In mineral exploration, geophysical inversion is a common mathematical tool to obtain reliable information on subsurface density properties based on gravity measurements. Many inversion algorithms were developed to obtain the density distribution in the Earth’s subsurface. Recovered density values are usually lower/higher than the actual density as a consequence of inversion algorithm. This paper presents the use of a fuzzy cross-update inversion (FCUI) procedure to improve the subsurface density model based on a triangular grid. The algorithm is written in MATLAB and uses fuzzy c means clustering to improve the density modeling result per iteration. Two additional input parameters are added, namely the number of geologic units in the model (i.e., number of clusters) and the cluster center values of the geologic units (mean density value of each geologic unit). Inversion results from the FCUI are presented and compared with conventional inversion. The effectiveness of the developed technique is tested for the interpretation of synthetic data and two sets of field data. The FCUI approach shows improvement over conventional inversion approaches in differentiating geologic units. Further, FCUI was performed to reduce ambiguity of interpretation for the delineation of chromite and uranium deposits as the first and second case studies, respectively. We integrated favorable information and show the efficacy of FCUI over conventional inversion for the field datasets.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Baranwal, V. C., Franke, A., Borner, R. U., & Spitzer, K. (2011). Unstructured grid based 2-D inversion of VLF data for models including topography. Journal of Applied Geophysics,75, 363–372.
Blakely, R. J. (1995). Potential theory in gravity and magnetic applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Böhm, G., Galuppo, P., & Vesnaver, A. (2000). 3D adaptive tomography using Delaunay triangles and Voronoi polygons. Geophysical Prospecting,48, 723–744.
Burger, H. R., Sheehan, A. F., & Jones, C. H. (2006). Introduction to applied geophysics. New York: W. W Norton and Company.
Carrillo, J., & Gallardo, L. A. (2018). Joint two-dimensional inversion of magnetotelluric and gravity data using correspondence maps. Geophysical Journal International,214(2), 1061–1071.
Carter-McAuslan, A., Lelièvre, P. G., & Farquharson, C. G. (2015). A study of fuzzy c-means coupling for joint inversion, using seismic tomography and gravity data test scenarios. Geophysics,80(1), W1–W15.
Ellis, R. G., & Oldenburg, D. W. (1994). The pole-pole 3-D DC resistivity inverse problem: Conjugate gradient approach. Geophysical Journal International,119, 187–194.
Farquharson, C. G., Ash, M. R., & Miller, H. G. (2008). Geologically constrained gravity inversion for the Voisey’s Bay ovoid deposit. The Leading Edge,27, 64–69.
Franke, A., Borner, R., & Spitzer, K. (2007). Adaptive unstructured grid finite element simulation of two-dimensional magnetotelluric fields for arbitrary surface and seafloor topography. Geophysical Journal International,171, 71–86.
Günther, T., Rucker, C., & Spitzer, K. (2006). Three-dimensional modeling and inversion of dc resistivity data incorporating topography-II. Inversion. Geophysical Journal International,166, 506–517.
Heincke, B., Jegen, M., Moorkamp, M., & Chen, J. (2010). Adaptive coupling strategy for simultaneous joint inversion that use petrophysical information as constraints. In 80th Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts (pp. 2805–2809).
Johnson, C., & Erikson, K. (1991). Finite element methods for parabolic problems I: A linear model problem. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis,28, 43–77.
Key, K., & Ovall, J. (2011). A parallel goal-oriented adaptive finite element method for 2.5-D electromagnetic modeling. Geophysical Journal International,186, 137–154.
Lane, R., FitzGerald, D., Guillen, A., Seikel, R., & Mclnerey, P. (2007). Lithologically constrained inversion of magnetic and gravity data sets. Preview,129, 11–17.
Last, B. J., & Kubik, K. (1983). Compact gravity inversion. Geophysics,48, 713–721.
Lelièvre, P. G., & Farquharson, C. G. (2013). Gradient and smoothness regularization operators for geophysical inversion on unstructured meshes. Geophysical Journal International,195, 330–341.
Lelièvre, P. G., Farquharson, C. G., & Hurich, C. A. (2011). Inversion of first-arrival seismic travel times without rays, implemented on unstructured grids. Geophysical Journal International,185, 749–763.
Lelièvre, P. G., Farquharson, C. G., & Hurich, C. A. (2012). Joint inversion of seismic travel times and gravity data on unstructured grids with application to mineral exploration. Geophysics,77(1), K1–K15.
Lelièvre, P. G., Oldenburg, D. W., & Williams, N. C. (2009). Integrating geological and geophysical data through advanced constrained inversions. Exploration Geophysics (Collingwood, Australia),40, 334–341.
Li, Y., & Oldenburg, D. W. (1998). 3-D inversion of gravity data. Geophysics,63, 109–119.
Liu, S., Hu, X., Liu, T., Feng, J., Gao, W., & Qiu, L. (2013). Magnetization vector imaging for borehole magnetic data based on magnitude magnetic anomaly. Geophysics,78, D429–D444.
Liu, S., Hu, X., Xi, Y., & Liu, T. (2015). 2D inverse modeling for potential fields on rugged observation surface using constrained Delaunay triangulation. Computers and Geosciences,76, 18–30.
Maag, E., & Li, Y. (2018). Discrete-valued gravity inversion using the guided fuzzy c-means clustering technique. Geophysics, 83(4), G59–G77.
Mandal, A., Mohanty, W. K., Sharma, S. P., Biswas, A., Sen, J., & Bhatt, A. K. (2015). Geophysical signatures of uranium mineralization and its subsurface validation at Beldih, Purulia District, West Bengal, India: a case study. Geophysical Prospecting,63, 713–726.
Mohanty, W. K., Mandal, A., Sharma, S. P., Gupta, S., & Misra, S. (2011). Integrated geological and geophysical studies for delineation of chromite deposits: A case study from Tangarparha, Orissa. IndiaChromite exploration at Tangarparha. Geophysics,76(5), B173–B185.
Paasche, H., & Tronicke, J. (2007). Cooperative inversion of 2D geophysical data sets: A zonal approach based on fuzzy c-means cluster analysis. Geophysics,72(3), A35–A39.
Paasche, H., Tronicke, J., Holliger, K., Green, A. G., & Maurer, H. (2006). Integration of diverse physical-property models: Subsurface zonation and petrophysical parameter estimation based on fuzzy c-means cluster analyses. Geophysics,71(3), H33–H44.
Piggott, M. D., Gorman, G. J., Pain, C. C., Allison, P. A., Candy, A. S., Martin, B. T., et al. (2008). A systematic approach to unstructured mesh generation for ocean modeling using GMT and Terre no. Computer and Geosciences,34, 1721–1731.
Pilkington, M. (1997). 3-D magnetic imaging using conjugate gradients. Geophysics,62, 1132–1142.
Pilkington, M. (2009). 3D magnetic data-space inversion with sparseness constraints. Geophysics,74(1), L7–L15.
Ramarao, P., & Murthy, I. V. R. (1989). Two FORTRAN 77 function subprograms to calculate gravity anomalies of bodies of finite and infinite strike length with the density contrast differing with depth. Computer and Geosciences,15(8), 1265–1277.
Ren, Z., Kalscheuer, T., Greenhalgh, S., & Maurer, H. (2013). A goal-oriented adaptive finite-element approach for plane wave 3-D electromagnetic modeling. Geophysical Journal International,194, 700–718.
Rodi, W., & Mackie, R. L. (2001). Nonlinear conjugate gradients algorithm for 2D magnetotelluric inversion. Geophysics,66, 174–187.
Roy, K. K. (2007). Potential theory in applied geophysics. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Singh, A., & Biswas, A. (2016). Application of global particle swarm optimization for inversion of residual gravity anomalies over geological bodies with idealized geometries. Natural Resources Research,25(3), 297–314.
Singh, A., Mishra, P. K., & Sharma, S. P. (2019). 2D Cooperative inversion of direct current resistivity and gravity data: A case study of uranium bearing target rock. Geophysical Prospecting. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2478.12763.
Singh, A., & Sharma, S. P. (2016). Interpretation of very low frequency electromagnetic measurements in terms of normalized current density over variable topography. Journal of Applied Geophysics,133, 82–91.
Singh, A., & Sharma, S. P. (2017). Modified zonal cooperative inversion of gravity data-a case study from uranium mineralization. In Society of Exploration Geophysicists Technical Program Expanded Abstracts (pp. 1744–1749).
Singh, A., & Sharma, S. P. (2018). Identification of different geologic units using fuzzy constrained resistivity tomography. Journal of Applied Geophysics,148, 127–138.
Singh, A., Sharma, S. P., Akca, İ., & Baranwal, V. C. (2018). Fuzzy constrained Lp-norm inversion of direct current resistivity data. Geophysics,83(1), E11–E24.
Spitzer, K. (1995). A 3-D finite difference algorithm for DC resistivity modelling using conjugate gradient methods. Geophysical Journal International,123, 903–914.
Sun, J., & Li, Y. (2015). Multidomain petrophysically constrained inversion and geology differentiation using guided fuzzy c-means clustering. Geophysics,80(4), ID1–ID18.
Sun, J., & Li, Y. (2016). Joint inversion of multiple geophysical data using guided fuzzy c-means clustering. Geophysics,81(3), ID37–ID57.
Sun, J., & Li, Y. (2017). Joint inversion of multiple geophysical and petrophysical data using generalized fuzzy clustering algorithms. Geophysical Journal International,208(2), 1201–1216.
Wang, J., Meng, X., & Li, F. (2015). A computationally efficient scheme for the inversion of large scale potential field data: Application to synthetic and real data. Computers and Geosciences,85, 102–111.
Williams, N. C. (2008). Geologically-constrained UBC-GIF gravity and magnetic inversions with examples from the Agnew-Wiluna Greenstone Belt, Western Australia. Ph.D. thesis, University of British Columbia.
Wilson, C. R. (2009). Modeling unstructured meshes. London: Imperial College London.
Zhang, J., Mackie, R. L., & Madden, T. R. (1995). 3-D resistivity forward modeling and inversion using conjugate gradients. Geophysics,60, 1313–1325.
The author is thankful to the Prof. John Carranza (Editor-in-Chief), Prof. Colin Farquharson, and anonymous reviewers for the reviews and numerous suggestions which greatly improved the paper. The author is also thankful to Dr. Shuang Liu, China University of Geosciences (Wuhan), for his 2D-CDTGMI code to compare the results. The author is extremely grateful to the IRCC-IITB for the financial support to carry out this study in the form of a Seed Grant Project (Project code- RD/0518-IRCCSH0-022).
About this article
Cite this article
Singh, A. Triangular Grid-Based Fuzzy Cross-Update Inversion of Gravity Data: Case Studies from Mineral Exploration. Nat Resour Res 29, 459–471 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-019-09480-x
- Fuzzy cross-update inversion
- Conventional inversion
- Fuzzy c means clustering
- Gravity data
- Triangular grid
- Mineral exploration