Light Adaptation of Retinal Rods, Adaptation Memory, and Afterimages

The GPCR signal cascade in retinal photoreceptor cells – rods and cones – supports powerful signal amplification and allows rods to respond reliably to single light quanta. Rods remain functional at light fluxes down to 105 quanta/sec, which is supported by the highly effective light adaptation system. Light adaptation is based on negative feedback circuits, mostly via changes in intracellular Ca2+ ion concentrations. Three calcium regulation loops have been reliably identified – acceleration of quenching of light-activated rhodopsin, acceleration of cGMP synthesis by guanylate cyclase, and increased affinity of cGMP-controlled ion cannels for nucleotide. However, one or two further highly effective mechanisms of adaptation are known to operate, one of which regulates the lifetime of activated phosphodiesterase; for others, the target of regulation is unknown. The mediators of this regulation are also unknown. Our studies of these mechanisms revealed a novel phenomenon, which has been missed in previous studies. We found that recovery of the dark current of rods after cessation of non-saturating adapting light can take 20–30 sec. Furthermore, after formal return of the membrane current to the dark level, cell sensitivity to test stimuli remains decreased for a further 1–2 min. We termed this phenomenon “adaptation memory.” Adaptation memory is reminiscent of the phenomenology of afterimages. The gradual return of the membrane current to the dark level may correspond to fading of the positive afterimage. Prolonged decreases in photoreceptor sensitivity to additional stimulation can create a negative afterimage. As far as we know, this is the first experimental physiological demonstration of the ability to generate afterimages at the level of single photoreceptors.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. 1.

    E. N. Pugh, Jr., N. Edward, and T. D. Lamb, “Phototransduction in vertebrate rods and cones: molecular mechanisms of amplification, recovery and light adaptation,” in: Handbook of Biological Physics, North-Holland (2000), Vol. 3, pp. 183–255.

  2. 2.

    V. Y. Arshavsky, T. D. Lamb, and E. N. Pugh, Jr., “G proteins and phototransduction,” Annu. Rev. Physiol., 64, 153–187 (2002).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    M. L. Firsov, and V. I. Govardovskii, “Light adaptation of photoreceptors: meaning and mechanisms,” Sens. Sistemy, 15, No. 2, 101–113 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    V. Y. Arshavsky and M. E. Burns, “Photoreceptor signaling: supporting vision across a wide range of light intensities,” J. Biol. Chem., 287, No. 3, 1620–1626 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    J. Chen, M. L. Woodruff, T. Wang, et al., “Channel modulation and the mechanism of light adaptation in mouse rods,” J. Neurosci., 30, No. 48, 16232–16240 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    F. Vinberg, J. Chen, and V. J. Kefalov, “Regulation of calcium homeostasis in the outer segments of rod and cone photoreceptors,” Prog. Retin. Eye Res., 67, 87–101 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    P. D. Calvert, V. I. Govardovskii, V. Y. Arshavsky, and C. L. Makino, “Two temporal phases of light adaptation in retinal rods,” J. Gen. Physiol., 119, No. 2, 129–146 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    L. A. Astakhova, M. L. Firsov, and V. I. Govardovski, “Kinetics of turn-offs of frog rod phototransduction cascade,” J. Gen. Physiol., 132, No. 5, 587–604 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    D. A. Baylor, T. D. Lamb, K.-W. Yau, “The membrane current of single rod outer segments,” J. Physiol., 288, 589–611 (1979).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    M. L. Firsov, A. V. Kolesnikov, E. Y. Golobokova, and V. I. Govardovskii, “Two realms of dark adaptation,” Vision Res., 45, No. 2, 147–151 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    R. D. Hamer, S. C. Nicholas, D. Tranchina, et al., “Toward a unifi ed model of vertebrate rod phototransduction,” Vis. Neurosci., 22, 417–436 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    B. M. Invergo, D. Dell’Orco, L. Montanucci, et al., “A comprehensive model of the phototransduction cascade in mouse rod cells,” Mol. Biosystems, 10, No. 6, 1481–1489 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    D. G. Kuz’min, S. V. Travnikov, M. L. Firsov, and V. I. D. G. Govardovskii, “Mathematical modeling of phototransduction and light adaptation in frog retinal rods,” Sens. Sistemy, 18, No. 4, 305–316 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    A. Morshedian and G. L. Fain, “Molecular mechanism of adaptation in vertebrate rods,” in: Vertebrate Photoreceptors, Springer, Tokyo (2014), pp. 73–90.

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    K. J. W. Craik, “Origin of visual after-images,” Nature, 145, 512 (1940).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    R. van Lier, M. Vergeer, and S. Anstis, “Filling-in afterimage colors between the lines,” Curr. Biol., 19, No. 8, R323–R324 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    G. Powell, A. Bompas, and P. Sumner, “Making the incredible credible: Afterimages are modulated by contextual edges more than real stimuli,” J. Vis., 12, No. 10, 1–13 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    S. Zeki, S. Cheadle, J. Pepper, and D. Mylonas, “The constancy of colored after-images,” Front. Hum. Neurosci., 11, 229 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    J. M. Loomis, “The photopigment bleaching hypothesis of complementary after-images,” Vision Res., 12, 1587–1594 (1972).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    V. Virsu and P. Laurinen, “Long-lasting afterimages caused by neural adaptation,” Vision Res., 17, No. 7, 853–860 (1977).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    G. S. Brindley, “The discrimination of after-images,” J. Physiol., 147, 194–203 (1959).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    H. B. Barlow and J. M. B. Sparrock, “The role of afterimages in dark adaptation,” Science, 144, 1309–1314 (1964).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    D. I. A. MacLeod, “Rod origin of prolonged afterimages,” Science, 185, 1171–1172 (1974).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Yu. Rotov.

Additional information

Translated from Rossiiskii Fiziologicheskii Zhurnal imeni I. M. Sechenova, Vol. 106, No. 4, pp. 462–473, April, 2020.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rotov, A.Y., Astakhova, L.A., Firsov, M.L. et al. Light Adaptation of Retinal Rods, Adaptation Memory, and Afterimages. Neurosci Behav Physi 51, 116–122 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11055-020-01046-2

Download citation

Keywords

  • photoreceptor
  • rod
  • light adaptation
  • calcium feedback
  • adaptation memory
  • afterimages