Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Community Forest Management in Thailand: Current Situation and Dynamics in the Context of Sustainable Development

  • Published:
New Forests Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Community forest management (CFM) has received increasing worldwide attention from governments, researchers and educational institutions over the past two decades. Many governments, especially in developing countries, have prioritized CFM over traditional forest management systems. In Thailand, CFM is not recognized by the legal system; however, there are de facto CFM practices under common property resource regimes. CFM has in essence been practiced here for hundreds of years by local people, and represents an important aspect of Thai culture. This study aims at evaluating CFM in Thailand in the context of sustainable development. To meet the objective, the study gathered information through focus group discussions with various stakeholders: academics, Forest Department staff, and members of the Chang Tok Tay community forests. From the study, it emerged that forest resources are critical for the livelihoods and survival of rural people, and so they have protected forests to ensure sustainable livelihoods. This study identified that prospects for sustainable CFM in Thailand are bright because: (i) community members are highly motivated and are sufficiently interested to protect trees because they are well aware that their livelihoods are under threat from depleting forests; (ii) tradition and culture of rural people support their relation with nature; (iii) non-timber forest products (NTFPs) play a crucial role in local livelihoods for subsistence and necessitate protection of the forest watershed, which is vital to support their occupations; (iv) spiritual rituals such as those where Buddhist monks bind yellow cloth on trees play a vital role in protecting trees, something rare in other countries. The study further identified various hindrances to achieve sustainable CFM: (i) legal support for CFM is absent; (ii) the Royal Forest Department (RFD) cannot transfer appropriate technology to community people due to lack of legal support; (iii) scope for developing effective strategies for sustainable CFM by combining traditional knowledge with existing scientific knowledge is limited; (iv) a formal institutional arrangement for CFM does not exist; and (v) community members’ access to the hard technology of CFM is limited. Therefore, in addition to legalizing CFM, a formal institutional framework for elaboration, implementation and control of CFM is essential to achieve sustainable CFM in Thailand.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • A. Agrawal C. Gibson (1999) ArticleTitleEnchantment and disenchantment: the role of community in natural resource conservation World Develop 27 IssueID4 629–649

    Google Scholar 

  • Anan G. 1999. Will the community forest law strengthen management of community forests?. In: Northern Development Foundation ed., 3 Decades of Community Forestry: in the Midst of Confusion of Thai Society. Northern Development Foundation, Chiang Mai, Thailand, pp. 35–57.

  • Apinyaa T. 2001. Summary of the important content from the 6 case studies. In: Princess Maha Ckhakri Sirindhorn Anthropology Center, (ed.), The Cultural Dimension in the Era of the Sufficient Economy (in Thai). Princess Maha Ckhakri Sirindhorn Anthropology Center, pp. 19–70.

  • J.E.M. Arnold (1998) Managing Forests as Common Property FAO Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • J.M. Baland J.P. Platteau (1996) Halting Degradation of Natural Resources: Is there a Role for Rural Communities? Clarendon Press for the Food and Agriculture Organization Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Bangkok Post 2002. Kultida Samabuddhi. Academic slams senators over ban. http://www.bangkokpost.co/News 29 Mar 2002_news21.html..

  • T.M. Beckley (1998) ArticleTitleMoving toward consensus-based forest management: a comparison of industrial, co-managedcommunity and small private forests in Canada Forest. Chronicle 74 736–744

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Borrini-Feyerabend (1996) Collaborative Management of Protected Natural Areas: Tailoring the Approach to the Context IUCN Gland Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • L.M. Campbell A. Vainio-Mattila (2003) ArticleTitleParticipatory development and community-based conservation: opportunities missed for lessons learned? Human Ecol 31 IssueID3 417–437

    Google Scholar 

  • R.M. Clugston T.J. Rogers (1995) ArticleTitleSustainable livelihoods in North America Development 3 60–63

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Conroy A. Mishra A. Rai (2002) ArticleTitleLearning from self-initiated community forest management in OrissaIndia Forest Policy Econom 4 227–237

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniel R. 2002. Thailand: Senate blocks draft community forest bill. World Rainforest Movement’s bulletin No. 57.

  • G.J.S. Dei (1992) ArticleTitleA forest beyond the trees: tree cutting in rural Ghana Human Ecol 20 IssueID1 57–88

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Douglass (1992) ArticleTitleThe political economy of urban poverty and environmental management in Asia: access, empowerment and community based alternatives Environ. Urbanization 4 IssueID2 9–32

    Google Scholar 

  • InstitutionalAuthorNameFAO (1978) Forestry for local community development FAO Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • A.O. Faulkner M. Albertson (1986) ArticleTitleTandem use of hard and soft technology: an evolving model for third world village development Int. J. Appl. Eng. Education 2 IssueID2 15–25

    Google Scholar 

  • F.P. Fellizar SuffixJr. K. Oya (1994) ArticleTitleAchieving sustainable development through community-based resource management Regional Develop. Dialogue 15 IssueID1 201–217

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Freeman M.K. Lowdermilk (1991) Middle level farmer organizations as links between farms and central irrigation systems M.C. Michael (Eds) Putting People First: Sociological Variables in Rural Development EditionNumber2 Published for the World Bank, Oxford University Press NY

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Ganjanapan (1996) A comparative study of scientific concepts in land and forest classification Northern Thailand P. Hirsch (Eds) Seeing Forests for Trees: Environment and Environmentalism in Thailand Trasvin Publications Limited Partnership Thailand 247–267

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Ghai (1993) ArticleTitleConservation, livelihood and democracy: social dynamics of environmental change in Africa Osterreichische Zeitschrift fur Soziologie 18 56–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Grifffin D.M. 1990. Forestry’s widening role in resource and environmental management the challenge to forestry education. Key note address. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Forestry Education, Vol. 1. University of Tuscia, Viterbo.

  • K. Hardwick J.R. Healey S. Elliott D. Blakesley (2004) ArticleTitleResearch needs for restoring seasonal tropical forests in Thailand: accelerated natural regeneration’ New Forest 27 285–302 Occurrence Handle10.1023/B:NEFO.0000022228.08887.d2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch P. 1997. Community forestry revised: messages from the periphery. In: Victor M., Lang C. and Bornemeier J. (eds), Community Forestry at a Crossroads: Reflections, and Future Directions n the Development of Community Forestry. Proceedings of an International Seminar held in Bangkok, Thailand, 17–19 July 1997, RECOFTC Report No. 16, pp. 9–18.

  • P. Hirsch (1990) ArticleTitleForests, forest reserveand forest land in Thailand Geograph. J 156 166–174

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Johnson T. Forsyth (2002) ArticleTitleIn the eyes of the state: negotiating a “Right-Based Approach” to forest conservation in Thailand World Develop 30 IssueID9 1591–1605

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Kant J.C. Nautiyal (1994) ArticleTitleSustainable joint forest management through bargaining: a bilateral monopoly gaming approach Forest Ecol. Manage 65 251–264

    Google Scholar 

  • M.K. Karjala E.E. Sherry S.M. Dewhurst (2004) ArticleTitleCriteria and indicators for sustainable forest planning: a framework for recording Aboriginal resource and social values Forest Policy Econom 6 95–110

    Google Scholar 

  • S.R. Kellert J.N. Mehta S.A. Ebbin L.L. Lichtenfeld (2000) ArticleTitleCommunity natural resource management: promiserhetoric, and reality Society Nat. Resour 13 705–713

    Google Scholar 

  • Y.B. Malla (1997) ArticleTitleSustainable use of communal forests in Nepal J. World Forest Resour. Manage 8 51–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Maneekul R., Traynor C.H., Jintana V. and Wichawutipong J. 2002. The community forest establishment process: a case study of Tho Saman village, Song Watershed, Phraf Province, Northern Thailand. In: Traynor C.H., Prabudhanitisarn P., Oksen S. Dontree and Saarnak C. (eds), Problems of Sustainable Land Use and Natural Resource Management n a Community at Song Watershed, Phraf Province, Thailand. Joint Interdisciplinary Research Project, Duced-Sluse, Thailand, pp. 171–193.

  • InstitutionalAuthorNameNDF (Northern Development Foundation). (2000) Villager’s Networks: Participatory Management of Watershed Resources Northern Development Foundation Chiang Mai, Thailand (in Thai

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Ostrom (1990) Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action Cambridge University Press Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Pàlsson (1998) Learning by fishing: practical engagement and environmental concerns F. Berkes C. Folke (Eds) Linking Social and Ecological Systems: Management Practices and Social Mechanisms for Building Resilience Cambridge University Press Cambridge, UK 48–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Pennapa H. 2002. Forest dwellers to remain in limbo. The Nation 27, March 2002.

  • InstitutionalAuthorNamePER (1992) The Future of People and Forests in Thailand after the Logging Ban Paap Pim Printing Co., Ltd Bangkok 202

    Google Scholar 

  • InstitutionalAuthorNamePER (1991) People and the Future of Thailand’s Forests: An Evaluation of the State of Thailand’s Forests Two years after the Logging Ban Paap Pim Printing Co., Ltd Bangkok

    Google Scholar 

  • J.A. Perry R.K. Dixon (1986) ArticleTitleAn interdisciplinary approach to community resource management: preliminary field test in Thailand J. Develop. Areas 21 IssueID1 31–47

    Google Scholar 

  • N.J. Pilcher (2002) ArticleTitleEditorial: contemporary science or inference? The inclusion of modern thought and science into traditional management practices Kachhapa 7 1–3

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Poffenberger (Eds) (1996) Grassroots Forest Protection: Eastern India Experiences Asia Forest Network San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Poffenberger M. and McGean B. 1993. Community Allies: Forest Co-Management in Thailand. Research Network Report No. 2, Southeast Asia Sustainable Forest Management Network, pp. 1–56.

  • Putz F.E. 1994. Approaches to Sustainable Forest Management. Center for International Forestry Research, Working Paper No. 4, pp. 1–6.

  • C.S. Rangachari S.D. Mukherji (2000) Old Roots New Shoots: A Study of Joint Forest Management in India Winrock International and Ford Foundation New Delhi, India

    Google Scholar 

  • InstitutionalAuthorNameRFD (Royal Forest Department) (1998) Community forestry Suan Pa Chum Chon, Samnak Songseem Kaan Pluuk Pa Bangkok, Thailand (in Thai)

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Robinson (1995) ArticleTitleTowards a new paradigm of community development Community Develop. J 30 IssueID1 21–30

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Roonwong S. Onprom (2000) ArticleTitleUpdate on Thailand community forestry support program activities Asia-Pacific Community Forest 13 IssueID2 8–10

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Sarin (1993) From Conflict to Collaboration: Local Institutions in Joint Forest Management National Support Group for Joint Forest management, Society for Promotion of Wastelands Developmentand the Ford Foundation New Delhi, India

    Google Scholar 

  • Sato J. 1997. The political economy of bufferzone management: a case study from Western Thailand. In: Voctor M., Lang C. and Bornemeier J. (eds), Community Forestry at a Crossroads: Reflections and Future Directions in the Development of Community Forestry. Proceedings of an International Seminar held in Bangkok, Thailand, 17–19 July, 1997, pp. 87–99.

  • M. Sekher (2001) ArticleTitleOrganized participatory resource management: insights from community forestry practices in India Forest Policy Econom 3 137–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Shalardchai R., Anan G. and Santita G. 1993. Community forestry in Thailand. Directions of Development Vol. 2. Community Forestry in the NorthBangkok, Local Development Institute (in Thai).

  • E.E. Sherry (2000) Constructing Partnership: A Delphi Study of Shared Resource Management in the North Yukon University of Northern British Colombia, Faculty of Natural Resources and Environmental Studies Prince George, BC

    Google Scholar 

  • F.L. Sinclair D.L. Walker (1999) A utilitarian approach to the incorporation of local knowledge in agroforestry research and extension L.E. Buck J.P. Lassoie E.C.N. Fernandes (Eds) Agroforestry in Sustainable Agricultural Systems CRC Press Boca Raton, Florida, USA 245–275

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Somsak M. Permasak (2000) Collection of Papers on Community Forestry Regional Community Forestry Training Center (RECOFTC) Bangkok, Thailand

    Google Scholar 

  • C.H. Traynor R. Maneekul V. Jintana J. Wichawutipong (2002) Forest products utilization and contribution to household economics in Tho Saman Village, Song Watershed, Phraf Province, Northern Thailand C.H. Traynor O.P. Prabudhanitisarn S. Dontree C. Saarnak (Eds) Problems of Sustainable Land Use and Natural Resource Management n a Community at Song Watershed, Phraf ProvinceThailand Joint Interdisciplinary Research Project Duced-SluseThailand 139–170

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Treseder N. Krogman (1999) ArticleTitleFeatures of First Nation forest management institutions and implications for sustainability Forest. Chronicle 75 793–798

    Google Scholar 

  • InstitutionalAuthorNameUNCSD (1997) Overall Progress Achieved Since the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development: Report of the Secretary General United Nations Commission on Sustainable Development (UNCSD) New York, United Nations

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Warren (1998) Developing Participatory and Integrated Watershed Management FAO Rome, Italy

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasi P. 1997. Community forestry: the great integrative force. In: Voctor M., Lang C. and Bornemeier J. (eds), Community Forestry at a Crossroads: Reflections and Future Directions n the Development of Community Forestry. Proceedings of an International Seminar held in Bangkok, Thailand, 17–19 July, 1997, pp. 3–8.

  • J. Westoby (1987) The Purpose of Forests – Follies of Development Basil Blackwell Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe-Keddie J. 1994. Aboriginal community development planning: trials of Australia’s pilot projects. Plan Canada, January, 7–12.

  • Y. Zhang (2001) ArticleTitleEconomics of transaction costs saving forestry Ecological Econom 36 197–204

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Statistics, Jahangirnagar University, Savar, Dhaka, Bangladesh

    Md. Abdus Salam

  2. Department of Forest Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Shinshu University, Minamiminowa mura 8304, Nagano-ken, 399-4598, Japan

    Toshikuni Noguchi

  3. Department of Forest Management, Faculty of Forestry, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand

    Rachanee Pothitan

Authors
  1. Md. Abdus Salam
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Toshikuni Noguchi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Rachanee Pothitan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Md. Abdus Salam.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Salam, M.A., Noguchi, T. & Pothitan, R. Community Forest Management in Thailand: Current Situation and Dynamics in the Context of Sustainable Development. New Forest 31, 273–291 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-005-7483-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-005-7483-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation