We propose an algorithm for the operation of a brain–computer interface based on recording hemodynamic activity using near-infrared spectrometry (NIRS) adapted for use in the rehabilitation of motor disorders. The algorithm includes a filtration method that takes account of the frequency of presentation of instructions with the aim of minimizing the time delay in the target frequency range, sequential classification of the states of rest and the mental tasks being performed, as well as additional training of the interface classifier using previously obtained data. The influences of the proposed methods for filtration, additional training, and selection of a smaller number of channels on the accuracy of recognition of motor imagery is evaluated using data from three series of experiments previously conducted in the laboratory with healthy volunteers. Removal of low-frequency noise components from the NIRS signal using the proposed filtration method is shown to produce significant increases in classification accuracy, as did use of additional training from previous sessions in the same person; the number of recording channels could be decreased without loss of recognition accuracy.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ang, K. and Guan, C., “Brain–computer interface in stroke rehabilitation,” J. Comput. Sci. Eng. 7, No. 2, 139–146 (2013).
Bai, Z., Fong, K. N., Zhang, J. J., et al., “Immediate and long-term effects of BCI-based rehabilitation of the upper extremity after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” J. Neuroeng. Rehabil., 17, No. 1, 1–20 (2020).
Benjamini, Y. and Yekutieli, D., “The control of the false discovery rate in multiple testing under dependency,” Ann. Statist., 29, No. 4, 1165–1188 (2001).
Bobrov, P. D., Isaev, M. R., Korshakov, A. V., et al., “Sources of electrophysiological and foci of hemodynamic activity of the brain of significance for control of hybrid brain–computer interfaces based on recognition of EEG patterns and near infrared range spectrograms during motor imagery,” Fiziol. Cheloveka, 42, No. 3, 12–24 (2016).
Cervera, M. A., Soekadar, S. R., Ushiba, J., et al., “Brain–computer interfaces for post-stroke motor rehabilitation: a meta-analysis,” Ann. Clin. Transl. Neurol., 5, No. 5, 651–663 (2018).
Chiarelli, A. M., Croce, P., Merla, A., and Zappasodi, F., “Deep learning for hybrid EEG-fNIRS brain–computer interface: application to motor imagery classification,” J. Neural Eng., 15, No. 3, 036028 (2018).
Congedo, M., Barachant, A., and Bhatia, R., “Riemannian geometry for EEG-based brain–computer interfaces; a primer and a review,” Brain–Comp. Interf., 4, No. 3, 155–174 (2017).
Delpy, D. T., Cope, M., van der Zee, P., et al., “Estimation of optical pathlength through tissue from direct time of flight measurement,” Phys. Med. Biol., 33, No. 12, 1433 (1988).
Engemann, D. A., Raimondo, F., King, J.-R., et al., “Robust EEG-based cross-site and cross-protocol classification of states of consciousness,” Brain, 141, No. 11, 3179–3192 (2018).
Frolov, A. A., Mokienko, O. A., Lyukmanov, R. Kh., et al., “Preliminary results of a controlled study of the effectiveness of BCI-exoskeleton technologies in post-stroke paresis of the arm,” Vestn. Ross. Gos. Med. Univ., 2, 16–23 (2016).
Frolov, A., Mokienko, O., Lyukmanov, R., et al., “Post-stroke rehabilitation training with a motor-imagery-based brain–computer interface (BCI)-controlled hand exoskeleton: a randomized controlled multicenter trial,” Front. Neurosci., 11, (2017).
Ge, S., Yang, Q., Wang, R., et al., “A brain–computer interface based on a few-channel EEG-fNIRS bimodal system,” IEEE Access, 5, 208–218 (2017).
Hramov, A. E., Maksimenko, V. A., and Pisarchik, A. N., “Physical principles of brain–computer interfaces and their applications for rehabilitation, robotics and control of human brain states,” Phys. Rep., 918, 1–133 (2021).
Hu, X. S., Hong, K. S., and Ge, S. S., “fNIRS-based online deception decoding,” J. Neural Eng., 9, No. 2, 026 (2012).
Isaev, M. R., Oganesyan, V. V., Gusek, D., and Snashel, V., “Simulation of radiation propagation in head tissues taking account of scattering anisotropies to optimize the locations of receivers and radiation sources in a brain–computer interface based on near-infrared spectroscopy,” Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat., 67, No. 4, 546–553 (2017).
Liu, Y., Ayaz, H., Curtin, A., et al., “Towards a hybrid P300-based BCI using simultaneous fNIR and EEG,” in: International Conference on Augmented Cognition, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, (2013); 335–344.
Mihara, M., Hattori, N., Hatakenaka, M., et al., “Near-infrared spectroscopy-mediated neurofeedback enhances efficacy of motor imagery-based training in poststroke victims: a pilot study,” Stroke, 44, No. 4, 1091–1098 (2013).
Naseer, N. and Hong, K. S., “fNIRS-based brain–computer interfaces: a review,” Front. Hum. Neurosci., 9, 3 (2015).
Peterson, V., Nieto, N., Wyser, D., et al., “Transfer learning based on optimal transport for motor imagery brain–computer interfaces,” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 69, No. 2, 807–817 (2021).
Power, S. D., Kushki, A., and Chau, T., “Towards a system-paced near-infrared spectroscopy brain–computer interface: differentiating prefrontal activity due to mental arithmetic and mental singing from the no-control state,” J. Neural Eng., 8, No. 6, 066004 (2011).
Ramadan, R. A. and Vasilakos, A. V., “Brain computer interface: control signals review,” Neurocomputing, 223, 26–44 (2017).
Rezazadeh, S. A., Yousefi, R., Wong, A. T., et al., “Development of a ternary hybrid fNIRS-EEG brain–computer interface based on imagined speech,” Brain–Comp. Interf., 6, No. 4, 128–140 (2019).
Rodrigues, P. L. C., Jutten, C., and Congedo, M., “Riemannian Procrustes analysis: transfer learning for brain–computer interfaces,” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 66, No. 8, 2390–2401 (2018).
Saha, S., Mamun, K. A., Ahmed, K., et al., “Progress in brain computer interface: challenges and opportunities,” Front. Syst. Neurosci., 15, 578875 (2021).
Tomita, Y., Vialatte, F. B., Dreyfus, G., et al., “Bimodal BCI using simultaneously NIRS and EEG,” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 61, No. 4, 1274–1284 (2014).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Translated from Zhurnal Vysshei Nervnoi Deyatel’nosti imeni I. P. Pavlova, Vol. 72, No. 5, pp. 728–738, September–October, 2022.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Isaev, M.R., Bobrov, P.D. Effects of Selection of the Learning Set Formation Strategy and Filtration Method on the Effectiveness of a BCI Based on Near Infrared Spectrometry. Neurosci Behav Physi 53, 373–380 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11055-023-01436-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11055-023-01436-2