Skip to main content
Log in

Late Components of Event-Related Potentials Elicited by Reading Words in Children, Adolescents, and Adults

  • Published:
Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Differences in reading repeated/new words in adults are known to be reflected in the N400 and P600 components of event-related potentials (ERP), though the question of the functional significance of these components in the age-related trajectory of their development remains open. The aim of the present work was to evaluate the amplitudes and latencies of the N400 and P600 components in responses to repeated and new words in three age groups: preadolescent children (N = 25; age 9–11 years), adolescents (N = 17, age 12–14 years), and adults (N = 22, age 18–36 years). Age-related differences in amplitudes were seen for the N400 component averaged for leads F3, Fz, F4, C3, Cz, and C4 and the P600 component averaged for leads P3, Pz, and P4, while no differences in latency were seen. Comparison of the amplitudes of averaged ERP to repeated and new words identified differences in all age groups: in children in the time interval 750–850 msec, in adolescents in the time interval 650–750 msec, and in adults in the interval 600–800 msec. P600 amplitude in all age groups was greater in responses to repeated than to new words. In the case of N400, differences in responses to repeated and new words were seen only among adults, where latency to new words was shorter than latency to repeated words. The process of comparing new and previously presented verbal and visual information is evidently a multistage process. These stages are formed at different points of ontogeny and are reflected to different extents in the various ERP components. Differences between repeated and new words initially appeared in the P600 component: the pattern of differences at age 12–14 years was analogous to that in adults. At the same time, there were no differences in the N400 component in childhood and adolescence, these being present only in adults.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Atchley, R. A., Rice, M. L., Betz, et al., “A comparison of semantic and syntactic event related potentials generated by children and adult,” Brain Lang., 99, No. 3, 236–246 (2006).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Benau, E. M., Morris, J., and Couperus, J. W., “Semantic processing in children and adults: incongruity and the N400,” J. Psycholinguist. Res., 40, No. 3, 225–239 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Best, J. R. and Miller, P. H., “A developmental perspective on executive function,” Child Dev., 81, No. 6, 1641–1660 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Bezrukikh, M. M. and Kreshchenko, O. Yu., “Characteristics of the formation of writing and reading skills in younger-grade classes,” Izv. Ross. Akad. Obraz., 1, No. 17, 122–136 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  • Canseco-Gonzalez, E., “Using the recording of event-related brain potentials in the study of sentence processing,” in: Foundations of Neuropsychology: A Series of Textbooks, Monographs, and Treatises, Academic Press, San Diego (2000), pp. 229–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castel, A. D., Humphreys, K. L., Lee, S. S., et al., “The development of memory effi ciency and value-directed remembering across the life span: a cross-sectional study of memory and selectivity,” Dev. Psychol., 47, No. 6, 1553–1564 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Cattell, R. B., “Culture Fair Intelligence Tests: CFIT,” Institute for Personality and Ability Testing (1973).

  • Chaumon, M., Bishop, D. V., and Busch, N. A., “A practical guide to the selection of independent components of the electroencephalogram for artifact correction,” J. Neurosci. Methods, 250, 47 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chulkov, N. A., The Safety of Living, Tomsk Polytechnical National Research University, Tomsk (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  • Crandall, M., The ELAN Event-Related Potential in Children 5 to 12 Years of Age, in: BYU ScholarsArchive: Theses and Dissertations, 2151 (2010).

  • Crone, E. A. and Konijn, E. A., “Media use and brain development during adolescence,” Nat. Commun., 9, No. 1, 588–603 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Crone, E. and Dahl, R., “Understanding adolescence as a period of social- affective engagement and goal fl exibility,” Nat. Rev. Neurosci., 13, 636–650 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Delogu, F., Brouwer, H., and Crocker, M. W., “Event-related potentials index lexical retrieval (N400) and integration (P600) during language comprehension,” Brain Cogn., 135, 103569 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ducharme, S., Albaugh, M. D., Nguyen, T.-V., et al., “Trajectories of cortical surface area and cortical volume maturation in normal brain development,” Data Brief, 5, 929–938 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Farber, D. A., Semenova, L. K., and Alferova, V. V., Structural-Functional Maturation of the Developing Brain, Nauka, Leningrad (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  • Federmeier, K. D., “Thinking ahead: The role and roots of prediction in language comprehension,” Psychophysiology, 44, No. 4, 491–505 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Fiebach, C. J., Friederici, A. D., Müller, K., and Cramon, D. Y. V., “fMRI evidence for dual routes to the mental lexicon in visual word recognition,” J. Cogn. Neurosci., 14, No. 1, 11–23 (2002).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Filimonenko, Yu. I. and Timofeev, V. I., Guidelines for the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (WISC): Adapted Version, GP Imaton, St. Petersburg (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  • Friederici, A. D. and Hahne, A., and “Developmental patterns of brain activity reflecting semantic and syntactic processes,” in: Approaches to Bootstrapping: Phonological, Lexical, Syntactic, and Neurophysiological Aspects of Early Language Acquisition, Weissenborn, J. and Houle, B. (eds.), John Benjamin, Amsterdam, Philadelphia: (2001), pp. 231–246.

  • Friederici, A. D., “Event-related brain potential studies in language,” Curr. Neurol. Neurosci. Rep., 4, No. 6, 466–470 (2004).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Friederici, A. D., “Neurophysiological aspects of language processing,” Clin. Neurosci., 4, No. 2, 64–72 (1997).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Friederici, A. D., “The neural basis of language development and its impairment,” Neuron, 52, 941–952 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Friederici, A. D., “The time course of syntactic activation during language processing: a model based on neurological and neurophysiological data,” Brain Lang., 50, 259281 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, D. and Johnson, R., “Event-related potential (ERP) studies of memory encoding and retrieval: A selective review,” Microsc. Res. Tech., 51, No. 1, 6–28 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frost, R., “Toward a strong phonological theory of visual word recognition: true issues and false trails,” Psychol. Bull., 123, No. 1, 71 (1998).

  • Giedd, J. N., Blumenthal, J., Jeffries, N. O., et al., “Brain development during childhood and adolescence: a longitudinal MRI study,” Nat. Neurosci., 2, No. 10, 861–863 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gouvea, A. C., Phillips, C., Kazanina, N., and Poeppel, D., “The linguistic processes underlying the P600,” Lang. Cogn. Proc., 25, No. 2, 149188 (2010).

  • Hahne, A., Eckstein, K., and Friederici, A. D., “Brain signatures of syntactic and semantic processes during children’s language development,” J. Cogn. Neurosci., 16, 1302–1318 (2004).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hampton, W. A. and Weber-Fox, C., “Specifi c aspects of cognitive and language profi ciency account for variability in neural indices of semantic and syntactic processing in children,” Dev. Cogn. Neurosci., 5, 149–171 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoeks, J. C. J., Stowe, L. A., and Doedens, G., “Seeing words in context: The interaction of lexical and sentence level information during reading,” Cogn. Brain Res., 19, No. 1, 59–73 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holcomb, P. J., Coffey, S. A., and Neville, H. J., “Visual and auditory sentence processing: a developmental analysis using event related brain potentials, Dev. Neuropsychol., 8, 203–241 (1992).

  • Huttenlocher, P., De Courten, C., Garey, L., and Van der Loossynapto, H., “Genesis in human visual cortex-evidence for synapse elimination during normal development,” Neurosci. Lett., 33, 247–252 (1982).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kaan, E., Harris, A., Gibson, E., and Holcomb, P. J., “The P600 as an index of syntactic integration diffi culty,” Lang. Cogn. Proc., 15, 159–201 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, A. and Osterhout, L., “The independence of combinatory semantic processing: evidence from event-related potentials,” J. Mem. Lang., 52, No. 2, 205–225 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kornev, A. N. and Ishimova, O. A., Methodology for the Diagnosis of Dyslexia in Children: Guidelines, Polytechnic University Press, St. Petersburg (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kornev, A. N., Fundamentals of Childhood Speech Pathology: Clinical and Psychological Aspects, Rech, St. Petersburg (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kutas, M. and Federmeier, K. D., “Thirty years and counting: finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP),” Annu. Rev. Psychol., 62, 621–647 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Maïonchi-Pino, N., Magnan, A., and Écalle, J., “Syllable frequency effects in visual word recognition: Developmental approach in French children,” J. Appl. Dev. Psychol., 31, 70–82 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mandler, G., Yonelinas, A. P., Aly, M., et al., “Recollection and familiarity: examining controversial assumptions and new directions,” Hippocampus, 20, No. 11, 1178–1194 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marinković, K., “Spatiotemporal dynamics of word processing in the human cortex,” Neuroscientist, 10, No. 2, 142–152 (2004).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Maurer, U., Brem, S., Kranz, F., et al., “Coarse neural tuning for print peaks when children learn to read,” NeuroImage, 33, 749–758 (2006).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McNealy, K., Dapretto, M., and Bookheimer, S., “Language and the developing brain: insights from neuroimaging,” in: Neuroimaging in Developmental Clinical Neuroscience, Rumsey, J. M. and Ernst, E. (eds.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2009), pp. 91–107.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mills, K. L., Goddings, A.-L., Herting, M. M., et al., “Structural brain development between childhood and adulthood: Convergence across four longitudinal samples,” NeuroImage, 141, 273–281 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moisala, M., Salmela, V., Carlson, S., et al., “Neural activity patterns between different executive tasks are more similar in adulthood than in adolescence,” Brain Behav., 8, No. 9, e01063 (2018).

  • Neville, H. J., Coffey, S. A., Holcomb, P. J., and Tallal, P., “The neurobiology of sensory and language processing in language-impaired children,” J. Cogn. Neurosci., 5, 235–253 (1993).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nieuwland, M. S. and van Berkum, J. J. A., “Testing the limits of the semantic illusion phenomenon: ERPs reveal temporary semantic change deafness in discourse comprehension,” Cogn. Brain Res., 24, No. 3, 691–701 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Portnova, G. V., Martynova, O. V., and Ivanitskii, G. A., “Age-related differences in auditory evoked potentials in the perception of sequential and spatial components of sound information,” Fiziol. Cheloveka, 40, No. 1, 26 (2014).

  • Rossetti, M. F., Cambiasso, M. J., Holschbach, M. A., and Cabrera, R. J., “Oestrogens and progestagens: Synthesis and action in the brain,” Neuroendocrinology, 28, 7 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rugg, M. D. and Curran, T., “Event-related potentials and recognition memory,” Trends Cogn. Sci., 11, No. 6, 251–257 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt-Kassow, M. and Kotz, S. A., “Event-related brain potentials suggest a late interaction of meter and syntax in the P600,” J. Cogn. Neurosci., 21, 1693–1708 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, J. M., Abel, A. D., Ogiela, D. A., et al., “Developmental differences in beta and theta power during sentence processing,” Dev. Cogn. Neurosci., 19, 19–30 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Seassau, M. and Bucci, M. P., “Reading and visual search: a developmental study in normal children,” PLoS One, 8, No. 7, e70261 (2013).

  • Shepoval’nikov, A. N., Tsitseroshin, M. N., and Levinchenko, N. V., “’Age-related minimization’ of brain areas involved in the systems support of mental functions: for and against,” Fiziol. Cheloveka, 17, No. 5, 28 (1991).

  • Singh, M. and Su, C., “Progesterone and neuroprotection,” Horm. Behav., 63, No. 2, 284–290 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Soroko, S. I., Belisheva, N. K., Nagornova, Zh. V., and Shemyakina, N. V., “Analysis of the age-related dynamics and gender features of spontaneous bioelectrical activity and components of auditory evoked potentials in young schoolchildren living in the Arctic zone of the Russian Federation,” Fiziol. Cheloveka, 2, No. 44, 84–95 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stavtsev, A. Yu., Ushakov, V. L., and Verkhlyutov, V. M., “Modeling of the influences of layer thickness and conductivity of head and brain tissues on EEG potentials using the fi nite elements method,” Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat., 57, No. 6, 742–752 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinbeis, N. and Crone, E. A., “The link between cognitive control and decision-making across child and adolescent development,” Curr. Opin. Behav. Sci., 10, 28 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S. J., Barker, L. A., Heavey, L., and McHale, S., “The longitudinal development of social and executive functions in late adolescence and early adulthood,” Front. Behav. Neurosci., 9, 252 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Toffoletto, S., Lanzenberger, R., Gingnell, M., et al., “Emotional and cognitive functional imaging of estrogen and progesterone effects in the female human brain: a systematic review,” Psychoneuroendocrinology, 50, 28–52 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tsivilis, D., Allan, K., Roberts, J., et al., “Old-new ERP effects and remote memories: the late parietal effect is absent as recollection fails whereas the early mid-frontal effect persists as familiarity is retained,” Front. Hum. Neurosci., 14, No. 9, 532 (2015).

  • Vettera, C., Pilhatscha, M., Weige, S., et al., “Mid-adolescent neurocognitive development of ignoring and attending emotional stimuli,” Dev. Cogn. Neurosci., 14, 23–31 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vijayakumar, N., Allen, N. B., Youssef, G., et al., “Brain development during adolescence: A mixed-longitudinal investigation of cortical thickness, surface area, and volume,” Hum. Brain Mapp., 37, 2027– 2038 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Weber-Fox, C., Davis, L. J., and Cuadrado, E., “Event-related brain potential markers of high-language profi ciency in adults,” Brain Lang., 85, 231–244 (2003).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Whitford, T. J., Rennie, C. J., Grieve, S. M., et al., “Brain maturation in adolescence: concurrent changes in neuroanatomy and neurophysiology,” Hum. Brain Mapp., 28, No. 3, 228–237 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wierenga, L. M., Langen, M., Oranje, B., and Durston, S., “Unique developmental trajectories of cortical thickness and surface area,” Neuro- Image, 87, 120–126 (2014).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wilding, E., “In what way does the parietal ERP old/new effect index recollection?” Int. J. Psychophysiol., 35, No. 1, 81–87 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Woodruff, C. C., Hayama, H. R., and Rugg, M. D., “Electrophysiological dissociation of the neural correlates of recollection and familiarity,” Brain Res., 1100, No. 1, 125–135 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yonelinas, A. P., Aly, M., Wang, W. C., and Koen, J. D., “Recollection and familiarity: examining controversial assumptions and new directions,” Hippocampus, 20, No. 11, 1178–1194 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. I. Galperina.

Additional information

Translated from Zhurnal Vysshei Nervnoi Deyatel’nosti imeni I. P. Pavlova, Vol. 71, No. 4, pp. 500–514, July–August, 2021.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Galperina, E.I., Kruchinina, O.V., Stankova, E.P. et al. Late Components of Event-Related Potentials Elicited by Reading Words in Children, Adolescents, and Adults. Neurosci Behav Physi 52, 373–382 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11055-022-01251-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11055-022-01251-1

Keywords

Navigation