Skip to main content
Log in

Background Gamma Activity in the Electroencephalogram as a Measure of the Level of Sustained (tonic) Attention during Execution of the “Active Oddball” Paradigm in Rabbits

  • Published:
Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Tonic brain activity has significant influences on the nature of a subject’s responses to target sensory stimuli. We report here studies of the dynamics of the background activity in the gamma-rhythm range of the EEG in rabbits during execution of an “active oddball” paradigm modified for animals – a task widely used for studies of attention. Increased levels of power and coherence in background gamma activity were found to reflect expectation of a target stimulus, correct responses to stimuli being executed at a particular level of background gamma activity which probably corresponds to the optimum level of sustained (tonic) attention. Decreases in the level of gamma activity led to missed responses to the target stimulus, while excess levels lead to erroneous responses to non-target signals (false anxiety). These dynamics of background gamma activity are interpreted as resulting from oscillations in the level of tonic cholinergic activation of right cerebral cortex.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. N. N. Danilova and S. A. Astafiev, “Attention in humans as a specific link between EEG rhythms and wave modulators of the cardiac rhythm,” Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat., 50, No. 5, 791–804 (2000).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. V. N. Dumenko, High-Frequency EEG Components and Operant Learning [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  3. B. I. Kotlyar and N. O. Timofeeva, “Tonic mechanisms of the conditioned reflex,” Usp. Fiziol. Nauk., 17, No. 3, 3–21 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  4. R. Näätänen, Attention and Brain Functions [in Russian], Moscow State University Press, Moscow (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  5. I. I. Semikopnaya, B. V. Chernyshev,Ya. A. Panasyuk, and N. O. Timofeeva, A Model of the Unusual Stimulus (Oddball) Paradigm for Rabbits. Mechanisms of Adaptive Behavior. Proceedings [in Russian], St. Petersburg (2005), pp. 81–82.

  6. N. D. Sorokina, G. V. Selitskii, and N. S. Kositsyn, “Neurobiological studies of bioelectrical brain activity in the gamma rhythm in humans,” Usp. Fiziol. Nauk., 37, No. 3, (2006), pp. 3–10.

    Google Scholar 

  7. I. S. Utochkin, “Theoretical and empirical bases of the multilevel approach to attention. Psychology,” Zh. Vyssh. Shkoly Ekon., 5, No. 3, 31–66 (2008).

  8. B. V. Chernyshev,Ya. A. Panasyuk, I. I. Semikopnaya, and N. O. Timofeeva, “Neuron activity in the basal magnocellular nucleus during execution of an operant conditioned reflex,” Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat., 53, No. 5, 633–645 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  9. B. Baird, “An oscillating cortical model of auditory attention and electrophysiology,” Neurocomputing, 26–27, 319–328 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. A. Berger and M. I. Posner, “Pathologies of brain attentional networks,” Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev., 24, No. 1, 3–5 (2000).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. C. Börgers, S. Epstein, and N. J. Kopell, “Background gamma rhythmicity and attention in cortical local circuits: a computational study,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 102, 7002–7007 (2005).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. J. J. Bouyer, M. F. Montaron, A. Rougeul, and P. Buser, “Parietal electrocortical rhythms in the cat: their relation to a behavior of focused attention and possible mesencephalic control through a dopaminergic pathway,” C. R. Seances Acad. Sci., 291, 779–783 (1980).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. E. G. Cape and B. E. Jones, “Effects of glutamate agonist versus procaine microinjections into the basal forebrain cholinergic cell area upon gamma and theta EEG activity and sleep-wake state,” Eur. J. Neurosci., 12, 2166–2184 (2000).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. S. Debener, C. S. Hermann, C. Kranczioch, D. Gembris, and A. K. Engel, “Top-down attentional processing enhances evoked gamma band activity,” Neuroreport, 14, 683–686 (2003).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. S. Dehaene and J. P. Changeux, “Ongoing spontaneous activity controls access to consciousness: a neuronal model for inattentional blindness,” PLoS Biol., 3, No. 5, e141 (2005).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. A. K. Engel, P. Fries, and W. Singer, “Dynamic prediction: oscillations and synchrony in top-down processing,” Nat. Rev. Neurosci., 2, 704–716 (2001).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. E. Fifkova and J. Marsala, “Stereotaxic atlases for the cat, rabbit, and rat,” in: Electrophysiological Methods in Biological Research [in Russian], J. Bures and M. Petran (eds.), Academic Press, New York (1967).

  18. P. Fries, J. Reynolds, A. E. Rorie, and R. Desimone, “Modulation of oscillatory neuronal synchronization by selective visual attention,” Science, 291, 1560–1563 (2001).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. F. Golmayo, A. Nuñez, and F. Zaborsky, “Electrophysiological evidence for the existence of a posterior cortical-prefrontal-basal forebrain circuitry in modulating sensory responses in visual and somatosensory rat cortical areas,” Neurosci., 119, No. 2, 597–609 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. D. W. Gross and J. Gotman, “Correlation of high-frequency oscillations with the sleep-wake cycle and cognitive activity in humans,” Neurosci., 94, 1005–1018 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. C. S. Herrmann and R. T. Knight, “Mechanisms of human attention: event-related potentials and oscillations,” Neurosci. Behav. Res., 25, 465–476 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. S. Makeig and T. P. Jung, “Tonic, phasic, and transient EEG correlates of auditory awareness in drowsiness,” Cogn. Brain Res., 4, 15–25 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. M. M. Mesulam, “From sensation to cognition,” Brain, 121, No. 6, 1013–1052 (1998).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. M. M. Mesulam, E. J. Mufson, B. H. Wauner, and A. I. Levey, “Central cholinergic pathways in the rat: an overview based on an alternative nomenclature (Ch1–Ch6),” Neurosci., 10, 1185–1201 (1983).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. R. Parasuraman, “Sustained attention in detection and discrimination,” in: Varieties of Attention, R. Parasuraman and D. R. Davies (eds.), Academic Press, Orlando, FL (1984), pp. 243–269 (1984).

  26. J. Polich, “Updating P300: An integrative theory of P3a and P3b,” Clin. Neurophysiol., 118, No. 10, 2128–2148 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. R. Rodriguez, U. Kallenbach, W. Singer, and M. H. Munk, “Shortand long-term effects of cholinergic modulation on gamma oscillations and response synchronization in the visual cortex,” J. Neurosci., 24, 10369–10378 (2004).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. C. B. Saper, “Organization of cerebral cortical afferent systems in the rat. II. Magnocellular basal nucleus,” J. Comp. Neurol., 222, 313–342 (1984).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. M. Sarter and J. P. Bruno, “Cortical cholinergic inputs mediating arousal, attentional processing and dreaming: differential afferent regulation of the basal forebrain by telencephalic and brain stem afferents,” Neurosci., 95, No. 4, 933–952 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. F. Zaborszky, R. P. Gaykema, D. J. Swanson, and W. E. Cullinan, “Cortical input to the basal forebrain,” Neurosci., 79, No. 4, 1051–1078 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. V. Chernyshev.

Additional information

A. A. Moskvitin (Deceased)

Translated from Zhurnal Vysshei Nervnoi Deyatel’nosti imeni I. P. Pavlova, Vol. 61, No. 1, pp. 75–84, January–February, 2011.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Panasyuk, Y.A., Matselepa, O.B., Chernyshev, B.V. et al. Background Gamma Activity in the Electroencephalogram as a Measure of the Level of Sustained (tonic) Attention during Execution of the “Active Oddball” Paradigm in Rabbits. Neurosci Behav Physi 42, 567–574 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11055-012-9602-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11055-012-9602-2

Keywords

Navigation