This article discusses three questions associated with studies of consciousness: the possible mechanisms whereby subjective experiences arise; the encoding of mental operations in electroencephalogram (EEG) rhythms; and the problem of understanding, which is important for creating artificial intelligence. 1) According to information synthesis theory, subjective experience arises as a result of the return of nerve spikes to the sites of the original projections, followed by comparison and synthesis of sensory information with representations extracted from memory and arriving at the motivation centers. This theory is based on results obtained from studies of the mechanisms of perception and thought. The synthesis centers underlying perceptions are located in the projection areas, while those underlying thought are located in the associative cortex. 2) Performance of mental actions involves consistent rearrangements of cortical rhythms. The rhythmic patterns which arise are highly specific for particular types of thinking. This was used as the basis to construct a technique for the highly accurate recognition of mental operations using EEG patterns. This was achieved using an artificial neural network. 3) It is widely accepted that computers, unlike living brains, can calculate but not understand. A hypothesis is presented whereby the subjective sense of understanding arises when particular information corresponds to a particular need which is evaluated in a signed (+/–) coordinate system. Such a correspondence terminates computations by the brain when there is a sufficient level of probability that the need is satisfied.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
D. I. Dubrovskii (ed.), “The question of ‘other’ consciousness,” in: The Question of Consciousness in Philosophy and Science [in Russian], Kanon-Plyus, Moscow (2009), pp. 153–171.
A. M. Ivanitskii, Cerebral Signal Assessment Systems [in Russian], Meditsina, Moscow (1976).
A. M. Ivanitskii, “Information synthesis in key areas of the cortex as the basis for subjective experiences,” Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat., 47, No. 2, 209–225 (1997).
A. M. Ivanitskii, “On Gerald Edelman and Giulio Tononi’s book ‘Consciousness. How matter becomes imagination’ (Penguin Books, London, 2000),” Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat., 53, No. 3, 296–304 (2002).
A. M. Ivanitskii and I. R. Ilyuchenok, “Mapping of brain biopotentials during solution of a verbal task,” Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat., 42, No. 4, 625–635 (1992).
A. M. Ivanitskii,V. B. Streets, and I. A. Korsakov, Brain Information Processes and Mental Activity [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1984).
G. A. Ivanitskii, “Recognition of the type of mentally soluble task using several-second EEG traces using a learning classifier,” Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat., 47, 743–747 (1997).
G. A. Ivanitskii, A. R. Nikolaev, and A. M. Ivanitskii, “Use of artificial neural networks for recognition of the type of mental operation using EEG traces,” Zh. Aviakosmich. Ekologich. Med., 3, No. 6, 23–28 (1997).
G. A. Ivanitskii, R. A. Naumov, and A. M. Ivanitskii, “Technology for identifying types of mentally performed thought operations from electroencephalogram patterns,” Tekhn. Zhiv. Sistem, 4, No. 5–6, 20–27 (2007).
G. A. Ivanitskii, R. A. Naumov, A. O. Roik, and A. M. Ivanitskii, “How to identify what the brain is occupied with using its electrical potentials. Stable EEG patterns during performance of cognitive tasks,” Vopr. Iskusstv. Intellekta, 1, No. 1, 93–102 (2008).
D. P. Matyushkin, The Problem of the Nature of the Inner Id of Humans [in Russian], Slovo, Moscow (2003).
E. S. Mikhailov, A. V. Zhila, A. V. Slavutskaya, M. A. Kulikov, and I. A. Shevelev, “Movement trajectories of the dipole sources of visual evoked potentials across the human brain,” Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat., 57, 673–683 (2007).
A. R. Nikolaev, A. P. Anokhin, G. A. Ivanitskii, O. D. Kashevarova, and A. M. Ivanitskii, “Spectral EEG rearrangements and the organization of cortical connections in spatial and verbal thought,” Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat., 46, No. 5, 831–848 (1996).
I. P. Pavlov, “Objective studies of higher nervous activity in humans. 20 years of experience of the objective study of higher nervous activity in animals,” Complete Works, Academy of Sciences of the USSR, Moscow, Leningrad (1951), Vol. 3, Book 2.
R. Penrose, Shadows of the Mind. A Search for the Missing Science of Consciousness. Part 1. Understanding the Mind and the New Physics [Russian translation], Institute of Computer Technologies, Izhevsk, Moscow (2003).
P. V. Smirnov, Lectures on Brain Functioning. Need-Information Theory [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (2001).
J. Edelman, “Group selection and phasic reentrant signaling: a theory of higher brain function,” in: The Mindful Brain [Russian translation], J. Edelman and V. Mountcastle (eds.), Mir, Moscow (1981), pp. 68–131.
G. Beckers and V. Homberg, “Impartment of visual perception and visual short term memory scanning by transcranial magnetic stimulation,” Exp. Brain Res., 87, 421–432 (1991).
H. Berger, “Über das Elektrenkephalogramm des Menschen,” Arch. Psychiat. Nervenkr., 87, 527–570 (1929).
D. J. Chalmers, “Facing up to the problem of consciousness,” J. Consciousness Studies, 2, 200–219 (1995).
F. Crick and Ch. Koch, “Towards a neurobiological theory of consciousness,” in: Seminars in the Neurosciences (1990), Vol. 2, pp. 263–275.
A. Damasio, Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Reason and the Human Brain, Grosset Pytham (1994).
A. Damasio, “The feeling of what happens,” in: Body and Emotion in the Making of Consciousness,A Harvest Book, Hartwort Inc., San Diego, New York, London (1999).
G. Edelman and G. Tononi, Consciousness. How Brain Becomes Imagination, Penguin Books, London (2001).
A. Fink, R. H. Grabner, C. Neuper, and A. Neubauer, “EEG alpha band dissociation with increasing task demands,” Cogn. Brain Res., 24, 252–259 (2005).
W. J. Freeman, “A cinematographic hypothesis of cortical dynamics in perception,” Int. J. Psychophysiol., 60, 149–161 (2006).
W. J. Freeman, “Indirect biological measures of consciousness from field studies of brains as dynamical systems,” Neural Netw., 20, 1021–1031 (2007).
F. W. Froehlich, Empfindungszeit: Ein Beitrag zur Lehre von der Zeit–Raum und Bewegungsempfindung, Jena (1929).
K. Gödel, “Über formal unentscheidbare Sätze per Principia Mathematics und vervander System I,” Monatshefte für Mathematic und Physik, 38, 173–198 (1931).
J. V. Haxby, M. I. Gobbini, M. L. Furey, A. Ishai, J. L. Schouten, and P. Pietrini, “Distributed and overlapping representations of faces and objects in ventral temporal cortex,” Science, 293, 2425–2430 (2001).
W. Klimesch, “EEG alpha and theta oscillations reflect cognitive and memory performance: a review and analysis,” Brain Res. Rev., 29, 169–195 (1999).
R. R. Llinas and U. Ribary, “Rostrocaudal scan in human brain: a global characteristic of the 40 Hz response during sensory input,” in: Induced Rhythms in the Brain, T. Bullock and T. Basar (eds.), Birkhauser, Boston (1992), pp. 147–154.
E. A. Maguire, C. D. Frith, and R. G. Morris, “The functional anatomy of comprehension and memory: the importance of prior knowledge,” Brain, 22, 1839–1850 (1999).
W. Penfield, The Mystery of the Mind, New York (1975).
H. Pieron, De l’Actinie a l’Homme, Presse Univ. de France, Paris (1958).
P. Pietrini, M. L. Furey, E. Ricciardi, M. I. Gobbini, W. C. Wu, L. Cohen, M. Guazzelli, and J. V. Haxby, “Beyond sensory images: Object-based representation in the human ventral pathway,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 101, 5658–5663 (2004).
D. E. Rumelhart and J. L. McClelland, The PDF Research Group. Parallel Distributed Processing, MIT Press, (1986).
S. V. Shinkareva, R. A. Mason, V. L. Malave, W. Wang, T. M. Mitchell, and M. U. Just, “Using fMRI brain activation to identify cognitive states associated with perception of tools and dwellings,” PLoS One, Iss. 1, e1394, 1–9 (2008).
W. Singer and C. M. Gray, “Visual feature integration and the temporal correlation hypothesis,” Ann. Rev. Neurosci., 8, 555–586 (1995).
Y. Swets,W. Tanner, and T. Birdsall, “Decision process in perception,” Psychol. Rev., 68, 15 (1961) [Russian translation in: Engineering Psychology, Progress, Moscow (1964), pp. 269–335].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Translated from Rossiiskii Fiziologicheskii Zhurnal imeni I. M. Sechenova, Vol. 95, No. 10, pp. 1108–1119, October, 2009. Original article submitted July 20, 2009.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ivanitskii, A.M., Ivanitskii, G.A. Some Implications of the Problem of “Consciousness and the Brain”. Neurosci Behav Physi 41, 83–90 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11055-010-9383-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11055-010-9383-4