Skip to main content
Log in

Multifractal Modeling of Worldwide and Canadian Metal Size-Frequency Distributions

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Natural Resources Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Pareto-lognormal frequency distribution, which can result from multifractal cascade modeling, previously was shown to be useful to describe the worldwide size-frequency distributions of metals including copper, zinc, gold and silver in ore deposits. In this paper, it is shown that the model also can be used for the size-frequency distributions of these metals in Canada which covers 6.6% of the continental crust. Like their worldwide equivalents, these Canadian deposits show two significant departures from the Pareto-lognormal model: (1) there are too many small deposits, and (2) there are too few deposits in the transition zone between the central lognormal and the upper tail Pareto describing the size-frequency distribution of the largest deposits. Probable causes of these departures are: (1) historically, relatively many small ore deposits were mined before bulk mining methods became available in the twentieth century, and (2) economically, giant and supergiant deposits are preferred for mining and these have strongest geophysical and geochemical anomalies. It is shown that there probably exist many large deposits that have not been discovered or mined. Although overall the samples of the size-frequency distributions are very large, frequencies uncertainties associated with the largest deposits are relatively small and it remains difficult to estimate more precisely how many undiscovered mineral deposits there are in the upper tails of the size-frequency distributions of the metals considered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agterberg, F. P. (1964). Statistical techniques for geological data. Tectonophysics,1, 233–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agterberg, F. P. (2014). Geomathematics: Theoretical foundations, applications and future developments. Quantitative geology and geostatistics (Vol. 18). Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agterberg, F. P. (2017a). Pareto-lognormal modeling of known and unknown metal resources. Natural Resources Research,26(1), 3–20. (with erratum on p. 21).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agterberg, F. P. (2017b). Pareto-lognormal modeling of known and unknown metal resources. II. Method refinement and further applications. Natural Resources Research,26(3), 265–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agterberg, F. P. (2018a). Can multifractals be used for mineral resource appraisal? Journal of Geochemical Exploration,189, 59–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agterberg, F. P. (2018b). Statistical modeling of regional and worldwide size-frequency distributions of metal deposits. In B. S. Daya Sagar, Q. Cheng, & F. Agterberg (Eds.), Handbook of mathematical geosciences: Fifty years of IAMG (pp. 505–527). Heidelberg: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Agterberg, F. P. (2018c). New method of fitting Pareto-lognormal size-frequency distributions to worldwide Cu and Zn deposit size data. Natural Resources Research,27(4), 405–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aitchison, J., & Brown, J. A. C. (1957). The lognormal distribution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billingsley, P. (1986). Probability and measure (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cargill, S. M. (1981). United States gold resource profile. Economic Geology,76, 937–943.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cargill, S. M., Root, D. H., & Bailey, E. H. (1980). Resources estimation from historical data: Mercury, a test case. Mathematical Geology,12, 489–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cargill, S. M., Root, D. H., & Bailey, E. H. (1981). Estimating unstable resources from historical industrial data. Economic Geology,76, 1081–1095.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, Q., & Agterberg, F. P. (1995). Multifractal modeling and spatial statistics. Mathematical Geology,28, 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, Q., & Agterberg, F. P. (1996). Comparison between two types of multifractal modeling. Mathematical Geology,29, 1001–1015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clauset, A., Shalizi, C. R., & Newman, M. E. J. (2009). Power-law distributions in empirical data. SIAM Review,51, 661–703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crovelli, R. A. (1995). The generalized 20/80 law using probabilistic fractals applied to petroleum field size. Nonrenewable Resources,4(3), 223–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cuney, C., & Kyser, K. (2008). Recent and not-so-recent developments in uranium deposits and implications for exploration. Short Course Series 39. Quebec City, QC: Mineralogical Association of Canada.

  • De Wijs, H. J. (1951). Statistics of ore distribution, I. Geologie en Mijnbouw,30, 365–375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drew, L. J., Schuenemeyer, J. H., & Bawlee, W. J. (1982). Estimation of the future rates of oil and gas discoveries in the western Gulf of Mexico. US Geological Survey Professional Paper 1252, U.S. GPO, Washington, DC.

  • Frimmel, H. E., Groves, D. L., Kirk, J., Rutz, J., Chesley, J., & Minter, W. E. L. (2005). The formation and preservation of the Witwatersrand goldfields, the world’s largest gold province. Economic Geology,100, 769–797.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hald, A. (1952). Statistical theory and engineering applications. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleiber, C., & Kotz, S. (2003). Statistical distributions in economics and actuarial sciences. Hoboken: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lévy, P. (1925). Calcul des Probabilités (Chapter 6). Paris: Gauthier-Villars.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovejoy, S., & Schertzer, D. (2007). Scaling and multifractal fields in the solid Earth and topography. Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics,14, 465–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lydon, J. W. (2007). An overview of economic and geological contexts of Canada’s major mineral deposit types. In M. D. Goodfellow (Ed.), Mineral deposits in Canada (Vol. 5, pp. 3–48). ‎Montreal: Geological Survey of Canada, Special Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandelbrot, B. B. (1960). The Pareto-Lévy law and the distribution of income. International economic Review,1, 79–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mandelbrot, B. B. (1983). The fractal geometry of nature. San Francisco: Freeman.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mandelbrot, B. B. (1998). Multifractals and 1/f noise. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montroll, E. W., & Shlesinger, F. (1982). On 1/f noise and other distributions with long tails. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,70, 3380–3383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orris, G. J., & Bliss, J. D. (1985). Geologic and grade-volume data on 330 gold placer deposits. U.S. Geological Survey Open File Report. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-015-9265-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pareto, V. (1895). La legge della domanda. Giornale degli Economisti, 10, 59–68. English translation in Rivista di Politica Economica, 87, 691–700 (1997).

  • Patiño-Douce, A. E. (2016a). Metallic mineral resources in the twenty first century. I. Historical extraction trends and expected demand. Natural Resources Research,25(1), 71–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patiño-Douce, A. E. (2016b). Metallic mineral resources in the twenty first century. II. Constraints on future supply. Natural Resources Research,25(1), 97–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patiño-Douce, A. E. (2016c). Statistical distribution laws for metallic mineral deposit sizes. Natural Resources Research,25(4), 365–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patiño-Douce, A. E. (2017). Loss distribution model for metal discovery probabilities. Natural Resources Research,25(3), 241–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quandt, R. E. (1966). Old and new methods of estimation and the Pareto distribution. Metrica,10, 55–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reed, W. J. (2003). The Pareto law of incomes: An explanation and an extension. Physica A,319, 579–597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reed, W. J., & Jorgensen, M. (2003). The double Pareto-lognormal distribution: A new parametric model for size distribution. Computational Statistics: Theory and Methods,33(8), 1733–1753.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuenemeyer, J. H., Drew, L. J., & Bliss, J. D. (2018). Predicting molybdenum deposit growth. In B. S. Daya Sagar, Q. Cheng, & F. Agterberg (Eds.), Handbook of mathematical geosciences: Fifty years of IAMG (pp. 395–409). Heidelberg: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Singer, D. A., & Menzie, W. D. (2010). Quantitative mineral resource assessments. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turcotte, D. L. (1997). Fractals and chaos in geology and geophysics (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Thanks are due to Alberto Patiño-Douce and Renguang Zuo for discussion and helpful suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Frits Agterberg.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Agterberg, F. Multifractal Modeling of Worldwide and Canadian Metal Size-Frequency Distributions. Nat Resour Res 29, 539–550 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-019-09460-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-019-09460-1

Keywords

Navigation