The reactivity of EEG power in the individually defined μ frequency ranges was studied in the central, frontal, and parietal EEG leads in children imagining an action, watching the real action, and performing the action him- or herself. The study involved 39 children aged 17–41 months. Analysis of the variance of EEG power in the μ range demonstrated significant desynchronization in the central, frontal, and parietal EEG leads on observation and performance of actions. The Observing a real action situation was accompanied by greater power desynchronization in the μ range in the medial frontal (Fz) and medial parietal (Pz) loci as compared with the Observing a fake action situation. With the aim of identifying the role of the mirror neuron system in speech assimilation processes, we analyzed the characteristics of EEG μ rhythm reactivity in children with different levels of receptive speech development, as defined using the Bayley test. Children with high levels on the receptive speech scale were found to display greater EEG power desynchronization in the μ range when observing a real action in the frontal (F3) and parietal (P3) loci of the left hemisphere as compared with children with intermediate levels on this scale. The results obtained here show that children demonstrating higher levels of activation of the mirror neuron system have higher levels of speech comprehension.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Antognini, K. and Daum, M., “Toddlers show sensorimotor activity during auditory verb processing,” Neuropsychologia, 126, 82–91 (2017), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.07.022.
Avanzini, P., Fabbri-Destro, M., Dalla Volta, R., et al., “The dynamics of sensorimotor cortical oscillations during the observation of hand movements: an EEG study,” PLoS One, 7, No. 5, e37534 (2012).
Bayley, N., Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Harcourt Assessment, San Antonio (2006), third edition.
Biro, S. and Leslie, A. M., “Infants’ perception of goal-directed actions: Development through cue-based bootstrapping,” Dev. Sci., 10, No. 3, 379–398 (2007).
Bowman, L. C., Thorpe, S. G., Cannon, E. N., and Fox, N. A., “Action mechanisms for social cognition: behavioral and neural correlates of developing Theory of Mind,” Dev. Sci., 20, No. 5) (2017), https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12447.
Buccino, G., “Neural circuits underlying imitation learning of hand actions: an event-related fMRI study,” Neuron, 42, No. 2, 323–334 (2004).
Buccino, G., Riggio, L., Melli, G., et al., “Listening to action-related sentences modulates the activity of the motor system: A combined TMS and behavioral study,” Cogn. Brain Res., 24, No. 3, 355–363 (2005).
Cannon, E. N., Simpson, E. A., Fox, N. A., et al., “Relations between infants’ emerging reach-grasp competence and event-related desynchronization in EEG,” Dev. Sci., 19, 50–62 (2016).
Daum, M. M., Prinz, W., and Aschersleben, G., “Means-end behavior in young infants: The interplay of action perception and action production,” Infancy, 14, No. 6, 613–640 (2009).
Debnath, R., Salo, V. C., Buzzell, G. A., et al., “Mu rhythm desynchronization is specific to action execution and observation: Evidence from time-frequency and connectivity analysis,” NeuroImage, 184, 496–507 (2019).
Ermolina, N. I., “Features of the development of several higher mental functions in young children in contemporary conditions,” Nauka Chel. Gumanit. Issled., 5, 134–140 (2010).
Filippi, C., Cannon, E. N., Fox, N., et al., “Motor system activation predicts goal imitation in 7-month-old infants,” Psychol. Sci., 27, No. 5, 675–684 (2016).
Fox, N. A., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., Yoo, K. H., et al., “Assessing human mirror activity with EEG mu rhythm: A meta-analysis,” Psychol. Bull., 142, No. 3, 291–313 (2016).
Hauk, O., Johnsrude, I., and Pulvermüller, F., “Somatotopic representation of action words in human motor and premotor cortex,” Neuron, 41, No. 2, 301–307 (2004).
Iacoboni, M., “Imitation, empathy, and mirror neurons,” Ann. Rev. Psychol., 60, No. 1, 653–670 (2009).
Jeon, H. and Lee, S. H., “From neurons to social beings: short review of the mirror neuron system research and its socio-psychological and psychiatric implications,” Clin. Psychopharmacol. Neurosci., 16, No. 1, 18–31 (2018).
Kaida, A. I., Makhin, S. A., Eismont, E. V., and Pavlenko, V. B., “Developmental dynamics and the topography of the reactivity of the EEG μ rhythm in children aged 4–14 years,” Vestn. Tomsk. Gos. Univ. Biol., 45, 106–127 (2019).
Kerechanin, Ya. V., Gusek, D., Bobrov, P. D., et al., “Sources of electrical activity in areas of the brain involved in motor imagery,” Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat., 69, No. 6, 711–725 (2019).
Keysers, C. and Gazzola, V., “Integrating simulation and theory of mind: from self to social cognition,” Trends Cogn. Sci., 11, No. 5, 194–196 (2007).
Khalil, R., Tindle, R., Boraud, T., et al., “Social decision making in autism: On the impact of mirror neurons, motor control, and imitative behaviors,” CNS Neurosci. Ther., 24, 669–676 (2018).
Lebedeva, N. N., Karimova, E. D., Karpychev, V. V., and Mal’tsev, V. Yu., “The mirror system of the brain on observation, performance, and imagination of motor tasks – neurophysiological refl ection of the perception of the consciousness of others,” Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat., 68, No. 2, 204–215 (2018).
Lebedeva, N. N., Zufman, A. I., and Mal’tsev, V. Yu., “The mirror neuron system of the brain: a key to learning, to the formation of the personality, and understanding the consciousness of others,” Usp. Fiziol. Nauk., 48, No. 4, 16–28 (2017).
Liao, Y., Acar, Z. A., Makeig, S., and Deak, G., “EEG imaging of toddlers during dyadic turn-taking: Mu-rhythm modulation while producing or observing social actions,” NeuroImage, 112, 52–60 (2015).
Luo, Y. and Johnson, S. C., “Recognizing the role of perception in action at 6 months,” Dev. Sci., 12, No. 1, 142–149 (2009).
Marshall, P. J. and Meltzoff, A. N., “Neural mirroring systems: Exploring the EEG mu rhythm in human infancy,” Dev. Cogn. Neurosci., 1, 110–123 (2011).
Marshall, P. J., Young, T., and Meltzoff, A. N., “Neural correlates of action observation and execution in 14-month-old infants: An event-related EEG desynchronization study,” Dev. Sci., 14, No. 3, 474–480 (2011).
Mollo, G., Pulvermüller, F., and Hauk, O., “Movement priming of EEG/MEG brain responses for action-words characterizes the link between language and action,” Cortex, 74, 262–276 (2016).
Moreno, I., de Vega, M., and Leon, I., “Understanding action language modulates oscillatory mu and beta rhythms in the same way as observing actions,” Brain Cognit., 82, No. 3, 236–242 (2013).
Nyström, P., Ljunghammar, T., Rosander, K., and von Hofsten, C., “Using mu rhythm desynchronization to measure mirror neuron activity in infants,” Dev. Sci., 14, 327–335 (2011).
Ramachandran, V. S., The Tell-Tale Brain: A Neuroscientist’s Quest for What Makes us Human [Russian translation], Kar’era Press, Moscow (2017).
Reid, V. M., Striano, T., and Iacoboni, M., “Neural correlates of dyadic interaction during infancy,” Dev. Cogn. Neurosci., 1, 124–130 (2011).
Rizzolatti, G. and Sinigaglia, C., “The functional role of the parieto-frontal mirror circuit: interpretations and misinterpretations,” Nat. Rev. Neurosci., 11, 264–274 (2010).
Rizzolatti, G., Fogassi, L., and Gallese, V., “Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the understanding and imitation of action,” Nat. Rev. Neurosci., 2, No. 9, 661–670 (2001).
Saby, J. N., Meltzoff, A. N., and Marshall, P. J., “Infants’ somatotopic neural responses to seeing human actions: I’ve got you under my skin,” PLoS One, 8, No. 10, e77905 (2013).
Sommerville, J. A. and Woodward, A. L., “Infants’ sensitivity to the causal features of means-end support sequences in action and perception,” Infancy, 8, 119–145 (2005).
Southgate, V., Johnson, M. H., El Karoui, I., and Csibra, G., “Motor system activation reveals infants’ on-line prediction of others’ goals,” Psychol. Sci., 21, 355–359 (2010).
Southgate, V., Johnson, M. H., Osborne, T., and Csibra, G., “Predictive motor activation during action observation in human infants,” Biol. Lett., 5, No. 6, 769–772 (2009).
Stapel, J. C., Hunnius, S., van Elk, M., and Bekkering, H., “Motor activation during observation of unusual versus ordinary actions in infancy,” Soc. Neurosci., 5, 451–460 (2010).
Thorpe, S. G., Cannon, E. N., and Fox, N. A., “Spectral and source structural development of mu and alpha rhythms from infancy through adulthood,” Clin. Neurophysiol., 127, No. 1, 254–269 (2016).
Upshaw, M. B., Bernier, R. A., and Sommerville, J. A., “Infants’ grip strength predicts mu rhythm attenuation during observation of lifting actions with weighted blocks,” Dev. Sci., 19, No. 2, 195–207 (2016).
Warreyn, P., Ruysschaert, L., Wiersema, R., et al., “Infants’ mu suppression during the observation of real and mimicked goal-directed actions,” Dev. Sci., 16, No. 2, 173–185 (2013).
Translated from Zhurnal Vysshei Nervnoi Deyatel’nosti imeni I. P. Pavlova, Vol. 70, No. 3, pp. 422–432, May–June, 2020.
About this article
Cite this article
Mikhailova, A.A., Orekhova, L.S., Dyagileva, Y.O. et al. Reactivity of the EEG μ Rhythm on Observing and Performing Actions in Young Children with Different Levels of Receptive Speech Development. Neurosci Behav Physi 51, 85–92 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11055-020-01042-6
- EEG μ rhythm
- receptive speech
- mirror neuron system