Abstract
This study investigated the effect of natural aquatic medium and human digestive media on the dissolution of single and mixture of nanoparticles. We determined an in-vitro dissolution factor for a mixture of nanoparticles in human digestive media. The oral exposure scenario was considered in this study, with exposure of nanoparticles through surface water containing a mixture of nanoparticles. The dissolution of these nanoparticles was tracked through the human gastrointestinal tract, including saliva, gastric, and intestinal artificial fluids. The dissolution factors for ZnO and CuO nanoparticles were found to be 68% and 54% in mixture suspension at 10 mg/L nanoparticle concentration, respectively. A comparison between single and mixture of nanoparticles showed a significant difference in ion contents in various mediums, thus indicating the effect of the simultaneous presence of two nanoparticles on extents of dissolution. The presence of antibiotics in the aquatic system along with mixture of nanoparticles decreased CuO nanoparticle dissolution factor to 21% and for ZnO, dissolution factor was found to be 77%. Both particulate fraction and ionic fraction for single and mixture of nanoparticles were reported in this study. Digestive loading values associated with NPs was found to be 6.2 and 5.4 mg/L for ZnO and CuO nanoparticles, respectively. Such data is essential in assessing exposure dose and characterizing human health risk. This data also helps in understanding risk associated with nanoparticles and ionic part separately for the mixture system.
Graphical abstract
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Abbreviations
- NP:
-
Nanoparticle
- BAF:
-
Bioassimilation factor
- NOAEL:
-
No observable adverse effect level
- LOAEL:
-
Low observable adverse effect level
- ADI:
-
Average daily intake
- GI:
-
Gastrointestinal
- RfD:
-
Reference dose
- HA:
-
Humic acid
- SAM:
-
Sulfadimethoxine
- HI:
-
Hazard Index
- CCC:
-
Critical coagulation concentration
- USEPA:
-
United States Environmental Protection Agency
- EU:
-
European Union
- OECD:
-
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
- IVG:
-
In-vitro gastrointestinal
- SBRC:
-
Solubility Bioavailability Research Consortium
- SGF:
-
Simulated gastric fluid
References
Barreto MSR, Aadrade CT, da Silva LCRP, Cabral LM, Flosi Paschoalin VM, Del Aguilar EM (2017). In vitro physiological and antibacterial characterization of ZnO nanoparticle composites in simulated porcine gastric and enteric fluids. BMC Vet Res 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/S12917-017-1101-9
Berardi A, Baldelli Bombelli F (2019) Oral delivery of nanoparticles - let's not forget about the protein corona. In: Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery, vol 16, Issue 6. Taylor and Francis Ltd., p 563–566. https://doi.org/10.1080/17425247.2019.1610384
Bergin IL, Witzmann FA (2013) Nanoparticle toxicity by the gastrointestinal route: evidence and knowledge gaps. Int J Biomed Nanosci Nanotechnol 3(1/2):163. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBNN.2013.054515
Bove P, Malvindi MA, Kote SS, Bertorelli R, Summa M, Sabella S (2017) Dissolution test for risk assessment of nanoparticles: a pilot study. Nanoscale 9(19):6315–6326. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6nr08131b
Chang YN, Zhang M, Xia L, Zhang J, Xing G (2012) The toxic effects and mechanisms of CuO and ZnO nanoparticles. Materials 5(12):2850–2871. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma5122850
Deng J, Ding QM, Jia MX, Li W, Zuberi Z, Wang JH, Ren JL, Fu D, Zeng XX, Luo JF (2021) Biosafety risk assessment of nanoparticles: evidence from food case studies. Environ Pollut 275:116662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2021.116662
Deo RP (2014) Pharmaceuticals in the surface water of the USA: a review. Curr Environ Health Rep 1(2):113–122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40572-014-0015-y
Dunphy Guzman KA, Finnegan MP, Banfield JF (2006) Influence of surface potential on aggregation and transport of itiania nanoparticles. Environ Sci Technol 40(24):7688–7693. https://doi.org/10.1021/es060847g
Fang J, Shijirbaatar A, Lin Dh, Wang Dj, Shen B, SunZhou PdZQ (2017) Stability of co-existing ZnO and TiO2 nanomaterials in natural water: aggregation and sedimentation mechanisms. Chemosphere 184:1125–1133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.06.097
Federation WE, Aph Association (2005) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. American Public Health Association (APHA), Washington, DC, USA, pp 21
He X, Zhang H, Shi H, Liu W, Sahle-Demessie E (2020) Fates of Au, Ag, ZnO, and CeO2 nanoparticles in simulated gastric fluid studied using single-particle-inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry. J Amer Soc Mass Spectro 31(10):2180–2190
Jones K, Morton J, Smith I, Jurkschat K, Harding AH, Evans G (2015) Human in vivo and in vitro studies on gastrointestinal absorption of titanium dioxide nanoparticles. Toxicol Lett 233(2):95–101
Kumar A, Xagoraraki I (2010) Pharmaceuticals, personal care products and endocrine-disrupting chemicals in US surface and finished drinking waters: a proposed ranking system. Sci Total Environ 408(23):5972–5989
Meesters JAJ, Koelmans AA, Quik JTK, Hendriks AJ, Van De Meent D (2014) Multimedia modeling of engineered nanoparticles with simpleBox4nano: model definition and evaluation. Environ Sci Technol 48(10):5726–5736. https://doi.org/10.1021/es500548h
Meunier L, Koch I, Reimer KJ (2011) Effect of particle size on arsenic bioaccessibility in gold mine tailings of Nova Scotia. Sci Total Environ 409(11):2233–2243. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2011.02.006
Nag SK, Das Sarkar S, Manna SK (2018) Triclosan–an antibacterial compound in water, sediment and fish of River Gomti, India. Int J Environ Health Res 28(5):461–470. https://doi.org/10.1080/09603123.2018.1487044
Parsai T, Kumar A (2019) Understanding effect of solution chemistry on heteroaggregation of zinc oxide and copper oxide nanoparticles. Chemosphere 235:457–469
Parsai T, Kumar A (2020) Stability and characterization of mixture of three particle system containing ZnO-CuO nanoparticles and clay. Sci Total Environ 740:140095. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140095
Parsai T, Kumar A (2021) Weight-of-evidence process for assessing human health risk of mixture of metal oxide nanoparticles and corresponding ions in aquatic matrices. Chemosphere 263:128289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.128289
Peters R, Kramer E, Oomen AG, Herrera Rivera ZE, Oegema G, Tromp PC, Fokkink R, Rietveld A, Marvin HJP, Weigel S, Peijnenburg AACM, Bouwmeester H (2012) Presence of nano-sized silica during in vitro digestion of foods containing silica as a food additive. ACS Nano 6(3):2441–2451. https://doi.org/10.1021/nn204728k
Pinďáková L, Kašpárková V, Kejlová K, Dvořáková M, Krsek D, Jírová D, Kašparová L (2017) Behaviour of silver nanoparticles in simulated saliva and gastrointestinal fluids. Int J Pharm 527(1–2):12–20
Sohal IS, Cho YK, O’Fallon KS, Gaines P, Demokritou P, Bello D (2018) Dissolution behavior and biodurability of ingested engineered nanomaterials in the gastrointestinal environment. ACS Nano 12(8):8115–8128. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.8b02978
Tresset G, Marculescu C, Salonen A, Ni M, Iliescu C (2013) Fine control over the size of surfactant-polyelectrolyte nanoparticles by hydrodynamic flow focusing. Anal Chem 85(12):5850–5856. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac4006155
Versantvoort CHM, Oomen AG, Van De Kamp E, Rompelberg CJM, Sips AJAM (2005) Applicability of an in vitro digestion model in assessing the bioaccessibility of mycotoxins from food. Food Chem Toxicol 43(1):31–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2004.08.007
Zhong L, Yu Y, Lian HZ, Hu X, Fu H, Chen YJ (2017) Solubility of nano-sized metal oxides evaluated by using in vitro simulated lung and gastrointestinal fluids: implication for health risks. J Nanopart Res 19(11):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-017-4064-7
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank the Indian Institute of Technology Delhi (India); Nanoscale Research Facility, Dr. Naminita Gogoi (Staff for ICP-MS analysis), Central Research Facility, IIT Delhi (India), for supporting this research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Highlights
1. Dissolution of nanoparticles is dependent on type of suspension, i.e., single or mixture of nanoparticles.
2. An in-vitro dissolution factor value for mixture of nanoparticles was found to be 68% for ZnO NPs and 54% for CuO NPs.
3. The presence of antibiotics decreased the in-vitro dissolution factor value for mixture suspension.
4. NP concentrations at target organ like in the digestive system were found to be 6.2 and 5.4 mg/L for ZnO and CuO nanoparticles, respectively.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Parsai, T., Kumar, A. In-vitro dissolution behaviour of mixture of nanoparticle from surface water to simulated human digestive system. J Nanopart Res 24, 90 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-022-05468-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-022-05468-6