Weights-of-evidence (WofE) and logistic regression techniques were used in a GIS framework to predict the spatial likelihood (prospectivity) of crushed-stone aggregate quarry development. The joint conditional probability models, based on geology, transportation network, and population density variables, were defined using quarry location and time of development data for the New England States, North Carolina, and South Carolina, USA. The Quarry Operation models describe the distribution of active aggregate quarries, independent of the date of opening. The New Quarry models describe the distribution of aggregate quarries when they open. Because of the small number of new quarries developed in the study areas during the last decade, independent New Quarry models have low parameter estimate reliability. The performance of parameter estimates derived for Quarry Operation models, defined by a larger number of active quarries in the study areas, were tested and evaluated to predict the spatial likelihood of new quarry development. Population density conditions at the time of new quarry development were used to modify the population density variable in the Quarry Operation models to apply to new quarry development sites. The Quarry Operation parameters derived for the New England study area, Carolina study area, and the combined New England and Carolina study areas were all similar in magnitude and relative strength. The Quarry Operation model parameters, using the modified population density variables, were found to be a good predictor of new quarry locations. Both the aggregate industry and the land management community can use the model approach to target areas for more detailed site evaluation for quarry location. The models can be revised easily to reflect actual or anticipated changes in transportation and population features.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agterberg, F. P., Bonham-Carter, G. F., Cheng, Q., and Wright, D. F., 1993, Weights of evidence modeling and weighted logistic regression for mineral potential mapping, in Davis, J. C., and Herzfeld, U. C., eds., Computers in Geology, 25 Years of Progress: Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, p. 13–32
Barksdale R. D. 2000 The Aggregate Handbook. National Stone, Sand, and Gravel Association, Arlington, VA. 1 CD-ROM
Bates R. L. 1969 Geology of the industrial rocks and minerals. Dover Publications, Inc., New York, 459 p
Begueria S. 2006 Validation and evaluation of predictive models in hazard assessment and risk management. Natural Hazards v. 37, p. 315–329
Bonham-Carter G. F. 1994 Geographic Information, Systems for geoscientists modeling in GIS. Elsevier Science, New York, 398 p
Chung C-J. F., Fabbri A. G. 1999 Probabilistic prediction models for landslide hazard mapping. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 65 (12):1389–1399
Congalton R. G. 1991 A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data. Remote Sensing of Environment. 37, 35–46
Conover W. J. 1980 Practical nonparametric statistics (2nd edn.). John Wiley &Sons, New York 493 p
Dicken, C. L., Nicholson, S. W., Horton, J. D., Foose, M.P., and Mueller, J. A. L., 2005, Preliminary integrated geologic map databases for the United States: Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Mississippi, North Carolina, and South Carolina: U.S. Geol. Survey Open-File Rept. 2005–1323 (available both on CD and at: http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2005/1323/, last accessed, 8 February 2007)
Horton, J. W., Jr., and Dicken, C. L, 2001, Preliminary digital geologic map of the Appalachian Piedmont and Blue Ridge, South Carolina segment: U.S. Geol. Survey Open File Rept. 01-298 (available both on CD and at: http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/of01-298/, last accessed, 8 February 2007)
Hosmer D. W., Lemeshow S. 1989 Applied logistic regression. (2nd edn.). John Wiley & Sons, New York, 307 p
Kuff, K. R., 1984, Rates of preemption of sand and gravel deposits in an urban area, in Glaser, J. D., and Edwards, J., eds., Twentieth Forum on the Geology of Industrial Minerals: Maryland Geol. Survey Spec. Publ. 2, p. 73–79
Langer, W. H., and Knepper Jr., D. H., 1995, Geologic characterization of natural aggregate: U.S. Geol. Survey Open-File Rept. 95–582, 32 p
Longley P. A., Goodchild M. F., Maguire D. J., Rhind D. W. 2001 Geographic information systems and science. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 150–151
McFaul, E. J., Mason Jr., G. T., Ferguson, W. B., and Lipin, B. R., 2000, U.S. Geological Survey Mineral Databases – MRDS and MAS/MILS: U.S. Geol. Survey Digital Data Series DDS-52, 2 Discs
The North Carolina Dept. of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources (NCDEHNR), Division of Land Resources, NC Geological Survey, in cooperation with the NC Center for Geographic Information and Analysis, 1998, Geology - North Carolina (1:250,000), coverage data file geol 250. The data represents the digital equivalent of the official State Geology map (1:500,000 scale), but was digitized from (1:250,000 scale) base maps. (available at: http://www.nconemap.com/data.html, last accessed 8 February 2007)
Peduzzi P., Concato J., Kemper E., Holford T. R., Feinstein A. 1996 A simulation of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis: Jour. Clinical Epidemiology. 99 p. 1373–1379
Poulin R., Pakalnis R. C., Sinding K. 1994 Aggregate resources; production and environmental constraints: Environmental Geology. 23 (3), p. 221–227
Raines G. L., Bonham-Carter G. F., Kemp L. D. 2000 Predictive probabilistic modeling using Arcview GIS: ArcUser. 3 (2), p. 45–48
Rhodes, T. S., and Conrad, S. G., 1985, Geologic map of North Carolina: Dept. Natural Resources and Community Development, Div. Land Resources, and the NC Geol. Survey, 1:500,000-scale, compiled by Brown, Philip M., and others, and Parker, John M. III, and in association with the State Geologic Map Advisory Committee
Robinson Jr., G. R., 2004, Trends in availability of aggregate: Mining Engineering, February 2004, p. 17–24
Robinson G. R. Jr., Kapo K. E., Raines G. L., 2004 A GIS analysis to evaluate areas suitable for crushed stone aggregate quarries in New England, USA: Natural Resources Research, 13 (3), p. 143–159
SAS Institute, 1990, SAS/STAT User’s Guide, Version 6 (4th edn.): SAS Institute Inc., Cary, N.C., v. 1 and 2, online access with SAS license
Sawatzky, D. L., Raines, G. L., Bonham-Carter, G. F., and Looney, C. G., 2004, ArcSDM2: ArcMap extension for spatial data modeling using weights of evidence, logistic regression, fuzzy logic and neural network analysis. (available at http://www.ige.unicamp.br/sdm/default_e.htm)
Stanley M. C., Marlow J. E., Harris D. P. 2000 Land-use issues and the aggregates industry–An introduction to the issues we face: Aggregates Manager. 5(9):30–33
Tepordei V. V. 2001 U.S. aggregates industry—an overview: Aggregates Manager. 5(11):13–15
U.S. Census Bureau, 2000. 2000 Census Tracts. Arcview shapefile. 1:500,000. U.S. Department of Commerce, Census Bureau, (available at: http://www.census.gov/geo/www/cob/tr2000.html, last accessed 8 February 2007)
U.S. Department of Transportation, 2002, National Transportation Atlas Database, National Highway Planning Network data, 1:100,000, National Rail Network, 1:2,000,000. Vector digital data. (available at: http://www.bts.gov/gis, last accessed 8 February 2007)
U.S. Geological Survey, 2005, Aggregates Industry Atlas of the United States: Washington, D.C., National Stone, Sand and Gravel Association, one CD-disk, version 2
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Robinson, G.R., Larkins, P.M. Probabilistic Prediction Models for Aggregate Quarry Siting. Nat Resour Res 16, 135–146 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-007-9039-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-007-9039-4