol 1:41–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Delagrange S, Messier C, Lechowicz MJ, Dizengremel P (2004) Physiological, morphological and allocational plasticity in understory deciduous juvenile trees: the additional importance of individual size. Tree Physiol 24:775–784PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Dickmann DI, Isebrands JG, Blake TJ, Kosola K, Kort J (2001) Physiological ecology of poplars. In: Dickmann DI (ed) Poplar culture in North America. NRC Research Press, Ottawa, pp 77–118Google Scholar
  12. Eissenstat DM (1991) On the relationship between specific root length and the rate of root proliferation: a field study using citrus rootstocks. New Phytol 118:63–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Eissenstat DM (1992) Costs and benefits of constructing roots of small diameter. J Plant Nutr 15:763–782CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ericsson T (1995) Growth and shoot—root ratio of seedlings in relation to nutrient availability. Plant Soil 169:205–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fitter AH (1986) The topology and geometry of plant-root systems—influence of watering rate on root-system topology in Trifolium pratense. Ann Bot-Lond 58:91–101Google Scholar
  16. Fitter AH (2002) Characteristics and functions of root systems. In: Waisel Y, Eshel A, Uzi Kafkafi U (eds) Plant roots: the hidden half, 3rd edn. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, pp 15–32Google Scholar
  17. Fujimaki R, Tateno R, Hirobe M, Tokuchi N, Takeda H (2004) Fine root mass in relation to soil N supply in a cool temperate forest. Eco Res 19:559–562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Glynn C, Herms DA, Egawa M, Hansen R, Mattson WJ (2003) Effects of nutrient availability on biomass allocation as well as constitutive and rapid induced herbivore resistance in poplar. Oikos 101:385–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Guo D, Mitchell R, Hendricks J (2004) Fine root branch orders respond differentially to carbon source-sink manipulations in a longleaf pine forest. Oecologia 140:450–457PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Harvey HP, van den Driessche R (1997) Nutrition, xylem cavitation and drought resistance in hybrid poplar. Tree Physiol 17:647–654PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Harvey HP, van den Driessche R (1999) Nitrogen and potassium effects on xylem cavitation and water-use efficiency in poplars. Tree Physiol 19:943–950PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Hodge A (2004) The plastic plant: root responses to heterogeneous supplies of nutrients. New Phytol 162(1):9–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Huang B, Eissenstat DM (2000) Linking hydraulic conductivity to anatomy in plants that vary in specific root length. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 125:260–264Google Scholar
  24. Karacic A, Weih M (2006) Variation in growth and resource utilisation among eight poplar clones grown under different irrigation and fertilisation regimes in Sweden. Biomass Bioenergy 30:115–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kern CC, Friend AL, Johnson JMF, Coleman MD (2004) Fine root dynamics in a developing Populus deltoides plantation. Tree Physiol 24:651–660PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. King JS, Pregitzer KS, Zak DR (1999) Clonal variation in above- and below-ground growth responses of Populus tremuloides Michaux: influence of soil warming and nutrient availability. Plant Soil 217:119–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. King JS, Albaugh TJ, Allen HL, Buford M, Strain BR, Dougherty P (2002) Below-ground carbon input to soil is controlled by nutrient availability and fine root dynamics in loblolly pine. New Phytol 154:389–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lopez-Bucio J, Cruz-Ramirez A, Herrera-Estrella L (2003) The role of nutrient availability in regulating root architecture. Curr Opin Plant Biol 6:280–287PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lynch J (1995) Root architecture and plant productivity. Plant Physiol 109:7–13PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Min X, Siddiqi MY, Guy RD, Glass ADM, Kronzucker HJ (1999) A comparative study of fluxes and compartmentation of nitrate and ammonium in early-successional tree species. Plant Cell Environ 22:821–830CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ozier-Lafontaine H, Lecompte F, Sillon JF (1999) Fractal analysis of the root architecture of Gliricidia sepium for the spatial prediction of root branching, size and mass: model development and evaluation in agroforestry. Plant Soil 209:167–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Parkinson JA, Allen SE (1975) A wet oxidation procedure suitable for the determination of nitrogen and mineral nutrients in biological material. Comm Soil Sci Plant Anal 6:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Poorter H, Nagel O (2000) The role of biomass allocation in the growth response of plants to different levels of light, CO2, nutrients and water: a quantitative review. Aust J Plant Physiol 27:1191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pregitzer KS, Dickmann DI, Hendrick R, Nguyen PV (1990) Whole-tree carbon and nitrogen partitioning in young hybrid poplars. Tree Physiol 7:79–93PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Pregitzer KS, Zak DR, Maziasz J, Deforest J, Curtis PS, Lussenhop J (2000) Interactive effects of atmospheric CO2 and soil-N availability on fine roots of Populus tremuloides. Ecol Appl 10:18–33Google Scholar
  36. Pregitzer KS, Deforest JL, Burton AJ, Allen MF, Ruess RW, Hendrick RL (2002) Fine root architecture of nine North American trees. Ecol Monogr 72:293–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ripullone F, Lauteri M, Grassi G, Amato M, Borghetti M (2004) Variation in nitrogen supply changes water-use efficiency of Pseudotsuga menziesii and Populus × euroamericana; a comparison of three approaches to determine water-use efficiency. Tree Physiol 24:671–679PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Rose DA (1983) The description of the growth of root systems. Plant Soil 75:405–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sakuratani T (1981) A heat balance method for measuring water flux in the stem of intact plants. J Agr Met 37:9–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Salas E, Ozier-Lafontaine H, Nygren P (2004) A fractal root model applied for estimating the root biomass and architecture in two tropical legume tree species. Ann For Sci 61:337–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Van den Driesche R, Rieche K (1974) Prediction of mineral nutrient status of trees by foliar analysis. Bot Rev 40:347–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. van Noordwijk M, Spek LY, Dewilligen P (1994) Proximal root diameter as predictor of total root size for fractal branching models. 1. Theory. Plant Soil 164:107–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. West GB, Brown JH, Enquist BJ (1999) A general model for the structure and allometry of plant vascular systems. Nature 400:664–667CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Woolfolk WTM, Friend AL (2003) Growth response of cottonwood roots to varied NH4:NO3 ratios in enriched patches. Tree Physiol 23:427–432PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Susy Domenicano
    • 1
  • Lluís Coll
    • 1
    • 2
  • Christian Messier
    • 1
  • Frank Berninger
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Département des Sciences BiologiquesUniversité du Québec à MontréalMontréalCanada
  2. 2.Centre Tecnològic Forestal de Catalunya (CTFC)SolsonaSpain
  3. 3.Department of Forest Sciences, PL27University of HelsinkiHelsinkiFinland

Personalised recommendations