Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology

, Volume 48, Issue 7, pp 796–803 | Cite as

A Weakened Geomagnetic Field: Effects on Genomic Transcriptiln Activity, Learning, and Memory in Drosophila Melanogaster

  • E. A. NikitinaEmail author
  • A. V. Medvedeva
  • M. S. Gerasimenko
  • V. S. Pronikov
  • S. V. Surma
  • B. F. Shchegolev
  • E. V. Savvateeva-Popova

Neurodegenerative diseases result from a complex interaction between unfavorable environmental factors and the individual characteristics of the genome which predispose to disease development. Drosophila provides a suitable system for studies of the relationship between genomic organization and chromosomal architecture producing cognitive impairments. We present here the results of complex investigations of the effects of attenuation of the geomagnetic field (by screening) on genomic transcriptional activity, learning ability, and the formation of intermediate-term memory in Drosophila melanogaster. In this stress, a relationship was seen between modifications to transcriptional activity and the structure of the LIMK1 gene – a key enzyme in the actin remodeling cascade. Impairments to intermediate-term memory were seen on exposure to a weak static magnetic field in Canton-S wild-type flies. Conversely, this same stress restored learning ability and memory formation in agnts3 mutants.


Drosophila weak static magnetic field neurodegenerative diseases learning and memory histone acetylation 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bamburg, J. R. and Zheng, J. Q., “ADF/cofilin-mediated actin dynamics regulate AMPA receptor trafficking during synaptic plasticity,” Nat. Neurosci., 13, No. 10, 1208–1215 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bamburg, J. R., Bernstein, B. W., Davis, R. C., et al., “ADF/Cofilin-actin rods in neurodegenerative diseases,” Curr. Alzheimer Res., 7, No. 3, 241–250 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baranov, V. S., “Genomics on the pathway to predictive medicine,” Acta Naturae, 1, No. 3, 77–88 (2009).Google Scholar
  4. Cook, C. M., Saucier, D. M., Thomas, A. W., and Prato, F. S., “Exposure to ELF magnetic and ELF-modulated radiofrequency fields: the time course of physiological and cognitive effects observed in recent studies (2001–2005),” Bioelectromagnetics, 27, No. 8, 613–27 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Darieva, Z., Bulmer, R., Pic-Taylor, A., et al., “Polo kinase controls cellcycle-dependent transcription by targeting a coactivator protein,” Nature, 23, 494–498 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Davis, R. C., Marsden, I. T., Maloney, M. T., et al., “Amyloid beta dimers/trimers potently induce cofilin-actin rods that are inhibited by maintainin cofilin phosphorylation,” Mol. Neurodegener., 6, 10 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Eberharter, A. and Becker, P. B., “Histone acetylation: a switch between repressive and permissive chromatin,” EMBO Rep., 3, 224–229 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Eckel, B., Fasquelle, L., Moulin, M., et al., “Knock down of heat shock protein 27 (HspBl) induces degradation of several putative client proteins,” PLoS One, 7, No. 1, 297–319 (2012).Google Scholar
  9. Friedman, M., Li, S., and Li, X.-J., “Activation of gene transcription by heat shock protein 27 may contribute to its neuronal protection,” J. Biol. Chem., 9, 27,944–27,951 (2009).Google Scholar
  10. George, V. T., Brooks, G., and Humphrey, T. C., “Regulation of cell cycle and stress responses to hydrostatic pressure in fission yeast,” Mol. Biol. Cell., 18, No. 10, 4168–4179 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Grigor’yan, G. A. and Gulyaeva, N. V., “Stress reactivity and stress resistance in the pathogenesis of depressive disorders: the role of epigenetic mechanisms,” Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat., 65, No. 1, 19–32 (2015).Google Scholar
  12. Kaminskaya, A. N., Nikitina, E. A., Payalina, T. L., et al., “Effects of the ratio of LIMK1 isoforms on mating behavior in Drosophila melanogaster: a complex approach,” Ekolog. Genetika, 9, No. 4, 3–14 (2011).Google Scholar
  13. Kamyishev, N. G., Iliadi, K. G., Bragina, Yu. V., et al., “Detection of Drosophila mutants with memory defects after acquisition of conditioned reflex mating suppression,” Ros. Fiziol. Zh., 85, No. 1, 84–92 (1999).Google Scholar
  14. Kamyshev, N. G., Iliadi, K. G., and Bragina, J. V., “Drosophila conditioned courtship: Two ways of testing memory,” Learn. Mem., 6, No. 1, 1–20 (1999).PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Kapoor, P. and Shen, X., “Mechanisms of nuclear actin in chromatin remodeling complexes,” Trends Cell Biol., 24, No. 4, 238–246 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kholodov, Yu. A. and Lebedeva, N. N., Reactions of the Nervous System to Electromagnetic Fields, Nauka, Moscow (1992).Google Scholar
  17. Kourmouli, N., Jeppesen R, Mahadevhaiah, S., et al., “Heterochromatin and tri-methylated lysine 20 of histone H4 in animals,” J. Cell Sci., 117, 2491–2501 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kuznetsov, P. A., Farmakovskii, B. V., Askinazi, A. Yu., et al., Patent No. 2324989 RF, “A composite material for protection against electromagnetic irradiation” (2006).Google Scholar
  19. Landry, C. D., Kandel, E. R., and Rajasethupathy, P., “New mechanisms in memory storage: piRNAs and epigenetics,” Trends Neurosci., 36, No. 9, 535–542 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lednev, V. V., Belova, N. A., Ermakov, A. M., et al., “Regulation of heart rate variability in humans using extremely weak varying magnetic fields,” Biofizika, 53, 648–654 (2008).Google Scholar
  21. Li, J., Tan, M., Li, L., et al., “SAK, a new polo-like kinase, is transcriptionally repressed by p53 and induces apoptosis upon RNAi silencing,” Neoplasia, 7, No. 4, 312–323 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Maloney, M. T. and Bamburg, J. R., “Cofilin-mediated neurodegeneration in Alzheimer’s disease and other amyloidopathies,” Mol. Neurobiol., 35, No. 1, 21–44 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Masliah, E., “The role of synaptic proteins in Alzheimer’s disease,” Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci., 924, 68–75 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Medvedeva, A. V., Molotkov, D. A., Nikitina, E. A., et al., “A system regulating genetic and cytogenetic processes by the actin remodeling signal cascade: the agnostic locus of Drosophila,” Genetika, 44, No. 6, 669–681 (2008).Google Scholar
  25. Minamide, L. S., Striegl, A. M., Boyle, J. A., et al., “Neurodegenerative stimuli induce persistent ADF/cofilin-actin rods that disrupt distal neurite function,” Nat. Cell Biol., 2, 628–636 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Munsie, L., Caron, N., Atwal, R. S., et al., “Mutant huntingtin causes defective actin remodeling during stress: defining a new role for transglutaminase 2 in neurodegenerative disease,” Hum. Mol. Genet., 20, No. 10, 1937–1951 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nikitina, E. A., Medvedeva, A. V., Dolgaya, Yu. F., et al., “The contribution of nucleosome-free regions of the LIMK1 gene in the spatial organization of the nucleus in polymorphic variants of the agnostic locus in Drosophila – models of human genomic diseases,” in: Health – the Basis of Human Potential: Problems and Ways of Solving them (2013), Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 97–982.Google Scholar
  28. Rath, U., Ding, Y., Deng, H., et al., “The chromodomain protein, Chromator, interacts with JIL-1 kinase and regulates the structure of Drosophila polytene chromosomes,” J. Cell Sci., 119, 2332–2341 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rosso, S., Bollati, F., Bisbal, M., et al., “LIMK1 regulates Golgi dynamics, traffic of Golgi-derived vesicles, and process extension in primary cultured neurons,” Mol. Biol. Cell., 15, No. 7, 3433–3449 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Saito, A., Miyajima K, Akatsuka, J., et al., “CaMKIIβ-mediated LIMkinase activation plays a crucial role in BDNF-induced neuritogenesis,” Genes Cells, 18, No. 7, 533–543 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. SantosRosa, H., Schneider, R., Bannister, A. J., et al., “Active genes are tri-methylated at K4 of histone H3,” Nature, 419, 407–411 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Savvateeva-Popova, E. V., Nikitina, E. A., Kurochkina, M. S., et al., “Actions of a weakened geomagnetic field as a factor regulating sexual behavior in Drosophila melanogaster,” in: Proc. 4th Int. Congress “Weak and Superweak Fields and Irradiation in Biology and Medicine” (2012).Google Scholar
  33. Scott, R. W. and Oison, M. F., “LIM kinases: function, regulation and association with human disease,” J. Mol. Med., 85, 555–568 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sjölinder, M., Bjork, P., Soderberg, E., et al., “The growing pre-mRNA recruits actin and chromatin-modifying factors to transcriptionally active genes,” Genes Dev., 19, No. 16, 1871–1884 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sokal, R. R. and Rohlf, F. J., Biometry: The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research, W. H. Freeman, New York (1995).Google Scholar
  36. Stokin, G. B. and Goldstein, L. S., “Axonal transport and Alzheimer’s disease,” Annu. Rev. Biochem., 75, 607–627 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Swaminathan, J., Baxter, E., and Corces, V., “The role of histone H2Av variant replacement and histone H4 acetylation in the establishment of Drosophila heterochromatin,” Genes Dev., 19, 65–76 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Turner, B. M., “Cellular memory and the histone code,” Cell, 111, 285–291 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Vatolina, Yu. T., Boldyreva, L. V., Demakova, O. V., et al., “Identical functional organization of nonpolytene and polytene chromosomes in Drosophila melanogaster,” PLoS One, 6, No. 10, 259–260 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Visa, N. and Percipalle, P. “Nuclear functions of actin,” Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol., 2, No. 4, 620–634 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Vogel-Ciernia, A. and Wood, M. A., “Neuron-specific chromatin remodeling: A missing link in epigenetic mechanisms underlying synaptic plasticity, memory, and intellectual disability disorders,” Neuropharmacology, 80, 18–27 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. World Health Organization, International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), “Non-ionizing radiation, Part I: static and extremely low-frequency (ELF) electric and magnetic fields,” IARC Monogr. Evaluat. Carcinog. Risks to Humans, 80, 1–395 (2002).Google Scholar
  43. Zakharov, G. A., Molecular Genetic Studies of the Role of the Components of the Actin Remodeling Signal Cascade in the Genesis of Behavioral Disorders in Drosophila Melanogaster: Auth. Abstr. Mast. Thesis in Biol. Sci., St. Petersburg (2012).Google Scholar
  44. Zegerman, P., Canas, B., Pappin, D., and Kouzarides, T., “Histone H3 lysine 4 methylation disrupts binding of nucleosome remodeling and deacetylase (NuRD) repressor complex,” J. Biol. Chem., 277, 11621–11624 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. A. Nikitina
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • A. V. Medvedeva
    • 1
  • M. S. Gerasimenko
    • 2
  • V. S. Pronikov
    • 2
  • S. V. Surma
    • 1
  • B. F. Shchegolev
    • 1
  • E. V. Savvateeva-Popova
    • 1
  1. 1.Pavlov Institute of PhysiologyRussian Academy of SciencesSt. PetersburgRussia
  2. 2.Gertsen Russian State Pedagogical UniversitySt. PetersburgRussia

Personalised recommendations