Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Issues in Energy Economics Led by Emerging Linkages between the Natural Gas and Power Sectors

  • Published:
Natural Resources Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Fuel prices in 2006 continued at record levels, with uranium continuing upward unabated and coal, SO2 emission allowances, and natural gas all softening. This softening did not continue for natural gas, however, whose prices rose, fell and rose again, first following weather influences and, by the second quarter of 2007, continuing at high levels without any support from fundamentals. This article reviews these trends and describes the remarkable increases in fuel expenses for power generation. By the end of 2005, natural gas claimed 55% of annual power sector fuel expenses, even though it was used for only 19% of electric generation. Although natural gas is enormously important to the power sector, the sector also is an important driver of the natural gas market—growing to over 28% of the market even as total use has declined. The article proceeds to discuss globalization, natural gas price risk, and technology developments. Forces of globalization are poised to affect the energy markets in new ways—new in not being only about oil. Of particular interest in the growth of intermodal traffic and its a little-understood impacts on rail traffic patterns and transportation costs, and expected rapidly expanding LNG imports toward the end of the decade. Two aspects of natural gas price risk are discussed: how understanding the use of gas in the power sector helps define price ceilings and floors for natural gas, and how the recent increase in the natural gas production after years of record drilling could alter the supply–demand balance for the better. The article cautions, however, that escalation in natural gas finding and development costs is countering the more positive developments that emerged during 2006. Regarding technology, the exploitation of unconventional natural gas was one highlight. So too was the queuing up of coal-fired power plants for the post-2010 period, a phenomenon that has come under great pressure with many consequences including increased pressures in the natural gas market. The most significant illustration of these forces was the early 2007 suspension of development plans by a large power company, well before the Supreme Court’s ruling on CO2 as a tailpipe pollutant and President Bush’s call for global goals on CO2 emissions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12
Figure 13
Figure 14
Figure 15
Figure 16
Figure 17
Figure 18

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Allowance prices are quoted and traded in dollars per short ton.

  2. Research for the Electric Power Research Institute has shown how base rail rates (i.e., excluding surcharges for escalating diesel costs) for coal shipments to plants captive to a single railroad increased by 30–70% between 2003 and late 2005, whereas those for shipments to competitively served destinations increased by approximately 20–40%. For captive shippers, these increases equate to $0.25 to $0.60 per million Btu to move PRB coal to Texas, or $0.25 to $0.45 per million Btu to move Central Appalachian coal the Southeast. New Price Structures for Coal Transportation: Evidence and Implications, Palo Alto, Calif. 2005. 1012250.

  3. EIA statistics indicate total gas consumption peaked at 23.3 trillion cubic feet in 2000, when power sector gas use was 5.2 Tcf or 22.3% of the total. In 2006, total consumption was 21.9 Tcf and power sector use was 6.2 Tcf or 28.6% of the total. These figures correspond to total demand of 661 billion cubic meters in 2000, of which 174 Bcm was for power generation and 619 Bcm in 2006, of which 177 Bcm was for power generation.

  4. These estimates correspond to a 2002 floor of $2.23/GJ when gas prices averaged $3.16/GJ to a 2005 floor of $5.70/GJ when gas prices averaged $8.10/GJ.

References

  • AEP, 2007, IGCC plant in West Virginia could be online in 2012 if plan filed by AEP’s Appalachian Power gains approvals. News Release. [629 MW New Haven WV IGCC $2.23B; $3,545/kW]

  • Anderson, J., 2006, Betting on the weather and taking an ice-cold bath: New York Times, September 29

  • Energy Information Administration (EIA), 2006, Annual energy outlook with projections to 2030: DOE/EIA-0383(2006), February

  • Energy Information Administration (EIA), 2007a, Annual energy outlook 2007 with projections to 2030: DOE/EIA-0383(2007), February

  • Energy Information Administration (EIA), 2007b, Natural gas weekly update: June 14, 2007. The EIA releases a summary of market activity and natural gas storage levels every Thursday at 2:00 pm

  • EPRI, 2006a, Changing expectations for coal transportation. Energy Markets and Generation Response (newsletter), October

  • EPRI, 2006b, Tracking new power plants in the U.S.—Midyear Review: 60 GW Through 2010. Energy Markets and Generation Response (newsletter), October

  • EPRI, 2006c, Changing perspective: intermediate-term increases in both U.S. production and LNG imports lead toward excess supply. Energy markets and generation response (newsletter), December

  • EPRI, 2006d, Putting LNG into perspective on a global basis, Palo Alto, Calif. Report Number 1013693

  • EPRI, 2007, Natural gas price uncertainty: Establishing price floors, Palo Alto, Calif. Report Number 1012249

  • Haywood, T., 2007, Corby: Market ‘Bit Screwed Up’ when gas glut spells $8 price. Natural Gas Week, Energy Intelligence Group, June 18

  • Hayden, J., and Pursell, D., 2005, The Barnett Shale report; Pickering Energy Partners, Inc. October. http://www.pickeringenergy.com

  • Holt, N., 2007, Preliminary economics of SCPC & IGCC with CO2 Capture & Storage. 2nd IGCC & XtL Conference, Freiberg, Germany, May 9–10. Available online under the title: IGCC plant designs for CO2 capture – 90% capture, partial capture and capture ready. http://www.iec.tu-freiberg.de/conference/conf07/programme.html

  • MIT, 2007, The future of coal, An interdisciplinary MIT study—Options for a carbon-constrained world; Chapter 4: Geological Carbon Sequestration. March. http://web.mit.edu/coal/

  • Morgenson, G., and Anderson, J., 2006, Hedge fund shifts to salvage mode: New York Times, September 20

  • National Energy Technology Laboratory, 2006, Tracking new coal-fired power plants. Office of Systems, Analyses and Planning, June and September

  • Tertzakian P. 2006, A thousand barrels a second – The coming oil break point and the challenges facing an energy dependent world. McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York, 272 p

    Google Scholar 

  • TXU Corp., 2007a, TXU to set new direction as private company; public benefits include price cuts, price protection, investments in alternative energy and stronger environmental policies. February 26

  • TXU Corp., 2007b, TXU halts efforts to obtain permits for eight coal-fueled units. March 1

  • TXU Corp., 2007c, TXU proceeding with KKR/TPG merger after ‘Go-Shop’ process ends. April 18

  • TXU Corp., 2007d, KKR, TPG and TXU announce a total 15% price reduction. New Release, May 29

  • Victor D. G., Jaffee A. M., Hayes M. H., 2006, Natural gas and geopolitics from 1970 to 2040. Cambridge Univ. Press, New York, 508 p

    Google Scholar 

  • White House News Release, May 31, 2007, President Bush discusses United States International Development Agenda. http://www.whitehouse.gov

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeremy B. Platt.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Platt, J.B. Issues in Energy Economics Led by Emerging Linkages between the Natural Gas and Power Sectors. Nat Resour Res 16, 263–275 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-007-9051-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-007-9051-8

Keywords

Navigation