Skip to main content
Log in

Genetic parameter estimates for growth and form traits in common ash (Fraxinus excelsior, L.) in a breeding seedling orchard at Little Wittenham in England

  • Published:
New Forests Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Data from a trial of 36 families at Little Wittenham, North Oxford was used to assess growth traits and stem form in common ash (Fraxinus excelsior, L.). The trial followed a design described by Barnes (Silv Genet 44(2–3):81–88, 1995) as the Breeding Seedling Orchard (BSO). The objectives of the study were to determine variation in growth and form traits and estimate genetic parameters of families. Assessments conducted at 3–8 years for height, diameter at breast height (dbh), straightness and forking showed significant differences (P < 0.05) among families with Guys (19), Settrington (34), Overbury (23) and Grimthorpe (36) being the best performers while Coleford (3 and 5) Gwynedd (27) and Bacheiddon (32) were the least performers. At the overall level, the additive genetic coefficient of variation (CVA) ranged between 10.2 and 12.7% for height and 1.5 and 2.1% for dbh. Height had a high genetic correlation (rg = 0.85) with dbh whilst forking had low correlation (rg = 0.25) with height. Estimates of heritability decreased with age from \( {\text{h}}^{2}_{{\text{i}}}\) = 0.62 at 3 years to \( {\text{h}}^{2}_{{\text{i}}}\) = 0.30 at 8 years for height while values for dbh decreased from \( {\text{h}}^{2}_{{\text{i}}}\) = 0.48 at 4 years to \( {\text{h}}^{2}_{{\text{i}}}\) = 0.27 at 8 years. Some genetic gains are possible despite the low genetic variation among families; height had the greatest potential of genetic gain (12.5% at 8 years). Results suggest that early selection of superior families of Fraxinus excelsior appears to be feasible and it could be possible to achieve simultaneous improvement in both growth and form.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  • Baliuckas V, Ekberg I, Eriksson G, Norell L (1999) Genetic variation among and within populations of four Swedish hardwood species assessed in a nursery trial. Silv Genet 48:17–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Baliuckas V, Lagerström T, Eriksson G (2000) Within and among population variation in juvenile growth rhythm and growth in Fraxinus excelsior and Prunus avium. For Genet 7(3):183–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Baliuckas V, Lagerström T, Norell L, Eriksson G (2004) Genetic variation among and within populations in Swedish species of Sorbus aucuparia L. and Prunus padus L. assessed in a nursery trial. Silv Genet 54:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes RD (1995) The breeding seedling orchard in the multiple population breeding strategy. Silv Genet 44(2–3):81–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett RL, Mullin LJ (1968) A method of assessing stem straightness in tropical pines. Rhodesian Bul For Res No. 4. Rhodesian Forestry Commission

  • Becker WA (1984) Manual of quantitative genetics, 4th edn. Academic Enterprises, Pullman, Washington, 62 pp

  • Bressnan DF, Geyer WA, Rink G (1996) Variation among green ash of differing geographic origins outplanted in Kansas. J Arbor 22:113–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Cahalan CM, Plowman MR, Baker CA, Cundall EP (1995) Genetic improvement of broadleaves for farm forestry. Final report, Forestry Commission/MAFF contracts CSA 1449 and 1450

  • Cotterill PP, Zed PG (1980) Estimates of genetic parameters for growth and form traits in four Pinus radiata D. Don Progeny tests in South Australia. Aus For 10:155–167

    Google Scholar 

  • Cundall EP, Cahalan CM, Connolly T (2003) Early results of ash (Fraxinus excelsior, L.) families trials at sites in England and Wales. Forestry 76(4):385–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dean CA, Cotterill PP, Eisemann RL (1986) Genetic parameters and gains expected from selection in Pinus caribaeae var.hondurensis in Northern Queensland, Australia. Silv Genet 35:29–236

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas G (2002) Improving Fraxinus excelsior productivity for European needs by testing, propagation and promotion of improved genetic resources. In: Bozzano M, Rusanene M, Rotach P, Koskela J (eds) Reports of the sixth framework network on noble hardwoods. Alta do Chäo, Portugal, 31 pp

  • Fady B, Ducii F, Aleta N, Becquey J, Diaz Vasquez R, Fernandez Lopez F, Jay-Alemand C, Levevre F, Ninot A, Panetsos K, Paris P, Pisanelli A, Rumpf H (2003). Walnut demonstrates strong genetic variability for adaptive and wood quality traits in a network of juvenile field tests across Europe. New Forests 25:211–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foggo A (1996) Long and short term changes in plant growth following simulated herbivory: adaptive responses to damage? Ecol Entomol 21:198–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FRAXIGEN (2005) Ash species in Europe: biological characteristics and practical guidelines for sustainable use. Oxford Forestry Institute, University of Oxford, UK, 128 pp

  • Heuertz M, Hausman JF, Hardy O, Vendramin GG, Fracscaria-Lacoste N, Vekemans X (2004) Nuclear microsatellites reveal contrasting patterns of genetic structure between western and south eastern European populations of the common ash (Fraxinus excelsior L). Evolution 58:976–988

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Houle D (1992) Comparing evolvability and variability of quantitative traits. Genetics 130:195–204

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kerr G (1995) Silviculture of ash in southern England. Forestry 68(1):63–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerr G (2003) Effects of spacing on the early growth of planted Fraxinus excelsior L. Can J For Res 33:1196–1207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerr G, Boswell RC (2001) The influence of spring frosts, ash bud moth and site factors on young ash (Fraxinus excelsior) in Southern Britain. Forestry 74(1):29–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambeth CC (1980) Juvenile-mature correlations in Pinaceae and implications for early selection. For Sci 26(4):571–580

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopez GA, Potts BM, Vaillancourt RE, Apiolaza LA (2003) Maternal carryover effects on early growth of Eucalyptus globulus. Can J For Res 33:2108–2115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malcom DC, Worrell R (2001). Potential for the improvement of Silver birch (Betula pendula Roth) in Scotland. Forestry 74(5):439–453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marinov I (1990) Heritability of diameter growth in seedling progeny of Fraxinus excelsior. Nauka za Gorata 27(1):9–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Matheson AC, Raymond CA (1984) Effects of thinning in progeny tests on estimates of genetic parameters in Pinus radiata. Silv Genet 33:124–128

    Google Scholar 

  • MINITAB (2000) Release 13, Minitab Inc., 3081 Enterprise Drive, State College, USA

  • Morand ME, Brachet S, Rossignol P, Dufour J, Franscaria-Lacoste N (2002) A generalised heterozygote deficiency assessed with microsatellite in French common ash populations. Mol Ecol 11:377–385

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Namkoong G, Barnes RD, Burley J (1980). A philosophy of breeding strategy for tropical forest trees. Tropical Forestry Paper No. 16. Commonwealth Forestry Institute, Oxford, 67 pp

  • Savill PS, Spencer R, Roberts JE, Hubert JD (1999) Sixth year results from four ash breeding seedling orchards. Silv Genet 48(2):92–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle SR, Casella G, McCulloch CE (1992). Variance components. Wiley, New York, 501 pp

  • Volker PW, Dean CA, Tibbits WN (1990) Genetic parameters and gains expected from selection in Eucalyptus globulus Labill in Tasmania. Silv Genet 39:18–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Worrell R (1992) A comparison between European and British provenances of some British native trees: growth, survival and stem form. Forestry 65:253–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zobel BJ (1981) Forest Tree Improvement. Past and present. In: Khosla PK (ed) Advances in forest genetics. Ambika Publications, New Delhi, pp 11–22

  • Zobel B, Talbert J (1984) Applied forest tree improvement. Wiley, New York, USA, 505 pp

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Forestry Research Manager and owners of the Northmoor Trust for the establishment and maintenance of the trial sites and facilitating collection of data. We thank Dr E. P. Cundall for providing the scheme for assessment of forking used in this paper. We also thank the anonymous reviewers and An Associate Editor for their valuable suggestions and contributions in improving the manuscript. The Royal Norwegian Embassy in Lilongwe, Malawi through its NORAD assistance to Bunda College is acknowledged for providing financial support to enable Weston Mwase conduct this research work as part of his MSc thesis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Weston F. Mwase.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mwase, W.F., Savill, P.S. & Hemery, G. Genetic parameter estimates for growth and form traits in common ash (Fraxinus excelsior, L.) in a breeding seedling orchard at Little Wittenham in England. New Forests 36, 225–238 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-008-9095-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-008-9095-6

Keywords