Pilot Point Optimization of Mining Boundaries for Lateritic Metal Deposits: Finding the Trade-off Between Dilution and Ore Loss
- 384 Downloads
Geological contacts in lateritic metal deposits (footwall topographies) often delineate the orebody boundaries. Spatial variations seen in such contacts are frequently higher than those for the metal grades of the deposit. Therefore, borehole spacing chosen based on the grade variations cannot adequately capture the geological contact variability. Consequently, models created using such boreholes cause high volumetric uncertainties in the actual and targeted ore extraction volumes, which, in turn, lead to high unplanned dilution and ore losses. In this paper, a method to design optimum ore/mining boundaries for lateritic metal deposits is presented. The proposed approach minimizes the dilution/ore losses and comprises two main steps. First, the uncertainty on the orebody boundary is represented using a set of stochastic realizations generated with a multiple-point statistics algorithm. Then, the optimal orebody boundary is determined using an optimization technique inspired by a model calibration method called Pilot Points. The pilot points represent synthetic elevation values, and they are used to construct smooth mining boundaries using the multilevel B-spline technique. The performance of a generated surface is evaluated using the expected sum of losses in each of the stochastic realizations. The simulated annealing algorithm is used to iteratively determine the pilot point values which minimize the expected losses. The results show a significant reduction in the dilution volume as compared to those obtained from the actual mining operation.
KeywordsMultiple-point statistics Direct sampling Bauxite mining Laterite simulated annealing Optimization Dig limit
The authors would like to thank the editor and three anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions.
- Barsottelli-Botelho, M., & Luiz, J. (2011). Using gpr to detect bauxite horizons in laterite deposits of amazon basin, brazil. In 73rd EAGE Conference and Exhibition incorporating SPE EUROPEC 2011.Google Scholar
- Campbell, G. (1994). Geophysical contributions to mine-development planning: A risk reduction approach. In 15th CMMI Congress, Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, (Vol. 3, pp. 283–325).Google Scholar
- de Marsily, G., Lavedan, G., Boucher, M., & Fasanino, G. (1984). Interpretation of interference tests in a well field using geostatistical techniques to fit the permeability distribution in a reservoir model. Geostatistics for Natural Resources Characterization, Part, 2, 831–849.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Erten, O. (2012). Profiling and mining control to mitigate dilution effect from SiO2 at the base of a bauxite deposit. Brisbane: The University of Queensland.Google Scholar
- Finley, A., & Banerjee, S. (2010). Mba: Multilevel b-spline approximation. R package version 0.0-7. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=MBA.
- Francke, J. (2010). Applications of gpr in mineral resource evaluations. In 2010 13th international conference on ground penetrating radar (GPR) (pp. 1–5). IEEE.Google Scholar
- Francke, J. (2012b). The role of ground penetrating radar in bauxite resource evaluations. In 2012 14th international conference on ground penetrating radar (GPR) (pp. 459–463). IEEE.Google Scholar
- Francké, J. C., & Nobes, D. C. (2000). Preliminary evaluation of gpr for nickel laterite exploration. In Eighth international conference on ground penetrating radar, (Vol. 4084, pp. 7–13). International Society for Optics and Photonics.Google Scholar
- Francke, J., & Parkinson, G. (2000). The new role of geophysics in nickel laterite exploitation and development. In Mining millennium/PDAC 2000 conference proceedings, Toronto.Google Scholar
- Francké, J. C., & Yelf, R. (2003). Applications of GPR for surface mining. In Proceedings of the 2nd international workshop on advanced ground penetrating radar, 2003 (pp. 115–119). IEEE.Google Scholar
- Francke, J., & Utsi, V. (2009). Advances in long-range GPR systems and their applications to mineral exploration, geotechnical and static correction problems. first break, 27(7), 85–93.Google Scholar
- Guardiano, F., & Srivastava, R. (1992). Borrowing complex geometries from training images: The extended normal equations algorithm. In Stanford center for reservoir forecasting report. Stanford University.Google Scholar
- Hartman, H. L., & Mutmansky, J. M. (2002). Introductory mining engineering. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Isaaks, E., Treloar, I., & Elenbaas, T. (2014). Optimum dig lines for open pit grade control. In 9th International mining geology conference, Adelaide, South Australia.Google Scholar
- Jung, Y. (2008). Evolutionary algorithm based pilot point methods for subsurface characterization. Ph.D. thesis, North Carolina State University.Google Scholar
- Mariethoz, G., Renard, P., & Straubhaar, J. (2010). The direct sampling method to perform multiple-point geostatistical simulations. Water Resources Research, 46(11), 1–14.Google Scholar
- McLennan, J., Ortiz, J., & Deutsch, C. (2006). Geostatistical simulation of optimum mining elevations for nickel laterite deposits. CIM Magazine, 1(6), 1–9.Google Scholar
- Morgan, C. (1995). Geology of the spheres at weipa. Trav Com Int Etude Bauxites, Alumine Alum, 22(24), 61–74.Google Scholar
- Norrena, K., & Deutsch, C. (2001). Determination of dig limits subject to geostatistical, economic, and equipment constraints. In 2001 SME annual conference and exhibition (pp. 133–148).Google Scholar
- Norrena, K., & Deutsch, C. (2002). Optimal determination of dig limits for improved grade control. In APCOM 2002: 30th international symposium on the application of computers and operations research in the mineral industry (pp. 329–339).Google Scholar
- Oliver, D. S., He, N., & Reynolds, A. C. (1996). Conditioning permeability fields to pressure data. In ECMOR V-5th European conference on the mathematics of oil recovery.Google Scholar
- Richmond, A. (2004). Integrating multiple simulations and mining dilution in open pit optimisation algorithms. In Orebody modelling and strategic mine planning conference.Google Scholar
- Richmond, A., & Beasley, J. (2004). Financially efficient dig-line delineation incorporating equipment constraints and grade uncertainty. International Journal of Surface Mining, 18(2), 99–121.Google Scholar
- Singh, N. (2007). Ground penetrating radar (GPR) in mineral base profiling and orebody optimization. In 6th international heavy minerals conference (pp. 185–194).Google Scholar
- Straubhaar, J. (2016). Deesse users guide. The Centre for Hydrogeology and Geothermics (CHYN), University of Neuchâtel.Google Scholar
- Team, R. C. (2017). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R foundation for statistical computing, Vienna, Austria, 2016.Google Scholar
- Xiang, Y., Gubian, S., & Martin, F. (2017). Generalized simulated annealing. In H. Peyvandi (Ed.), Computational optimization in engineering. IntechOpen. https://www.intechopen.com/books/computational-optimization-in-engineering-paradigms-and-applications/generalized-simulated-annealing.