Advertisement

Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology

, Volume 47, Issue 8, pp 960–966 | Cite as

Effects of Cognitive Loading on the Development of Muscle Fatigue

Article
  • 22 Downloads

The aim of the present work was to study the effects of cognitive loading requiring activation of the attention systems on the development of muscle fatigue. The dynamics of measures of arm muscle fatigue were evaluated in two sessions, separated by 5 min, consisting of 250 maximum-strength dynamometer compressions in response to acoustic target signals in three tasks with different levels of cognitive loading. The first experiment used only the target signals; in experiment two, the subjects had to discriminate the target signal from an equal number (250) of nontarget signals, which required voluntary attention. In experiment three, the proportions of target stimuli were 17 and 83%, respectively, i.e., the target stimulus was random (deviant), activating not only voluntary attention, but also involuntary attention. Measurements of grip strength, maximum voluntary contraction strength, and subjective assessments of fatigue before and after the motor tasks showed that experiments involving voluntary and involuntary attention to sound stimuli produced a smaller rate of development of muscle fatigue. Activation of involuntary attention, accompanied by the appearance of mismatch negativity on the EEG, enhanced the effect of voluntary attention.

Keywords

attention involuntary processing of auditory information event-related potentials mismatch negativity cognitive loading central muscle fatigue 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aleksandrov, A. A., Babanin, M. E., and Stankevich, L. N., “Mechanisms generating mismatch negativity and their role in the recognition of short-duration acoustic stimuli,” Ros. Fiziol. Zh., 88, No. 7, 809–816 (2002).Google Scholar
  2. Aleksandrov, A. A., Babanin, M.E., and Stankevich, L. N., “Mechanisms of generation of mismatch negativity and their role in the recognition of brief auditory stimuli,” Neurosci. Behav. Physiol., 33, No. 9, 867–872 (2003a).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Aleksandrov, A. A., Starostina L. V., and Stankevich, L. N., “Characteristics of event-related potentials of the human brain during recognition of short acoustic stimuli of different frequencies,” Neurosci. Behav. Physiol., 35, No. 2, 209–213 (2005).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Aleksandrov, A. A., Starostina, L. V., and Stankevich, L. N., “Characteristics of event-related potentials in the human brain on recognition of short acoustic stimuli of different frequencies,” Ros. Fiziol. Zh., 89, No. 8, 913–918 (2003b).Google Scholar
  5. Asmussen, E. and Mazin, B., “Recuperation after muscular fatigue by ‘diverting activities’,” Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. Occup. Physiol., 38, No. 1, 1–7 (1978).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bigland-Ritchie, B. and Woods, J. J., “Changes in muscle contractile properties and neural control during human muscular fatigue,” Muscle Nerve, 7, No. 9, 691–699 (1984).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Borg, G., “Borg’s Perceived Exertion and Pain Scales,” in: Human Kinetics, Champaign, IL (1998).Google Scholar
  8. Davranche, K. and Pichon, A., “Critical flicker frequency threshold increment after an exhausting exercise,” J. Sport Exercise Psychol., 27, No. 4, 515–520 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Evstigneeva, M. D. and Aleksandrov, A. A., “Mismatch negativity: the contribution of differences in the refractoriness of stimulus-specific neuronal populations,” Ros. Fiziol. Zh., 94, No. 10, 1147–1157 (2008).Google Scholar
  10. Evstigneeva, M. D. and Aleksandrov, A. A., “Mismatch negativity: The contribution of differences in the refractoriness of stimulus-specific neuron populations,” Neurosci. Behav. Physiol., 39, No. 9, 833–840 (2009).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Evstigneeva, M. D., Alexandrov, A. A., Mathiassen, S. E., and Lyskov, E., “Muscle contraction force and fatigue: Effects on mis-match negativity,” Neuroreport, 21, No. 18, 1152–1156 (2010).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Evstigneeva, M., Aleksandrov, A., Mathiassen, S. E., and Lyskov, E., “Concurrent cognitive task may improve motor work performance and reduce muscle fatigue,” Work, 41, Suppl. 1, 2893–2896 (2012).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Gandevia, S. C., “Spinal and supraspinal factors in human muscle fatigue,” Physiol. Rev., 81, No. 4, 1725–1789 (2001).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Jasper, H., “Report of the committee on methods of clinical examination in electroencephalography,” EEG Clin. Neurophysiol., 10, 370–375 (1957).Google Scholar
  15. Kirmizi-Alsan, E., Bayraktaroglu, Z., Gurvit, H., et al., “Comparative analysis of event-related potentials during Go/NoGo and CPT: Decomposition of electrophysiological markers of response inhibition and sustained attention,” Brain Res., 1104, No. 1, 114–128 (2006).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Lorist, M. M., Kernell, D., Meijman, T. E., and Zijdewind, L., “Motor fatigue and cognitive task performance in humans,” J. Physiol., 545, No. 1, 313–319 (2002).CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Mathiassen, S. E., Crenshaw, A., Hellstrum, E., et al., “Does mental load during pauses in monotonous work enhance recovery of fatigue?” Int. J. Psychophysiology, 69, 242–275 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mathiassen, S. E., Hallman, D. M., Lyskov, E., and Hygge, S., “Can cognitive activities during breaks in repetitive manual work accelerate recovery from fatigue? A controlled experiment,” PLoS One, 9, No. 11, e112090 (2014).CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Näätänen, R. and Alho, K., “Event–related potentials in human selective attention research,” in: Handbook of Neuropsychology, Johnson, R. J. and Baron, J. C. (eds.), Elsevier, Amsterdam (1995), pp. 115–123.Google Scholar
  20. Näätänen, R. and Gaillard, A. W. K., “The N2 deflection of ERP and the orienting reflex,” in: EEG Correlates of Information Processing. Theoretical Issues, Gaillard, A. W. K. and Ritter, W. (eds.), Amsterdam (1983), pp. 119–141.Google Scholar
  21. Näätänen, R., “The orienting response theory: An integration of informational and energetical aspects of brain function,” in: Adaptation to Stress and Task Demands: Energetical Aspects of Human Information Processing, Hockey, G. R., Coles, M., and Gaillard, A. (eds.), Martinus Nijhoff, Leiden (1986), pp. 91–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Näätänen, R., Astikainen, P., Ruusuvirta, T., and Huotilainen, M., “Auto matic auditory intelligence: an expression of the sensory–cognitive core of cognitive processes,” Brain Res. Rev., 64, No. 1, 123–136 (2010).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Näätänen, R., Kujala, T., and Winkler, I., “Auditory processing that leads to conscious perception: A unique window to central auditory processing opened by the mismatch negativity and related responses,” Psychophysiology, 48, No. 1, 4–22 (2011).Google Scholar
  24. Setschenow, I., “Zur Frage nach der Einwirkung sensitiver Reize auf die Muskelarbeit des Menschen,” Le Physiologiste Russe, No. 3, 56–69 (1903).Google Scholar
  25. Sokolov, E. N., Evtikhin, D. V., Polyanskii, V. B., and Nezlina, N. I., “The orientational reflex: the ‘aiming reflex’ and the ‘projector of attention,’” Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat., No. 4, 421–437 (2001).Google Scholar
  26. Tiitinen, H., May, P., Reinikainen, K., and Näätänen, R., “Attention novelty detection in humans is governed by pre–attentive sensory memory,” Nature, 372, No. 6501, 90–92 (1994).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Zijdewind, I., van Duinen, H., Zielman, R., and Lorist, M. M., “Interaction between force production and cognitive performance in humans,” Clin. Neurophysiol., 117, No. 3, 660–667 (2006).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Higher Nervous Activity and PsychophysiologySt. Petersburg State UniversitySt. PetersburgRussia

Personalised recommendations