Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation as a Tool to Induce Language Recovery in Patients with Post-Stroke Aphasia

  • Published:
Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

In recent years, possible therapeutic effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) have been widely investigated in studies dealing with different types of neural pathologies. Initially, tDCS was applied for treatment of patients with motor stroke; later on, it was introduced into studies of patients with Alzheimer’s disease, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson’s disease, schizophrenia, and post-stroke aphasia. Recent reviews of tDCS application in patients with post-stroke aphasia did not provide coherent evidence on the tDCS efficiency. There were no uniform protocols of stimulation used, patients’ selection criteria were highly divergent, and the reports of treatment outcomes varied dramatically. In this review, we will focus on the reported heterogeneity of tDCS effects, trying to disentangle its putative underpinnings rooted in the diversity of lesion types, aphasia severity, and recovery stages. Given the current theoretical models suggesting the qualitatively different patterns of brain activity to accompany post-stroke aphasia recovery, a number of physiological factors should be taken into account to choose optimal tDCS parameters. With this in mind, we assess results of ten studies applying tDCS in post-stroke aphasia treatment, and, based on this analysis, suggest directions for further research in this rapidly developing field.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aldini, G., Essai Théorique et Expérimental sur le Galvanisme, avec une Série D’expériences Faites Devant des Commissaires de l’Institut National de France, et en Divers Amphithéâtres Anatomiques de Londres, Fournier Fils, Paris (1804).

  • Allman, C., Amadi, U., Winkler, A. M., et al., “Ipsilesional anodal tDCS enhances the functional benefits of rehabilitation in patients after stroke,” Sci. Transl. Med., 8, 330 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Anglade, C., Thiel, A., and Ansaldo, A. I., “The complementary role of the cerebral hemispheres in recovery from aphasia after stroke: a critical review of literature,” Brain Injury, 28, 138–145 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ardila A., Aphasia Handbook, Miami, Florida Int. Univ., FL (2014).

  • Avenanti, A., Coccia, M., Ladavas, E., et al., “Low-frequency rTMS promotes use-dependent motor plasticity in chronic stroke: a randomized trial,” Neurology, 78, 256–64 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, J. M., Rorden, C., and Fridriksson, J., “Using transcranial direct current stimulation to treat stroke patients with aphasia,” Stroke, 41, 1229–1236 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Batsikadze, G., Moliadze, V., Paulus, W., et al., “Partially non-linear stimulation intensity dependent effects of direct current stimulation on motor cortex excitability in humans,” J. Physiol., 591, No. 7, 1987–2000 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Bindman, L. J., Lippold, O. C. J., and Redfearn, J. W. T., “The action of brief polarizing currents on the cerebral cortex of the rat (1) during current flow and (2) in the production of long-lasting after-effects,” J. Physiol. (London), 172, 369–82 (1964).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Blank, S. C., Bird, H., Turkheimer, F., and Wise, R. J., “Speech production after stroke: the role of the right pars opercularis,” Ann. Neurol., 54, 310–320 (2003).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brunoni, A. R., Amadera, J., Berbel, B., et al., “A systematic review on reporting and assessment of adverse effects associated with transcranial direct current stimulation,” Int. J. Neuropsychopharmacol., 14, 1133–45 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brunoni, A. R., Ferrucci, R., Fregni, F., et al., “Transcranial direct current stimulation for the treatment of major depressive disorder: a summary of preclinical, clinical and translational findings,” Prog. Neuropsychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry, 39, 9–16 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brunelin, J., Mondino, M., Haesebaert, F., et al., “Poulet E. Efficacy and safety of bifocal tDCS as an interventional treatment for refractory schizophrenia,” Brain Stimul., 5, 431–2 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Campana, S., Caltagirone, C., and Marangolo, P., “Combining voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping (VLSM) with A-tDCS language treatment: predicting outcome of recovery in nonfluent chronic aphasia,” Brain Stimul., 8, No. 4, 769–776 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Elsner, B., Kugler, J., Pohl, M, and Mehrholz, J., “Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for improving aphasia in patients after stroke,” Cochrane Database Syst. Rev., 6, CD009760 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  • Flöel, A., Meinzer, M., Kirstein, R, et al., “Short-term anomia training and electrical brain stimulation,” Stroke, 42, 2065–2067 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ford, J. M., Mathalon, D. H., Whitfield, S., et al., “Reduced communication between frontal and temporal lobes during talking in schizophrenia,” Biol. Psychiatry, 51, No. 6, 485–492 (2002).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fridman, E. A., Hanakawa, T., Chung, M., et al., “Reorganization of human premotor cortex after stroke recovery,” Brain, 127, 747–58 (2004).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fridriksson, J., Richardson, J. D., Baker, J. M., and Rorden, C., “Transcranial direct current stimulation improves naming reaction time in fluent aphasia: a double-blind, sham-controlled study,” Stroke, 42, 819–821 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Grefkes, C. and Ward, N. S., “Cortical reorganization after stroke: how much and how functional?” Neuroscientist, 20, No. 1, 56–70 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, R. H., Chrysikou, E. G., and Coslett, B., “Mechanisms of aphasia recovery after stroke and the role of noninvasive brain stimulation,” Brain Lang., 118, 40–50 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, M. A., Coffman, B. A., Trumbo, M. C., and Clark, V. P., “Tracking the neuroplastic changes associated with transcranial direct current stimulation: a push for multimodal imaging,” Front. Hum. Neurosci., 7, 495 (2013).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Johansen-Berg, H., Rushworth, M. F., Bogdanovic, M. D., et al., “The role of ipsilateral premotor cortex in hand movement after stroke,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 99, 14518–23 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Johansen-Berg, H. and Duzel, E., “Neuroplasticity: Effects of Physical and Cognitive activity on brain structure and function,” NeuroImage, 131, 1 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kang, E. K., Kim, Y. K., Sohn, H. M., et al., “Improved picture naming in aphasia patients treated with cathodal tDCS to inhibit the right Broca’s homologue area,” Restor. Neurol. Neurosci., 29, 141–152 (2011).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Khedr, E. M., Shawky, O. A., El-Hammady, D. H., et al., “Effect of anodal versus cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation on stroke rehabilitation: a pilot randomized controlled trial,” Neurorehabil. Neural Repair, 27, 592–6 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lefaucheur, J-P., Antal, A., Ayache, S. S., et al., “Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS),” Clin. Neurophysiol., 128, No. 1, 56–92 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Liebetanz, D., Nitsche, M. A., Tergau, F., and Paulus, W., “Pharmacological approach to the mechanisms of transcranial DC stimulation-induced after-effects of human motor cortex excitability,” Brain, 125, 2238–47 (2002).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marangolo, P., Fiori V., Calpagnano, M., et al., “tDCS over the left inferior frontal cortex improves speech production in aphasia,” Front. Hum. Neurosci., 7, 539 (2013).

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meinzer, M., Flaisch, T., Breitenstein, C., et al., “Functional re-recruitment of dysfunctional brain areas predicts language recovery in chronic aphasia,” Neuroimage, 39, No. 4, 2038–2046 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mondino, M., Haesebaert, F., Poulet, E., et al., “Fronto-temporal transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) reduces source-monitoring deficits and auditory hallucinations in patients with schizophrenia,” Schizophr. Res., 161, 515–6 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Monte-Silva, K., Kuo, M. F., Hessenthale, S., et al., “Induction of late LTPlike plasticity in the human motor cortex by repeated non-invasive brain stimulation,” Brain. Stimul., 6, No. 3, 424–432 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Monti, A., Cogiamanian, F., Marceglia, S., et al., “Improved naming after transcranial direct current stimulation in aphasia,” J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, 79, 451–453 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Monti, A., Ferrucci, R., Fumagalli, M., et al., “Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and language,” J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, 84, 832–42 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nias, D. K., “Therapeutic effects of low-level direct electrical currents,” Psychol. Bull., 83, No. 5, 766 (1976).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nitsche, M. A. and Paulus, W., “Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation,” J. Physiol., 527, 633–9 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Nitsche, M. A. and Paulus, W., “Sustained excitability elevations induced by transcranial DC motor cortex stimulation in humans,” Neurology, 57, 1899–901 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nitsche, M. A., Nitsche, M. S., Klein, C. C., et al., “Level of action of cathodal DC polarisation induced inhibition of the human motor cortex,” Clin. Neurophysiol., 114, No. 4, 600–604 (2003).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nitsche, M. A., Cohen, L. G., Wassermann, E. M., et al., “Transcranial direct current stimulation: state of the art 2008,” Brain Stimul., 1, No. 3, 206–223 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pascual-Leone, A., Tormos, J. M., Keenan, J., et al., “Study and modulation of human cortical excitability with transcranial magnetic stimulation,” J. Clin. Neurophysiol., 15, 333–343 (1998).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Polanowska, K. E., Lesniak, M. M., Seniów, J. B., et al., “Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation in early rehabilitation of patients with post-stroke non-fluent aphasia: a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled pilot study,” Restor. Neurol. Neurosci., 31, 761–71 (2013).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Poreisz, C., Boros, K., Antal, A., and Paulus, W., “Safety aspects of transcranial direct current stimulation concerning healthy subjects and patients,” Brain Res. Bull., 72, 208–214 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rehme, A. K., Eickhoff, S. B., Rottschy, C., et al., “Activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis of motor-related neural activity after stroke,” Neuroimage, 59, No. 3, 2771–2782 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rossi, C., Sallustio, F., Di Legge, S., et al., “Transcranial direct current stimulation of the affected hemisphere does not accelerate recovery of acute stroke patients,” Eur. J. Neurol., 20, 202–4 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rush, S. and Driscoll, D. A., “Current distribution in the brain from surface electrodes,” Anaest. Analg. Curr. Res., 47, 717–23 (1968).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Saur, D., Lange, R., Baumgaertner, A., et al., “Dynamics of language reorganization after stroke,” Brain, 129, No. 6, 1371–1384 (2006).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Seniow, J., Bilik, M., Lesniak, M., et al., “Transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with physiotherapy in rehabilitation of poststroke hemiparesis: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study,” Neurorehabil. Neural Repair, 26, 1072–9 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shah, P. P., Szaflarski, J. P., Allendorfer, J., and Hamilton, R. H., “Induction of neuroplasticity and recovery in post-stroke aphasia by non-invasive brain stimulation,” Front. Hum. Neurosci., 7, 888 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Stagg, C. J., Bachtiar, V., O’Shea, J., et al., “Cortical activation changes underlying stimulation-induced behavioral gains in chronic stroke,” Brain, 135, 276–84 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Szaflarski, J. P., Allendorfer, J. B., Banks, C., et al., “Recovered vs not-recovered from post-stroke aphasia: the contributions from the dominant and non-dominant hemispheres,” Restor. Neurol. Neurosci., 31, 347–360 (2013).

  • Thiel, A., Habedank, B., Herholz, K., et al., “From the left to the right: How the brain compensates progressive loss of language function,” Brain Lang., 98, 57–65 (2006).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Turkeltaub, P. E., Coslett, H. B., Thomas, A. L., et al., “The right hemisphere is not unitary in its role in aphasia recovery,” Cortex, 48, 1179–1186 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Venkatakrishnan, A. and Sandrini, M., “Combining transcranial direct current stimulation and neuroimaging: novel insights in understanding neuroplasticity,” J. Neurophysiol., 107, 1–4 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vines, B. W., Norton, A. C., and Schlaug, G., “Non-invasive brain stimulation enhances the effects of melodic intonation therapy,” Front. Psychol., 2, 230 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Volpato, C., Cavinato, M., Piccione, F., et al., “Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) of Broca’s area in chronic aphasia: a controlled outcome study,” Behav. Brain Res., 15, 211–6 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winhuisen, L., Thiel, A., Schumacher, B., et al., “Role of the contralateral inferior frontal gyrus in recovery of language function in post stroke aphasia: a combined repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and positron emission tomography study,” Stroke, 36, No. 8, 1759–1763 (2005).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • You, D. S., Kim, D. Y., Chun, M. H., et al., “Cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation of the right Wernicke’s area improves comprehension in subacute stroke patients,” Brain Lang., 119, No. 1, 1–5 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Center for Cognition and Decision Making, National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia

    M. A. Ulanov & Y. Y. Shtyrov

  2. MEG-Center, Moscow State University of Psychology and Education, Moscow, Russia

    M. A. Ulanov & T. A. Stroganova

Authors
  1. M. A. Ulanov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Y. Y. Shtyrov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. T. A. Stroganova
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. A. Ulanov.

Additional information

Published in Zhurnal Vysshei Nervnoi Deyatel’nosti imeni I. P. Pavlova, Vol. 68, No. 6, pp. 703–718, November–December, 2018.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ulanov, M.A., Shtyrov, Y.Y. & Stroganova, T.A. Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation as a Tool to Induce Language Recovery in Patients with Post-Stroke Aphasia. Neurosci Behav Physi 49, 1169–1180 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11055-019-00854-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11055-019-00854-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation