Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Financial breakeven point for competition control in longleaf pine (Pinus palustris Mill.) reestablishment

  • Published:
New Forests Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Reestablishment of longleaf pine (Pinus palustris Mill.) in the American South is a priority of conservation groups. Its original Pre-European natural range of 38 million ha has been reduced by 95% and it is one of the most endangered ecosystems in the US. The species undergoes a grass stage where no stem development takes place that can last 7 years or longer. Competition control can limit this grass stage and increase economic returns. The amount of competition control cost that equals the cost of the grass stage delay would be the most one would want to expend in reducing the grass stage delay. This breakeven amount can be determined using land expectation value methodology and a simple calculation technique is presented. A case study shows that each additional year of a grass stage delay decreases the bare land value of a longleaf pine stand by about 6% annually. A longleaf pine stand with no grass stage delay worth $2,500 per ha would be worth $1,768 per ha with a 5-year grass stage delay. One could spend up to $478 per ha to eliminate this 5-year grass stage delay and still break-even.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alavalapati JRR, Stainback GA, Carter DR (2002) Restoration of the longleaf pine ecosystem on private lands in the US South: an ecological economic analysis. Ecol Econ 40:411–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbier EB, Burgess JC, Grainger A (2010) The forest transition: towards a more comprehensive theoretical framework. Land Use Policy 27:98–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brockway DG, Outcalt KW, Tomczak DJ, Johnson EE (2005) Restoration of longleaf pine ecosystems. General Technical Report GTR-SRS-83. USDA Forest Service, Southern Research Station, Asheville

  • Brodie JD, Tedder PL (1982) Regeneration delay: economic cost and harvest loss. J For 80:26–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullard SH, Straka TJ (1998) Basic concepts in forest valuation and investment analysis, 2nd edn. Forestry Suppliers, Jackson

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullard SH, Straka TJ, Caulfield JP (2001) Inflation and the rule-of-thumb method of adjusting the discount rate for income taxes. Can J For Res 31:52–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis KP (1966) Forest management: regulation and valuation, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Duryea ML, Dougherty PH (eds) (1991) Forest regeneration manual. Kluwer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrar RM Jr, White JB (1983) Early development of longleaf pine planted on prepared sites in the East Gulf. In: Jones EP Jr. (ed) Proceedings of the 2nd biennial southern silvicultural research conference. General Technical Report SE-24. USDA Forest Service, Southeastern Forest Experiment Station, Asheville, pp 109–117

  • Frost CC (1993) Four centuries of changing landscape patterns in the longleaf pine ecosystem. In: Herman SM (ed) Proceedings of the 18th Tall Timbers fire ecology conference. Tall Timbers Research Station, Tallahassee, pp 17–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Haywood JD (2000) Mulch and hexazinone herbicide shorten the time longleaf pine seedlings are in the grass stage and increase height growth. New For 19:279–290

    Google Scholar 

  • Haywood JD (2005) Effect of herbaceous and wood plant control on Pinus palustris growth and foliar nutrients through six growing seasons. For Ecol Manag 214:384–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haywood JD (2007) Influence of herbicides and felling, fertilization, and prescribed fire on longleaf pine establishment and growth through six growing seasons. New For 33:257–279

    Google Scholar 

  • Jose S, Jokela EJ, Miller DL (2006) The longleaf pine ecosystem: ecology, silviculture, and restoration. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilgore MA, Greene JL, Jacobson MG, Straka TJ, Daniels SE (2007) The influence of financial incentive programs in promoting sustainable forestry on the nation’s family forests. J For 105:184–191

    Google Scholar 

  • Kupčák V (2007) Analysis of some dynamic series of forest production and trends of forest economics in the Czech Republic. J For Sci 53:119–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Landers JL, Van Lear DH, Boyer WD (1995) The longleaf pine forests of the southeast: requiem or renaissance? J For 93:39–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Loveless RW, Pait JA III, McElwain T (1989) Response of longleaf pine to varying intensity of silvicultural treatments. In: Miller JH (ed) Proceedings of the 5th biennial southern silvicultural research conference. General Technical Report S0-74. USDA Forest Service, Southern Forest Experiment Station, New Orleans, pp 159–164

  • Nelson LR, Zutter BR, Gjerstad DH (1985) Planted longleaf pine seedlings respond to herbaceous weed control using herbicides. South J Appl For 9:236–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Nord JC, Ghent JH, Thomas HA, Dogget CA (1982) Control of pales and pitch-eating weevils in the South. Report SA-FR21. USDA Forest Service, Southern Region, Atlanta

  • Noss RF (1989) Longleaf pine and wiregrass: keystone components of an endangered ecosystem. Nat Area J 9:211–213

    Google Scholar 

  • Noss RF, LaRoe, ET, Scott JM (1995) Endangered ecosystems of the United States: a preliminary assessment of loss and degradation. Biological Report 28. U.S. Department of the Interior, National Biological Service, Washington

  • Repetto R (2006) Macroeconomic policies and deforestation. In: Dasqupta P, Mäler KG (eds) The environment and development issues (Vol 2). Oxford University Press, New York, pp 463–480

    Google Scholar 

  • Straka TJ, Hotvedt JE (1985) Economic aspects of the forest regeneration delay decision. South J Appl For 9:91–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Sword Sayer MA, Goelz JCG, Haywood JD (2006) Effect of prescribed fire on production of foliage by sapling longleaf pine. In: Connor, KF (ed) Proceedings of the 13th biennial southern silvicultural research conference. General Technical Report GTR-SRS-92. USDA Forest Service, Southern Research Station, Asheville, pp 478–485

  • Torrance PR, Crosby PM, Dickens ED. McElvany BC, Moorhead DJ, Irwin KM (2007) Timing, herbicide type, and dosage effect on old-field longleaf pine survival and early growth after a droughty first growing season in Emanuel county, Georgia. Georgia Forest Productivity Publication Series Publication Number 002R-07. University of Georgia, Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources, Athens

  • USDA Farm Service Agency (2006) Conservation reserve program longleaf pine initiative. USDA Farm Service Agency Fact Sheet, October 2006

  • Van Lear DH, Carroll WD, Kapelock PR, Johnson R (2005) History and restoration of the longleaf pine—grassland ecosystem: implications for species at risk. For Ecol Manag 211:150–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wahlenberg WG (1946) Longleaf pine: its use, ecology, regeneration, protection, growth, and management. Charles Pack Forestry Foundation and USDA Forest Service, Washington

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas J. Straka.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Straka, T.J. Financial breakeven point for competition control in longleaf pine (Pinus palustris Mill.) reestablishment. New Forests 40, 165–173 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-010-9191-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-010-9191-2

Keywords

Navigation