Skip to main content
Log in

Temporal summation and reaction times for detecting gratings

  • Published:
Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effects of the duration of presentation of stimuli on the reaction time for detection of gratings of different spatial frequencies were studied. The product of contrast and duration (the contrast “energy”) was kept constant for each duration. These experiments showed that at near-threshold “energies,” reaction times did not change with increases in the duration to 15 and 30 msec at low and high spatial frequencies respectively. At high contrast “energies,rd this critical duration was identical (15 msec) for both low and high spatial frequencies. The effects of the duration of a linearly increasing front for grating presentation on detection reaction times were also studied. Increases in the duration of the front (to 60 msec) significantly lengthened the reaction time at low spatial frequencies at all contrast levels studied. Conversely, at high spatial frequencies, a significant increase in the reaction time was seen only at high contrast levels. These results suggest that reaction time depends on two types of mechanisms (phasic and tonic) at nearthreshold contrast and one type (phasic) at high contrast.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. V. D. Glezer, V. A. Ivanov, and T. A. Shcherbach, “Studies of the receptive fields of cat visual cortex neurons as spatial frequency filters,” Fiziol. Zh. SSSR, 59, 206–214 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. M. Barr, A Study of Visual Detection Latencies Using Stimuli of Varying Spatial Frequency, Ph.D. Thesis, Oxford, UK (1986).

  3. C. Blakemore and R. W. Campbell, “On the existence of neurones in the visual system selectively sensitive to the orientation and size of retinal images,” J. Physiol., 203, 237–260 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  4. B. G. Breitmeyer, “Simple reaction time as a measure of the temporal response properties of transient and sustained channels,” Vision Res. (1998).

  5. C. Bonnet, J. Gurlekian, and P. Harris, “Reaction time and the visual area: searching for determinants, ” Bull. Psychonom. Soc., 30, 396–398 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  6. F. W. Campbell and R. W. Gubish, “Optical quality of the human eye,” J. Physiol., 186, 558–578 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  7. F. W. Campbell and J. G. Robson, “Application of Fourier analysis to the visibility of gratings,” J. Physiol., 197, 551–556 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  8. A. Felipe, M. J. Buades, and J. M. Artigas, “Influences of the contrast sensitivity function on the reaction time,” Vision. Res., 33, 2461–2466 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  9. N. Graham, “Detection and identification of near-threshold visual patterns,” J. Opt. Soc. Amer., A, No.2, 1468–1482 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  10. N. Graham and J. Nachmias, “Detection and identification of grating patterns containing two spatial frequencies. A comparison of single-channel and multiple-channel models,” Vision Res., 11, 251–259 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  11. R. S. Harwerth and D. M. Levi, “Reaction time as a measure of suprathreshold grating detection,” Vision. Res., 18, 1579–1586 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  12. R. Jones and M. J. Keck, “Visual evoked response as a function of grating spatial frequency,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Visual. Sci., 17, 652–659 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  13. J. J. Kulikowski and D. J. Tolhurst, “Psychophysical evidence for sustained and transient detectors in human vision,” J. Physiol., 232, 149–162 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  14. G. E. Legge, “Sustained and transient mechanisms in human vision. Temporal and spatial properties,” Vision Res., 18, 69–81 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  15. U. Lupp, G. Hauske, and W. Wolf, “Perceptual latencies to sinusoidal gratings,” Vision Res., 16, 969–972 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  16. R. J. W. Mansfield, “Latency fusions in human vision,” Vision Res., 13, 2219–2234 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  17. D. Mitov, Investigation of Some Temporal Characteristics of Grating Perception, Ph.D. Thesis, Institute of Physiology, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences (1983).

  18. D. Mitov, “How many channels determine the RT to grating onset detection?” Perception, 28, Supplement, 103–104 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  19. D. Mitov and H. Gigov, “A hybrid system for automated visual investigation,” Perception, 16, Supplement, 244 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  20. D. Mitov and C. Totev, “Does spatial frequency and contrast uncertainty influence reaction time?” Perception, 29, Supplement, 116 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  21. J. Nachmias, “Effect of exposure duration on visual contrast sensitivity with square-wave gratings, ” J. Opt. Soc. Amer., 57, 421–427 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  22. L. A. Olzak and J. P. Thomas, in: Handbook of Perception and Human Performance, K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, and J. P. Thomas (eds.),Vol. 1: Sensory Processes and Perception, Wiley Interscience, New York (1986), pp. 7.1-7.56.

  23. D. M. Parker and E. A. Salzen, “Latency changes in the human visual evoked response to sinusoidal gratings,” Vision Res., 17, 1201–1204 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  24. N. F. Podvigin, A. M. Cooperman, V. D. Glezer, and I. V. Chueva, “Changes of the region of summation of cat’s corpus geniculatum lateralis in time due to illumination. The role of excitation and inhibition in this process, ” Biofizika, 18, 535–543 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  25. M. Saleh and C. Bonnet, “Reaction time and retinal operation,” in: Fechner Day 98, S. Gondrin and J. Lacoutre (eds.), Quebec (1998), pp. 344–348.

  26. M. Saleh and C. Bonnet, “Probability summation in the Piéron function,” in: Fechner Day 2000, C. Bonnet (ed.), ISP, Strasbourg (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  27. J.P. Thomas, P. Fagerholm, and C. Bonnet, “One spatial filter limits speed of detecting low and middle frequency gratings,” Vision Res., 39, 1683–1693 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  28. D. J. Tolhurst, “Reaction time in the detection of gratings by human observers. A probabilistic mechanism,” Vision. Res., 15, 1143–1149 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  29. A. Vassilev and D. Mitov, “Spatial frequency and the speed of visual information processing,” Abstracts, 97 (1974).

  30. A. Vassilev and D. Mitov, “Perception time and spatial frequency,” Vision Res., 16, 89–92 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  31. A. Vassilev, M. Mihaylova, and C. Bonnet, “On the delay in processing high spatial frequency visual information: reaction time and VEP latency study of the effect of local intensity of stimulation,” Vision Res., 42, 851–864 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  32. A. Vassilev and D. Strashimirov, “On the latency of human visually evoked response to sinusoidal gratings,” Vision. Res., 19, 843–845 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  33. A. Vassilev, D. Mitov, and D. Strashimirov, “Human visually evoked responses and temporal summation of suprathreshold sinusoidal gratings,” Comptes Rendus de l’Academie Bulgare des Sciences, 33, 837–840 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Translated from Rossiiskii Fiziologicheskii Zhurnal imeni I. M. Sechenova, Vol. 89, No. 10, pp. 1240–1249, October, 2003.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mitov, D.L., Totev, T.T. Temporal summation and reaction times for detecting gratings. Neurosci Behav Physiol 35, 417–422 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11055-005-0042-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11055-005-0042-0

KEY WORDS

Navigation