Skip to main content
Log in

Potential of a Wavelet Synchronization Method for Assessing the Long-Latency Components of Auditory Evoked Potentials in Healthy Humans

  • Published:
Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

The traditional characteristics of long-latency event-related potentials, which are established indictors of higher nervous activity, include the amplitude-time parameters of the components, the topography of power levels, and identification of the locations of equivalent dipole sources. Evaluation of the synchronization of event-related activity is difficult because of the short duration of the process. Wavelet analysis overcomes the disadvantages of traditional Fourier analysis and allows calculation of these characteristics, particularly phase synchronization. The present report is methodological in nature. It proposes an approach to the component analysis of wavelet synchronization of averaged auditory event-related potentials in healthy humans in states with different levels of concentration of attention. The differences seen in the spatial organization of signals seen on listening to sounds and counting them indicate the potential of this methodological approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. V. S. Rusinov (ed.), Biopotentials in the Human Brain (mathematical analysis) [in Russian], Meditsina, Moscow (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  2. V. V. Gnezditskii, Evoked Potentials in the Brain in Clinical Practice [in Russian], TRTY, Taganrog (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  3. M. N. Livanov, Spatial Organization of Brain Processes [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow 172

  4. R. I. Machinskaya, “Functional maturation of the brain and the formation of the neurophysiological mechanisms of selective voluntary attention in children of young school age,” Fiziol. Cheloveka, 32, No. 1, 26–36 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  5. E. L. Masherov, P. E. Volynskii, and G. A. Shchekutiev, “A single approach to removing spatial non-correlating artifacts from the EEG,” Fiziol. Cheloveka,, 35, No. 4, 124–134 (2009).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. R. Näätänen, Attention and Brain Function [in Russian], Moscow State University Press, Moscow (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  7. A. R. Nikolaev, G. A. Ivanitskii, and A. M. Ivanitskii, “Studies of cortical interactions over short time intervals during the search for verbal associations,” Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat., 50, No. 1, 44–61 (2000).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. E. V. Sharova, “Electrophysiological correlates of brain reactions to afferent stimuli in post-comatose unconscious states in patients with severe craniocerebral trauma,” Fiziol. Cheloveka, 31, No. 3, 5–15 (2005).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. A. B. Shitov, Development of Numerical Methods and Programs Related to the Use of Wavelet Analysis for Modeling and Processing Experimental Data [in Russian], Dissertation in Phys.-Math. Sciences, Ivanovo State University, Ivanovo (2001).

  10. A. R. Nikolaev, P. Gong, and C. Leeuwen, “Evoked phase synchronization between adjacent high-density electrodes in human scalp EEG: Duration and time course related to behavior,” Clin. Neurophysiol., 116, 2403–2419 (2005).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. C. J. James and C. W. Hesse, “Independent component analysis for biomedical signals,” Physiol. Meas., 26, No. 1, 15–39 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. J. A. Jiang, C. F. Chao, M. J. Chiu, R. G. Lee, C. L. Tseng, and R. Lin, “An automatic analysis method for detecting and eliminating ECG artefacts in EEG,” Comput. Biol. Med., 37, No. 11, 1660–1671 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. R. Quian Quiroga and H. Garcia, “Single-trial event-related potentials with wavelet denoising,” Clin. Neurophysiol., 114, 376–390 (2003).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. P. Senthil Kumar, R. Armuganathan, K. Sivakumar, and C. Vimal, “Removal of ocular artifacts in the EEG through wavelet transform without using an EOG reference channel,” Int. J. Open Problems Compt. Math., 1, No. 3, 188–200 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  15. G. Stephane, T. Cenier, S. Garcia, P. Litaudon, and N. Buonviso, “A wavelet-based method for local phase extraction from a multifrequency oscillatory signal,” J. Neurosci. Meth., 160, No. 1, 135–143 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  16. M. Teplan, K. Susmakova, M. Palus, and M. Vejmelka, “Phase synchronization in human EEG during audiovisual stimulation,” Electromagn. Biol. Med., 28, No. 1, 80–84 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. R. Vigário, J. Säräelä, V. Jousmäki, M. Hämäläinen, and E. Oja, “Independent component approach to the analysis of EEG and MEG recordings,” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 47, No. 5, 589–593 (2000).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Z. Wang, N. K. Logothetis, and H. Liang, “Extraction of perceptrelated induced local field potential during spontaneously reversing perception,” Neural Netw., 22, No. 5–6, 720–727 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. S. Romanov.

Additional information

Translated from Zhurnal Vysshei Nervnoi Deyatel’nosti imeni I. P. Pavlova, Vol. 61, No. 1, pp. 112–118, January–February, 2011.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Romanov, A.S., Sharova, E.V., Kuznetsova, O.A. et al. Potential of a Wavelet Synchronization Method for Assessing the Long-Latency Components of Auditory Evoked Potentials in Healthy Humans. Neurosci Behav Physi 42, 588–593 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11055-012-9605-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11055-012-9605-z

Keywords

Navigation