Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Academic nanotechnology laboratories: investigating good practices and students’ health status

  • Research paper
  • Published:
Journal of Nanoparticle Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Students working in nanotechnology laboratories could expose to nanomaterials during production, handling, and transportation of these materials. Studies have shown that nanomaterials have adverse effects on humans. So, this study was conducted to investigate the status of nanotechnology laboratories and also to examine students’ non-specific symptoms. This cross-sectional study was conducted in nanotechnology laboratories of 8 universities of medical sciences. Two questionnaires were used for data collection. A questionnaire was used to assess the status of laboratories and another to assess the non-specific symptoms of students. Finally, data were analyzed using SPSS 22.0. Results showed that only %33.7 of the laboratories had nanomaterials safety and health policy, while %63.6 of them reported the existence of general health and safety policy. Examination of the parameters affecting the exposure showed that in the studied laboratories, the ground for significant exposure to nanomaterials is provided. Study of transportation and storage of nanomaterials in the laboratories showed a relatively good situation. In terms of controls, condition was not favorable. The most reported symptoms among students were cutaneous, ocular, neurological, and respiratory symptoms, respectively. Comparing the status of the studied laboratories and the standards of nanotechnology laboratories, these laboratories are far from the ideal situation. Training the principles of working safely with nanomaterials, improving engineering controls, and providing appropriate PPEs for nanomaterials and using them properly, can effectively improve the laboratories, reduce exposure and reduce symptoms among the students.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ahmed W, Jackson MJ, Ul Hassan I (2015) Chapter 1 - Nanotechnology to nanomanufacturing. In: Ahmed W, Jackson MJ (eds) Emerging nanotechnologies for manufacturing (Second Edition). William Andrew Publishing, Boston, pp 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-28990-0.00001-4

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Dolez PI (2015) Chapter 1.1 - Nanomaterials definitions, classifications, and applications. In: Dolez PI (ed) Nanoengineering. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 3–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-62747-6.00001-4

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Mohammadian Y, Nasirzadeh N (2021) Toxicity risks of occupational exposure in 3D printing and bioprinting industries: a systematic review. Toxicol Ind Health 37:573–584

    Google Scholar 

  4. Nasirzadeh N, Rasoulzadeh Y, Rezazadeh Azari M, Mohammadian Y (2020) Cellular toxicity of multi-walled carbon nanotubes on human lung cells. J Chem Health Risks 10:135–144

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Westmeier D, Knauer SK, Stauber RH, Docter D (2017) Chapter 1 - Bio–nano interactions. In: Fadeel B, Pietroiusti A, Shvedova AA (eds) Adverse effects of engineered nanomaterials (Second Edition). Academic Press, pp 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809199-9.00001-X

  6. McShane HVA, Sunahara GI (2015) Chapter 2.4 - Environmental perspectives. In: Dolez PI (ed) Nanoengineering. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 257–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-62747-6.00009-9

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Colognato R, Park MVDZ, Wick P, De Jong WH (2012) Chapter 1 - Interactions with the human body. In: Fadeel B, Pietroiusti A, Shvedova AA (eds) Adverse effects of engineered nanomaterials. Academic Press, Boston, pp 3–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-386940-1.00001-5

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Omari Shekaftik S, Ashtarinezhad A, Yarahmadi R, Rasouli M, Soleimani M, Hosseini Shirazi F (2020) Relationship between chemical composition and physical State of used nanomaterials in nanotechnology companies with type and prevalance of symptoms of employees of these companies in Tehran. Iran Iran Occup Health 17:936–950

    Google Scholar 

  9. Nasirzadeh N, Azari MR, Rasoulzadeh Y, Mohammadian Y (2019) An assessment of the cytotoxic effects of graphene nanoparticles on the epithelial cells of the human lung. Toxicol Indus Health 35:79–87

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Rafieepour A, Azari MR, Jaktaji JP, Khodagholi F, Peirovi H, Mehrabi Y, Mohammadian Y (2021) The effect of particle size on the cytotoxicity of amorphous silicon dioxide: an in vitro toxicological study. Asian Pacific J Cancer Prevention: APJCP 22:325

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Sengul AB, Asmatulu E (2020) Toxicity of metal and metal oxide nanoparticles: a review. Environ Chem Lett 18:1659–1683

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Utembe W, Tlotleng N, Kamng'ona A (2022) A systematic review on the effects of nanomaterials on gut microbiota. Curr Res Microb Sci:100118

  13. Omari Shekaftik S, Nasirzadeh N (2021) 8-Hydroxy-2′-deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG) as a biomarker of oxidative DNA damage induced by occupational exposure to nanomaterials: a systematic review. Nanotoxicology 15:850–864

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Alsaleh NB, Brown JM (2020) Engineered nanomaterials and type I allergic hypersensitivity reactions. Front Immunol 11:222

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Calderón-Gonzalez R et al (2016) Pregnancy vaccination with gold glyco-nanoparticles carrying Listeria monocytogenes peptides protects against listeriosis and brain-and cutaneous-associated morbidities. Nanomaterials 6:151

    Google Scholar 

  16. Meldrum K, Guo C, Marczylo EL, Gant TW, Smith R, Leonard MO (2017) Mechanistic insight into the impact of nanomaterials on asthma and allergic airway disease. Part Fibre Toxicol 14:1–35

    Google Scholar 

  17. Omari Shekaftik S, Yarahmadi R, Moghadasi N, Sedghi Noushabadi Z, Hosseini AF, Ashtarinezhad A (2020) Investigation of recommended good practices to reduce exposure to nanomaterials in nanotechnology laboratories in Tehran, Iran. J Nanopart Res 22:59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-020-4764-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Omari Shekaftik S, Nasirzadeh N (2021) Iranian National Standards regarding safety, health and environmental aspects of nanotechnology: a review. J Occup Hyg Eng 8:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  19. Nanoproduct (2022) Total statistics of nanotechnology in Iran. Nanoproduct https://nanoproduct.ir/page/2995

  20. Omari Shekaftik S, Mohammadi S, Zareipour M, Haghighi Asl A, Ahmadi Kanrash F, Soltani Gerdefaramarzi R (2021) Design and validation of a tool to assess the safety principles of working with nanomaterials in nanotechnology laboratories. SSUJ 13:38–47

    Google Scholar 

  21. Demou E, Stark WJ, Hellweg S (2009) Particle emission and exposure during nanoparticle synthesis in research laboratories. Ann Occup Hyg 53:829–838

  22. Iavicoli I, Fontana L, Pingue P, Todea AM, Asbach CJSoTTE (2018) Assessment of occupational exposure to engineered nanomaterials in research laboratories using personal monitors 627:689–702

  23. StatNano (2022) Nanotechnology publications (ARTICLE). StatNano. https://statnano.com/report/s29

  24. Zhang C, Zhang J, Wang G (2014) Current safety practices in nano-research laboratories in China. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 14:4700–4705

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. CKMNT (2012) Guidelines and best practices for safe handling of nanomaterials in research laboratories and industries. India

  26. Gibbs L, Lamba F, Stoxkmeier B, Kojola W (2012) General safe practices for working with engineered nanomaterials in research laboratories National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH)

  27. R.T.M. Cornelissen MS-L, M.B.H.J. Vervoort and D. Hoeneveld (2014) Use of engineered nanomaterials in Dutch academic research settings – Part B: Good Practices. Hague, Netherlands

  28. Omari Shekaftik S, Hosseini Shirazi F, Yarahmadi R, Rasouli M, Soleimani Dodaran M, Ashtarinezhad A (2019) Preliminary investigation of the symptoms of nanotechnology companies employees in Tehran, Iran, 2018. J Occup Hyg Eng 6:61–70. https://doi.org/10.29252/johe.6.2.61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Iavicoli I, Leso V, Fontana L (2019) Nanoparticle exposure in research laboratories. Italian J Occup Med Ergon 41:349–353

  30. Raynor PC, Peters TM (2016) Chapter 7 - Controlling nanoparticle exposures. In: Ramachandran G (ed) Assessing nanoparticle risks to human health (Second Edition). William Andrew Publishing, Oxford, pp 153–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-35323-6.00007-4

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  31. Etemadi M, Mahdzir AM (2021) Nanotechnology in Malaysia: a qualitative study about the current occupational health and safety issues. Psychol Educ 58:4727–4740

    Google Scholar 

  32. Zhang C, Zhang J, Wang G (2014) Current safety practices in nano-research laboratories in china. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 14:4700–4705

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Asbach C et al (2017) Review of measurement techniques and methods for assessing personal exposure to airborne nanomaterials in workplaces 603:793-806

  34. Silva F, Arezes P, Swuste P (2015) Risk assessment in a research laboratory during sol-gel synthesis of nano-TiO2. Saf Sci 80:201–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2015.07.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Omari Shekaftik S, Nasirzadeh N (2021) Iranian National Standards regarding safety, health and environmental aspects of nanotechnology: a review umsha-johe 8:1–13

  36. Tsai C-J, Pui DY (2009) Recent advances and new challenges of occupational and environmental health of nanotechnology. J Nanopart Res 11:1–4

    Google Scholar 

  37. Golbabai F, Haydarnzhad N, Sharfi K, Shaahamdi F, Hanifi SM, Harati B (2015) Occupational exposure risk assessment of engineered nanomaterial’s by CB nano tool in a nano, research laboratory. Tech J Eng Appl Sci 5:133–138

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Omari Shekaftik S, Ashtarinezhad A, Shirazi FH, Hosseini A, Yarahmadi R (2021) Assessing the risk of main activities of nanotechnology companies by the NanoTool method. Int J Occup Saf Ergon 27:1145–1153. https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2019.1693778

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Sousa M, Arezes P, Silva F (2021) Occupational exposure to incidental nanoparticles: a review on control banding. In: J Physics 1:012008

  40. Omari Shekaftik S, Sedghi Noushabadi Z, Ashtarinezhad A (2021) Nanosafety: a knowledge, attitude and practice (KAP) study among Iranian researchers working in nanotechnology laboratories. Int J Occup Saf Ergon:1–5 https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2021.2005958

  41. NS M (2014) Occupational health and safety training: knowledge, attitude and practice among technical education students. Egypt J Occup Med 38:153–165

    Google Scholar 

  42. Díaz-Soler BM, López-Alonso M, Martínez-Aires MD (2017) Nanosafety practices: results from a national survey at research facilities. J Nanopart Res 19:169

    Google Scholar 

  43. Freeland J et al (2016) Working safely with nanomaterials in research & development, 2 edn. The UK NanoSafety Group (UKNSG)

  44. Vinches L, Testori N, Dolez P, Perron G, Wilkinson KJ, Hallé SJNM (2013) Experimental evaluation of the penetration of TiO2 nanoparticles through protective clothing and gloves under conditions simulating occupational use 2:1–15

  45. Vinches L, Hallé S, Peyrot C, Wilkinson KJJIJoT, Nanotechnology A (2014) Which gloves are efficient to protect against titanium dioxide nanoparticles in work conditions? 2:24–29

  46. Vinches L, Hallé SJJoO, Hygiene E (2017) Resistance of Type 5 chemical protective clothing against nanometric airborne particles: behavior of seams and zipper 14:939–946

  47. ISIRI (2015) Nano technology - Health and safety in nano occupational settings - Code of Practices. Institute of Standards and Industrial Research of Iran, Tehran, Iran

  48. WHO Guidelines Approved by the Guidelines Review Committee (2017). In: WHO guidelines on protecting workers from potential risks of manufactured nanomaterials. World Health Organization(c) World Health Organization 2017., Geneva

  49. Shekaftik SO, Shirazi FH, Yarahmadi R, Rasouli M, Ashtarinezhad A (2022) Investigating the relationship between occupational exposure to nanomaterials and symptoms of nanotechnology companies’ employees. Arch Environ Occup Health 77:209–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/19338244.2020.1863315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Larese Filon F (2017) Skin exposure to nanoparticles and possible sensitization risk. In: Allergy and immunotoxicology in occupational health. Springer, pp 143–152

  51. Bae J-S et al (2022) Particulate matter exposure aggravates IL-17-induced eye and nose inflammation in an OVA/Poly (I: C) mouse model. Allergy, Asthma Immunol Res 14:59

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Zhu S, Gong L, Li Y, Xu H, Gu Z, Zhao Y (2019) Safety assessment of nanomaterials to eyes: an important but neglected issue. Adv Sci 6:1802289

    Google Scholar 

  53. Simkó M, Mattsson M-O (2010) Risks from accidental exposures to engineered nanoparticles and neurological health effects: a critical review. Part Fibre Toxicol 7:1–15

    Google Scholar 

  54. Garcia-Garcia E et al (2005) A relevant in vitro rat model for the evaluation of blood-brain barrier translocation of nanoparticles. Cell Mol Life Sci 62:1400–1408

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Nitzsche A, Jung J, Pfaff H, Driller E (2013) Employees’ negative and positive work–home interaction and their association with depressive symptoms. Am J Ind Med 56:590–598

    Google Scholar 

  56. Lund T et al (2011) The influence of ligand organization on the rate of uptake of gold nanoparticles by colorectal cancer cells. Biomaterials 32:9776–9784

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Shaffer RE, Rengasamy S (2009) Respiratory protection against airborne nanoparticles: a review. J Nanopart Res 11:1661–1672

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Nazarenko Y, Zhen H, Han T, Lioy PJ, Mainelis G (2012) Nanomaterial inhalation exposure from nanotechnology-based cosmetic powders: a quantitative assessment. J Nanopart Res 14:1–14

    Google Scholar 

  59. Schinwald A, Murphy FA, Jones A, MacNee W, Donaldson K (2012) Graphene-based nanoplatelets: a new risk to the respiratory system as a consequence of their unusual aerodynamic properties. ACS Nano 6:736–746

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Oberdörster G, Oberdörster E, Oberdörster J (2005) Nanotoxicology: an emerging discipline evolving from studies of ultrafine particles. Environ Health Perspect 113:823–839

    Google Scholar 

  61. Cena L, Chisholm W, Keane M, Chen B (2015) A field study on the respiratory deposition of the nano-sized fraction of mild and stainless steel welding fume metals. J Occup Environ Hyg 12:721–728

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Lee MB, Greig JD (2010) A review of gastrointestinal outbreaks in schools: effective infection control interventions. J Sch Health 80:588–598

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nafiseh Nasirzadeh.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 320 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Omari Shekaftik, S., Nasirzadeh, N., Baba-Ahangar, T. et al. Academic nanotechnology laboratories: investigating good practices and students’ health status. J Nanopart Res 24, 177 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-022-05548-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-022-05548-7

Keywords

Navigation