Abstract
Gender-related differences in the EEG correlates of creative thought were studied by mapping EEG power during performance of a Remote Associations Task as compared with verbal word-generation and simple association tasks. Right-handed students (18 male, 21 female) took part in the studies. Gender-related differences were seen in the factor structure of measures of verbal activity and in the larger number of words generated for a given letter in women than in men. In terms of the originality of the associations, men and women showed no significant difference, though the dynamics of the power of the beta-2 rhythm during creative thought differed. In males, the search for original associations was accompanied by increases in beta-2 power in both hemispheres at the initial stages of performing the task, with local increases in the beta-2 rhythm in the central parts of the cortex at the end of testing. In women, the increase in beta-2 power was initially greater in the right hemisphere than the left, while there was a relative decrease in beta activity in the parietal-temporal areas of the cortex and an increase in the left anterior frontal areas at the terminal stage of task performance. It is suggested that creative verbal thought is based mostly on an “insight” strategy in males, while women additionally use an “intellectual” strategy.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
N. P. Bekhtereva, S. G. Dan’ko, and M. G. Starchenko, “Studies of the cerebral organization of creativity. III. Brain activation from local brain blood flow and EEG data,” Fiziol. Cheloveka, 27, No. 4, 6–19 (2001).
N. V. Vol’f, Gender-Related Differences in the Functional Organization of the Hemisphere Mechanisms of Processing Speech Information [in Russian], OOO “TsVVR” Press, Rostov-on-Don (2000).
N. V. Vol’f and O. M. Razumnikova, “Sexual dimorphism in the functional organization of the brain during the processing of speech information,” in: Functional Interhemisphere Asymmetry. Selected Readings [in Russian], Nauchnyi Mir, Moscow (2004), pp. 386–410.
Ya. A. Ponomarev, “The psychology of creativity: perspectives of development,” Psikhol. Zh., No. 6, 38–50 (1994).
O. M. Razumnikova, “Gender and the professional area of students as factors in creativity,” Vopr. Psikhologii, No. 1, 111–125 (2002).
O. M. Razumnikova, Thought and the Functional Asymmetry of the Brain [in Russian], Publishing House of the Siberian Division of the Russian Academy of Medical Sciences, Novosibirsk (2004).
O. M. Razumnikova and N. V. Vol’f, “Gender-related differences in the temporal dynamics of interhemisphere asymmetry in the perception of speech information,” Byull. Sib. Otdel. Ros. Akad. Med. Nauk, No. 2, 87–90 (1997).
P. V. Simonov, “Neurobiological bases of creativity,” Fiziol. Cheloveka, 22, No. 2, 5–9 (1995).
M. G. Starchenko, N. P. Bekhtereva, S. V. Pakhomov, and S. V. Medvedev, “Studies of the cerebral organization of creative thought,” Fiziol. Cheloveka, 27, No. 4, 6–19 (2001).
I. Carlsson, P.E. Wendt, and J. Risberg, “On the neurobiology of creativity. Differences in frontal activity between high and low creative subjects,” Neuropsychology, 38, 873–885 (2000).
M. Corsi-Cabrera, J. Ramos, M. A. Guevara, C. Arce, et al., “Gender differences in the EEG during cognitive activity,” Int. J. Neurosci., 72, No. 3–4, 257–264 (1993).
M. Faust and M. Lavidor, “Semantically convergent and semantically divergent priming in the cerebral hemispheres: lexical decision and semantic judgment,” Brain Res. Cogn. Brain Res., 17, No. 3, 585–597 (2003).
C. Y. Fu, K. Morgan, J. Suckling, S. C. R. Williams, C. Andrew, G. N. Vythelingum, and P. K. McGuire, “A functional magnetic resonance imaging study of overt letter verbal fluency using a clustered acquisition sequence: greater anterior cingulate activation with increased task demand,” Neuroimage, 17, 871–879 (2002).
M. Grossman, E. E. Smith, P. Koenig, G. Glosser, C. DeVita, P. Moore, and C. McMillan, “The neural basis for categorization in semantic memory,” Neuroimage, 17, No. 3, 1549–1561 (2002).
A. Gundel and G. F. Wilson, “Topographical changes in the ongoing EEG related to the difficulty of mental tasks,” Brain Topogr., 5, No. 1, 17–25 (1992).
D. F. Halpern, Sex Differences in Cognitive Abilities, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, New York, London (2000), 3rd edition.
W. P. Hetrick, C. A. Sandman, W. E. Bunney, Jr., U. Jin, S. G. Potkin, and M. H. White, “Gender differences in gating of the auditory evoked potentials in normal subjects,” Biol. Psychiatry, 39, No. 1, 51–58 (1996).
N. Jausovec, “Differences in cognitive processes between gifted, intelligent, creative, and average individuals while solving complex problems: an EEG study,” Intelligence, 28, No. 3, 213–237 (2000).
D. Kimura, “Sex, sexual orientation and sex hormones influences human cognitive function,” Curr. Opin. Neurobiol., 6, 259–263 (1997).
W. Klimesch, M. Doppelmayr, T. Pachinger, and H. Russegger, “Event-related desynchronization in the alpha band and the processing of semantic information,” Cogn. Brain Res., 6, No. 2, 83–94 (1997).
B. A. Klinterberg, S. E. Levander, and D. Schalling, “Cognitive sex differences: speed and problem-solving strategies on computerized neuropsychological tasks,” Percept. Motor Skill, 65, 683–697 (1987).
A. Knateb, C. M. Michel, A. J. Pegna, S. D. O’Dochartaigh, T. Landis, and J.-M. Annoni, “Processing of semantic categorical and associative relations: an ERP mapping study,” Int. J. Psychophysiol., 49, 41–55 (2003).
R. F. McGivern, J. P. Huston, D. Byrd, et al., “Sex differences in visual recognition memory: support for sex-related differences in attention in adults and children,” Brain Cogn., 34, No. 3, 323–336 (1997).
J. Meyer-Levy, “Gender differences in information processing: a selectivity interpretation,” in: Cognitive and Affective Responses to Advertising, P. Cafferata and A. M. Tybout (eds.), Lexington Books, Canada (1989), pp. 128–140.
I. Papousek and G. Schulter, “Manipulation of frontal brain asymmetry by cognitive tasks,” Brain Cogn., 54, No. 1, 43–51 (2004).
H. Petsche, “Approaches to verbal, visual and musical creativity by EEG coherence analysis,” Int. J. Psychophysiol., 24, No. 1–2, 145–159 (1996).
O. M. Razoumnikova, “Functional organization of different brain areas during convergent and divergent thinking: An EEG investigation,” Cogn. Brain Res., No. 10, 11–18 (2000).
O. M. Razoumnikova, “Gender differences in hemispheric organization during divergent thinking: An EEG investigation in human subjects,” Neurosci. Lett., 362, No. 3, 193–195 (2004).
T. Welsh and D. Elliott, “Gender differences in a dichotic listening and movement task: lateralization or strategy?” Neuropsychology, 39, 25–35 (2001).
G. I. De Zubicaray, F. O. Zelaya, C. Andrew, S. C. R. Williams, and E. T. Bullmore, “Cerebral regions associated with verbal response initiation, suppression and strategy use,” Neuropsychologia, 38, 1292–1304 (2000).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
__________
Translated from Zhurnal Vysshei Nervnoi Deyatel’nosti imeni I. P. Pavlova, Vol. 55, No. 4, pp. 487–495, July–August, 2005.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Razumnikova, O.M., Bryzgalov, A.O. Frequency-spatial organization of brain electrical activity in creative verbal thought: The role of the gender factor. Neurosci Behav Physiol 36, 645–653 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11055-006-0069-x
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11055-006-0069-x