Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Reorganization of Functional Interactions in the Frontotemporal System of the Human Brain during Production of Russian Vowels

  • Published:
Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This report describe studies of the functioning of brain structures which are components of the frontotemporal system which is involved in the processes giving rise to speech and the organization of the mental lexicon. The studies address the question of whether it is possible, using functional tomography data, to discriminate the processes generating word forms into those carried out following rules (so-called regular forms) and those based on extracting forms from memory as whole units (so-called irregular forms). This was approached by carrying out experiments designed to identify how the origination of regular forms modulates the interaction between Broca’s area and two zones in the superior temporal gyrus of both hemispheres. It is suggested that when regular verbs are generated on the basis of symbolic rules (using a two-system approach), changes in interactions affect only the left hemisphere part of the system. Studies of cause effect relationships using dynamic causal modeling identified a relationship between the type of morphological process and the type of interaction between zones of the frontotemporal system. Thus, processes linked with generating regular forms, presuming construction of word forms from morphemes, are characterized by negative modulatory influences from the left zones of the superior temporal gyrus on activity in Broca’s area. These data support the view that the regularity effect seen in our previous studies of functional connectedness actually reflects the process of generation by rule and is supported by interactions between the left superior temporal cortex and Broca’s area. In addition, the generation of irregular verbs is characterized by an interaction between Broca’s area and the superior temporal gyrus in both hemispheres, which supports the suggestion that memory retrieval processes are involved.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yu. I. Aleksandrov, Psychophysiological Significance of Activity in Central and Peripheral Neurons in Behavior, Nauka, Moscow (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  2. L. L. Bechtereva, Neurophysiological Aspects of Mental Activity in Humans, Meditsina, Leningrad (1974), 2nd ed.

  3. A. A. Zaliznyak, Grammatical Dictionary of the Russian Language. Inflections, Russian Language Press, Moscow (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  4. S. V. Medvedev and S. V. Pakhomov, Dynamic Organization of Cerebral Systems, Nauka, Leningrad (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  5. N. Yu. Shvedov (ed.), Russian Grammar, Nauka, Moscow (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  6. N. E. Sviderskaya, Synchronous Electrical Activity of the Brain and Mental Processes, Nauka, Moscow (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  7. T. V. Chernigovskaya, K. Gor, and T. I. Svistunova, “Formation of verb paradigms in the Russian language: rules, probabilities, and analogies as the basis for the organization of the mental lexicon (an experimental study),” in: Cognitive Studies: Coll. Sci. Works, T. V. Chernigovskaya and V. D. Solov’ev (eds.), Institute of Psychology, Moscow (2008), Iss. 2.

  8. I. Berent, S. Pinker, and J. Shimron, “Default nominal infl ection in Hebrew: Evidence for mental variables,” Cognition, 72, No. 1, 1–44 (1999).

  9. A. Beretta, C. Campbell, T. H. Carr, et al., “An ER-fMRI investigation of morphological infl ection in German reveals that the brain makes a distinction between regular and irregular forms,” Brain Lang., 85, No. 1, 67–92 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. T. Chernigovskaya and K. Gor, “The complexity of paradigm and input frequencies in native and second language verbal processing: evidence from Russian Language,” Lang. Behav., 2, No. 3, 20–37 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  11. H. Clahsen, F. Aveledo, and I. Roca, “The development of regular and irregular verb infl ection in Spanish child language,” J. Child Lang., 29, No. 3, 591–622 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. H. Clahsen, “Lexical entries and rules of language: a multidisciplinary study of German infl ection,” Behav. Brain Sci., 22, No. 6, 991–1060 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. D. E. Davidson, K. S. Gor, and M. D. Lekic, Russian: Stage One: Live from Moscow, Kendall Hunt Publ., Dubuque, IO (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  14. J. Daunizeau, O. David, and K. E. Stephan, “Dynamic causal modelling: A critical review of the biophysical and statistical foundations,” Neuroimage, 58, No. 2, 312–322 (2011).

  15. R. Desai, L. L. Conant, E. Waldron, and J. R. Binder, “fMRI of past tense processing: The effects of phonological complexity and task difficulty,” J. Cogn. Neurosci., 18, No. 2, 278–297 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. R. De Diego-Balaguer, A. Rodriguez-Fornells, M. Rotte, et al., “Neural circuits subserving the retrieval of stems and grammatical features in regular and irregular verbs,” Hum. Brain Mapp., 27, No. 11, 874–888 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. R. P. Dhond, K. Marinkovic, A. M. Dale, et al., “Spatiotemporal maps of past-tense verb infl ection,” Neuroimage, 19, No. 1, 91–100 (2003).

  18. K. J. Friston, A. Mechelli, R. Turner, and C. Price, “Nonlinear responses in fMRI: The Balloon model, Volterra kernels and other hemodynamics,” Neuroimage, 12, No. 4, 466–477 (2000).

  19. K. Gor and T. Chernigovskaya, “Mental lexicon structure in L1 and L2 acquisition: Russian evidence,” Glossos, No. 4 (2003).

  20. K. Gor and T. Chernigovskaya, “Rules in the processing of Russian verbal morphology,” in: Current Issues in Formal Slavic Linguistics, G. Zybatow et al. (eds.), Peter Lang, Frankfurt am Main (2001) pp. 528–536.

  21. K. Gor and S. Jackson, “Morphological decomposition and lexical access in a native and second language: a nesting doll effect,” Lang. Cogn. Proc., 28, No. 7, 1065–1091 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. K. Gor, “Symbolic rule versus analogy in the processing of complex verbal morphology,” Revue d’Intell. Artif., 17, No. 5–6, 823–840 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. P. Indefrey, C. Brown, P. Hagoort, et al., “A PET study of cerebral activation patterns induced by verb infl ection,” Neuroimage, 5, No. 4, 548 (1997).

  24. J. J. Jaeger, A. H. Lockwood, D. L. Kemmerer, et al., “A positron emission tomographic study of regular and irregular verb morphology in English,” Language, 72, No. 3, 451–497 (1996).

  25. R. O. Jakobson, “Russian conjugation,” Word, 4, 155–167 (1948).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. M. F. Joanisse and M. S. Seidenberg, “Imaging the past: neural activation in frontal and temporal regions during regular and irregular past-tense processing,” Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci., 5, No. 3, 282–296 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. M. Kireev, N. Slioussar, A. D. Korotkov, et al., “Changes in functional connectivity within the fronto-temporal brain network induced by regular and irregular Russian verb production,” Front. Hum. Neurosci., 9, 36 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. M. D. Lekic, D. E. Davidson, and K. S. Gor, Russian Stage One: Live from Russia, Kendall Hunt Publ., Dubuque (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  29. B. MacWhinney and J. Leinbach, “Implementations are not conceptualizations: revising the verb learning model,” Cognition, 40, No. 1–2, 121–157 (1991).

  30. V. A. Marchman, “Constraints on plasticity in a connectionist model of the English past tense,” J. Cogn. Neurosci., 5, No. 2, 215–234 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. V. A. Marchman, K. Plunkett, and J. Goodman, “Overregularization in English plural and past tense infl ectional morphology: a response to Marcus,” J. Child Lang., 24, No. 3, 767–779 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. G. F. Marcus, “Plasticity and nativism: Towards a resolution of an apparent paradox,” in: Emergent Neural Computational Architectures Based on Neuroscience, S. Wermter et al. (eds.), Springer-Verlag (2001), pp. 368–382.

  33. G. F. Marcus, S. Pinker, M. Ullman, et al., “Overregularization in language acquisition,” Monogr. Soc. Res. Child Dev., 57, No. 4, (1992).

  34. W. D. Marslen-Wilson and L. K. Tyler, “Dissociating types of mental computation,” Nature, 387, No. 6633, 592–594 (1997).

  35. J. L. McClelland and K. Patterson, “Rules or connections in pasttense inflections: what does the evidence rule out?” Trends Cogn. Sci., 6, No. 11, 465–472 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. T. M. Oh, K. L. Tan, P. Ng, et al., “The past tense debate: is phonological complexity the key to the puzzle?” Neuroimage, 57, No. 1, 271–280 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  37. R. C. Oldfi eld, “The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory,” Neuropsychologia, 9, No. 1, 97–113 (1971).

  38. M. Orsolini and W. D. Marslen-Wilson, “Universals in morphological representation: evidence from Italian,” Lang. Cogn. Proc., 12, No. 1, 1–47 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. W. D. Penny, “Comparing dynamic causal models,” Neuroimage, 22, No. 3, 1157–1172 (2004).

  40. S. Pinker and A. Prince, “On language and connectionism: analysis of a parallel distributed processing model of language acquisition,” Cognition, 28, No. 1–2, 73–193 (1988).

  41. S. Pinker and M. T. Ullman, “The past and future of the past tense,” Trends Cogn. Sci., 6, No. 11, 456–463 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. S. Pinker, “Rules of language,” Science, 253, No. 5019, 530–535 (1991).

  43. S. Pinker, Words and Rules: The Ingredients of Language, Harper Collins, New York (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  44. K. Plunkett and V. Marchman, “From rote learning to system building: acquiring verb morphology in children and connectionist nets,” Cognition, 48, No. 1, 21–69 (1993).

  45. K. Plunkett and R. C. Nakisa, “A connectionist model of the Arabic plural system,” Lang. Cogn. Neurosci., 12, No. 5–6, 807–836 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  46. S. Prasada and S. Pinker, “Generalizations of regular and irregular morphology,” Lang. Cogn. Proc., 8, No. 1, 1–56 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. H. Ragnasdottir, H. G. Simonsen, and K. Plunkett, “The acquisition of past tense morphology in Icelandic and Norwegian children: An experimental study,” J. Child Lang., 26, No. 3, 577–618 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. L. Rigoux, K. E. Stephan, K. J. Friston, and J. Daunizeau, “Bayesian model selection for group studies – revisited,” Neuroimage, 84, 971–985 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. D. Rumelhart and J. McClelland, “On learning the past tenses of English verbs,” in: Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition, Vol. 2, Psychological and Biological Models, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (1986), pp. 216–271.

  50. M. Sach, R. Seitz, and P. Indefrey, “Unifi ed infl ectional processing of regular and irregular verbs: a PET study,” Neuroreport, 15, No. 3, 533–537 (2004).

  51. N. Sahin, S. Pinker, and E. Halgren, “Abstract grammatical processing of nouns and verbs in Broca’s area: evidence from fMRI,” Cortex, 42, No. 4, 540–562 (2006).

  52. N. Slioussar, M. V. Kireev, T. V. Chernigovskaya, et al., “An ERfMRI study of Russian infl ectional morphology,” Brain Lang., 130, 33–41 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. E. A. Stamatakis, W. D. Marslen-Wilson, L. K. Tyler, and P. C. Fletcher, “Cingulate control of fronto-temporal integration refl ects linguistic demands: a three-way interaction in functional connectivity,” Neuroimage, 28, No. 1, 115–121 (2005).

  54. L. K. Tyler, E. A. Stamatakis, B. Post, et al., “Temporal and frontal systems in speech comprehension: an fMRI study of past tense processing,” Neuropsychologia, 43, No. 13, 1963–1974 (2005).

  55. M. T. Ullman, “Acceptability ratings of regular and irregular pasttense forms: Evidence for a dual-system model of language from word frequency and phonological neighborhood effects,” Lang. Cogn. Proc., 14, No. 1, 47–67 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. M. T. Ullman, R. Bergida, and K. O’Craven, “Distinct fMRI activation patterns for regular and irregular past tense,” NeuroImage, 5, 549 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  57. M. T. Ullman, “Contributions of memory circuits to language: The declarative/procedural model,” Cognition, 92, No. 1–2, 231–270 (2004).

  58. M. T. Ullman and M. Gopnik, “Infl ectional morphology in a family with inherited specifi c language impairment,” Appl. Psycholinguist, 20, No. 1, 51–117 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. M. T. Ullman, R. Pancheva, T. Love, et al., “Neural correlates of lexicon and grammar: Evidence from the production, reading, and judgment of infl ection in aphasia,” Brain Lang., 93, No. 2, 185– 238 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. C. D. Yang, Knowledge and Learning in Natural Language, Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford (2002).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Bekhtereva Institute of the Human Brain, St. Petersburg, Russia

    M. V. Kireev, A. D. Korotkov, I. A. Kotomin, R. S. Masharipov & S. V. Medvedev

  2. St. Petersburg State University, St. Petersburg, Russia

    M. V. Kireev, N. A. Slioussar & T. V. Chernigovskaya

  3. National Research University Higher School of Economics (HSE), Moscow, Russia

    N. A. Slioussar

Authors
  1. M. V. Kireev
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. N. A. Slioussar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. A. D. Korotkov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. I. A. Kotomin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. R. S. Masharipov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. T. V. Chernigovskaya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. S. V. Medvedev
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. V. Kireev.

Additional information

Translated from Rossiiskii Fiziologicheskii Zhurnal imeni I. M. Sechenova, Vol. 104, No. 11, pp. 1331–1346, November, 2018.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kireev, M.V., Slioussar, N.A., Korotkov, A.D. et al. Reorganization of Functional Interactions in the Frontotemporal System of the Human Brain during Production of Russian Vowels. Neurosci Behav Physi 50, 349–357 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11055-020-00907-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11055-020-00907-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation