Natural Resources Research

, Volume 16, Issue 3, pp 277–292 | Cite as

H2-rich and Hydrocarbon Gas Recovered in a Deep Precambrian Well in Northeastern Kansas

  • K. David Newell
  • John H. Doveton
  • Daniel F. Merriam
  • Barbara Sherwood Lollar
  • William M. Waggoner
  • L. Michael Magnuson
Article

Abstract

In late 2005 and early 2006, the WTW Operating, LLC (W.T.W. Oil Co., Inc.) #1 Wilson well (T.D. = 5772 ft; 1759.3 m) was drilled for 1826 ft (556.6 m) into Precambrian basement underlying the Forest City Basin in northeastern Kansas. Approximately 4500 of the 380,000 wells drilled in Kansas penetrate Precambrian basement. Except for two previous wells drilled into the arkoses and basalts of the 1.1-Ga Midcontinent Rift and another well drilled in 1929 in basement on the Nemaha Uplift east of the Midcontinent Rift, this well represents the deepest penetration into basement rocks in the state to date. Granite is the typical lithology observed in wells that penetrate the Precambrian in the northern Midcontinent. Although no cores were taken to definitively identify lithologies, well cuttings and petrophysical logs indicate that this well encountered basement metamorphic rocks consisting of schist, gneiss, and amphibolitic gneiss, all cut by aplite dikes.

The well was cased and perforated in the Precambrian, and then acidized. After several days of swabbing operations, the well produced shows of low-Btu gas, dominated by the non-flammable component gases of nitrogen (20%), carbon dioxide (43%), and helium (1%). Combustible components include methane (26%), hydrogen (10%), and higher molecular-weight hydrocarbons (1%). Although Coveney and others [Am. Assoc. Petroleum Geologists Bull., v. 71, no, 1, p. 39–48, 1987] identified H2-rich gas in two wells located close to the Midcontinent Rift in eastern Kansas, this study indicates that high levels of H2 may be a more widespread phenomenon than previously thought. Unlike previous results, the gases in this study have a significant component of hydrocarbon gas, as well as H2, N2, and CO2. Although redox reactions between iron-bearing minerals and groundwater are a possible source of H2 in the Precambrian basement rocks, the hydrocarbon gas does not exhibit the characteristics typically associated with proposed abiogenic hydrocarbon gases from Precambrian Shield sites in Canada, Finland, and South Africa. Compositional and isotopic signatures for gas from the #1 Wilson well are consistent with a predominantly thermogenic origin, with possible mixing with a component of microbial gas. Given the geologic history of uplift and rifting this region, and the major fracture systems present in the basement, this hydrocarbon gas likely migrated from source rocks and reservoirs in the overlying Paleozoic sediments and is not evidence for abiogenic hydrocarbons generated in situ in the Precambrian basement.

Keywords

Forest City Basin low Btu gas Precambrian metamorphics thermogenic vs. abiogenic gas 

References

  1. Berendsen, P., Doveton, J., Gerhard, L., Newell, K. D., Steeples, D., Watney, W. L., and Borcherding, R., 1988, Preliminary geologic report of the Texaco 1 Poersch borehole: Oil & Gas Jour., v. 86, no. 44, p. 48–52, 54Google Scholar
  2. Bernard B. B., Brooks J. M., Sackett W. M., 1978, Light hydrocarbons in recent Texas continental shelf and slope sediments. Jour. Geophys. Res., v. 83, no, C8, p. 4053–4061Google Scholar
  3. Bickford M. E., Hill B. M., 2007, Does the arc accretion model adequately explain the Paleoproterozoic evolution of southern Laurentia?; An expanded interpretation Geology, v. 35, no, 2, p. 167–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bickford, M. E., and others, 1981, Rb-Sr and U-Pb and geochronology and distribution of rock types in the Precambrian basement of Missouri and Kansas: Geol. Soc. America Bull., v. 92, no. 6, pt. 1, p. 323–341Google Scholar
  5. Bunker, B. J., and Witzke, B. J., 1988, Central mid-continent region, in Sloss, L. L., ed., The Geology of North America, v. D-2, Geol. Soc. America, Plate 4Google Scholar
  6. Burchett, R. R., Wilson, F. W., Anderson, R. R., and Kisvarsanyi, E. B., 1983, Precambrian configuration map of the Forest City Basin and adjacent regions of Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, and Nebraska: Kansas Geol. Survey, 1 sheet, 1:500,000 mapGoogle Scholar
  7. Cardwell, L. E., and Benton L. F., 1970, Analyses of natural gases, 1968: Bur. Mines, Inform. Circ. 8443, 169 pGoogle Scholar
  8. Carlson M. P., Treves S. B., 2005, The Elk Creek Carbonatite, southeast Nebraska – an overview: Natural Resources Research, v. 14, no. 1, p. 39–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cole, V. B., 1976, Configuration of the top of Precambrian rocks in Kansas: Kansas Geol. Survey, Map Ser. M-7, scale: 1:500,000Google Scholar
  10. Cole, V. B., and Watney W. L., 1985, List of wells drilled into Precambrian rocks: Kansas Geol. Survey, Subsurface Geology Ser. 7, 139 pGoogle Scholar
  11. Coveney R. M. J., Goebel E. D., Zeller E. J., Dreschhoff G. A. M., Angino E. E., 1987, Serpentinization and the origin of hydrogen gas in Kansas. Am. Assoc. Petroleum Geologists Bull., v. 71, no. 1, p. 39–48Google Scholar
  12. Craig H. 1961, Isotopic variations in meteoric waters: Science, v. 133, no. 3465, p. 1702–1703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Haworth, E., 1896, Oil and gas in Kansas (preliminary): University Geol. Survey [Kansas], v. 1, Kansas State Printing Co., Topeka, KS, p. 232–245Google Scholar
  14. Horibe Y., Craig H., 1995, D/H fractionation in the system methane-hydrogen-water: Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, v. 59, no. 24, p. 5209–5217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jenden P. D., Newell K. D., Kaplan I. R., Watney W. L., 1988, Composition and stable isotope geochemistry of natural gases from Kansas, Midcontinent, U.S.A: Chem. Geol., v. 71, no. 1–3, p. 117–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lancet H. S., Anders E., 1970, Carbon isotope fractionation in the Fischer-Tropsch synthesis of methane: Science, v. 170, p. 980–982CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lee, W., 1943, The stratigraphy and structural development of the Forest City Basin in Kansas: Kansas Geol. Survey Bull. 51, 142 pGoogle Scholar
  18. Lin L.-H., Slater G. F., Sherwood Lollar B., Lacrampe-Couloume G., Onstott T. C., 2005, The yield and isotopic composition of radiolytic H2, a potential energy source for the deep subsurface biosphere: Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, v. 69, no. 4, p. 893–903CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. McCain, W. D., Jr., 1990, The properties of petroleum fluids (2nd edn.): PennWell Books, Tulsa, OK, 548 pGoogle Scholar
  20. Merriam, D. F., 1963, The geologic history of Kansas: Kansas Geol. Survey Bull. 162, 317 pGoogle Scholar
  21. Merriam D. F., Goebel E. D., 1959, Where’s the oil in Kansas. Oil & Gas Jour., v. 57, no. 11, p. 212–218Google Scholar
  22. Miller, R. D., and Norrell, G. P., 1964, Analyses of natural gases of the United States, 1961: Bur. Mines, Inform. Circ. 8221, 148 pGoogle Scholar
  23. Munnerlyn, R. D., and Miller R. D., 1963, Helium-bearing natural gases of the United States, analyses, second supplement to Bulletin 486: Bur. Mines, Bull. 617, 93 pGoogle Scholar
  24. Newell K. D., Burruss R. C., Palacas J. G., 1993, Thermal maturation and organic richness of potential petroleum source rocks in Proterozoic Rice Formation, North American Mid-Continent Rift system, northeastern Kansas: Am. Assoc. Petroleum Geologists Bull., v. 77, no. 11, p. 1922–1941Google Scholar
  25. Newell, K. D., Watney, W. L., Cheng, S. W. L., and Brownrigg, R. L., 1987, Stratigraphic and spatial distribution of oil and gas production in Kansas: Kansas Geol. Survey, Subsurface Geology Ser. 9, 86 pGoogle Scholar
  26. Newell K. D., Watney W. L., Stephens B. P., Hatch J. R., 1989, Hydrocarbon potential in Forest City Basin: Oil & Gas Jour., v. 85, no. 42, p. 58–62Google Scholar
  27. Pechnig, R., Delius, H., and Bartetzko, A., 2005, Effect of compositional variations on log responses of igneous and metamorphic rocks. II: Acid and intermediate rocks, in Harvey and others, eds., Petrophysical Properties of Crystalline Rocks: Geol. Soc. London Spec. Publ. 240, p. 279–300Google Scholar
  28. Schlumberger, 1987, Log interpretation principles/applications: Schlumberger, Houston, 198 pGoogle Scholar
  29. Schoell M., 1988, Multiple origins of methane in the earth: Chem. Geol., v. 71, no. 1–3, p. 1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sherwood Lollar B., Lacrampe-Couloume G., Slater G. F., Ward J., Moser D. P., Gihring T. M., Lin L.-H., Onstott T. C., 2006, Unraveling abiogenic and biogenic sources of methane in the Earth’s deep subsurface. Chem. Geol., v. 226, no. 3, p. 328–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sherwood Lollar, B., Voglesonger, K., Lin, L.-H., Lacrampe-Couloume, G., Telling, J., Abrajano, T., Onstott, T. C., and Pratt, L. M., Hydrogeologic controls on episodic H2 release from Precambrian fractured rocks – energy for deep subsurface life on Earth and Mars: Astrobiology (in press)Google Scholar
  32. Thayer T. P., 1967, Serpentinization considered as a constant-volume metasomatic process: Am. Mineral., v. 52, p. 549–553Google Scholar
  33. Van Schmus, W. R., and others, 1993, Transcontinental Proterozoic provinces, in Reed, J. C., Jr., and others, eds., Precambrian: Conterminous U.S.: The Geology of North America, v. C-2, Geol. Soc. America, p. 171–334Google Scholar
  34. Walters R. F., 1953, Oil production from fractured pre-Cambrian basement rocks in central Kansas: Am. Assoc. Petroleum Geologists Bull., v. 37, no. 2, p. 30l–313Google Scholar
  35. Whiticar M. J., 1999, Carbon and hydrogen isotope systematics of bacterial formation and oxidation of methane: Chem. Geol., v. 161, no. 1–3, p. 291–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Association for Mathematical Geology 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. David Newell
    • 1
  • John H. Doveton
    • 1
  • Daniel F. Merriam
    • 1
  • Barbara Sherwood Lollar
    • 2
  • William M. Waggoner
    • 3
  • L. Michael Magnuson
    • 1
  1. 1.Kansas Geological SurveyUniversity of KansasLawrenceUSA
  2. 2.Department of GeologyUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  3. 3.WTW Oil Co., Inc.IrvingUSA

Personalised recommendations