Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of Visual Environment Complexity on Saccade Performance in Humans with Different Functional Asymmetry Profiles

  • Published:
Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Studies in 47 right-handed subjects with right and left leading eyes addressed the latent periods of visually-evoked saccades in the horizontal, vertical, and diagonal directions within the field of vision. Visual environments with three levels of temporospatial complexity and two standard time protocols of visual stimulation, with “gap” and “overlap,” were used. In subjects with left leading eyes, saccades were more often performed with shorter latent periods in the direction ipsilateral to the leading eye than in the contralateral direction (53% versus 20%); among subjects with right leading eyes, the proportions with decreases in the latent periods in the ipsi- and contralateral directions were different (25% and 22%, respectively). Thus, there was a relationship between eye dominance and the spatial asymmetry of the latent periods of saccades.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. N. N. Bragina and T. A. Dobrokhotova, Functional Asymmetry of the Human Brain [in Russian], Meditsina, Moscow, 2nd Edition, Revised and Updated (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  2. N. N. Bragina and T. A. Dobrokhotova, Left-Handers [in Russian], Kniga Ltd., Moscow (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. A. Vladimirov, Methods for Studies of Eye Movements [in Russian], Moscow State University Press, Moscow (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  4. O. V. Kolesnikov, L. V. Tereshchenko, S. A. Molchanov, A. V. Latanov, and V. V. Shulgovskii, “Relationship between the latent periods of saccadic eye movements and the complexity of the visual environment in humans,” Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat., 56, No. 2, 202–210 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  5. V. F. Konovalo and N. A. Otmakhova, “Characteristics of interhemisphere interactions on imprinting of information,” Vopr. Psikhol., 4, 96–102 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  6. A. P. Kulaichev, Computerized Electrophysiology [in Russian], Moscow State University Press, Moscow (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  7. I. E. Lazarev and A. V. Kirenskaya, “Effects of the leading eye factor on the characteristics of saccades and slow EEG potentials,” Fiziol. Cheloveka, 34, No. 2, 1–11 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  8. I. V. Larin, V. G. Stepanov, and E. A. Khatemlyanskaya, “Determination of right- and left-handedness in terms of motor response asymmetry,” Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat., 45, No. 3, 608–611 (1995).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. L. I. Leushina, A. A. Nevskaya, and M. B. Pavlovskaya, “Differences in the means of processing visual information in the right and left hemispheres,” Psikhol. Zh., 3, 81–94 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  10. V. V. Moiseeva, M. V. Slavutskaya, and V. V. Shulgovskii, “Lateral differences in the latent periods of saccades on monocular presentation of stimuli with ‘overlap’ in the leading and non-leading eyes,” Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat., 53, No. 1, 33–40 (2003).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. H. Beydagi, A. Yilmaz, and C. Suer, “The effect of direction on saccadic eye movement parameters,” J. Basic. Clin. Physiol. Pharmacol., 10, No. 1, 73–77 (1999).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. R. M. Bracewell, M. Husain, and J. F. Stein, “Specialization of the right hemisphere for visuomotor control,” Neuropsychologia, 28, No. 8, 763–775 (1990).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. T. S. Constantinidis, N. Smyrnis, I. Evdokimidis, N. C. Stefanis, D. Avramopoulos, I. Giouzelils, and C. N. Stefanis, “Effects of direction on saccadic performance in relation to lateral preferences,” Exp. Brain Res., 150, No. 4, 443–448 (2003).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. A. Delinte, C. M. Gomez, M. F. Decostre, M. Crommelinck, and A. Roucoux, “Amplitude transition function of human express saccades,” Neurosci. Res., 42, No. 1, 21–34 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. H. Deubel and W. X. Schneider, “Saccade target selection and object recognition: evidence for a common attentional mechanism,” Vision Res., 36, No. 12, 1827–1837 (1996).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. J. Goldring and B. Fischer, “Reaction times of vertical pro-saccades and antisaccades in gap and overlap tasks,” Exp. Brain Res., 113, No. 1, 88–103 (1997).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. H. Honda, “Idiosyncratic left-right asymmetries of saccadic latencies: examination in a gap paradigm,” Vision Res., 42, 1437–1445 (2002).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. J. T. Hutton and J. Palet, “Lateral saccadic latencies and handedness,” Neuropsychologia, 24, 449–451 (1986).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. F. Jagla, V. Zikmund, T. R. Mashonkina, and N. A. Yakimoff, “The accuracy of saccadic eye movements is associated with their horizontal and vertical direction,” Bratisl. Lek. Listy, 93, No. 6, 287–377 (1992).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. M. Kinsbourne, Evolution of Language in Relation to Lateral Action. Asymmetrical Function of the Brain, M. Kinsbourne (ed.), Cambridge University Press, New York (1978), pp. 553–565.

    Google Scholar 

  21. M. I. Posner, “Orientation of attention,” Quart. J. Exp. Psychological., 32, 3–25 (1980).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. M. F. Rushworth, A. Ellison, and V. Walsh, “Complementary localization and lateralization of orienting and motor attention,” Nat. Neurosci., 4, No. 6, 656–661 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. J. D. Schall and N. P. Bichot, “Neural correlates of visual and motor decision processes,” Curr. Opin. Neurobiol., 8, 211–217 (1998).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. D. L. Sparks, “The brainstem control of saccadic eye movements,” Nat. Neurosci. Rev., 3, 952–964 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. C. P. Talgar and M. Carrasco, “Vertical meridian asymmetry in spatial resolution: visual and attentional factors,” Psychon. Bull. Rev., 4, 714–722 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  26. A. Tzelepi, Q. Yang, and Z. Kapoula, “The effect of transcranial magnetic stimulation on the latencies of vertical saccades,” Exp. Brain Res., 164, 67–77 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. W. Zhou and W. M. King, “Attentional sensitivity and asymmetries of vertical saccade generation in monkey,” Vision Res., 42, 771–777 (2002).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to O. V. Kolesnikova.

Additional information

Translated from Zhurnal Vysshei Nervnoi Deyatel’nosti imeni I. P. Pavlova, Vol. 59, No. 5, pp. 547–556, September–October, 2009.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kolesnikova, O.V., Tereshchenko, L.V., Latanov, A.V. et al. Effects of Visual Environment Complexity on Saccade Performance in Humans with Different Functional Asymmetry Profiles. Neurosci Behav Physi 40, 869–876 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11055-010-9342-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11055-010-9342-0

Key words

Navigation