The effects of the protein synthesis inhibitor cycloheximide and serotonin and NMDA glutamate receptor antagonists on the processes of consolidation of an associative skill consisting of refusing a particular foodstuff were studied in the common snail. When animals were trained on the background of cycloheximide, the skill was not acquired. Repeat training of “amnestic” snails to refuse the same food without the inhibitor also failed to produce the skill. Training of snails on the background of the nonselective serotonin receptor antagonist methiothepin or the NMDA glutamate receptor antagonist MK-801 (dizocilpine maleate) did not lead to acquisition of the conditioned reflex to food. However, on repeat training, the skill was formed more quickly. The studies included the first observation that using a single type of training, treatments addressing different molecular mechanisms evoke reversible or irreversible impairments to the mechanisms of consolidation of long-term memory. It is suggested that the reversible effect is associated with suppression of the processes of reproduction, while the irreversible effect is linked with impairment to engram storage.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
P. M. Balaban and I. S. Zakharov, Learning and Development: A Common Basis for Two Phenomena [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1992).
N. V. Gulyaeva, “Non-apoptotic functions of caspase-3 in nervous tissue,” Biokhimiya, 68, No. 11, 1459–1470 (2003).
V. P. Nikitin, “A new mechanism for synapse-specific neuronal plasticity,” Ros. Fiziol. Zh. im. I. M. Sechenova, 92, No. 4, 402–419 (2006).
K. A. Radyushkin and K. V. Anokhin, “Recovery of memory impaired during irradiation in chicks: reversibility of amnesia induced by blockade of protein synthesis,” Ros. Fiziol. Zh. im. I. M. Sechenova, 83, 11–18 (1997).
A. A. Saushkina, S. V. Solntseva, I. F. Komar’kov, V. P. Nikitin, and V. V. Sherstnev, “Different mechanisms of involvement of contextual memory in the processes of the reproduction of an associative skill in the common snail,” Neirokhimiya, 24, No. 4, 312–317 (2007).
S. A. Solntseva,V. P. Nikitin, S. A. Kozyrev, A. V. Shevelkin, A. V. Lagutin, and V. V. Sherstnev, “Inhibition of protein synthesis during reactivation of associative memory in the common snail elicits transient or irreversible amnesia,” Ros. Fiziol. Zh. im. I. M. Sechenova, 92, No. 9, 1058–1068 (2006).
S. V. Solntseva and V. P. Nikitin, “Antagonists of serotonin and NMDA glutamate receptors selectively impair reactivation of associative memory in the common snail,” Ros. Fiziol. Zh. im. I. M. Sechenova, 93, No. 10, 1101–1111 (2007).
C. M. Alberini, M. H. Milekic, and S. Tronel, “Mechanisms of memory stabilization and destabilization,” Cell Mol. Life Sci., 63, No. 9, 999–1008 (2006).
K. V. Anokhin, A. A. Tiunova, and S. P. R. Rose, “Reminder effects – reconsolidation or retrieval deficit? Pharmacological dissection with protein synthesis inhibitors following reminder for a passiveavoidance task in young chicks,” Eur. J. Neurosci., 15, No. 11, 1759–1765 (2002).
H. P. Davis and L. R. Squire, “Protein synthesis and memory: a review,” Psychol. Bull., 96, No. 4, 518–559 (1984).
Y. Dudai, “The neurobiology of consolidations, or how stable is the engram?” Ann. Rev. Psychol., 55, 51–86 (2004).
P. Goelet, V. F. Castellucci, S. Schacher, and E. Kandel, “The long and the short of long-term memory – a molecular framework,” Nature, 322, No. 6078, 419–422 (1986).
R. D. Hawkins, E. R. Kandel, and C. H. Bailey, “Molecular mechanisms of memory storage in Aplysia,” Biol. Bull., 210, No. 3, 174–191 (2006).
I. Izquierdo, L. R. Bevilaqua, J. L. Rossato, J. S. Bonini, J. H. Medina, and M. Cammarota, “Different molecular cascades in different sites of the brain control memory consolidation,” Trends Neurosci., 29, No. 9, 496–505 (2006).
C. A. McClung and E. J. Nestler, “Neuroplasticity mediated by altered gene expression,” Neuropsychopharmacology Rev., 33, No. 10, 1–17 (2008).
J. L. McGaugh, “Memory – a century of consolidation,” Science, 287, No. 5451, 248–251 (2000).
C. A. Miller, “Amnesia or retrieval deficit? Implications of a molecular approach to the question of reconsolidation,” Learn. Mem., 13, No. 5, 498–505 (2006).
R. R. Miller and A. D. Springer, “Induced recovery of memory in rats following electroconvulsive shock,” Physiol. Behav., 84, No. 4, 645–651 (1972).
K. Nader and S. H. Wang, “Fading in,” Learn. Mem., 13, No. 5, 530–553 (2006).
D. Quartermain, B. S. McEwen, and E. C. Azmitia, “Amnesia produced by electroconvulsive shock or cycloheximide: conditions for recovery,” Science, 169, No. 946, 683–686 (1970).
D. C. Riccio, P. M. Millin, and A. R. Bogart, “Reconsolidation: a brief history, a retrieval view, and some recent issues,” Learn. Mem., 13, No. 5, 536–544 (2006).
S. J. Sara and B. Hars, “In memory of consolidation,” Learn. Mem., 13, No. 5, 515–521 (2006).
N. C. Tronson and J. R. Taylor, “Molecular mechanisms of memory reconsolidation,” Nature. Rev. Neurosci., 8, No. 4, 262–275 (2007).
C. L. Waites, A. M. Craig, and C. C. Garner, “Mechanisms of vertebrate synaptogenesis,” Ann. Rev. Neurosci., 28, 251–274 (2005).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Translated from Rossiiskii Fiziologicheskii Zhurnal imeni I. M. Sechenova, Vol. 94, No. 11, pp. 1259–1269, November, 2008.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Solntseva, S.V., Nikitin, V.P. Neurochemical Mechanisms of Consolidation of Associative Aversive Training to Food in the Common Snail. Neurosci Behav Physi 39, 865–872 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11055-009-9207-6
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11055-009-9207-6