Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Estimation of Facies Boundaries Using Categorical Indicators with P-Field Simulation and Ensemble Kalman Filter (EnKF)

  • Published:
Natural Resources Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Ensemble Kalman Filter (EnKF) often fails to reproduce realistic facies distribution and proportion corresponding to the prior spatial distribution. In this paper, a new step is proposed for inclusion in the history matching of multiple facies reservoir models using EnKF. The new step consists of constructing a facies probability map and application of probability field (P-Field) simulation to re-sample a new ensemble. After certain number of assimilation steps in EnKF, the updated ensemble members are used to propose a probability map for facies distribution. P-Field simulation is performed subsequently using the facies probability map to generate a new ensemble, which honors the static geologic data and is more consistent with the early production data. After the re-sampling step, the forecast model is applied to the new ensemble from the beginning. EnKF is again applied on the ensemble members to assimilate the remaining production history. Two case studies with different facies distribution and well configurations were conducted. Initial ensemble was created using known facies classification at the well locations and populating binary facies data throughout the reservoir using prior information of spatial facies distribution and facies proportions. The qualities of the history-matched models were assessed by comparing the spatial facies distribution and proportions of the updated ensemble, in addition to the root mean square error of the predicted data mismatch. Implementation of EnKF together with re-sampling of the new realizations using probability maps demonstrates reasonable improvement in the history matching and uncertainty assessment of multiple facies reservoir models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12
Figure 13
Figure 14
Figure 15
Figure 16
Figure 17

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aanonsen, S. I., Nævdal, G., Oliver, D. S., Reynolds, A. C., & Valles, B. (2009). The Ensemble Kalman Filter in reservoir engineering: A review. SPE Journal, 14(3), 393–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agbalaka, C., & Oliver, D. S. (2008). Application of the EnKF and localization to automatic history matching of facies distribution and production data. Mathematical Geosciences, 40(4), 353–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, C. V., & Journel, A. G. (1997). GSLIB: Geostatistical software library and user’s guide (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dovera, L., & Della Rossa, E. (2010). Multimodal Ensemble Kalman filtering using Gaussian mixture models. Computational Geosciences, 15(2), 307–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ECLIPSE 100 (Black Oil). (2011). Reference manual and technical description. Houston: Schlumberger GeoQuest.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emerick, A. A., & Reynolds, A. C. (2012). Combining the Ensemble Kalman Filter with Markov Chain Monte Carlo for improved history matching and uncertainty characterization. SPE Journal, 17(2), 418–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evensen, G. (2007). Data assimilation: The Ensemble Kalman Filter. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Froidevaux, R. (1993). Probability field simulation. In A. Soares (Ed.), Geostatistics Troia ’92 (Vol. 2, pp. 73–84). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jafarpour, B., & McLaughlin, D. B. (2008). History matching with an ensemble Kalman filter and discrete cosine parameterization. Computational Geosciences, 12(2), 227–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jafarpour, B., & Tarrahi, M. (2011). Assessing the performance of the Ensemble Kalman Filter for subsurface flow data integration under variogram uncertainty. Water Resources Research, 47, W05537. doi:10.1029/2010WR009090.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jain, A. K. (1988). Fundamentals of digital image processing. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, L., Zhou, H., Hendricks Franssen, H. J., & Gómez-Hernández, J. J. (2012). Groundwater flow inverse modeling in non-MultiGaussian media: Performance assessment of the normal-score Ensemble Kalman Filter. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 16(2), 573–590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, N., & Oliver, D. S. (2005). Ensemble Kalman Filter for automatic history matching of geologic facies. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 47(3–4), 147–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorentzen, R. J., Fjelde, K. K., Froyen, J., Lage, A. C., Naevdal, G., & Vefring, E. H. (2001). Underbalanced and low-head drilling operations: Real time interpretation of measured data and operational support. Paper SPE 71384 presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans, September 30–October 3.

  • Modis, K., & Sideri, D. (2013). Geostatistical simulation of hydrofacies heterogeneity of the west thessaly aquifer systems in Greece. Natural Resources Research, 22(2), 123–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moreno, D., & Aanonsen, S. I. (2011). Continuous facies updating using the Ensemble Kalman Filter and the level set method. Mathematical Geosciences, 43(8), 951–970.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nejadi, S., Trivedi, J., & Leung, J. (2012). Estimation of geological facies boundaries using categorical indicators with P-Field simulation and Ensemble Kalman Filter. Paper SPE 153645 presented at the SPE Latin America and Caribbean Petroleum Engineering Conference, Mexico City, Mexico, 16–18 April.

  • Nejadi, S., Trivedi, J., & Leung, J. (2012). Ensemble Kalman Filter predictor bias correction method for non-Gaussian geological facies detection. IFAC Conference on Automatic Control in Offshore Oil and Gas Production (ACOOG 2012), Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway, 31 May–1 June.

  • Pyrcz, M. J., & Deutsch, C. V. (2001). Two artifacts of probability field simulation. Mathematical Geology, 33(7), 775–799.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao, K. R., & Yip, P. (1990). Discrete cosine transform: Algorithms, advantages, applications. Boston: Academic Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Remy, N., Boucher, A., & Wu, J. (2009). Applied geostatistics with SGeMS: A user’s guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava, R. M. (1992). Reservoir characterization with probability field simulation. SPE Formation Evaluation, 7, 927–937.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teng, Y., & Koike, K. (2007). Three-dimensional imaging of a geothermal system using temperature and geological models derived from a well-log dataset. Geothermics, 36(6), 518–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamamoto, J. K., Mao, X. M., Koike, K., Crosta, A. P., Landim, P. M. B., Hu, H. Z., et al. (2012). Mapping an uncertainty zone between interpolated types of a categorical variable. Computers & Geosciences, 40, 146–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zafari, M., & Reynolds, A. C. (2007). Assessing the uncertainty in reservoir description and performance predictions with the Ensemble Kalman Filter. SPE Journal, 12(3), 382–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to acknowledge the financial support from NSERC Discovery Grant and the University of Alberta for this research. The ECLIPSE black-oil reservoir simulator was provided by Schlumberger.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, School of Mining and Petroleum Engineering, University of Alberta, 3-122 Markin/CNRL Natural Resources Engineering Facility, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2W2, Canada

    Siavash Nejadi, Japan Trivedi & Juliana Y. Leung

Authors
  1. Siavash Nejadi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Japan Trivedi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Juliana Y. Leung
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Japan Trivedi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nejadi, S., Trivedi, J. & Leung, J.Y. Estimation of Facies Boundaries Using Categorical Indicators with P-Field Simulation and Ensemble Kalman Filter (EnKF). Nat Resour Res 24, 121–138 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-014-9233-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-014-9233-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation