Abstract
Studies in 11 young, healthy subjects addressed the characteristics of visual seeking (time taken, errors) on changes in the parameters of the target element to be sought (shape, color, and location) in an environment containing heterogeneous white distractors. Evoked potentials (EP) were recorded in six cortical leads (P3, P4, T3, T4, T5, T6) and the late endogenous components of EP were studied, i.e., the N2 and P3 components (standard terminology), as these components are known to change when the type of search changes, in the zone of so-called late selection. When the search difficulty increased (increased similarity between target and distractors), an increase in seeking time was accompanied by a delay in the P3 component and a decrease in its amplitude. Location of the target in a defined position resulted in a decrease in search time and a reduction in the latent period of the P3 component as compared with the situation in which the target position was indeterminate. Changes in the color of the target stimulus led to elimination of the inhibitory action of the distractors: EP parameters were no different from those recorded on presentation of single stimuli. A high level of correlation was found between search parameters and measures of the P3 component. Changes in EP in different types of search were essentially identical (no statistical differences) in the parietal and temporal leads. This suggests that on seeking the target in the environment, the parietal and temporal areas of the cortex function as a single system.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
I. N. Baranov-Krylov and V. T. Shuvaev, “Neurophysiological indicators of voluntary and involuntary visual attention,” Fiziol. Cheloveka, 26, No. 6, 31–40 (2000).
I. N. Baranov-Krylov, V. T. Shuvaev, and D. N. Berlov, “Activation of extrastriate areas of the cortex in humans during selection of visual stimuli by shape and position: analysis of evoked potentials,” Fiziol. Cheloveka, 29, No. 4, 31–39 (2003).
I. N. Baranov-Krylov, V. T. Shuvaev, and I. E. Kanunikov, “Characteristics of activation in the parietal areas of the human cortex in different types of visual attention,” Ros. Fiziol. Zh. im. I. M. Sechenova, 92, No. 2, 176–190 (2006).
D. E. Broadbent, “Stimulus set and response set: two kinds of selective attention,” in: Attention: Contemporary Theory and Analysis, D. I. Mostofsky (ed.), Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York (1970), pp. 51–60.
M. Cheal and D. R. Lyon, “Attention in visual search: multiple search classes,” Percept. Psychophys., 52, No. 2, 113–138 (1992).
J. T. Coull and C. D. Frith, “Differential activation of right superior parietal cortex and intraparietal sulcus by spatial and nonspatial attention,” Neuroimage, 8, No. 2, 176–187 (1998).
R. Desimone and L. Ungerleider, “Neural mechanisms of visual processing in monkeys,” in: Handbook of Neuropsychology, F. Boller and J. Grafman (eds.), Elsevier, Amsterdam (1989), Vol. 2, pp. 267–299.
J. E. Desmedt and J. Debecker, “Wave-form and neural mechanism of the decision P350,” EEG Clin. Neurophysiol., 47, No. 6, 648–670 (1970).
E. Donchin and J. B. Israel, “Event-related potentials and psychological theory,” Progr. Brain Res., 54, 697–715 (1980).
J. Duncan and G. W. Humphreys, “Visual search and similarity,” Psychol. Rev., 96, No. 3, 433–458 (1989).
H. E. Egeth and S. Yantis, “Visual attention: control, representation and time course,” Ann. Rev. Psychol., 48, 269–297 (1997).
D. R. Gitelman, A. C. Nobre, T. B. Parrish, K. S. LaBar, Y. H. Kim, J. R. Meyer, and M. Mesulam, “A large-scale distributed network for covert spatial attention: further anatomical delineation based on stringent behavioural and cognitive controls,” Brain, 122, No. 6, 1093–1106 (1999).
E. Jodo and Y. Kayama, “Relation of negative ERP component to response inhibition in a go/no-go task,” EEG Clin. Neurophysiol., 82, No. 6, 477–482 (1992).
B. Julesz, “Toward an axiomatic theory of preattentive vision,” Bat Sheva Seminar on Selective Attention in Sensory Processing, Jerusalem, 120–149, No. 7, 41–45 (1987).
G. Keren, “Some considerations of two alleged kinds of selective attention,” J. Exptl. Psychol. Gen., 105, 349–374 (1976).
M. Kutas, G. McCarthy, and E. Donchin, “Augmenting mental chronometry: the P300 as a measure of stimulus evaluation time,” Science, 197, No. 4305, 792–795 (1977).
G. R. Mangun, “Neural mechanisms of visual selective attention,” Psychophysiology, 32, 4–18 (1995).
A. Martinez, F. Di Russo, L. Anlo-Vento, and S. A. Hillyard, “Electrophysiological analysis of cortical mechanisms of selective attention to high and low spatial frequencies,” Clin. Neurophysiol., 112, No. 11, 1980–1998 (2001).
M. Mishkin, L. Ungerlieder, and K. Macko, “Object vision and spatial vision: two cortical pathways,” Trends. Neurosci., 6, 414–417 (1983).
A. C. Nobre, G. N. Sebestyen, D. R. Gitelman, M. M. Mesulam, R. S. Frackowiak, and C. D. Frith, “Functional localization of the system for visuospatial attention using positron emission tomography,” Brain, 120, No. 3, 515–533 (1997).
I. R. Olson, M. M. Chun, and T. Alisson, “Contextual guidance of attention. Human intracranial event-related potential evidence for feed-back modulation in anatomically early, temporally late stages of visual processing,” Brain, 124, 1417–1425 (2001).
H. Pashler, J. C. Johnston, and E. Ruthruff, “Attention and performance,” Ann. Rev. Psychol., 52, 629–651 (2001).
T. Picton, “P300: Review and reconciliation,” Psychophysiology, 32, Supplement 1, 7 (1995).
T. W. Picton and D. T. Stuss, “The component structure of the human event-related potentials,” Progr. Brain Res., 54, 18–49 (1980).
T. W. Picton, S. Bentin, E. Donchin, S. A. Hillyard, R. Johnson, G. A. Miller, W. Ritter, D. S. Ruchkin, M. D. Rugg, and M. J. Taylor, “Guidelines for using human event-related potentials to study cognition: Recording standards and publication criteria,” Psychophysiology, 37, 127–152 (2000).
M. I. Posner and Y. Cohen, “Components of visual orienting,” Bat Sheva Seminar on Selective Attention, Jerusalem, 531–555 (1987).
W. S. Pritchard, “Psychophysiology of P300,” Psychol. Bull., 89, 506–540 (1981).
W. Ritter, J. M. Ford, A. W. Gaillard, R. Harter, M. Kutas, R. Näätänen, J. Polish, B. Revault, and J. Rohrbaugh, “Cognition and event-related potentials. The relation of negative potentials and cognitive processes,” Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., 425, 24–38 (1984).
A. B. Sereno and J. H. Maunsell, “Shape selectivity in primate lateral intraparietal cortex,” Nature, 395, No. 6701, 500–503 (1998).
S. Sutton and D. S. Ruchkin, “The late positive complex. Advances and new problems,” Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., 425, 1–23 (1984).
A. Treisman and G. Gelade, “A feature integration theory of attention,” Cogn. Psychol., 12, 97–136 (1980).
C. Umilta, “Orienting of attention,” in: Handbook of Neuropsychology, F. Boller and J. Grafman (eds.), Elsevier, Vol. 1, pp. 175–193 (1988).
T. R. Vidyasagar, “A neuronal model of attentional spotlight: parietal guiding the temporal,” Brain Res. Rev., 30, No. 1, 66–76 (1999).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
__________
Translated from Rossiiskii Fiziologicheskii Zhurnal imeni I. M. Sechenova, Vol. 93, No. 9, pp. 1001–1011, September, 2007
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Baranov-Krylov, I.N., Astashchenko, A.P. Characteristics of visual seeking and evoked potentials in the extrastriate areas of the cortex in humans. Neurosci Behav Physi 38, 661–668 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11055-008-9030-5
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11055-008-9030-5