Advertisement

Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology

, Volume 47, Issue 8, pp 895–899 | Cite as

Association of the GRIN2B Gene Polymorphism with Verbal Fluency and Impairments to Abstract Thought in Schizophrenia

  • M. V. Alfimova
  • V. E. Golimbet
  • G. I. Korovaitseva
  • L. I. Abramova
  • T. V. Lezheiko
  • E. V. Aksenova
Article
  • 21 Downloads

Objective. This study was conducted to seek associations between the GRIN2B gene and signs of impairments to thought and speech in schizophrenia, which may be based on access to the mental lexicon. Materials and methods. A group 552 patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders were studied to establish associations between the rs7301328 polymorphism of the GRIN2B gene and semantic verbal fluency and five symptoms of impairments to thought and speech on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS). Results and conclusions. Associations between the GRIN2B gene and verbal fluency (p = 0.013) and impairment to abstract thought (p = 0.012) were found. Verbal fluency was not found to have a mediatory role in the association between the gene and the impairment to thought. These results suggest that the GRIN2B gene has a modifying action on language processes extracting information from the mental lexicon on the basis of semantic features and, furthermore, that it makes a contribution to the variability of clinically marked impairments to abstract thought in patients with schizophrenia. The heterozygous genotype may be protective in relation to the development of thought and speech pathology.

Keywords

semantic verbal fluency PANSS schizophrenia GRIN2B impaired thought 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    T. P. Klyushnik, O. S. Brusov, G. Sh. Burbaeva, and G. I. Kolyaskina, “Current views of the main pathogenetic hypotheses of schizophrenia,” Psikhiatriya, 1, No. 43, 7–13 (2010).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    C. Adler, T. Goldberg, A. Malhotra, et al., “Effects of ketamine on thought disorder, working memory, and semantic memory in healthy volunteers,” Biol. Psychiatry, 43, No. 11, 811–816 (1998), doi:  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0006-3223(97)00556-8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    C. Adler, A. Malhotra, I. Elman, et al., “Comparison of ketamine-induced thought disorder in healthy volunteers and thought disorder in schizophrenia,” Am. J. Psychiatry, 156, No. 10, 1646–1649 (1999), doi:  https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.156.10.1646.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    J. Krystal, E. Perry, R. Gueorguieva, et al., “Comparative and interactive human psychopharmacologic effects of ketamine and amphetamine,” Arch. Gen. Psychiatry, 62, No. 9, 985 (2005), doi:  https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.62.9.985.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    A. Nagels, A. Kirner-Veselinovic, R. Wiese, et al., “Effects of ketamine-induced psychopathological symptoms on continuous overt rhyme fluency,” Eur. Arch. Psychiatry Clin. Neurosci., 262, No. 5, 403–414 (2011), doi:  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00406-011-0281-8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    M. Covington, W. Riedel, C. Brown, et al., “Does ketamine mimic aspects of schizophrenic speech?” J. Psychopharmacol., 21, No. 3, 338–346 (2007), doi:  https://doi.org/10.1177/0269881107077729.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    D. Levy, M. Coleman, H. Sung, et al., “The genetic basis of thought disorder and language and communication disturbances in schizophrenia,” J. Neurolinguistics, 23, No. 3, 176–192 (2010), doi:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroling.2009.08.003.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Y. Yang, W. Li, H. Zhang, et al., “Association study of N-methyl-Daspartate receptor subunit 2B (GRIN2B) polymorphisms and schizophrenia symptoms in the Han Chinese population,” PLoS ONE, 10, No. 5, 0125925 (2015), doi:  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0125925.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    T. Ohtsuki, K. Sakurai, H. Dou, et al., “Mutation analysis of the NMDAR2B (GRIN2B) gene in schizophrenia,” Mol. Psychiatry, 6, No. 2, 211–216 (2001), doi:  https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.mp.4000808.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    D. Li and L. He, “Association study between the NMDA receptor 2B subunit gene (GRIN2B) and schizophrenia: A HuGE review and meta-analysis,” Genet. Med., 9, No. 1, 4–8 (2007), doi:  https://doi.org/10.1097/01.gim.0000250507.96760.4b.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    A. E. Gareeva, D. F. Zakirov, and E. K. Khusnutdinova, “Analysis of the association between polymorphous variants of the GRIN2B gene and paranoid schizophrenia and the efficacy of treatment with typical neuroleptics in the Russian and Tatar populations in the Republic of Bashkortostan,” Genetika, 49, No. 9, 1106–111 (2013).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    C. Weickert, S. Fung, V. Catts, et al., “Molecular evidence of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor hypofunction in schizophrenia,” Mol. Psychiatry, 18, No. 11, 1185–1192 (2012), doi:  https://doi.org/10.1038/mp.2012.137.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    M. Radanovic, R. Sousa, L. Valiengo, et al., “Formal thought disorder and language impairment in schizophrenia,” Arq. Neuropsiquiatr., 71, No. 1, 55–60 (2013), doi:  https://doi.org/10.1590/s0004-282x2012005000015.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    H. Allen, P. Liddle, and C. Frith, “Negative features, retrieval processes and verbal fluency in schizophrenia,” Brit. J. Psychiatry, 163, No. 6, 769–775 (1993), doi:  https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.163.6.769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    E. Joyce, S. Collinson, and P. Crichton, “Verbal fluency in schizophrenia: relationship with executive function, semantic memory and clinical alogia,” Psychol. Med., 26, No. 1, 39 (1996), doi:  https://doi.org/10.1017/s0033291700033705.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    T. Goldberg, M. Aloia, M. Gourovitch, et al., “Cognitive substrates of thought disorder. I: The semantic system,” Am. J. Psychiatry, 155, No. 12, 1671–1676 (1998), doi:  https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.155.12.1671.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Y. Benjamini and Y. Hochberg, “On the adaptive control of the false discovery rate in multiple testing with independent statistics,” J. Educat. Behav. Stat., 25, No. 1, 60–83 (2000), doi:  https://doi.org/10.3102/10769986025001060.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    M. V. Alfimova, “Semantic verbal fluency: normative data and characteristics of task performance by patients with schizophrenia,” Sotsial. Klin. Psikhiatr., 20, No. 3, 20–25 (2010).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    F. Mori, M. Ribolsi, H. Kusayanagi, et al., “Genetic variants of the NMDA receptor influence cortical excitability and plasticity in humans,” J. Neurophysiol., 106, No. 4, 1637–1643 (2011), doi:  https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00318.2011.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Z. Shao, E. Janse, K. Visser, and A. Meyer, “What do verbal fluency tasks measure? Predictors of verbal fluency performance in older adults,” Front. Psychol., 5, 772, (2014), doi:  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00772. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    R. Stolwyk, B. Bannirchelvam, C. Kraan, and K. Simpson, “The cognitive abilities associated with verbal fluency task performance differ across fluency variants and age groups in healthy young and old adults,” J. Clin. Exp. Neuropsychol., 37, No. 1, 70–83 (2014), doi:  https://doi.org/10.1080/13803395.2014.988125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    S. Qin, X. Zhao, Y. Pan, et al., “An association study of the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor NR1 subunit gene (GRIN1) and NR2B subunit gene (GRIN2B) in schizophrenia with universal DNA microarray,” Eur. J. Hum. Genet., 13, No. 7, 807–814 (2005), doi:  https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201418.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    K. Nicodemus, B. Elvevag, P. Foltz, et al., “Category fluency, latent semantic analysis and schizophrenia: a candidate gene approach,” Cortex, 55 182–191 (2014), doi:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2013.12.004.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    E. Cuyas, A. Verdejo-Garcia, A. Fagundo, et al., “The influence of genetic and environmental factors among MDMA users in cognitive performance,” PLoS ONE, 6, No. 11, 27206 (2011), doi:  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0027206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    S. Ocklenburg, L. Arning, C. Hahn, et al., “Variation in the NMDA receptor 2B subunit gene GRIN2B is associated with differential language lateralization,” Behav. Brain Res., 225, No. 1, 284–289 (2011), doi:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2011.07.042.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    K. Ludwig, D. Roeske, S. Herms, et al., “Variation in GRIN2B contributes to weak performance in verbal short-term memory in children with dyslexia,” Am. J. Med. Genet. B. Neuropsychiatr. Genet., 153B, No. 2, 503–511 (2010), doi:  https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.b.31007.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    S. Mascheretti, A. Facoetti, R. Giorda, et al., “GRIN2B mediates susceptibility to intelligence quotient and cognitive impairments in developmental dyslexia,” Psychiatr. Genet., 25, No. 1, 9–20 (2015), doi:  https://doi.org/10.1097/ypg.0000000000000068.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    D. de Quervain and A. Papassotiropoulos, “Identification of a genetic cluster influencing memory performance and hippocampal activity in humans,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 103, No. 11, 4270–4274 (2006), doi:  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0510212103.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    A. Jablensky, B. Morar, S. Wiltshire, et al., “Polymorphisms associated with normal memory variation also affect memory impairment in schizophrenia,” Genes Brain Behav., 10, No. 4, 410–417 (2011), doi:  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-183x.2011.00679.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    T. Greenwood, G. Light, N. Swerdlow, et al., “Association analysis of 94 candidate genes and schizophrenia-related endophenotypes,” PLoS ONE, 7, No. 1, 29630 (2012), doi:  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0029630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    A. Nagels, A. Kirner-Veselinovic, S. Krach, and T. Kircher, “Neural correlates of S-ketamine induced psychosis during overt continuous verbal fluency,” NeuroImage, 54, No. 2, 1307–1314 (2011), doi:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.08.021.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    T. Kircher, D. Leube, M. Erb, et al., “Neural correlates of metaphor processing in schizophrenia,” NeuroImage, 34, No. 1, 281–289 (2007), doi:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.08.044.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    C. Breitenstein, A. Jansen, M. Deppe, et al., “Hippocampus activity differentiates good from poor learners of a novel lexicon,” Neuro-Image, 25, No. 3, 958–968 (2005), doi:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.12.019.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Y. Glikmann-Johnston, N. Oren, T. Hendler, and I. Shapira-Lichter, “Distinct functional connectivity of the hippocampus during semantic and phonemic fluency,” Neuropsychologia, 69 39–49 (2015), doi:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.01.031.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    T. Kircher, C. Whitney, T. Krings, et al., “Hippocampal dysfunction during free word association in male patients with schizophrenia,” Schizophr. Res., 101, No. 1–3, 242–255 (2008), doi:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2008.02.003.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. V. Alfimova
    • 1
  • V. E. Golimbet
    • 1
  • G. I. Korovaitseva
    • 1
  • L. I. Abramova
    • 1
  • T. V. Lezheiko
    • 1
  • E. V. Aksenova
    • 1
  1. 1.Scientific Center for Mental HealthMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations