Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Modeling of Coalbed Gas Pressure/Content Identification Using Image Analysis

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Natural Resources Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Coalbed gas pressure and content are fundamental parameters for mine gas recovery and disaster prevention. In response to the lengthy measurement cycles and low accuracy of existing models, this research proposes a new model for determining coalbed gas pressure and content based on image analysis. Utilizing dual-threshold edge detection and dynamic cycle extraction algorithms, a desorption image database was developed, enabling rapid inversion of gas pressure/content through an enhanced image similarity calculation method and cycle comparison algorithm. Field experiments demonstrate the high accuracy of the image analysis model in determining gas pressure/content, controlling the absolute error of gas pressure below 0.08 MPa and maintaining relative errors of 2.27–8.05%; for gas content, the absolute errors range 0.105–0.674 ml/g, with relative errors of 1.32–8.21%. Compared to previous desorption models, the image analysis model improves accuracy by 6.30% and reduces the measurement time to within 1.5 h, thus facilitating rapid and precise determination of coalbed gas pressure/content. Furthermore, by applying image recognition principles, this study delves into the critical points and significant change areas of the desorption rate curve, providing new insights into gas desorption behavior and expanding the application potential of image analysis technology in coalbed methane recovery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12
Figure 13
Figure 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Airey, E. M. (1968). Gas emissions from broken coal, an experimental and theoretical investigation. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 5, 475–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asif, M., Paul, N., Panigrahi, D. C., & Ojha, K. (2017). Pore characterization of coal of Jharia coalfield for coalbed methane using pore image analysis. In 79th EAGE conference and exhibition.

  • Asif, M., Naveen, P., Panigrahi, D. C., Ojha, K., & Anwer, S. S. (2018). Multicomponent adsorption modelling for enhanced coalbed methane recovery from Jharia coalfield using iterative method. In 80th EAGE conference and exhibition.

  • Asif, M., Panigrahi, D. C., & Ojha, K. (2021). CO2 sequestration and ECBM recovery: A new approach for mitigating the effect of global warming. In 82nd EAGE annual conference & exhibition.

  • Asif, M., Pillalamarry, M., Panigrahi, D. C., Naveen, P., & Ojha, K. (2020). Measurement of coalbed gas content of Indian coalfields: A statistical approach. International Journal of Oil, Gas and Coal Technology, 25(1), 73–88.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Asif, M., Wang, L., Naveen, P., Longinos, S. N., Hazlett, R., Ojha, K., & Panigrahi, D. C. (2024). Influence of competitive adsorption, diffusion, and dispersion of CH4 and CO2 gases during the CO2-ECBM process. Fuel, 358, 130065.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Baatar, L., Mostaghimi, P., Yuan, M., Armstrong, R. T., Adler, L., Canbulat, I., et al. (2023). Multiscale measurements of gas diffusion coefficient of coal using counter-diffusion and image-based methods. International Journal of Coal Geology, 265, 104155.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barrer, R. M. (1951). Difussion in and through solid. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bibi, N., & Dawood, H. (2023). SEBR: Scharr edge-based regularization method for blind image deblurring. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 48, 15713–15729.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolt, B. A., & Innes, J. A. (1959). Diffusion of carbon dioxide from coal. Fuel, 38, 333–337.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chandra, D., & Vishal, V. (2021). A critical review on pore to continuum scale imaging techniques for enhanced shale gas recovery. Earth-Science Reviews, 217, 103638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandra, D., & Vishal, V. (2022). A comparative analysis of pore attributes of sub-bituminous Gondwana coal from the Damodar and Wardha valleys: implication for enhanced coalbed methane recovery. Energy & Fuels, 36(12), 6187–6197.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Q., Sun, Q. S., Heng, P. A., & Xia, D. S. (2008). A double-threshold image binarization method based on edge detector. Pattern Recognition, 41(4), 1254–1267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comaniciu, D., Ramesh, V., & Meer, P. (2003). Kernel-based object tracking. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 25(5), 564–577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cui, X., Zhang, J., Guo, L., & Gong, X. (2020). A new method for the measurement of gas pressure in water-bearing coal seams and its application. Geofluids, 2020, e8881063.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hou, X., Liu, S., Zhu, Y., & Yang, Y. (2020). Evaluation of gas contents for a multi-seam deep coalbed methane reservoir and their geological controls: In situ direct method versus indirect method. Fuel, 265, 116917.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hua, C., Wang, Z., Su, E., Dong, J., Yue, J., Cui, Y., & Zhang, K. (2022). In situ volume recovery method for non-seal gas pressure measurement technology: A comparative study. ACS Omega, 7(45), 41341–41352.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jia, L., Peng, S., Xu, J., Yan, F., Chen, J., Wu, B., & Chen, Y. (2022). On the evolution mechanism of permeability during gas drainage: Insights from deformation field, gas pressure field and temperature field. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 162, 825–836.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Karacan, C. O., & Okandan, E. (2001). Adsorption and gas transport in coal microstructure: investigation and evaluation by quantitative X-ray CT imaging. Fuel, 80(4), 509–520.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li, J., Lu, S., Zhang, P., Cai, J., Li, W., Wang, S., & Feng, W. (2020). Estimation of gas-in-place content in coal and shale reservoirs: A process analysis method and its preliminary application. Fuel, 259, 116266.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, C., Yu, B., Zhao, H., Hong, Z., Tian, Z., Zhang, D., & Liu, Y. (2022a). Effective stress effect and slippage effect of gas migration in deep coal reservoirs. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 155, 105142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, J., Qin, Y., Zhang, S., & He, C. (2019). Numerical solution for borehole methane flow in coal seam based on a new dual-porosity model. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 68, 102916.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, L., Yang, M., Zhang, X., Mao, J., & Chai, P. (2021). LNMR experimental study on the influence of gas pressure on methane adsorption law of middle-rank coal. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 91, 103949.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, T., Zhao, Y., Kong, X., Lin, B., & Zou, Q. (2022b). Dynamics of coalbed methane emission from coal cores under various stress paths and its application in gas extraction in mining-disturbed coal seam. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 104, 104677.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, W., Han, D., Xu, H., Chu, X., & Qin, Y. (2023). Modeling of gas migration in a dual-porosity coal seam around a borehole: the effects of three types of driving forces in coal matrix. Energy, 264, 126181.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Y., Du, Y., Li, Z., Zhao, F., Zuo, W., Wei, J., & Mitri, H. (2020). A rapid and accurate direct measurement method of underground coal seam gas content based on dynamic diffusion theory. International Journal of Mining Science and Technology, 30(6), 799–810.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Long, Q., Hu, Q., Zhang, Z., & Ren, T. (2018). On factors affecting coalbed gas content measurement. Measurement, 121, 47–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu, X., Armstrong, R. T., & Mostaghimi, P. (2020). Analysis of gas diffusivity in coal using micro-computed tomography. Fuel, 261, 116384.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Saghafi, A. (2017). Discussion on determination of gas content of coal and uncertainties of measurement. International Journal of Mining Science and Technology, 27(5), 741–748.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sampath, K. H. S. M., Perera, M. S. A., Ranjith, P. G., Matthai, S. K., Rathnaweera, T., Zhang, G., & Tao, X. (2017). CH4–CO2 Gas exchange and supercritical CO2 based hydraulic fracturing as CBM production-accelerating techniques: A review. Journal of CO2 Utilization, 22, 212–230.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Serikov, G., Wang, L., Asif, M., & Hazlett, R. (2022). Simulation evaluation of CO2-ECBM potential in Karaganda Coal Basin in Kazakhstan. In SPE EuropEC-Europe energy conference featured at the 83rd EAGE annual conference & exhibition.

  • Si, L., Wang, H., Xi, Y., Wen, Z., & Yao, B. (2022). Modeling for gas dissolution and diffusion in water-intrusion coal seam and its potential applications. Fuel, 307, 121786.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Skiba, M., Dutka, B., & Młynarczuk, M. (2021). MLP-based model for estimation of methane seam pressure. Energies, 14(22), 7661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sporysz, G. (2009). Assessment of the methane hazard in the south-eastern part of the Upper Silesian coal basin. AGH University of Science and Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun, C. X. (1983). Research on coal gas emission and desorption characteristics in outburst seam. In 3th academic conference of coal and gas outburst.

  • Sun, Y., Wang, Z., Yue, J., & Liang, Y. (2023). Study on gas desorption law and gas loss estimation in a positive pressure reverse circulation sampling process. Fuel, 352, 129141.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, Y., Zhao, Y., Zhang, H., & Zhang, C. (2020). Visualization of gas diffusion-sorption in coal: A study based on synchrotron radiation nano-CT. Geofluids, 2020, e8835848.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vishal, V., Mahanta, B., Pradhan, S. P., Singh, T. N., & Ranjith, P. G. (2018). Simulation of CO2 enhanced coalbed methane recovery in Jharia coalfields, India. Energy, 159, 1185–1194.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, C., & Cheng, Y. (2023). Role of coal deformation energy in coal and gas outburst: A review. Fuel, 332, 126019.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, C., Cheng, Y., Yi, M., Hu, B., & Jiang, Z. (2020b). Surface energy of coal particles under quasi-static compression and dynamic impact based on fractal theory. Fuel, 264, 116835.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, C., Li, X., Xu, C., Niu, Y., Chen, Y., Yang, S., et al. (2020a). Study on factors influencing and the critical value of the drilling cuttings weight: An index for outburst risk prediction. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 140, 356–366.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, C., Yang, S., Jiang, C., Yang, D., Zhang, C., Li, X., et al. (2017). A method of rapid determination of gas pressure in a coal seam based on the advantages of gas spherical flow field. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 45, 502–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, H., Wang, E., Li, Z., Shen, R., & Liu, X. (2021). Study and application of a new gas pressure inversion model in coal seam while drilling based on directional drilling technology. Fuel, 306, 121679.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, H., Wang, E., Li, Z., Shen, R., Liu, X., Zhang, Q., & Li, B. (2020c). Study and application of dynamic inversion model of coal seam gas pressure with drilling. Fuel, 280, 118653.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, K., Wang, Y., Xu, C., Guo, H., Xu, Z., Liu, Y., et al. (2023a). Modeling of multi-field gas desorption-diffusion in coal: A new insight into the bidisperse model. Energy, 267, 126534.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, L., Cheng, L., Cheng, Y., Liu, S., Guo, P., Jin, K., & Jiang, H. (2015). A new method for accurate and rapid measurement of underground coal seam gas content. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 26, 1388–1398.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, L., Cheng, Y., Wang, L., Guo, P., & Li, W. (2012). Safety line method for the prediction of deep coal-seam gas pressure and its application in coal mines. Safety Science, 50(3), 523–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y., Kang, J., Zhou, F., Yuan, L., & Pan, Z. (2022). Evaluation of lost gas in the borehole drilling stage: Implication for the direct method of coalbed methane content determination. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 105, 104711.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y., & Yang, S. (1980). Some characteristics of coal seams with hazard of outburst. Journal of China Coal Society, 1, 47–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Z., Bovik, A. C., Sheikh, H. R., & Simoncelli, E. P. (2004). Image quality assessment: From error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 13(4), 600–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Z., Hao, C., Wang, X., Wang, G., Ni, G., & Cheng, Y. (2023b). Effects of micro-mesopore structure characteristics on methane adsorption capacity of medium rank coal. Fuel, 351, 128910.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Winter K., Janas H. (1975). Gas emission characteristics of coal and methods of determining the desorbable gas content by means of desorbometers. In 16th international conference on coal mine safety research.

  • Wu, Z., Fan, D., Jiang, S., Shao, H., Wang, K., Zhang, W., & Guo, C. (2019). A wireless-communication-based measurement of gas pressure with capsule-slime sealing device. International Journal of Mining Science and Technology, 29(6), 917–923.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, C., Wang, K., Li, X., Yuan, L., Zhao, C., & Guo, H. (2022a). Collaborative gas drainage technology of high and low level roadways in highly-gassy coal seam mining. Fuel, 323, 124325.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, H., Pan, Z., Hu, B., Liu, H., & Sun, G. (2020). A new approach to estimating coal gas content for deep core sample. Fuel, 277, 118246.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, Y., Liu, T., & Lin, B. (2022b). Multi-field coupling theory and research progress of methane extraction in deep coal seams: A review. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 107, 104796.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xue, S., & Yuan, L. (2017). The use of coal cuttings from underground boreholes to determine gas content of coal with direct desorption method. International Journal of Coal Geology, 174, 1–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yan, G., Gang, W., Lin, X., Du, W., & Huang, Q. (2017). Direct fitting measurement of gas content in coalbed and selection of reasonable sampling time. International Journal of Mining Science and Technology, 27(2), 299–305.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, D., Peng, K., Zheng, Y., Chen, Y., Zheng, J., Wang, M., & Chen, S. (2023). Study on the characteristics of coal and gas outburst hazard under the influence of high formation temperature in deep mines. Energy, 268, 126645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ye, J. (2011). Cosine similarity measures for intuitionistic fuzzy sets and their applications. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 53(1), 91–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, Q. X., Wang, K., & Yang, S. Q. (2000). Study on pattern and control of gas emission at coal face in China. Journal of China University of Mining Technology, 29, 9–14.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, X. G., Ranjith, P. G., Perera, M. S. A., Ranathunga, A. S., & Haque, A. (2016). Gas transportation and enhanced coalbed methane recovery processes in deep coal seams: a review. Energy & Fuels, 30(11), 8832–8849.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, C., Jiang, B., Xue, S., Chen, Z., & Li, H. (2019). Coalbed methane emissions and drainage methods in underground mining for mining safety and environmental benefits: A review. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 127, 103–124.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52004292), and the Guizhou Scientific Support Project (2023 General 430).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Chengwu Li or Shouye Ma.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wei, C., Li, C., Qiao, Z. et al. Modeling of Coalbed Gas Pressure/Content Identification Using Image Analysis. Nat Resour Res (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-024-10340-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-024-10340-6

Keywords

Navigation