Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Performance of northern red oak enrichment plantings in naturally regenerating Southern Appalachian hardwood stands

  • Published:
New Forests Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The limited success of methods to naturally regenerate northern red oak (Quercus rubra L.) has increased the use of artificial techniques to improve overall oak composition. Enrichment plantings are often recommended as a means to supplement species composition within the existing natural reproduction. Previous enrichment efforts have often resulted in low survival and poor growth, generally due to poor planting stock quality and a lack of competition control. In this study, high quality northern red oak seedlings were established on four recently harvested sites in western North Carolina using one of four competition control treatments (untreated, year 1 control, year 2 control or a weed mat) in a 1.2 × 1.2 m area around each seedling with or without a soil fertility amendment. The 3 year results show that competition control and fertilization treatments had few positive impacts on survival and growth of the planted seedlings. These results suggest that either the treatment area was insufficient to adequately release the seedlings, or other factors like belowground competition from existing advance reproduction and/or stump sprouts may be important determinants of the overall success of northern red oak enrichment plantings on recently harvested sites.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  • Abrams MD (1990) Adaptations and responses to drought in Quercus species of North America. Tree Physiol 7:227–238

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Allen HL, Dougherty PM, Campbell RG (1990) Manipulation of water and nutrients practice and opportunity in southern U.S. pine forests. For Ecol Manage 30:437–453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Auchmoody LR (1972) Effects of fertilizer-nutrient interactions on red oak seedling growth. USDA For. Serv. Res. Pap. NE-239, 5 p

  • Beckjord PR, Melhuish JH Jr, McIntosh MS, Hacskaylo E (1983) Effects of nitrogen fertilization on growth and ectomycorrhizal formation of Quercus alba, Quercus rubra, Quercus falcata, and Quercus falcata var. pagodifolia. Can J Bot 61:2507–2514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berenguer BJ (2006) Fertilization impacts on growth and species composition in a very young naturally regenerated Piedmont upland hardwood stand in North Carolina. M.Sc. Thesis. North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, 83 p

  • Berenguer BJ, Schuler JL, Robison DJ, Gocke MH, Treasure E (2008) Response of a rising 2-year-old natural Piedmont upland stand to fertilization. New Forests 37(2):155–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brose P, Van Lear D, Cooper R (1999) Using shelterwood harvests and prescribed fire to regenerate oak stands on productive upland sites. For Ecol Manage 113(2/3):125–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckley D, Sharik TL, Isebrands JG (1998) Regeneration of northern red oak: positive and negative effects of competitor removal. Ecology 79(1):65–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canham CD, Berkowitz AR, Kelly VR, Lovett GM, Ollinger SV, Schnurr J (1996) Biomass allocation and multiple resource limitation in tree seedlings. Can J For Res 26(9):1521–1530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark SL, Schlarbaum SE, Kormanik PP (2000) Visual grading and quality of 1–0 northern red oak seedlings. South J Appl For 24(2):93–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Crow TR (1988) Reproductive mode and mechanisms for self-replacement of northern red oak (Quercus rubra)—a review. For Sci 34:19–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Della-Bianca L, Beck DE (1985) Selection management in southern Appalachian hardwoods. South J Appl For 9(3):191–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Demchik MC, Sharpe WE (1999) Survivorship and growth of natural northern red oak seedlings in response to selected treatments in an extremely acidic forest soil. In: Stringer JW, Loftis DL (eds) Proceedings of the 12th Central Hardwood Conference, Lexington, KY, USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. SRS-24, pp 98–102

  • Dey DC, Parker WC (1997) Overstory density affects field performance of underplanted red oak (Quercus rubra L.) in Ontario. North J Appl For 14(3):120–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Dey DC, Jacobs D, McNabb K, Miller G, Baldwin V, Foster G (2008) Artificial regeneration of major oak (Quercus) species in the eastern United States—A review of the literature. For Sci 54(1):77–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickson RE, Tomlinson PT (1996) Oak growth, development and carbon metabolism in response to water stress. Ann Sci For 53:181–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fajvan MA, Grushecky ST, Hassler CC (1998) The effects of harvesting practices on West Virginia’s wood supply. J For 96(5):33–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster AA, Farmer RE Jr (1970) Juvenile growth of planted northern red oak: effects of fertilization and size of planting stock. Tree Plant Notes 21(1):4–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon AM, Simpson JA, Williams PA (1995) Six-year response of red oak seedlings planted under a shelterwood in central Ontario. Can J For Res 25:603–613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gottschalk KW (1985) Effects of shading on growth and development of northern red oak, black oak, black cherry, and red maple seedlings. I. Height, diameter, and root/shoot ratio. In: Proceedings of 5th Central Hardwood For. Conf., Soc. Amer. For. Publ. 85-05. Soc. Amer. For., Bethesda, MD, pp 189–195

  • Graney DL, Rogerson TL (1985) Development of oak, ash and cherry reproduction following thinning and fertilization of upland hardwood stands in the Boston Mountains of Arkansas. In: Dawson JO, Majerus KJ (eds) Proceedings of the fifth Central Hardwood Forest Conf., Urbana-Champaign, IL, USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. SO-54, pp 171–177

  • Guo Y, Lockhart BR, Ku T (1998) Effect of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilization on growth in a sweetgum plantation in southeastern Arkansas. South J Appl For 22(3):163–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Holt HA, Fischer BC (1979) Regenerating oaks in upland hardwoods. Proceedings of 1979 John Wright Forestry Conf., Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 132 p

  • Jacobs DF, Salifu KF, Seifert JR (2005) Growth and nutritional response of hardwood seedlings to controlled-release fertilization at outplanting. For Ecol Manage 214:28–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson PS (1980) Response to fertilization of five oak species eight years after planting. Tree Plant Notes 31(1):9–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson PM (1984) Responses of planted northern red oak to three overstory treatments. Can J For Res 14:536–542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson PS, Shifley SR, Rogers R (2002) The ecology and silviculture of oaks. CABI Pub, Cambridge 503 pp

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy HE Jr (1984) Hardwood growth and foliar nutrient concentrations best in clean cultivation treatments. Forest Ecol Manage 8(2):117–126

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkham KB (1988) Even-age management practices for regenerating Appalachian hardwood stands. In: Smith HC, Perkey AW, Kidd WE Jr (eds) Workshop Proceedings: guidelines for regenerating Appalachian hardwood stands. SAF Publication 88–03, Morgantown, pp 124–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Korstian CF, Coile TS (1938) Plant competition in forest stands. Duke University School of Forestry Bulletin 3, Durham, NC, 123 p

  • Loftis DL (1979) Northern red oak performs poorly in North Carolina planting artificial regeneration. USDA For. Serv. Res. Note SE-277, 3 p

  • Loftis DL (1983) Regenerating southern Appalachian mixed hardwood stands with the shelterwood method. South J Appl For 7(4):212–217

    Google Scholar 

  • Loftis DL (1990) A shelterwood method for regenerating red oak in the southern Appalachians. For Sci 36(4):917–929

    Google Scholar 

  • Loftis D, McGee CE (eds) (1993) Oak regeneration: serious problems, practical recommendations. USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. SE-84, p 319

  • Martin JP (1981) Mechanical weed control in southern forests. In: Holt HA, Fischer BC (eds) Weed control in forest management. Purdue University, West Lafayette, pp 102–107

    Google Scholar 

  • McGee CE, Loftis DL (1986) Planted oaks perform poorly in North Carolina and Tennessee. North J Appl For 3(3):114–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson EA (1985) Weed control and fertilization aid sweetgum plantation establishment. In: Dawson JO, Majerus KA (eds) Fifth central hardwood forest conference. Urbana-Champaign, IL, pp 68–70

  • Newton LP, Robison DJ, Hansen G, Allen HL (2002) Fertilization and thinning in a 7 year-old hardwood stand in eastern North Carolina. In: Outcalt KW (ed) Proceedings of the Eleventh Biennial Southern Silvicultural Research Conference, Knoxville, TN, USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep., SRS-48, pp 193–195

  • Opperman JJ, Merenlender AM (2000) Deer herbivory as an ecological constraint to restoration of degraded riparian corridors. Restor Ecol 8:41–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oswalt CM, Clatterbuck WK, Houston AE (2006) Impacts of deer herbivory and visual grading on the early performance of high-quality oak planting stock in Tennessee, USA. For Ecol Mange 229:128–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pubanz DM, Lorimer CG (1992) Oak regeneration experiments in southwestern Wisconsin: two year results. Res. Pap. R3552. School of Natural Resources, University of Wisconsin, Madison

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn GP, Keough MJ (2002) Experimental design and data analysis for biologists. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Robison DJ, Schuler JL, Jervis L, Cox J, Birks PJ (2004) Individual tree release and enrichment planting in young natural upland hardwoods. In: Conner K (ed) Proc. Twelfth biennial southern silvicultural research conference, Biloxi, pp 283–286

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidtling RC (2001) Southern pine seed sources. USDA, Forest Service, Southern Research Sta. Gen. Tech. Rep. SRS-44

  • Schuler JL, Robison DJ (2006) Stand development and growth responses of 1- and 3-year-old natural upland hardwoods to silvicultural treatments. For Ecol Manage 232:124–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuler JL, Robison DJ, Quicke HE (2004) Assessing the use of chopper herbicide for establishing hardwood plantations on a cutover site. South J Appl For 28:163–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Toumey JW, Kienholz AR (1931) Trenched plots under forest canopies. Yale University, Bull. No. 30, New Haven, CT. 31 p

  • Weigel DR, Johnson PS (2000) Planting red oak under oak/yellow-poplar shelterwoods: a provisional prescription. USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. NC-210. 16 p

  • Wendel GW (1980) Growth and survival of planted northern red oak seedlings in West Virginia. South J Appl For 4(1):49–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson AD, Shure DJ (1993) Plant competition and nutrient limitation during early succession in the Southern Appalachian Mountains. Amer Mid Nat 129(1):1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wishard RJ, Lockhart BR, Hodges JD (1999) Underplanting oaks in riverfront hardwood stands along the Mississippi river: successes and failures. In: Haywood JD (ed) Proceedings of the tenth biennial southern silvicultural research conference. USDA For. Serv. GTR SRS-30, pp 176–179

  • Zaczek JJ, Steiner KC, Bowersox TW (1996) Northern red oak planting stock: 6-year results. New For 13:175–189

    Google Scholar 

  • Zar JH (2010) Biostatistical analysis, 5th edn. Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, 944 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Zutter BR, Nelson LR, Minogue PJ, Gjerstad DH (1987) Hardwood plantation growth following weed control using herbicides and cultivation. South J Appl For 11(3):134–138

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Matthew Gocke, Emrys Treasure and BJ Berenguer of NC State University, and John Blanton of the US Forest Service, for their assistance throughout this project. We also acknowledge the generous support provided by Leo Brevard and Clifford Farthing who made available their properties for this study, and the US Forest Service for providing access to sites on the Pisgah National Forest. We also acknowledge the statistical assistance provided by Edward Gbur. Funding for this project was provided by USDA CSREES, and the NC State Hardwood Research Cooperative.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jamie L. Schuler.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schuler, J.L., Robison, D.J. Performance of northern red oak enrichment plantings in naturally regenerating Southern Appalachian hardwood stands. New Forests 40, 119–130 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-009-9187-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-009-9187-y

Keywords