Natural Resources Research

, Volume 19, Issue 3, pp 231–236 | Cite as

Modelling of Riparian-Imitated Constructed Wetland for Fish Habitat

  • Darrien Yau Seng Mah
  • Sai Hin Lai
  • Nor Azazi Zakaria
Article
  • 97 Downloads

Abstract

This paper presents a hydrodynamic-based investigation of constructed wetland suitability for fish habitat. A constructed wetland adjacent to river is manoeuvred to imitate riparian fish habitat by means of computer modelling. Flow-velocity conditions, water depths and effects of macrophytes to resistance of flow in constructed wetland are modelled and steered towards creating a favourable ground for natural substrate spawning of native fish species. The model suggests combination of two zones, which are a macrophyte zone for typical functions of a wetland and an open water zone with gravel bed to support fish reproductive cycles.

Keywords

Constructed wetland drainage fish spawning hydraulic riparian urban 

References

  1. Ahmadi-Nedushan, B., St-Hilaire, A., Bérubé, M., Ouarda, T. B. M. J., and Robichaud, É., 2008, Instream flow determination using a multiple input fuzzy-based rule system: a case study: River Res. Appl., v. 24, p. 279–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), 2000, Hydraulic modelling, concepts and practice. ASCE Manuals and Reports on Engineering Practice No. 97. ISBN 0-7844-0415-1.Google Scholar
  3. Arcement, G. J., and Schneider, V. R., 1984, Guide for selecting Manning’s roughness coefficients for natural channels and floodplains. US Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 2339, 38 p.Google Scholar
  4. Beamish, F. W. H., Sa-ardrit, P., and Tongnunui, S., 2006, Habitat characteristics of the Cyprinadae in small rivers in Central Thailand: Environ. Biol. Fish, v. 76, no. 2–4, p. 237–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Benito, G., Lang, M., Barriendos, M., Llasat, M. C., Frances, F., Ouarda, T., Thorndycraft, V. R., Enzel, Y., Bardossy, A., Coeur, D., and Bobee, B., 2004, Use of systematic, palaeoflood and historical data for the improvement of flood risk estimation, review of scientific methods: Nat. Hazard, v. 31, no. 3 (March), p. 623–643. doi:10.1023/B:NHAZ.0000024895.48463.eb.
  6. Construction Industry Research and Information Association (CIRIA), 2001, Sustainable urban drainage systems: best practice manual for England and Wales. CIRIA Report C523.Google Scholar
  7. Department of Irrigation and Drainage (DID) Malaysia, 2000, Urban stormwater management manual for Malaysia. Official manual for Government of Malaysia.Google Scholar
  8. Hussain, M. G., Islam, M. S., Hossain, M. A., Wahid, M. I., Kohinoor, A. H. M., Dey, M. M., and Mazid, M. A., 2002, Stock improvement of silver barb (Barbodes gonionotus Bleeker) through several generations of genetic selection: Aquaculture, v. 204, no. 3–4, p. 469–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Jones, W. W., 1997, Design features of constructed wetlands for nonpoint source treatment. Document for US Environment Protection Agency and Indiana Department of Environmental Management, Revised September 1997.Google Scholar
  10. Kohler, E. A., Poole, V. L., Reicher, Z. J., and Turco, R. F., 2004, Nutrient, metal and pesticide removal during storm and nonstorm events by a constructed wetland on an urban golf course: Ecol. Eng., v. 23, p. 285–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Koskiaho, J., 2003, Flow velocity retardation and sediment retention in two constructed wetland-ponds: Ecol. Eng., v. 19, no. 5, p. 325–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kottelat, M., Whitten, A. J., Kartikasari, S. N., and Wirjoatmodjo, S., 1993, Freshwater fishes of Western Indonesia and Sulawesi: Periplus Editions, Hong Kong, 221 p.Google Scholar
  13. Liley, N. R., and Tan, E. S. P., 2006, The induction of spawning behaviour in Puntius gonionotus (Bleeker) by treatment with prostaglandin PGF: J. Fish Biol., v. 26, no. 5, p. 491–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Masi, F., Martinuzzi, N., Bresciani, R., Giovannelli, L., and Conte, G., 2007, Tolerance to hydraulic and organic load fluctuations in constructed wetlands: Water Sci. Technol., v. 56, no. 3, p. 39–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ), 2001, MDEQ wetland identification manual: a technical manual for identifying wetlands in Michigan.Google Scholar
  16. Mohsin, A. K. M., and Ambak, M. A., 1983, Freshwater fishes of Peninsular Malaysia: Universiti Pertanian Malaysia Publisher, Malaysia, p. 284.Google Scholar
  17. Nakamura, K., Miki, O., and Shimatani, Y., 2000, Compact wetland system for urban area in Japan, in Proceedings of 7th International Conference on Wetland Systems for Water Pollution Control: IWA and University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA, p. 963–969.Google Scholar
  18. Pusch, M., and Hoffmann, A., 2000, Conservation concept for a river ecosystem (River Spree, Germany) impacted by flow abstraction in large post-mining area: Landsc. Urban Plan., v. 51, p. 165–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Schneider, M., Jorde, K., Zöllner, F., Kerle, F., and Eisner, A., 2002, Use of habitat models for decision support in water resources management, in Proceedings of 3rd International Conference on Water Resources and Environment Research (ICWRER): Dresden, Germany.Google Scholar
  20. Schneider, M., Kopecki, I., Eisner, A., and Noack, M., 2007, Linking morphodynamic and fish habitat modelling—case study, in Bodendorf, River Mur (Austria). IAHR Publication 32. IAHR Congress, 2–6 July 2007: Venice, Italy.Google Scholar
  21. Scholes, L., Revitt, D. M., and Ellis, J. B., 2008, A systematic approach for the comparative assessment of stromwater pollutant removal potentials: J. Environ. Manag., v. 88, p. 467–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Shutes, R. B. E., 2001, Artificial wetlands and water quality improvement: Environ. Int., v. 26, p. 441–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sindilariu, P. D., Wolter, C., and Reiter, R., 2008, Constructed wetlands as a treatment method for effluents from intensive trout farms: Aquaculture, v. 277, p. 179–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW), 2004, Stream habitat restoration guidelines: final draft. Saldi-Caromile, K. (Ed.)Google Scholar
  25. Wieprecht, S., Eisner, A., and Noack, M., 2006, Modelling approach to simulate habitat dynamics, in Proceedings of International Conference on Fluvial Hydraulics: Lisbon, Portugal, Vol. 2, p. 2055–2063.Google Scholar
  26. Wieprecht, S., Eisner, A., and Noack, M., 2007, Development of ecological oriented flow regimes based on habitat, in Sixth International Symposium on Ecohydraulics, 18–23 February 2007: Christchurch, New Zealand.Google Scholar
  27. Vromant, N., Cao, Q. N., and Ollevier, F., 2002, Growth of Barbodes gonionotus (Bleeker) in intensively cultivated rice fields: Aquaculture, v. 212, no. 1–4, p. 167–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wyzga, B., Amirowicz, A., Radecki-Pawlik, A., and Zawiejska, J., 2009, Hydromorphological conditions, potential fish habitats and the fish community in a mountain river subjected to variable human impacts, the Czarny Dunajec, Polish Carpathians: River Res. Appl., v. 25, no. 5, p. 517–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Association for Mathematical Geology 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Darrien Yau Seng Mah
    • 1
  • Sai Hin Lai
    • 1
  • Nor Azazi Zakaria
    • 1
  1. 1.River Engineering and Urban Drainage Research Centre (REDAC)Universiti Sains Malaysia, Engineering CampusPenangMalaysia

Personalised recommendations