Abstract
The diameter of carbon nanotubes is strongly related the geometric sizes of the metal particles upon which they are nucleated. To improve the control over the nanoparticle sizes derived from iron acetate and deposited on Si substrates, two different approaches were employed; manipulation of the solvent chemistry and manipulation of the Si substrate surface. The iron acetate was dissolved separately in pure water and ethanol and in binary ethanol/water mixtures. Silicon substrates, with either smooth surface or nano-porous surface, were dip coated using these solutions. The dip-coated substrates were first thermally oxidised at 400 °C in air followed by reduction at 800 °C in an Ar/H2 gas mixture. As derived particles were measured by scanning electron microscopy, and the average size and size distribution were determined by statistical analysis. Electron microscopy and statistical analyses demonstrated that metal particles deposited onto the smooth Si wafer have sizes ranging from 18 to 160 nm based on the solvent used, where the pure solvents resulted in a narrower size distribution when compared to the water/ethanol mixtures. When nano-porous Si wafer is used as a substrate, the metal particle diameter distributions are reduced to a range from 11 to 17 nm contingent upon the solvent used. The role of the ethanol/water interactions investigated by vibrational (IR and Raman) and 1H nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy on nanoparticle sizes and size distributions is discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arcos Tdl et al (2002) Influence of iron–silicon interaction on the growth of carbon nanotubes produced by chemical vapour deposition. Appl Phys Lett 80:2383–2385
Chiang W-H, Mohan Sankaran R (2009) Linking catalyst composition to chirality distributions of as-grown single-walled carbon nanotubes by tuning NixFe1-x nanoparticles. Nat Mater 8:882–886
Cipiciani A, Onori G, Savelli G (1988) Structural properties of water-ethanol mixtures: a correlation with the formation of micellar aggregates. Chem Phys Lett 143:505–509. doi:10.1016/0009-2614(88)87404-9
Coccia A, Indovina PL, Podo F, Viti V (1975) PMR studies on the structures of water-ethyl alcohol mixtures. Chem Phys 7:30–40. doi:10.1016/0301-0104(75)85022-1
D’Angelo M, Onori G, Santucci A (1994) Self association of monohydric alcohols in water: Compressibility and infrared absorption measurements. J Chem Phys 100:3107–3113. doi:10.1063/1.466452
Dixit S, Crain J, Poon WCK, Finney JL, Soper AK (2002) Molecular segregation observed in a concentrated alcohol–water solution. Nature 416:829–832
Egashira K, Nishi N (1998) Low-frequency Raman spectroscopy of ethanol–water binary solution: evidence for Self-association of solute and solvent molecules. J Phys Chem B 102:4054–4057. doi:10.1021/jp9806359
Falk M (1984) The frequency of the H·O·H bending fundamental in solids and liquids. Spectrochim Acta Part A 40:43–48. doi:10.1016/0584-8539(84)80027-6
Franks F, Ives DJG (1966) The structural properties of alcohol–water mixtures. Q Rev Chem Soc 20:1–44. doi:10.1039/QR9662000001
Husnu Emrah U, Manish c (2005) Investigation of single-walled carbon nanotube growth parameters using alcohol catalytic chemical vapour deposition. Nanotechnology 16:2153
Jia Y (2011) Encapsulated carbon nanotube-oxide-silicon solar cells with stable 10 % efficiency. Appl Phys Lett 98:133115
Kahlweit M, Busse G, Jen J (1991) Adsorption of amphiphiles at water/air interfaces. J Phys Chem 95:5580–5586. doi:10.1021/j100167a040
Kamogawa K, Kaminaka S, Kitagawa T (1987) Behavior of ethanol in various binary solutions: difference Raman spectroscopy on the C–H stretching vibrations. J Phys Chem 91:222–226. doi:10.1021/j100285a047
Kim DY et al (2005) Preparation of uniformly dispersed iron-acetate nanoparticles using freeze-drying method for the growth of carbon nanotubes. Diam Relat Mater 14:810–814
Landi BJ, Ganter MJ, Cress CD, DiLeo RA, Raffaelle RP (2009) Carbon nanotubes for lithium ion batteries. Energy Environ Sci 2:638–654
Martin PJ, Bendavid A (2001) Review of the filtered vacuum arc process and materials deposition. Thin Solid Films 394:1–14. doi:10.1016/S0040-6090(01)01169-5
Martin PJ, Bendavid A, Comte C, Miyata H, Asao Y, Ishida Y, Sakai A (2007) Alignment and switching behaviors of liquid crystal on a-SiO[sub x] thin films deposited by a filtered cathodic arc process. Appl Phys Lett 91:063513–063516
Mizuno K, Miyashita Y, Shindo Y, Ogawa H (1995) NMR and FT-IR studies of hydrogen bonds in ethanol–water mixtures. J Phys Chem 99:3225–3228
Morjan RE, Nerushev OA, Sveningsson M, Rohmund F, Falk LKL, Campbell EEB (2004) Growth of carbon nanotubes from C60. Appl Phys A 78:253–261. doi:10.1007/s00339-003-2297-z
Murakami Y, Miyauchi Y, Chiashi S, Maruyama S (2003) Direct synthesis of high-quality single-walled carbon nanotubes on silicon and quartz substrates. Chem Phys Lett 377:49–54
Rümmeli MH et al (2007) Catalyst size dependencies for carbon nanotube synthesis. Phys Status Solidi (b) 244:3911–3915
Saito T, Horie R, Den T, Bendavid A, Preston E, Martin PJ (2009) Phase separated AlSi thin films prepared by filtered cathodic arc deposition. Thin Solid Films 517:1567–1571
Seah C-M, Chai S-P, Ichikawa S, Mohamed A (2012) Growth of uniform thin-walled carbon nanotubes with spin-coated Fe catalyst and the correlation between the pre-growth catalyst size and the nanotube diameter. J Nanopart Res 15:1–10. doi:10.1007/s11051-012-1371-x
Sinnott SB, Andrews R, Qian D, Rao AM, Mao Z, Dickey EC, Derbyshire F (1999) Model of carbon nanotube growth through chemical vapor deposition. Chem Phys Lett 315:25–30. doi:10.1016/S0009-2614(99)01216-6
Umemura J, Mantsch HH, Cameron DG (1981) Micelle formation in aqueous n-alkanoate solutions: A fourier transform infrared study. J Colloid Interface Sci 83:558–568. doi:10.1016/0021-9797(81)90350-7
Wakisaka A, Matsuura K (2006) Microheterogeneity of ethanol–water binary mixtures observed at the cluster leve. Journal of Molecular Liquids 129:25–32. doi:10.1016/j.molliq.2006.08.010
Wakisaka A, Ohki T (2005) Phase separation of water-alcohol binary mixtures induced by the microheterogeneity. Faraday Discuss 129:231–245. doi:10.1039/B405391E
Wakisaka A, Komatsu S, Usui Y (2001) Solute–solvent and solvent–solvent interactions evaluated through clusters isolated from solutions: preferential solvation in water–alcohol mixtures. J Mol Liq 90:175–184. doi:10.1016/S0167-7322(01)00120-9
Wu W, He Q, Jiang C (2008) Magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles: synthesis and surface functionalization strategies. Nanoscale Res Lett 3:397–415
Yu Y, Lin K, Zhou X, Wang H, Liu S, Ma X (2007) New C–H stretching vibrational spectral features in the Raman spectra of gaseous and liquid ethanol. J Phys Chem C 111:8971–8978. doi:10.1021/jp0675781
Zana R, Eljebari MJ (1993) Fluorescence probing investigation of the self-association of alcohols in aqueous solution. J Phys Chem 97:11134–11136. doi:10.1021/j100144a039
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to acknowledge the UWS PhD scholarship for Mr Phillip Newman and the UWS Advanced Materials Characterisation Facility (AMCF) for access to instrumentation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Newman, P., Milev, A., Kannangara, K. et al. Effect of solvent and silicon substrate surface on the size of iron nanoparticles. J Nanopart Res 17, 164 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-015-2963-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-015-2963-z