Skip to main content
Log in

The Nonspecific Positive Actions of Direct Current Transcranial Electrical Stimulation on Novel Word Acquisition

  • Published:
Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

The effects of transcranial electrical stimulation (TES) of the brain on word learning were addressed in a large-scale study in 288 people. The study included a comprehensive assessment of the effects of TES in various conditions (implicit/explicit learning strategy, with/without articulation, anodic/cathodic stimulation, left/right hemisphere, and stimulation area (Broca/Wernicke and their homologs in the right hemisphere)). After 15 minutes of real or placebo stimulation, subjects were presented with eight new words with semantic binding, each 10 times. The latency of correct responses in the test task assessing the semantic correlation of the word and image was used as an indicator of the effectiveness of acquiring new words. The results showed a general non-specific acceleration of responses when real stimulation was used (as compared to placebo), independently of the conditions tested.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brückner, S. and Kammer, T., “Both anodal and cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation improves semantic processing,” Neuroscience, 343, 269–275 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cocquyt, E. M., De Ley, L., Santen, P., et al., “The role of the right hemisphere in the recovery of stroke-related aphasia: A systematic review,” J. Neurolinguistics, 44, 68–90 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dedoncker, J., Brunoni, A. R., Baeken, C., and Vanderhasselt, M. A., “A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in healthy and neuropsychiatric samples: Influence of stimulation parameters,” Brain Stimul., 9, No. 4, 501–517 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Elmer, S., Burkard, M., Renz, B., et al., “Direct current induced short-term modulation of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex while learning auditory presented nouns,” Behav. Brain Funct., 5, No. 1, 29 (2009).

  • Fiori, V., Cipollari, S., Caltagirone, C., and Marangolo, P., “’If two witches would watch two watches, which witch would watch which watch?’ tDCS over the left frontal region modulates tongue twister repetition in healthy subjects,” Neuroscience, 256, 195–200 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Flöel, A., Rösser, N., Michka, O., et al., “Noninvasive brain stimulation improves language learning,” J. Cogn. Neurosci., 20, No. 8, 1415–1422 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gurskaya, O. A., Altynbaev, R. Sh., and Kudryashov, I. E., “Effects of the prolonged action of direct electric fi elds on the rat brain,” Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat., 62, No. 1, 79–88 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  • Horvath, J. C., Forte, J. D., and Carter, O., “Evidence that transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) generates little-to-no reliable neurophysiologic effect beyond MEP amplitude modulation in healthy human subjects: A systematic review,” Neuropsychologia, 66, 213–36 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Malyutina, S. and den Ouden, D. B., “High-defi nition tdcs of noun and verb retrieval in naming and lexical decision,” NeuroRegulation, 2, 111–125 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pisoni, A., Cerciello, M., Cattaneo, Z., and Papagno, C., “Phonological facilitation in picture naming: When and where? A tDCS study,” Neuroscience, 352, 106–121 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pisoni, A., Vernice, M., Iasevoli, L., et al., “Guess who? Investigating the proper name processing network by means of tDCS,” Neuropsychologia, 66, 267–278 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shelyakin, A. M. and Preobrazhenskaya, I. G., “Micropolarization of the brain,” in: Yesterday. Today. Tomorrow (2021).

  • Shtyrov, Y., Filippova, M., Blagovechtchenski, E., et al., “Electrophysiological evidence of dissociation between explicit encoding and fast mapping of novel spoken words,” Front. Psychol., 12, 571673 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Tomczak, M. and Tomczak, E., “The need to report effect size estimates revisited. An overview of some recommended measures of effect size,” Trends Sport Sci., 1, No. 21, 19–25 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. G. Filippova.

Additional information

Translated from Zhurnal Vysshei Nervnoi Deyatel’nosti imeni I. P. Pavlova, Vol. 72, No. 2, pp. 227–232, March–April, 2022.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Filippova, M.G., Perikova, E.I., Blagovechtchenski, E.D. et al. The Nonspecific Positive Actions of Direct Current Transcranial Electrical Stimulation on Novel Word Acquisition. Neurosci Behav Physi 52, 1254–1257 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11055-023-01354-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11055-023-01354-3

Keywords

Navigation