Tannic acid- and natural organic matter-coated magnetite as green Fenton-like catalysts for the removal of water pollutants

  • C. NadejdeEmail author
  • M. NeamtuEmail author
  • V.-D. Hodoroaba
  • R. J. Schneider
  • A. Paul
  • G. Ababei
  • U. Panne
Research Paper


The use of magnetic materials as heterogeneous catalysts has attracted increasing attention in the last years since they proved to be promising candidates for water treatment. In the present study, two types of surface-modified magnetite (Fe3O4) nanoparticles, coated with non-hazardous naturally occurring agents—either tannic acid (TA) or dissolved natural organic matter—were evaluated as magnetic heterogeneous catalysts. Chemical synthesis (co-precipitation) was chosen to yield the nanocatalysts due to its well-established simplicity and efficiency. Subsequently, the properties of the final products were fully assessed by various characterization techniques. The catalytic activity in heterogeneous oxidation of aqueous solutions containing a model pollutant, Bisphenol A (BPA), was comparatively studied. The effect of operational parameters (catalyst loading, H2O2 dosage, and UV light irradiation) on the degradation performance of the oxidation process was investigated. The optimum experimental parameters were found to be 1.0 g/L of catalysts and 10 mM H2O2, under UV irradiation. The highest mineralization rates were observed for Fe3O4-TA catalyst. More than 80 % of BPA was removed after 30 min of reaction time under the specified experimental conditions. The obtained results showed that the two catalysts studied here are suitable candidates for the removal of pollutants in wastewaters by means of heterogeneous reaction using a green sustainable treatment method.


Nanocatalysts Characterization Photo-Fenton oxidation Wastewater Bisphenol A degradation Environment Mitigation 



The authors acknowledge the financial support of the Romanian Ministry of National Education CNCS–UEFISCDI through the national grant PN-II-ID-PCE-2012-4-0477 and BAM Institute (Berlin, Germany). The authors also thank Dr. V. Nica for XRD analysis, Dr. P. Postolache for VSM measurements (Faculty of Physics, ‘Alexandru Ioan Cuza’ University in Iasi, Romania), and Prof. Dr. A. Pui (Faculty of Chemistry, ‘Alexandru Ioan Cuza’ University in Iasi, Romania) for the FTIR recordings.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.


  1. Ai ZH, Gao Z, Zhang L, He W, Yin JJ (2013) Core-Shell structure dependent reactivity of Fe@Fe2O3 nanowires on aerobic degradation of 4-Chlorophenol. Environ Sci Technol 47:5344–5352. doi: 10.1021/es4005202 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Atacan K, Özacar M (2015) Characterization and immobilization of trypsin on tannic acid modified Fe3O4 nanoparticles. Coll Surf B 128:227–236. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2015.01.038 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chong MN, Jin B, Chow CWK, Saint C (2010) Recent developments in photocatalytic water treatment technology: a review. Water Res 44:2997–3027. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2010.02.039 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Defoin A, Defoin-Straatmenn R, Hildenbrand K, Bittersmann E, Kreft D, Kühn HJ (1986) A new liquid phase actinometer: quantum yield and photo-CIDNP study of phenylglyoxylic acid in aqueous solution. J. Photochem 33:237–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Genuino HC, Mazrui N, Seraji MS, Luo Z, Hoag GE (2013) Green synthesis of iron nanomaterials for oxidative catalysis of organic environmental pollutants. Chapter 3. In: New and future developments in catalysis. pp 41–61Google Scholar
  6. Gilmour CR (2012) Water treatment using advanced oxidation processes: application perspectives. Dissertation. University of Western Ontario-Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository. Paper 836Google Scholar
  7. Gorski CA, Handler RM, Beard BL, Pasararnis T, Johnson CM, Scherer MM (2012) Fe atom exchange between aqueous Fe2+ and magnetite. Environ Sci Technol 46:12399–12407. doi: 10.1021/es204649a CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hanif S, Shahzad A (2014) Removal of chromium(VI) and dye Alizarin Red S (ARS) using polymer-coated iron oxide (Fe3O4) magnetic nanoparticles by co-precipitation method. J Nanopart Res 16:2429. doi: 10.1007/s11051-014-2429-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Katsumata H, Kawabe S, Kaneco S, Suzuki T, Ohta K (2004) Degradation of Bisphenol A in water by the photo-Fenton reaction. J Photochem Photobiol A 162:297–305. doi: 10.1016/S1010-6030(03)00374-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Liu JF, Zhao ZS, Jiang GB (2008) Coating Fe3O4 magnetic nanoparticles with humic acid for high efficient removal of heavy metals in water. Environ Sci Technol 42:6949–6954CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Munoz M, de Pedro ZM, Casas JA, Rodriguez JJ (2015) Preparation of magnetite-based catalysts and their application in heterogeneous Fenton oxidation—a review. Appl Catal B 176:249–265. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2015.04.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Nadejde C, Neamtu M, Hodoroaba VD, Schneider RJ, Paul A, Ababei G, Panne U (2015) Green Fenton-like magnetic nanocatalysts: synthesis, characterization and catalytic application. Appl Catal B 176–177:667–677. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2015.04.050 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Neamtu M, Frimmel FH (2006) Degradation of endocrine disrupting bisphenol A by 254 nm irradiation in different water matrices and effect on yeast cells. Water Res 40:3745–3750. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2006.08.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Neamtu M, Grandjean D, Sienkiewicz A, Le Faucheur S, Slaveykova V, Velez Colmenares J, Pulgarín C, De Alencastro FL (2014) Degradation of eight relevant micropollutants in different water matrices by neutral photo-Fenton process under UV254 and simulated solar light irradiation—a comparative study. Appl Catal B 158–159:30–37. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2014.04.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Nowack B (2008) Pollution prevention and treatment using nanotechnology. Chapter 1. In: Krug H (ed.). Nanotechnology. Volume 2: environmental aspects. Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, WeinheimGoogle Scholar
  16. Pecher K, Haderlein SB, Schwarzenbach RP (2002) Reduction of polyhalogenated methanes by surface-bound Fe(II) in aqueous suspensions of iron oxides. Environ Sci Technol 36:1734–1741. doi: 10.1021/es011191o CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Peng L, Qin P, Lei M, Zeng Q, Song H, Yang J, Shao J, Liao B, Gu J (2012) Modifying Fe3O4 nanoparticles with humic acid for removal of Rhodamine B in water. J Haz Mat 209–210:193–198. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.01.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Qu X, Alvarez PJJ, Li Q (2013) Applications of nanotechnology in water and wastewater treatment. Water Res 47:3931–3946. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2012.09.058 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ren B, Han C, Al Anazi Ah, Nadagouda MN, Dionysiou DD (2013) Iron-based nanomaterials for the treatment of emerging environmental contaminants. Chapter 8. In: Doong R et al. (eds.). Interactions of nanomaterials with emerging environmental contaminants. ACS Symposium Series. American Chemical Society, Washington DC. doi:  10.1021/bk-2013-1150.ch008
  20. Sajiki J, Yonekubo J (2003) Leaching of bisphenol A (BPA) to seawater from polycarbonate plastics and its degradation by reactive species. Chemosphere 51:55–62. doi: 10.1016/S0045-6535(02)00789-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Shahwan T, Abu Sirriah S, Nairat M, Boyaci E, Eroglu AE, Scott TB, Hallam KR (2011) Green synthesis of iron nanoparticles and their application as a Fenton-like catalyst for the degradation of aqueous cationic and anionic dyes. Chem Eng J 172:258–266. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2011.05.103 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Song XC, Zheng YF, Yin HY (2013) Catalytic wet air oxidation of phenol over Co-doped Fe3O4 nanoparticles. J Nanopart Res 15:1856. doi: 10.1007/s11051-013-1856-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sun SP, Lemley AT (2011) p-Nitrophenol degradation by a heterogeneous Fenton-like reaction on nano-magnetite: process optimization, kinetics, and degradation pathways. J Molecular Catal A 349:71–79. doi: 10.1016/j.molcata.2011.08.022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Virkutyte J, Varma RS, Jegatheesan V (2010) Treatment of micropollutants in water and wastewater. IWA Publishing, LondonGoogle Scholar
  25. Voinov MA, Sosa JO, Pagan S, Morrison E, Smirnova TI, Smirnov AI (2011) Surface-mediated production of hydroxyl radicals as a mechanism of iron oxide nanoparticle biotoxicity. J Am Chem Soc 133:35–41. doi: 10.1021/ja104683w CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wang D, Astruc D (2014) Fast-growing field of magnetically recyclable nanocatalysts. Chem Rev 114:6949–6985. doi: 10.1021/cr500134h CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Wang C, Liu H, Sun Z (2012) Heterogeneous photo-Fenton reaction catalyzed by nanosized iron oxides for water treatment. Int J Photoenergy. doi: 10.1155/2012/801694 Google Scholar
  28. Zhang J, Zhuang J, Gao L, Zhang Y, Gu N, Feng J, Yang D, Zhu J, Yan X (2008) Decomposing phenol by the hidden talent of ferromagnetic nanoparticles. Chemosphere 73:1524–1528. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2008.05.050 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Zhang S, Zhao X, Niu H, Shi Y, Cai Y, Jiang G (2009) Superparamagnetic Fe3O4 nanoparticles as catalysts for the catalytic oxidation of phenolic and aniline compounds. J Haz Mat 167:560–566. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.01.02 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Interdisciplinary Research Department – Field Science‘Alexandru Ioan Cuza’ UniversityIasiRomania
  2. 2.BAM Federal Institute for Materials Research and TestingBerlinGermany
  3. 3.National Institute of Research and Development for Technical PhysicsIasiRomania
  4. 4.Department of ChemistryHumboldt-Universität zu BerlinBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations