Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Mismatch Negativity: The Contribution of Differences in the Refractoriness of Stimulus-Specific Neuron Populations

  • Published:
Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Mismatch negativity (MMN) is a component of auditory evoked potentials associated with rare changes in acoustic stimulation. Mismatch negativity is usually interpreted as an automatic response from a “changes detector” based on comparison of an incoming stimulus and the representation of preceding stimulation in memory. However, some investigators take the view that mismatch negativity is explained by simpler processes, associated with neuronal refractoriness. The existence of “genuine” mismatch negativity was confirmed, though the question of the contribution of refractoriness to traditional mismatch negativity remained open. The present study uses an experimental design allowing the hypothetical sources of mismatch negativity to be discriminated. A contribution to mismatch negativity associated with neuronal refractoriness was demonstrated; this decreased with increases in the probability of presentation of a deviant stimulus and became negligible at a probability of 15%. Thus, classically interpretable mismatch negativity can be obtained either by using a method excluding the contribution of refractoriness or by using “safe” deviant stimulus presentation probabilities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. R. Näätänen, Attention and Brain Function [in Russian], Moscow University Press. Moscow (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  2. K. Alho, P. Paavilainen, K. Reinikainen, and R. Näätänen, “Separability of different negative components of the event-related potential associated with auditory processing,” Psychophysiology, 23, 613–623 (1986).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. T. W. Budd, R. J. Barry, E. Gordon, C. Rennie, and P. T. Michie, “Decrement of the N1 auditory event-related potential with stimulus repetition: habituation vs. refractoriness,” Int. J. Psychophysiol., 31, 51–68 (1998).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. R. A. Butler, “The cumulative effects of different stimulus repetition rates on the auditory evoked response in man,” EEG Clin. Neurophysiol., 35, 337–345 (1973).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. R. A. Butler, M. Spreng, and W. D. Keidel, “Stimulus repetition rate factors which influence the auditory evoked potential in man,” Psychophysiology, 5, 665–672 (1969).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. J. Daltrezzo, N. Wioland, V. Mutschler, and B. Kolchoubey, “Predicting coma and other low responsive patients outcome using event-related brain potentials: A meta-analysis,” Clin. Neurophysiol., 118, 606–614 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. S. Elangovan, J. L. Crawford, L. Walker, and A. Stuart, “Comparison of the mismatch negative and differential waveform response,” Int. J. Audiol., 44, 637–646 (2005).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. S. W. Greenhouse and S. Geisser, “On methods in the analysis of profile data,” Psychometrika, 24, 95–112 (1959).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. T. Imada, R. Hari, N. Loveless, L. McEvay, and M. Sams, “Determinants of the auditory mismatch negativity,” EEG Clin. Neurophysiol., 87, 144–153 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. I. P. Jääskeläinen, J. Ahveninen, G. Bonmassar, A. M. Dale, R. J. Ilmoniemi, S. Levanen, F.-H. Lin, P. May, J. Melcher, S. Stufflebeam, H. Tiitinen, and J. W. Belliveau, “Human posterior auditory cortex gates novel sounds to consciousness,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 17, 6809–6814 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. T. Jacobsen and E. Schröger, “Measuring duration mismatch negativity,” Clin. Neurophysiol., 114, 1133–1143 (2003).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. T. Jacobsen, T. Horenkamp, and E. Schröger, “Preattentive memorybased comparison of sound intensity,” Audiol. Neuro-Otol., 8, 338–346 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. T. Jacobsen and E. Schröger, “Is there pre-attentive memory-based comparison of pitch?” Psychophysiology, 38, 723–727 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. T. Jacobsen, E. Schröger, T. Horenkamp, and I. Winkler, “Mismatch negativity to pitch change: varied stimulus proportions in controlling effects of neural refractoriness on human auditory event-related brain potentials,” Neurosci. Lett., 344, 79–82 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. J. Jasper, “Report of the committee on methods of clinical examination in electroencephalography,” EEG Clin. Neurophysiol., 10, 305–375 (1958).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. N. Kraus, T. McGee, T. D. Carrell, and A. Sharma, “Neurophysiologic bases of speech discrimination,” Ear. Hear., 16, 19–37 (1995).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. N. Kraus, T. McGee, T. Carrell, A. Sharma, A. Micco, and T. Nicol, “Speech-evoked cortical potentials in children,” J. Amer. Acad. Audiol., 4, 238–248 (1993).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. N. Kraus, T. McGee, A. Micco, T. Carrell, A. Sharma, and T. Nicol, “Mismatch negativity in schoolage children to speech stimuli that are just perceptibly different,” EEG Clin. Neurophysiol., 88, 123–130 (1993).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. J. D. Kropotov, K. Alho, R. Näätänen, V. A. Ponomarev, O. V. Kropotova, A. D. Anichkov, and V. B. Nechaev, “Human auditory-cortex mechanisms of preattentive sound discrimination,” Neurosci. Lett., 280, 87–90 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. H. Lang, T. Nyrke, M. Ek, O. Aaltonen, and R. Näätänen, “Pitch discrimination performance and auditory event-related potentials,” Psychophysiol. Brain Res., 1, 294–298 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  21. P. May, H. Tiitinen, R. J. Ilmoniemi, G. Nyman, J. G. Taylor, and R. Näätänen, “Frequency change detection in human auditory cortex,” J. Comput. Neurosci., 6, 99–120 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. T. McGee, N. Kraus, and T. Nicol, “Is it really a mismatch negativity? An assessment of methods for determining response validity in individual subjects,” EEG Clin. Neurophysiol., 104, 359–368 (1997).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. D. Morlet and C. Fischer, “The mismatch negativity (MMN) recorded in comatose patients actually discloses mismatch processes,” Int. J. Psychophysiol., 41, 199–200 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  24. R. Näätänen, “Mismatch negativity: clinical research and possible applications,” Int. J. Psychophysiol., 48, 179–188 (2003).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. R. Näätänen, “The mismatch negativity: a powerful tool for cognitive neuroscience,” Ear. Hear., 16, 6–8 (1995).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. R. Näätänen, “The role of attention in auditory information processing as revealed by event-related potentials and other brain measures of cognitive function,” Behav. Brain Sci., 13, 201–288 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  27. R. Näätänen, A. W. K. Gaillard, and S. Mantysalo, “Early selective attention effect on evoked potential reinterpreted,” Acta Psychol., 42, 313–329 (1978).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. R. Näätänen, T. Jacobsen, and I. Winkler, “Memory-based or afferent processes in mismatch negativity (MMN): A review of the evidence,” Psychophysiology, 42, 25–32 (2005).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. R. Näätänen and P. T. Michie, “Early selective attention effects on the evoked potential: A critical review and reinterpretation,” Biol. Psychol., 8, 81–136 (1979).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. R. Näätänen, P. Paavilainen, K. Alho, K. Reinikainen, and M. Sams, “Do event-related potentials reveal the mechanism of auditory sensory memory in the human brain?” Neurosci. Lett., 98, 217–221 (1989).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. R. Näätänen, P. Paavilainen, and K. Reinikainen, “Do event-related potentials to infrequent decrements in duration of auditory stimuli demonstrate a memory trace in man?” Neurosci. Lett., 107, 347–352 (1989).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. R. Näätänen, M. Sams, K. Alho, P. Paavilainen, K. Reinikainen, and E. N. Sokolov, “Frequency and location specificity of the human vertex N1 wave,” EEG Clin. Neurophysiol., 69, 523–531 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. R. Näätänen, M. Tervaniemi, E. Sussman, P. Paavilainen, and I. Winkler, “‘Primitive intelligence’ in the auditory cortex,” Trends Neurosci., 24, 283–288 (2001).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. D. A. Nelson and F. M. Lassman, “Combined effects of recovery period and stimulus intensity on the human auditory-evoked vertex response,” J. Speech Hear. Res., 16, 297–308 (1973).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. D. A. Nelson and F. M. Lassman, “Re-examination of the effect of periodic and aperiodic stimulation on the auditory-evoked vertex response,” Audiol., 16, 409–418 (1977).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. D. A. Nelson and F. M. Lassman, “Effects of intersignal interval on the human auditory evoked response,” J. Acoust. Soc. Amer., 44, 1529–1532 (1968).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. G. P. Novak, W. Ritter, H. G. Vaughan, Jr., and M. L. Wizmitzer, “Differentiation of negative event-related potentials in an auditory discrimination task,” EEG Clin. Neurophysiol., 75, 255–275 (1990).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. B. Opitz, E. Schröger, and D. Y. von Cramon, “Sensory and cognitive mechanisms for preattentive change detection in auditory cortex,” Eur. J. Neurosci., 21, 531–535 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. P. Paavilainen, K. Alho, K. Reinikainen, M. Sams, and R. Näätänen, “Right hemisphere dominance of different mismatch negativities,” EEG Clin. Neurophysiol., 78, 466–479 (1991).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. T. W. Picton, D. L. Woods, G. B. Proulx, “Human auditory sustained potentials. II. Stimulus relationships,” EEG Clin. Neurophysiol., 45, 198–210 (1978).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. T. Rinne, K. Alho, R. J. Ilmoniemi, J. Virtanen, and R. Näätänen, “Separate time behaviors of the temporal and frontal MMN sources,” Neuroimage, 12, 14–19 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. A. Scherg, J. Vajsar, and T. W. Picton, “A source analysis of human auditory evoked potentials,” J. Cogn. Neurosci., 1, 336–355 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. E. Schröger and C. Wolff, “Mismatch response of the human brain to changes in sound location,” Neuroreport., 7, 3005–3008 (1996).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. H. Tiitinen, K. Alho, M. Huotilainen, R. J. Ilmoniemi, J. Simola, and R. Näätänen, “Tonotopic auditory cortex and the magnetoencephalographic (MEG) equivalent of the mismatch negativity,” Psychophysiology, 30, 537–540 (1993).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. L. J. Walker, M. Carpenter, C. R. Downs, J. L. Cranford, A. Stuart, and D. Pravica, “Possible neuronal refractory or recovery artifacts associated with recording the mismatch negativity response,” J. Amer. Acad. Audiol., 2, 348–356 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  46. I. Winkler, E. Schröger, and N. Cowan, “The role of large-scale memory organization in the mismatch negativity event-related brain potential,” J. Cogn. Neurosci., 13, 59–71 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. St. Petersburg State University, 7/9 Universitetskaya Bank, 199034, St. Petersburg, Russia

    M. D. Evstigneeva & A. A. Aleksandrov

Authors
  1. M. D. Evstigneeva
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. A. Aleksandrov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. D. Evstigneeva.

Additional information

Translated from Rossiiskii Fiziologicheskii Zhurnal imeni I. M. Sechenova, Vol. 94, No. 10, pp. 1147–1157, October, 2008.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Evstigneeva, M.D., Aleksandrov, A.A. Mismatch Negativity: The Contribution of Differences in the Refractoriness of Stimulus-Specific Neuron Populations. Neurosci Behav Physi 39, 833–840 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11055-009-9211-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11055-009-9211-x

Key words

Search

Navigation