A group of 24 adult subjects performed a task consisting of delayed motor reproduction (copying) of unfamiliar outline figures (trajectory templates). Templates were presented for 250 msec and were reproduced in response to an instruction given by sound signal (a brief click), delayed relative to the end of the period of presentation of the trajectory image by time T = 0, 500, 1000, 2000, or 4000 msec. Subjects performed the task in a block experiment in which the delay T was constant within each block of 32 trials. Reaction time (RT) was analyzed, along with the mean duration of movement along one segment of the trajectory (MT) and the duration of the pause between adjacent segments (DT). Reaction time RT was found to show a non-monotonic dependence on delay T, decreasing at T ≤ 1000 msec and increasing at T ≤ 2000 msec. The relationship between RT and T was adequately described by a very simple additive model – the sum of a linearly increasing component and an exponentially decreasing component. The linear increase reflected a decrease in the accuracy of predicting the moment at which the instruction signal would be presented as the delay T increased (foreperiod effect [Niemi and Näätänen, 1981; Meulenbroek and Van Galen, 1988]). The exponentially decreasing component is suggested to reflect transformation of the internal representation of the trajectory template during the period it is held in short-term memory.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abrahamse, E. L., Jimenez, L., Verwey, W. B., and Clegg, B. A., “Representing serial action and perception,” Psychon. Bull. Rev., 17, No. 5, 603–23 (2010).
Agam, Y., Huang, J., and Sekuler, R., “Neural correlates of sequence encoding in visuomotor learning,” J. Neurophysiol., 103, No. 3, 1418–24 (2010).
Ashe, L., Taira, M., Smyrnis, N., et al., “Motor cortical activity preceding a memorized movement trajectory with an orthogonal bend,” Exp. Brain Res., 95, No. 1, 118–30 (1993).
Averbeck, B. B., Chafee, M. V., Crowe, D. A., and Georgopoulos, A. P., “Parallel processing of serial movements in prefrontal cortex,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 99, No. 20, 13,172–13,177 (2002).
Bastian, A., Schöner, G., and Riehle, A., “Preshaping and continuous evolution of motor cortical representations during movement preparation,” Eur. J. Neurosci., 18, No. 7, 2047–58 (2003).
Bertelson, P. and Tisseyre, F., “The time-course of preparation with regular and irregular foreperiods,” Q. J. Exp. Psychol., 20, No. 3, 297–300 (1968).
Boutin, A., Massen, C., and Heuer, H., “Modality-specific organization in the representation of sensorimotor sequences,” Front Psychol., 4, 93 (2013).
Crammond, D. J. and Kalaska, J. F., “Prior information in motor and premotor cortex: activity during the delay period and effect on pre-movement activity,” J. Neurophysiol., 84, No. 2, 986–1005 (2000).
Desmurget, M., Pelisson, D., Rossetti, Y., and Prablanc, C. “From eye to hand: planning goal-directed movements,” Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev., 22, No. 6, 761–88 (1998).
Erlhagen, W. and Schöner, G., “Dynamic field theory of movement preparation,” Psychol. Rev., 109, No. 3, 545–572 (2002).
Holcombe, A. O., “Seeing slow and seeing fast: two limits on perception,” Trends Cogn. Sci., 13, No. 5, 216–221 (2009).
Keele, S. W., Ivry, R., Mayr, U., et al., “The cognitive and neural architecture of sequence representation,” Psychol. Rev., 110, No. 2, 316–39 (2003).
Korneev, A. A. and Kurganskii, A. V., “The internal representation of a series of movements on reproduction of a static figure and the trajectory of a moving object,” Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat., 63, No. 4, 437–450 (2013).
Lewis, S. M., Jerde, T. A., Tzagarakis, C., et al., “Cerebellar activation during copying geometrical shapes,” J. Neurophysiol., 90, No. 6, 3874–87 (2003).
Los, S. A. and Agter, F., “Reweighting sequential effects across different distributions of foreperiods: Segregating elementary contributions to nonspecific preparation,” Percept. Psychophys., 67, No. 7, 1161–1170 (2005).
Los, S. A., Kruijne, W., and Meeter, M., “Outlines of a multiple trace theory of temporal preparation,” Front. Psychol., 5, 1058 (2014).
Machinskaya, R. I., Talalai, I. V., and Kurganskii, A. V., “Functional organization of the cerebral cortex in directed and implicit modally specific anticipatory attention. Analysis of the coherence of the alpha rhythm in the space of sources,” Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat., 65, No. 5, XXX (2015) (in press).
Meulenbroek, R. G. and Van Galen, G. P., “Foreperiod duration and the analysis of motor stages in a line-drawing task,” Acta Psychol. (Amst.), 69, No. 1, 19–34 (1988).
Niemi, P. and Näätänen, R., “Foreperiod and simple reaction time,” Psychol. Bull., 89, No. 1, 133–162 (1981).
Rhodes, B. J., Bullock, D., Verwey, W. B., et al., “Learning and production of movement sequences: Behavioral, neurophysiological, and modeling perspectives,” Hum. Mov. Sci., 23, 699–746 (2004).
Rosenbaum, D. A., Cohen, R. G., Jax, S. A., et al., “The problem of serial order in behavior: Lashley’s legacy,” Hum. Mov. Sci., 26, No. 4, 525–554 (2007).
Swinnen, S. P., Vangheluwe, S., Wagemans, J., et al., “Shared neural resources between left and right interlimb coordination skills: the neural substrate of abstract motor representations,” Neuroimage, 49, No. 3, 2570–80 (2010).
Wong, A. L., Haith, A. M., and Krakauer, J. W., “Motor planning,” Neuroscientist., doi: 10.1177/1073858414541484 [Epub ahead of print] (2014).
Xu, Y. and Chun, M. M., “Selecting and perceiving multiple visual objects,” Trends Cogn. Sci., 13, No. 4, 167–174 (2009).
Zimmermann, E., Morrone, M. C., and Burr, D. C., “Buildup of spatial information over time and across eye movements,” Behav. Brain Res., 275, 281–287 (2014).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Translated from Zhurnal Vysshei Nervnoi Deyatel’nosti imeni I. P. Pavlova, Vol. 66, No. 1, pp. 51–61, January–February, 2016.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Korneev, A.A., Lomakin, D.I. & Kurganskii, A.V. Delayed Copying of Unfamiliar Outline Images: Does the Decrease in Reaction Time with the Increase in the Delay Reflect a Change in the Internal Representation of the Forthcoming Movement?. Neurosci Behav Physi 47, 413–420 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11055-017-0414-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11055-017-0414-2