Advertisement

Comparative evaluation of polymersome versus micelle structures as vehicles for the controlled release of drugs

  • Mona Alibolandi
  • Mohammad Ramezani
  • Khalil Abnous
  • Fatemeh SadeghiEmail author
  • Farzin HadizadehEmail author
Research Paper

Abstract

Di-block copolymers composed of two biocompatible polymers, poly(ethylene glycol) and poly(d,l-lactide), were synthesized by ring-opening polymerization for the preparation of doxorubicin-loaded self-assembled nanostructures, including polymeric vesicles (polymersomes) and micelles. The capability and stability of the nanostructures prepared for the controlled release of DOX are discussed in this paper. The in vitro drug release at 37 °C was evaluated up to 6 days at pH 7.4 and 5.5 and in the presence of 50 % FBS. The cellular uptake and cytotoxicity effect of both formulations were also evaluated in the MCF-7 cell line. The SEM and AFM images confirmed the hollow spherical structure of the polymersomes and the solid round structures of the micelles. The TEM results also revealed the uniformity in size and shape of the drug-loaded micelle and polymersome nanostructures. The DOX-loaded micelles and polymersomes presented efficient anticancer performance, as verified by flow cytometry and MTT assay tests. The most important finding of this study is that the prepared nanopolymersomes presented significant increases in the doxorubicin encapsulation efficiency and the stability of the formulation in comparison with the micelle formulation. In vitro studies revealed that polymersomes may be stable in the blood circulation and meet the requirements for an effective drug delivery system.

Keywords

Micelles Polymersomes Di-block copolymer Self-assembled Doxorubicin Nanomedicine 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful for the financial support provided by the Iran National Science Foundation (No. 9000719) and the Mashhad University of Medical Sciences (No. 901051). The authors would also like to thank Prof. Hossein Hosseinkhani from the National University of Taiwan for the valuable assistance provided.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interests.

References

  1. Ahmed F, Discher DE (2004) Self-porating polymersomes of PEG-PLA and PEG-PCL: hydrolysis-triggered controlled release vesicles. J Control Release 96:37–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brinkhuis R, Rutjes FPJT, Hest JCM (2011) Polymeric vesicles in biomedical applications. Polym Chem 2:1449–1462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cabral H, Kataoka K (2014) Progress of drug-loaded polymeric micelles into clinical studies. J Control Release 190:465–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen H, Kim S, He W et al (2008) Fast release of lipophilic agents from circulating PEG-PDLLA micelles revealed by in vivo forster resonance energy transfer imaging. Langmuir 24:5213–5217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Colley HE, Hearnden V, Avila-Olias M, Cecchin D, Canton I, Madsen J, MacNeil S, Warren N, Hu K, McKeating JA, Armes SP, Murdoch C, Thornhill MH, Battaglia G (2014) Polymersome-mediated delivery of combination anticancer therapy to head and neck cancer cells: 2D and 3D in vitro evaluation. Mol Pharm 11(4):1176–1188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Coupillaud P, Fèvre M, Wirotius AL, Aissou K, Fleury G, Debuigne A, Detrembleur C, Mecerreyes D, Vignolle J, Taton D (2014) Precision synthesis of poly(ionic liquid)-based block copolymers by cobalt-mediated radical polymerization and preliminary study of their self-assembling properties. Macromol Rapid Commun 35(4):422–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Discher BM, Won YY, Ege DS, Lee JCM, Bates FS, Discher DE, Hammer DA (1999) Polymersomes: tough vesicles made from diblock copolymers. Science 284(5417):1143–1146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Emami J, Rezazadeh M, Rostami M, Hassanzadeh F, Sadeghi H, Mostafavi A, Minaiyan M, Lavasanifar A (2014) Co-delivery of paclitaxel and α-tocopherol succinate by novel chitosan-based polymeric micelles for improving micellar stability and efficacious combination therapy. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 14:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fu Y, Kao WJ (2010) Drug release kinetics and transport mechanisms of non-degradable and degradable polymeric delivery systems. Expert Opin Drug Deliv 7(4):429–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gan CW, Chien S, Feng SS (2010) Nanomedicine: enhancement of chemotherapeutical efficacy of docetaxel by using a biodegradable nanoparticle formulation. Curr Pharm Des 16(21):2308–2320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gao H, Liu J, Yang C, Cheng T, Chu L, Xu H, Meng A, Fan S, Shi L, Liu J (2013) The impact of PEGylation patterns on the in vivo biodistribution of mixed shell micelles. Int J Nanomed 8:4229–4246Google Scholar
  12. Garofalo C, Capuano G, Sottile R, Tallerico R, Adami R, Reverchon E, Carbone E, Izzo L, Pappalardo D (2014) Different insight into amphiphilic PEG-PLA copolymers: influence of macromolecular architecture on the micelle formation and cellular uptake. Biomacromolecules 15(1):403–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Grubbs RB, Sun Z (2013) Shape changing polymer assemblies. Chem Soc Rev 42(17):7436–7445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hasek J (2006) Poly(ethylene glycol) interactions with proteins. Z Kristallogr (suppl 23): 613–618Google Scholar
  15. Hoogenboom R, Schubert US (2007) Microwave-assisted polymer synthesis: recent developments in a rapidly expanding field of research. Macromol Rapid Commun 28(4):368–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jain JP, Kumar N (2010) Development of amphotericin B loaded polymersomes based on (PEG)3-PLA co-polymers: factors affecting size and in vitro evaluation. Eur J Pharm Sci 40(5):456–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jeetah R, Bhaw-Luximon A, Jhurry D (2014) Polymeric nanomicelles for sustained delivery of anti-cancer drugs. Mutat Res, Fundam Mol Mech Mutagen 768:47–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jeong B, Choi YK, Bae YH, Zentner G, Kim SW (1999) New biodegradable polymers for injectable drug delivery systems. J Control Release 62(1–2):109–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kayser O, Lemke A, Hernández-Trejo N (2005) The impact of nanobiotechnology on the development of new drug delivery systems. Curr Pharm Biotechnol 6(1):3–5Google Scholar
  20. Khodaverdi E, Tekie FS, Mohajeri SA, Ganji F, Zohuri G, Hadizadeh F (2012) Preparation and investigation of sustained drug delivery systems using an injectable, thermosensitive, in situ forming hydrogel composed of PLGA-PEG-PLGA. AAPS PharmSciTech 13(2):590–600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lebouille JG, Vleugels LF, Dias AA, Leermakers FA, Cohen Stuart MA, Tuinier R (2013) Controlled block copolymer micelle formation for encapsulation of hydrophobic ingredients. Eur Phys J E Soft Matter 36(9):9919CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lee JS, Ankone M, Pieters E, Schiffelers RM, Hennink WE, Feijen J (2011) Circulation kinetics and biodistribution of dual-labeled polymersomes with modulated surface charge in tumor-bearing mice: comparison with stealth liposomes. J Control Release 155:282–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Letchford K, Burt H (2007) A review of the formation and classification of amphiphilic block copolymer nanoparticulate structures: micelles, nanospheres, nanocapsules and polymersomes. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 65(3):259–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Li S, Byrne B, Welsh J, Palmer AF (2007) Self-assembled poly(butadiene)-b-poly(ethylene oxide) polymersomes as paclitaxel carriers. Biotechnol Prog 23(1):278–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Li Y, Qi XR, Maitani Y, Nagai T (2009) PEG-PLA diblock copolymer micelle-like nanoparticles as all-trans-retinoic acid carrier: in vitro and in vivo characterizations. Nanotechnology 20(5):055106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Li S, Wu W, Xiu K, Xu F, Li Z, Li J (2014) Doxorubicin loaded pH-responsive micelles capable of rapid intracellular drug release for potential tumor therapy. J Biomed Nanotechnol 10(8):1480–1489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Magenheim B, Levy MY, Benita S (1993) A new in vitro technique for evaluation of drug release profile from colloidal carriers-ultrafiltration technique at low pressure. Int J Pharm 94:115–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mai Y, Eisenberg A (2012) Self-assembly of block copolymers. Chem Soc Rev 41(18):5969–5985CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Meng F, Zhong Z (2011) Polymersomes spanning from nano- to microscales: advanced vehicles for controlled drug delivery and robust vesicles for virus and cell mimicking. J Phys Chem Lett 2:1533–1539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Nahire R, Haldar MK, Paul S, Ambre AH, Meghnani V, Layek B, Katti KS, Gange KN, Singh J, Sarkar K, Mallik S (2014) Multifunctional polymersomes for cytosolic delivery of gemcitabine and doxorubicin to cancer cells. Biomaterials 35(24):6482–6497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Palma G, Conte C, Barbieri A, Bimonte S, Luciano A, Rea D, Ungaro F, Tirino P, Quaglia F, Arra C (2014) Antitumor activity of PEGylated biodegradable nanoparticles for sustained release of docetaxel in triple-negative breast cancer. Int J Pharm 473(1–2):55–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ragi C, Sedaghat-Herati MR, Ouameur AA, Tajmir-Riahi HA (2005) The effects of poly(ethylene glycol) on the solution structure of human serum albumin. Biopolymers 78:231–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rixman MA, Dean D, Ortiz C (2003) Nanoscale intermolecular interactions between human serum albumin and low grafting density surfaces of poly(ethylene oxide). Langmuir 19:9357–9372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Savoji MT, Strandman S, Zhu XX (2013) Switchable vesicles formed by diblock random copolymers with tunable pH- and thermo-responsiveness. Langmuir 29(23):6823–6832CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Savoji MT, Strandman S, Zhu XX (2014) Invertible vesicles and micelles formed by dually-responsive diblock random copolymers in aqueous solutions. Soft Matter 10(32):5886–5893CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Smejkalová D, Nešporová K, Hermannová M, Huerta-Angeles G, Cožíková D, Vištejnová L, Safránková B, Novotný J, Kučerík J, Velebný V (2014) Paclitaxel isomerisation in polymeric micelles based on hydrophobized hyaluronic acid. Int J Pharm 466(1–2):147–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sosnik A, Gotelli G, Abraham GA (2011) Microwave-assisted polymer synthesis (MAPS) as a tool in biomaterials science: how new and how powerful. Prog Polym Sci 36(8):1050–1078CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wang R, Xiao R, Zeng Z, Xu L, Wang J (2012) Application of poly(ethylene glycol)-distearoylphosphatidylethanolamine (PEG-DSPE) block copolymers and their derivatives as nanomaterials in drug delivery. Int J Nanomed 7:4185–4198Google Scholar
  39. Xiao RZ, Zeng ZW, Zhou GL, Wang JJ, Li FZ, Wang AM (2010) Recent advances in PEG-PLA block copolymer nanoparticles. Int J Nanomed 5:1057–1065Google Scholar
  40. Xu J, Zhao Q, Jin Y, Qiu L (2014) High loading of hydrophilic/hydrophobic doxorubicin into polyphosphazene polymersome for breast cancer therapy. Nanomedicine 10(2):349–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Yan LT, Xie XM (2013) Computational modeling and simulation of nanoparticle self-assembly in polymeric systems: Structures, properties and external field effects. Prog Polym Sci 38(2):369–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Yokoyama M (2014) Polymeric micelles as drug carriers: their lights and shadows. J Drug Target 22(7):576–583CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Zhan C, Gu B, Xie C, Li J, Liu Y, Lu W (2010) Cyclic RGD conjugated poly(ethylene glycol)-co-poly(lactic acid) micelle enhances paclitaxel anti-glioblastoma effect. J Control Release 143(1):136–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Zhang H, Xia H, Wang J, Li Y (2009) High intensity focused ultrasound-responsive release behavior of PLA-b-PEG copolymer micelles. J Control Release 139(1):31–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Zhang W, Li Y, Liu L, Sun Q, Shuai X, Zhu W, Chen Y (2010) Amphiphilic toothbrushlike copolymers based on poly(ethylene glycol) and poly(epsilon-caprolactone) as drug carriers with enhanced properties. Biomacromolecules 11(5):1331–1338CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Biotechnology Research Center, School of PharmacyMashhad University of Medical SciencesMashhadIran
  2. 2.Pharmaceutical Research Center, School of PharmacyMashhad University of Medical SciencesMashhadIran
  3. 3.Targeted Drug Delivery Research Center, School of PharmacyMashhad University of Medical SciencesMashhadIran

Personalised recommendations