Abstract
Data from a mineral deposit are commonly obtained by core drilling. This kind of sampling involves high costs, limiting the number of drill holes. Additional holes should be located to bring the maximum benefit. The benefit can be evaluated by various ways and must take into account the goals of sampling. This article presents a case study where the deposit has been sampled and the new drillings must be added to reduce the uncertainty about a transfer function, Net Present Value (NPV) of the mining project. There are basically two ways to choose locations where new drillings should be placed for cases where the aim of sampling is to reduce uncertainty about a global function: the addition of new drillings outlining a quasi regular grid with previously collected drillings or the addition of new drillings on the locations of high uncertainty about the attribute of interest (or the attribute that is considered most influential in the transfer function). The performances of these patterns on reducing the uncertainty measured by the function selected are compared. The results point out that the most efficient pattern relates to the distribution (histogram) of the uncertainty about the attribute of interest. Thus, the choice of which sampling pattern should be adopted varies depending on data distribution and its influence on the transfer function.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Boucher, A., Dimitrakopoulos, R., and Vargas-Guzman, J. A., 2004, Joint simulations, optimal drillhole spacing and the role of the stockpile, in Leuangthong, O., and Deutsch, C. V., eds., Geostatistics Banff 2004: Springer, p. 35–44.
Deutsch, C. V., and Journel, A. G., 1998, GSLIB: geostatistical software library and user’s guide (2nd edn.): Oxford University Press, New York, 369 p.
Emery, X., Hernández, J., Corvalán, P., and Montaner, D., 2008, Developing a cost-effective sampling design for forest inventory, in Ortiz, J. M., and Emery, X., eds., Proceedings of the Eighth International Geostatistics Congress, Vol. 2: Gecamin, p. 1001–1010.
Englund, E. J., and Heravi, N., 1993, Conditional simulation: practical application for sampling design optimization, in Soares, A., ed., Proceedings of the Fourth International Geostatistics Congress, Vol. 2: Kluwer Academic Publishers, p. 613–624.
Gotway, C. A., and Rutherford, B. M., 1994, Stochastic simulation for imaging spatial uncertainty: Comparison and evaluation of available algorithms, in Armstrong, M. and Dowd, P. A., eds., Proceedings of Geostatistical Simulations: Kluwer Academic Publisher, p. 1–21.
Isaaks, E. H., and Srivastava, R. M., 1989, Applied geostatistics: Oxford University Press, New York, 560 p.
Journel, A. G., 1988, Geostatistics: nonparametric geostatistics for risk and additional sampling assessment: American Chemical Society, New York, p. 45–72.
Journel, A. G., and Huijbregts, Ch. J., 1978, Mining geostatistics: Academic Press, London, 600 p.
Koppe, V. C., Costa, J. F. C. L., and Koppe, J. C., 2008, The benefit of additional data accessed via transfer functions, in Ortiz, J. M., and Emery, X., eds., Proceedings of the Eighth International Geostatistics Congress, Vol. 2: Gecamin, p. 1179–1184.
Koppe, V. C., Costa, J. F. C. L., and Koppe, J. C., 2009, Algorithm to help additional drilling location, in APCOM 2009 Application of Computers & Operations Research in the Mineral Industry: CD-ROM, p. 87–93.
Li, S., Dimitrakopoulos, R., Scott, J., and Dunn, D., 2004, Quantification of geological uncertainty and risk using stochastic simulation and applications in the coal mining industry, in Orebody Modelling and Strategic Mining Planning: The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metalurgy, Melbourne, p. 233–240.
Matheron, G., 1973, The intrinsic random functions and their applications: Adv. Appl. Prob., v. 5, p. 439–468. Paper found on internet. Website http://cg.ensmp.fr/bibliotheque/index.html (accessed on December 8, 2006).
McBratney, A. B., and Webster, R., 1981, The design of optimal sampling schemes for local estimation and mapping of regionalized variables. II. Program and examples: Comput. Geosci., v. 7, no. 4, p. 335–365.
Pilger, G. G., Costa, J. F. C. L., and Koppe, J. C., 2001, Additional samples: where they should be located?: Nat. Resour. Res., v. 10, no. 3, p. 197–207.
Richmond, A., Waltho, A., Bateman, J., and Fergusson, D., 2007, Locating drill holes to reduce multivariate risk, in Magri, E. J., ed., APCOM 2007: 33rd International Symposium on Application of Computers and Operations Research in the Mineral Industry: Gecamin, p. 65–69.
Van Groenigen, J. W., Siderius, W., and Stein, A., 1999, Constrained optimisation of soil sampling for minimisation of kriging variance: Geoderma, v. 87, p. 239–259.
Van Meirvenne, M., and Goovaerts, P., 2001, Evaluating the probability of exceeding a site-specific soil cadmium contamination threshold: Geoderma, v. 102, p. 75–100.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the CNPq (Brazilian government research agency) and Datamine Latin America for providing financial support to this research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Koppe, V.C., Costa, J.F.C.L., de Lemos Peroni, R. et al. Choosing Between Two Kind of Sampling Patterns Using Geostatistical Simulation: Regularly Spaced or at High Uncertainty Locations?. Nat Resour Res 20, 131–142 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-011-9141-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-011-9141-5